HR ANALYTICS

ASSIGNMENT
Syed Ali Murtaza
20137 Course Facilitator,
Sir M. Farhan
 FILE – DATA FOR EXERCISES

(GRAPHS REPRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION)

 Gender Analysis Age Distribution By Gender
700
a) Age Distribution By Gender Gender 619
Grand
Females Males Total 600
18 - 20 14 14 28
21 - 30 132 226 358
500
Age 31 - 40 249 370 619
41-50 129 193 322

Employees Count
51 - 60 64 79 143 400
358 370 Sum of Females
322 Sum of Males
588 882 1470 300 Grand Total
249
226
193
200
In Gender analysis out of total number of 143
132 129
employees 1470, 882 are males and 588 females 100 79
64
where as in age of 31-40 there are highest number 28
14 14
of employees both males and females. A ratio of 0
18 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41-50 51 - 60
60:40 approx. of males and females respectively.
Age
b) Job Satisfaction Distribution By Gender
Gender Job Satisfaction By Gender
Grand
Male Female Total 500
1 (Low) 170 119 289 459
450 442
2 (Medium) 162 118 280
Rating
3 (High) 261 181 442
400
4 (Very high) 289 170 459
350
882 588 1470 289 289

Employee Count
300 280
261 Sum of Male
250 Sum of Female
Sum of Grand Total
In Job Satisfaction gender wise, maximum of male 200
170 162
181
170
employees who are highly satisfied with their job 150
119 118
are 289 while 261 also said high, out of 882 left 100
others are for medium and low which shows dis- 50
satisfaction from their job. Same as for females 60%
0
are highly satisfied approx. and 40% are not satisfied 1 (Low) 2 (Medium) 3 (High) 4 (Very high)

with their jobs. Job Satisfaction Rating

c) Monthly Income by Gender
Gender
Grand Monthly Income By Gender
Income Range Male Female Total
0-3000 249 146 395 600
3001-6000 308 211 519
Monthly 6001-9000 131 92 223 519
Income 9001-12000 87 51 138 500
Range 12001-15000 29 33 62
15001-18000 33 31 64
18001-21000 45 24 69 400 395

Employee Count
308
882 588 1470 300
249
211 223
200
Monthly Income by Gender shows that majority of 146
131
138
workers in between range of 0-6000 income are 100
92 87
51 45 69
more in count (May be daily wages or contract 29 62
33 33 64
31 24

workers), other than this general management staff 0

0-3000 3001-6000 6001-9000 9001-12000 12001-15000 15001-18000 18001-21000
is bit low as compare to workers depend upon Income Range Monthly
nature of work where 45 management employees
are male and 24 female who earns highest 18001 Rs Male Female Grand Total

– 21000 Rs approx. per months.

d) Presence By Department
Gender Presence By Department Genderwise
Gran
d 1200
Male Female Total
Human Resource 43 20 63
Departme
Research and Development 582 379 961 1000
nts 961
Sales 257 189 446
800

Employee Count
882 588
600 582

Presence by department of both males and females 400 379 446

shows that, highest count 961 employees are in 257

189
R&D department 582 males & 379 females, where 200

Sales employees are on mid with 257 males & 189 43 63 20

0
females, and HR employees are lowest in all three Human Resource Research and Development Sales

departments 43 males and 20 females. Departments

Male Female Grand Total

 The Impact of Income towards Attrition
Monthly Avg Income
Average Monthly Income By
a) Department

Sales 6959
Total
Monthly Income Number of
Avg Income Monthly Employees

Human Resource 6655 419234 63

Departments
Departments
Research and Development 6281 6036284 961
Research and Development 6281
Sales 6959 3103791 446

Human Resource department has avg monthly

income of 6655 where female 9 % above average
salary and male has 4 % below average salary. R&D
Human Resource 6655
has 6281 monthly avg income in which 4% above
average salary range of female and 2 % below average
for Males. Sales has equal average salary range for 5800 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 7200
male and female both.
b) Determining Satisfaction by Income
Gender Satisfaction By Income
Count of Gender Column Labels 180
Row Labels Low Med High Very High Grand Total
160
158
0-3000 69 83 120 123 395 160
Monthly 3001-6000 113 88 158 160 519
Income 6001-9000 38 46 66 73 223 140
Range 9001-12000 33 22 37 46 138 123
120
120 113
12001-15000 9 14 22 17 62
15001-18000 17 11 14 22 64

