Energy Efficient Pumping Technology

Innovations and Recent trends

SHAKTI PUMPS INDIA LIMITED
SHAKTI SLIP START SYNCHRONOUS RUN MOTOR

1
 Brief Company Profile
Year of incorporation, Type of ownership & Brief description of the company
Established in 1982 as Shakti Electrical
Incorporated as public limited company in 1995 as Shakti Pumps India Limited.
Established in 1982. Listed in BSE & NSE India in year 1995. 750+ products performing over 52 unique
applications across 15 sectors in plus 100 countries, made in 1 manufacturing unit with an annual
production capacity of 1 million pumps with a turnover close to 100 million USD in Domestic, Industrial,
Agriculture and Renewable energy segment.
We are ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001:2004, BS OHSAS 18001:2007 Certified India’s first five star rating, largest
Manufacturer, of Stainless Steel Submersible pumps Company.

2
 Brief Company Profile
Key Management Personnel:-
Mr. Dinesh Patidar, CMD
Mr. Sunil Patidar, Executive Director
Mr. Ramesh Patidar, Executive Director & Head International Marketing

Partnership with R&D or institutes:-

Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.
Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur (Project to project)
SGSITS, Indore

3
Shakti Slip Start Synchronous Run
Motor
 Brief information about the innovation
High efficiency (Unique combination of induction and PMSM)
Power factor close to unity. (Unique)
A PMSM machine without VFD.
Reduced starting current and higher starting toque.
High and constant discharge even at low voltage.

Surface Motor Submersible Motors

4
Patents
Certifications/ patents/ IPR
Indian Patent Application No.201721007519 A :
“ HIGH STARTING TORQUE DIRECT LINE OPERATEDENERGY EFFICIENT MOTOR”

US Patent Application No. : US 20180254689A1

“ HIGH STARTING TORQUE DIRECT LINE OPERATEDENERGY EFFICIENT MOTOR” published on 6 th
Sept. 2018.

5
Explanation of the innovation and technical aspects
 The S4RM technology based motors are magnetic motors which are line start i.e. they do not require any
VFDs to operate; thus they are a direct replacement of conventional induction motors
This technology is implemented for both surface and submersible type of motor-pump applications
 As it is a magnet based motor, the runtime efficiency of the S4RM motor is 5-10% higher than that of an
Induction motor
 The S4RM takes reduced starting current up to 50% as compared to other motors
 It thus offers a long life of motor insulation as the starting current is lesser.
 Power factor is close to 1, which is better for utility as they can serve more customer with exiting
resource.

6
Technical aspects of your innovation
No rotor losses leading to high run efficiency
Less heat generated inside the motor leading to higher life
The motor when coupled with pumps, provides high discharge even when the input voltage from the grid
is lower because of synchronous operation.
The motor has a compact design which offers space saving
Lesser full load current
Unity power factor

7
Comparison with other existing technologies
Sl.No. Parameter Induction Motor S4RM Motor Implication
1 System Efficiency Low High Energy Saving
2 Starting Current 7 to 8 times FL 4 to 5 times FL Lower load on existing line
Existing line can be used for more no. of
3 Full Load Current High Lower loads
4 Power Factor Lower (0.75-0.82) High (close to 1) Better utilization of existing resources
5 VFD required No No Less no. of components in the system
Discharge with Voltage
6 Variation Variable Constant High discharge even at low voltage
No big investment from customer for new
7 Initial Cost Implementation Lower Little higher
motors.
8 Reliability High High Higher because of less heat
9 RPM 2750-2850 **3000 **Fixed RPM

