Midterm The Pioneering Sociologists or Great Classical Thinkers Lesson III The Pioneering Sociologists or Great Classical Thinkers • It can be said that the American Civil War has brought the necessity for men - for Americans to study in Germany, and return to the United States inspired with a new spirit and by the methods of their German Teachers. The men who trained under their German teachers were given a new direction and inspiration to have a fresh start and fresh interest in social studies, history, political science and economics. However, it was by way of English influence that the study about sociology in America flourished. Some of the most notable contributors to the study of the social sciencesare: 1. August Comte 1. August Comte (Isidore Auguste Marie François Xavier Comte) • (19 January 1798 -September 1857) • a French philosopher generally credited for coining the term sociology. • He was a founder of the discipline of sociology and of the doctrine of positivism, a philosophical and political movement which enjoyed a very wide diffusion in the second half of the nineteenth century. It sank into an almost complete oblivion during the twentieth, when it was eclipsed by neopositivism. However, Comte’s decision to develop successively a philosophy of mathematics, a philosophy of physics, a philosophy of chemistry and a philosophy of biology, makes him the first philosopher of science in the modern sense, and his constant attention to the social dimension of science resonates in many respects with current points of view. His political philosophy, on the other hand, is even less known, because it differs substantially from the classical political philosophy we have inherited. Comte’s Most Important Works • A. the Course on Positive Philosophy (1830-1842, six volumes,Ctranslated and condensed by Harriet Martineau as The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte); • B. the System of Positive Polity, or Treatise on Sociology, Institutingthe Religion of Humanity, (1851-1854, four volumes); and • C. the Early Writings (1820-1829), where one can see the influenceof Saint-Simon, for whom Comte served as secretary from 1817to 1824. • The Early Writings are still the best introduction to Comte's thought. In the Course, Comte said, science was transformed into philosophy; in the System, philosophy was transformed into religion. The second transfornmation met with strong opposition; as a result, it has become customary to distinguish, with Mill, between a "good Comte" (the author of the Course) and a "bad Comte" (the author of the System). Today’s common conception of positivism corresponds mainly to what can befound in the Course. • Comte was born in Montpellier on January 20, 1798 ('le 1er pluviôsede l'an VI, according to the Revolutionary calendar then in use in France). Having displayed his brilliance in school, he was ranked fourth on the admissions list of the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris in 1814. • Two years later, the Bourbons closed that institution, and its students were dismissed. InAugust 1817, Auguste Comte met Henri de Saint-Simon, who appointed him as his secretary to replace Augustin Thierry. The young Comte was thus initiated into politics and was able to publish a great numberof articles, which placed him very much in the public eye. (The most important of these articles were republished by him in 1854 and remain the best introduction to his oeuvre as a whole.) In April 1824, he broke withSaint-Simon. Shortly afterward, in a civil wedding, he married CarolineMassin, who had been living with hinm for several months. In April 1826,Comte began teaching a Course of Positive Philosophy, whose audienceincluded some of the most famous scientists of the time (Fourier, A. vonHumboldt, Poinsot). It was suddenly interrupted because of a 'cerebralcrisis' due to overwork and conjugal sorrows. Comte was then hospitalizedin the clinic of Dr. Esquirol. Upon leaving, he was classified as 'not cured'He recovered gradually, thanks to the devotion and patience of his wife. • Comte's first essays signalled the beginning of sociology; his courseof Positive Philosophy introduced the important relationship betweentheory, practice, and human understanding of the world. It also views allphenomena as subject to invariable natural laws and sociologists mustuse their senses to facts, when unguided by theory, will prove useless inthe development of science. The progressive development of science wasanalyzed in his law of the three stages: theological-military, metaphysicaljudicial, and scientific-industrial or positivistic. The theological-militarystage is dominated by ideas that refer to the supernatural while beingstructured around slavery and the military. While the metaphysicaljudicial stage, which follows from the theological and represents atransition to the scientific, is typified by ideas that refer to the fundamentalessences of phenomena and by elaborate political and legal forms.Finally, the scientific-industrial stage is dominated by the positivephilosophy of science and industrial patterns of social organization. 2. Emile Durkheim 2. Emile Durkheim • Emile Durkheim was a well-known sociologist famous for hiaviews on the structure of society. Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist who rose to prominencein the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Along with Karl Marx and MaxWeber, he is credited as being one of the principal founders of modernsociology. Chief among his claims is that society is a sui generis reality,or a reality unique to itself and irreducible to its composing parts. It iscreated when individual consciences interact and fuse together to createa synthetic reality that is completely new and greater than the sum of itsparts. This reality can only be understood in sociological terms, and cannotbe reduced to biological or psychological explanations. The fact that sociallife has this quality would form the foundation of another of Durkheim'sclaims, that human societies could be studied scientifically. For this purposehe developed a new methodology, which focuses on what Durkheim calls"social facts," or elements of collective life that exist independently of andare able to exert an influence on the individual. • His work focused on how traditional and modern societies evolvedand function. Durkheim's theories were founded on the concept of socialfacts, defined as the norms, values, and structures of a society. This perspective of society differed from other sociologists off his era as Durkheim's theories were founded on things external in nature, asopposed to those internal in nature, such as the motivations and desiresof individuals. According to Durkheim, collective consciousness, values,and rules are critical to a functional society. In this lesson, we will focus onDurkheim's theories of functionalism, anomie, and division of labor. • Durkheim actually viewed crime and delinquent behavior as a normal and necessary Occurrence in the social system. He proposed that crimeled to reactions from society about the crime. These shared reactions wereused to create a common consensuses of what individuals felt were moraland ethical norms by which to abide. These commonly held norms and values led to boundaries and rules for the society. • When Durkheim began writing, sociology was not recognized as anindependent field of study. As part of the campaign to change this he went to great lengths to separate sociology from all other disciplines, especially philosophy. In consequence, while Durkheim’s influence in the social sciences has been extensive, his relationship with philosophy remains ambiguous. Nevertheless, Durkheim maintained that sociology and philosophy are inmany ways complementary, going so far as to say that sociology has anadvantage over philosophy, since his sociological method provides the means to study philosophical questions empirically, rather than metaphysicallyor theoretically. As a result, Durkheim often used sociology to approachtopics that have traditionally been reserved for philosophical investigation. • Durkheim was born into a middle class family. He spent most of hiscareer occupying a professorship at a prestigious university in Paris. He devoted himself in understanding the stability of society and the importance of social participation for individual happiness. He defined sociology as the study of social facts. According to him, there are social factswhich are distinct from biological and psychological facts. By social facts he meant of behaviour that characterize a social group in a given society. • He was acclaimed the father of modern sociology for his works, Rules of Sociological Method; Suicide: A Study in Sociology, Division of Labor in Society, and Elementary Forms of Religious Life wherein he clearlydefined the scope and method of sociology and even provided notableexamples of empirical (or scientific) investigations. 3. Max Weber 3. Max Weber • Max Weber, (born April 21, 1864, Erfurt, Prusosia (now Germany DiedJune 14, 1920,Munich, Germany) • German sociologst and political economist best known for his thesis of the "Protestant ethic" relating Protestantism to capitalism, and for his ideas on bureaucracy. Webers profound influence on sociological theory stens from his demand for objectivity in scholarship and from his analysis of the motivesbehind human action. • Weber was the eldest son of Max and Helene Weber. His father was an aspiring liberal politician who soon joined the more compliant, pro-Bismarckiarn "National-Liberals" and moved the family from Erfurt to Berlin, where he became a member of the Prussian House of Deputies(1868-97) and the Reichstag (1872-84). • The elder Weber established himself as a fixture of the Berlin social milieu and entertained prominent politicansand scholars in the Weber household. The sociologisť's mother was raised in Calvinist orthodoxy. Though she gradually accepted a more tolerant theology, her Puritan morality never diminished. As a result, her husband's social activities distanced her from him, especially when he spurned her prolonged grief following • the deaths of two of their children. He, in turn, adopted a traditionally authoritarian manner at home and demanded absolute obedience from wife and children. It is thought that this bleak home environment, marked by conflicts between Weber's parents, contributed to the inner agonies that haunted Weber in his adult life. • Weber defines sociology as the scientific study of human social action,which refers to any action oriented to influence or influenced by anotherperson or persons. It is not necessary for more tharn one person to bephysically present for action to be regarded as social action. Sociology forWeber is concerned with the interpretative understanding of human socialaction and the meaning people attach to their own actions and behavioursand those of others. • Weber's significance during his lifetime was considerable among German social scientists, many of whom were his friends in Heidelbergor Berlin; but because so little of his work was published in book form during his lifetime, and because most of the journals in which he published had restricted audiences of scholarly specialists, his major impact was not felt until after his death. The only exceptions were his formulation of "liberal imperialism" in 1895, his widely discussed thesis on Protestantism and capitalism, and his extensive attack on German foreign and domestic policies during World War I in the pages of the Frankfurter Zeitung, which stimulated liberal sentiment against the government's war aims and led General Erich Ludendorff to view Weber as a traitor. • In general, Weber's greatest merit as a thinker was that he brought the social sciences in Germany, hitherto preoccupied largely with national problems, into direct critical confrontation with the international giants of 19th-century European thought-Marx and Nietzsche; and, through this confrontation, Weber helped create a methodology and a body of literature dealing with the sociology of religion, political parties, and the economy,as well as studies of formal organizations, small-group behaviour, and the Philosophy of history. His work continues to stimulate scholarship.