Employee Count
100
88 Low
18001-21000 10 16 25 18 69 83 Med
Grand Total 289 280 442 459 1470 80 73 High
69 66 Very High
Satisfaction level by income shows that highest satisfied 60
people are with less income in between range of 0-6000 38
46
37
46
40 33
Rs and others with a mix ratio in between low medium 25
22 22 22
high and very high. 20 14 17 17 14 16 18
9 11 10

0
0-3000 3001-6000 6001-9000 9001-12000 12001- 15001- 18001-
15000 18000 21000

Monthly Income
 Income and the Levels
c) of Attrition Income and Levels of Attrition
1400

Row Labels Count of MonthlyIncome

No 1233 1200

Yes 237
Grand Total 1470 1000

Income and the level of Attrition shows 237

800
for yes and 1233 highest for No in count of Total

monthly income. 600

400

200

0
No Yes
 Average Daily Rates and Percent
d) Difference Avg Daily Rate and Percentage Difference
1400 180%
Daily Rate Avg of Daily Rate %age Difference
1255
0-500 299 37% 160%
501-1000 1255 156% 1200 156%
1001-1500 743 93% 140%
  1000
802 100% 120%

Employee Count
800 743 100%

Axis Title
For the daily rate of 0-500 the difference from 93%
80%
average daily rate is of 63% is lower than 600

average daily rate. For the daily rate of 501- 400

60%
299
1000 the difference from average daily rate is of 37% 40%

only 7% lower than the average daily rate. For 200

20%
the daily rate of 1001-1500 the difference from 0 0%
average daily rate is of 56% higher than the 0-500 501-1000 1001-1500

average. Average daily rate is 802. Avg Daily Rates

 Level of Attrition by
e) Overtime Level Attrition By overtime
350
Column
Count of Attrition Labels
Very Grand
Row Labels Low Med High High Total 300
No 205 211 321 317 1054
Yes 84 69 121 142 416
Grand Total 289 280 442 459 1470 250

Low
69.06% of the staff having very high satisfaction don’t do 200 Med
High
over times while 30.94% of the staff do overtimes. 71% of Very High
150
the staff having low satisfaction don’t do overtimes while
29% of staff with low satisfaction do overtime. 75.35% of
100
the staff having medium satisfaction don’t do overtime
while 24.65% of the staff do overtimes. 72.6% of the staff
50
having high satisfaction don’t do overtimes while 27.4% of
the staff do overtimes.
0
No Yes
 Working Environment
a) Number of Employees in each Job Role Number of Employees in Job Role
Count of EmployeeNumber Column Labels
Grand
Row Labels Female Male Total
Healthcare Representative 51 80 131
250
Human Resources 16 36 52
Laboratory Technician 85 174 259 200 178
194
174
Manager 47 55 102
Manufacturing Director 72 73 145 150 132
Research Director 33 47 80 114
Research Scientist 114 178 292 100 80 85
72 73
Sales Executive 132 194 326 51 47 55 47 38 45
50 36 33 Female
Sales Representative 38 45 83