8
Efficiency of S4RM v/s other surface motor
IE-2 IE-3 IE-4
SL. POWER S4RM Standard Standard Standard TYPICAL ENERGY SAVINGS & COST
EXAMPLE
NO [KW] [%] Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency IMPLEMENTATION FOR 7.5 KW S4RM MOTOR
[%] [%] [%]
INPUT POWER
1 3 90.4 84.6 87.1 89.1 with IE2 Motor (O/P kW / IE2 EFF)*100 (7.5 / 88.1) *100 =
(kW) 8.513 kW
2 4 90.9 85.8 88.1 90 INPUT POWER (7.5 / 91.5) *100 =
with S4RM (kW) (kW / S4RM EFF)*100 8.196 kW
3 5.5 91.0 87.0 89.2 90.9 DIFFERENCE in
INPUT POWER IE2 I/P kW – S4RM I/P kW 8.513 – 8.196=
0.317 kW
4 7.5 91.5 88.1 90.1 91.7
DIFFRENCE X 24 HOUR X 0.317 X 24 X 365 X
YEARLY SAVINGS
5 11 91.0 89.4 91.2 92.6 365 DAY X 10 RS PER UNIT 10 = INR 27,769.2
YEARLY

9
Efficiency of S4RM v/s other submersible motor
PN INDUCTION
S4RM ENERGY SAVINGS & COST IMPLEMENTATION FOR
S.NO [%] MOTOR EXAMPLE 22 KW S4RM MOTOR
[KW] [%]

1 3.7 85.9 75.6 INPUT POWER

with IE2 Motor (O/P kW / IE2 EFF)*100 (22 / 82) *100 = 26.82
(kW) kW
2 5.5 87.6 78.3
INPUT POWER (22 / 90) *100 = 24.44
with S4RM (kW) (kW / S4RM EFF)*100
kW
3 7.5 87.2 78.4
DIFFERENCE in IE2 I/P kW – S4RM I/P kW 26.82 – 24.44 = 2.38
4 11 89.6 78.9 INPUT POWER kW

5 18.5 90.5 82.9

DIFFRENCE X 24 HOUR X 2.38 X 24 X 365 X 10 =
YEARLY SAVINGS
365 DAY X 10 RS PER UNIT INR 2,08,488 YEARLY
6 22 90 82

10
Case Study : Comparative Analysis
O v e r a ll e ffic ie n c y (% )

Other Available (SR65-10)

S4RM Pumpset(QF8-9)
8000
7000 6690 6670 6460
6100 6300

I/P Power (W)

Other Available (SR65-10) 6000 5500
S4RM Pumpset(QF8-9) 5160
5000 4640
70.00
3680 3835 4003 4084 4027 3798
60.00 55.91 54.95
51.93
4000 3500
50.21 3076
50.00 44.78
3000
40.00 33.57 32.27
27.15 28.54 29.09 2000
30.00 25.73
19.87 22.01 24.25
20.00 17.84 1000
10.62
10.00 0
0.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Head (m) Head (m)

11
 Case Study : Comparative Analysis
Other Available (SR65-10) Other Available (SR65-10)
S4RM Pumpset(QF8-9) S4RM Pumpset(QF8-9)
450 80000
387 70000 66700
400 360 60030
339 60000 28,720
Discharge (LPM)

350 53360

Units (kWh)
Cumulative
300 46690 kWh
300 274 50000
305 40020
250 286 222 40000 33350
265
242 26680 37980
200 218 170 30000 34182
20010 30384
191 20000 26586
150 162 13340 22788
6670 18990
100 10000 15192
11394
0 7596
50 3798
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Operating Hours
Head (m)

12
Case Study : Comparative Analysis
Other Available (SR65-10) S4RM Pumpset(QF8-9)
1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
0.95
0.95
0.90
Power factor

0.85
0.80 0.83
0.81 0.82 0.81 0.81
0.80
0.75 0.77 0.77
0.70
0.65
0.60
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Head (m)

13
Conclusion
 The S4RM is a retrofit energy efficient technology
 The technology is available till 75 hp of power range as of now
 The overall energy consumptions can reduced to 2:1 proportions in some cases
 The pumping systems should be seen wrt over all efficiency
 S4RM runs at full speed irrespective of voltage and load therefore can improve production in
industry environment
 The company also offer ESCO model for this technology
 A near to unity power factor operation reduces distribution losses and PFC capacitors

14
Contact Details
Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd.(Head Office)
Plot No. 401, Sector - 3,
Pithampur - 454774, Dhar (M.P.) India
Phone: +91-7292-410500
Fax: +91-7292-410645
Toll Free(INDIA): 1800-103-5555
Email ID: info@shaktipumpsindia.com
 

15