Axis Title
16
Male
Grand Total 588 882 1470 0

Laboratory Technician

Manager

Research Director
Manufacturing Director

Research Scientist
Healthcare Representative

Sales Executive

Sales Representative
Human Resources
It shows number of employees in Job role where
most of them are research scientist males and
females, and Sales executives. While lowest in HR
for females and males respected to other
Axis Title
departments. Managerial has only 7% of total
population. Manufacturing Director has only 10% of
total population.
b) Median Salary by Job Role
Average of
Row Labels Monthly Income Median Salary By Job Role
Healthcare Representative 7528.763359 20000
Human Resources 4235.75
Laboratory Technician 3237.169884 18000 17181.68
16033.55
Manager 17181.67647 16000
Manufacturing Director 7295.137931
14000
Research Director 16033.55
Research Scientist 3239.972603 12000
Sales Executive 6924.279141
10000
Sales Representative 2626
Grand Total 6502.931293 8000 7528.76 7295.14 6924.28 Total
6000
4235.75
Health care representative, human resources, 4000 3237.17 3239.97
2626
laboratory technician, manager, manufacturing 2000
director, research director, research scientist, sales 0
e es n er to
r or s t ve e
executive, sales representative have medians ta
tiv urc
ni
cia ag re
c
ri e
ct nti uti a tiv
en so h an Di D ci e e c nt
es Re ec M S Ex se
mentioned above in chart. pr an ry
T
ur
in
g
a rc
h
rc
h
le
s pr
e
R e to ct se ea Sa e
re Hu
m
ra a Re Re
s sR
ca bo uf le
lt h La an Sa
a M
He
c) Attrition by Job Role
Column Attrition By Job Role
Count of Job Level Labels
Medi Very Grand 120
112
Row Labels Low um High High Total Medium High Very High
Healthcare Low % % % %
100 95
Representative 26 19 43 43 131 90 91
Human Resources 10 16 13 13 52 20% 15% 33% 33%
80
Laboratory Technician 56 48 75 80 259 19% 31% 25% 25% 80 75
Manager 21 21 27 33 102 22% 19% 29% 31% 69
Manufacturing Director 26 32 49 38 145 21% 21% 26% 32% 60 56 5453 54
Research Director 15 16 27 22 80
Research Scientist 54 53 90 95 292 18% 22% 34% 26% 48 49
4343 Low
Sales Executive 69 54 91 112 326 19% 20% 34% 28% 38

Axis Title
40 33 32 Medium
Sales Representative 12 21 27 23 83 18% 18% 31% 33% 26 27 26 27 27 High
Grand Total 289 280 442 459 1470 21% 17% 28% 34% 19 2121 22 21 23
20 16 1516 Very High
14% 25% 33% 28% 10 1313 12
20% 19% 30% 31%
0
tiv
e es an er or or st
tiv
e
tiv
e
rc ici ag ct ct nti
ta u n n re re i e cu ta
en so ch a Di Di Sc e en
es Re Te M g ch h Ex es
Attrition by Job role shows that the job role by which employees are highly satisfied to not- pr n y ri n r rc e s
ep
r
Re
a
to
r tu ea ea Sa
l
satisfied much. According to the chart present highest number of satisfied are from sales re Hum ra f ac R es es e sR
ca bo u R l
lt h La an Sa
executives where after research scientist and laboratory technician are next to highly a M
He
satisfied.
Job Role
 Current Managers and Average
d) Satisfaction Score Current Managers & Avg Satisfaction
250
Count of Column
YearsWithCurrManager Labels
Row Labels Low Med High Very High Grand Total
18 - 20 5 5 9 9 28 200
200
21 - 30 77 64 107 110 358 183
31 - 40 113 123 183 200 619
41-50 67 61 101 93 322
51 - 60 27 27 42 47 143
Grand Total 289 280 442 459 1470 150
Low

Axis Title
123 Med
113 High
107110
Current Managers and average satisfaction age wise 100
101
93
Very High

shown above in the chart. Where lowest are in 18-20 77

64 67
age sector. Highest in 31-40 age sector. 61

50 47
42
27 27

5 5 9 9
0
18 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41-50 51 - 60

Age
e) Average Environment Satisfaction
Sum of Avg of
Environment Environment Avg Environment Satisfaction
Row Labels Satisfaction Satisfaction
Human Resources 169 2.68 3000
Research & Development 2637 2.74
Sales 1195 2.68
Grand Total 4001 2.72
2500

The average Environment satisfaction based on 2000

department wise. The Average HR satisfaction is
Total
2.68. The RND satisfaction is 2.74. The average Sales 1500
satisfaction is 2.68. The average Total satisfaction is
2.72. Average satisfaction level is slightly higher than
1000
medium.

500

0
Human Resources Research & Development Sales
 FILE – HR SCORECARD WITH DATA

(GRAPHS REPRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION)

Talent Retention Year
Talent Retention Metrics 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
Total Turnover 12.7% 11.0% 8.9% 7.0% 6.1%
Talent Retention
Rate 9.1% 0.09 0.08
Voluntary 11.8% 11.5% 8.1% 7.1% 6.1% 0.08
Turnover Rate 0.08
8.9%
Involuntary 0.07
0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 1.0% 2.0% 0.06
Turnover Rate 1.1% 0.06
0.06
Average 8.5% 7.8% 5.9% 5.0% 4.7% 6.4% 0.05
0.05 0.05

Average
According to the analysis by year 2013 to 2017, Total Average
0.04
turnover rate is continuously decreasing and on the average
0.03
of 9.1% in 5 years. Where voluntary turnover rate decreases,
Involuntary turnover rate increases and on the average of 0.02

1.1% in 5 years. 0.01

0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Years
Talent Retention Year
Turnover by Deparment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Department Average Turnover By Department
01 - Marketing 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 5.8%
02 - Sales 18.2% 18.2% 16.0% 12.0% 11.0% 15.1% 0.18
03 - Customer 25.0% 12.5% 0.0%
Services 12.5% 0.16
04 - Materials 4.6% 4.6% 8.7% 2.5% 5.0% 5.1% 0.16
05 - 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.1% 4.2%
Manufacturing 6.0% 0.14
06 - Hr & Admin. 20.6% 15.0% 12.8% 10.0% 9.1% 13.5% 0.12
07 - Finance 11.0% 0.0% 21.1% 5.3% 9.3% 0.12
08 - Information
Services 27.8% 11.0% 21.1% 5.0% 6.0% 14.2% 0.1
0.1 0.09
16.0% 9.3% 12.3% 5.8% 6.3% 9.9%

AVerage
Average
Average
0.08
0.06
0.06 0.06

Turnover in the company department wise shows that the 0.04

average of Marketing in 5 years is 5.8%, Sales 15.1%,
0.02
Customer services 12.5%, Materials 5.1%, Manufacturing 6%,
HR & Admin 13.5%, Finance information 9.3%, Information 0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
services 14.2%, Total average approx. 9.9%. Years
Talent Retention Year
Turnover by Cadre 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average Average
Cadre (1)
% of Separation Chief Executive Officer 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.14
Director 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.13
General Manager 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Senior Manager 0.0% 4.4% 4.4% 10.5% 10.5% 6.0% 0.12 0.11
Manager 3.3% 4.4% 4.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4%
Deputy Manager 0.0% 8.7% 8.7% 5.3% 5.7%
Assistant Manager 3.3% 4.4% 15.8% 15.8% 9.8% 0.1 0.09
Executive / Group Leader / GL 20.0% 18.0% 19.0% 21.1% 21.1% 19.8% 0.09
0.08 0.08
Officer / Sr. Team Leader / Sr. TL 23.3% 21.0% 25.0% 31.6% 31.6% 26.5% 0.08

Average
Assistant Officer / Team Leader / TL 33.3% 30.0% 25.0% 23.0% 23.0% 26.9%
Assistant / JR. Team Leader / Jr. TL 21.0% 21.7% 21.7% 21.0% 20.0% 21.1% 0.06
Jr. Assistant / Assistant Team Leader 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
/ ATL 0.7% 0.04
Skilled Worker / Sr. Team Member / 0.0% 4.4% 4.4% 0.0% 0.0%
Sr. TM 1.7%
Worker / Team Member / TM 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 5.3% 0.02
3.4%
Average 8.2% 11.2% 8.3% 12.8% 9.5% 8.9%
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
Years
Above chart shows the Talent Retention Turnover. Highest of average for
Asst Officer/ Team Leader and lowest for CEO, Director, GM.
Talent Retention Year
Turnover Reasons Reasons of Turnover %age of Separation
Turnover Reasons 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
% of Separation Average
Pay Package 0.0% 17.4% 17.4% 17.4% 15.0% 13.4% 0.3
Career growth 33.3% 20.0% 43.5% 43.5% 30.0% 34.1%
Supervisory Behavior 4.0% 5.0% 13.0% 13.0% 15.0% 10.0%
0.25
Personal (Self Business, 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 6.0%
Immigration, Health)
5.2%
Other Misc. Reasons 66.7% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% 40.0% 0.2
53.3%
Performance Issues 9.0% 9.0% 15.0% 8.7% 10.0% 10.3% Average
Average 19.7% 19.4% 24.0% 22.9% 19.3% 21.1% 0.15

Reasons of Turnover %age of separation. Average of Pay package for 5

0.1
years 13.4 %, career growth 34.1%, Supervisory behavior of 10%,
Personal 5.2%, Other misc. 53.3%, Performance issues 10.3%. It is
0.05
observed that the average turnover ratio by have had a sustaining
trend. Which can also be observed based on the per year average
between individual reason. 0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
Employee Relations Year
Workforce Demographics
Workforce Demographics Metrics 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1.8
1.00 1.20 1.50 1.46 1.61
Employee per
Manager 1.6

Workforce demographic metrics shows that it has 1.4

upward trend over the change in years for Employee 1.2

per manager.
1 Employee per Manager

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Recruitment & Selection Recruitment & Year
Selection Metrics
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average Recruitment Yield Index (only PRs received
Recruitment Yield
Index (only PRs 2 3 5 4 5 4 & Hired)
received & Hired)
Recruitment Yield 6 Recruitment Yield Index
Index (Hired & 2 3 4 3 4 3 5 (only PRs received &
position inprocess) 4 Hired)
Recruitment Yield ratio 3
% (only PRs received 20% 25% 31% 30% 31% 28% 2
& Hired) 1
Recruitment Yield ratio 0
% (Hired & Position 30% 20% 47% 50% 47% 39% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
inprocess)
Job Offer Acceptance 0.7
Index 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.6
Net Hire Index 0.5
20% 30% 51% 55% 51% 42%
(replacement) 0.4 Net Hire Index
Net Hire Index (new) 40% 60% 50% 33% 50% 47% 0.3 (replacement)
0.2 Net Hire Index (new)
0.1
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average

It is observed that the recruitment yield index and net hire index of replacements are with upward trend over the change
in years. While the net hire index of new has had a downward trend.
 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
Time to Hire
(average) days 180 150 155 138 130 150.6 Time to Hire (average) days
% Positions taken more than 45
days to fill 30% 40% 45% 75% 81% 54% 200
Unfilled Vacancy Rate 80% 75% 75% 65% 80% 75% 180
160
140
0.9 120 Time to Hire (average)
days
100
0.8
80
0.7 60
0.6 40
20
0.5 % Positions taken more 0
than 45 days to fill 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
0.4
Unfilled Vacancy Rate
0.3
0.2 From analysis it is observed that the percentage of position taken more than
0.1 45 days to fill had an increasing trend while the unfilled vacancy rate is stable.
0 Also the average time to Hire has also decreased. Total average over 5 years
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
150.6 days time to Hire. While average of un-filled vacancy rate is 75%.
 Human Capital Spending & ROI
Cost Metrics - Permanent 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Compensation Cost to HR Cost

Average
Human Capital Spending and ROI
30 31 32 33 36 32
Ratio - on Total "HR" Cost
180
Compensation Cost to HR Cost
Ratio - on "HR" Salary Cost 40 41 42 42 44 42
160 150 153
Compensation Cost to HR Cost 144 141
124 134 144 150 153 141 134
Ratio - on "HR" Benefits Cost 140
124
Compensation Cost per Employee 665,180 745,002 834,402 934,530 1,046,674 845,157
120 Compensation Cost to HR
Salary to Compensation Cost Ratio 61.7% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 77.4% 69.8% Cost Ratio - on Total
100 Compensation Cost to HR
Benefits to Compensation Cost 38.3% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 22.6% 30.2%
Ratio Axis Title Cost Ratio - on
80 Compensation Cost to HR
HR to Organization Employees 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2.8% 2.5% 2.6%
Ratio Cost Ratio - on
HR Cost to Revenue Ratio (HR 60
0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% 44 41.8
Total Cost) 40 41 42 42
40 30 32 33 36 32.4
HR Cost to Operating Cost Ratio 31
(HR Total Cost) 0.5% 1.0% 1.3% 2.0% 1.8% 1.3%

HR Cost per Employee (HR Total

20
Cost) 20,000 23,000 26,450 30,418 34,980 26,970
HR Budget Variance (HR Total 0
Cost) 1.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 5.0% 2.7% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Average
Human Capital ROI (Shows the Years
ratio of income to employment 9.00 10.00 10.61 11.16 12.87 10.73
costs)
Revenue per FTE 1,986,196 2,252,298 2,500,859 2,546,129 2,479,505 2,352,997 In Human capital spending and RIO, all of them are stable
HR Expense to Operating Expense
Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 over 5 years of time period as per the chart given above.
 Human Capital Spending & ROI
Cost
Metrics - Permanent
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Average
Human Capital Spending & ROI
Compensation Cost per 0.9
Employee 665,180 745,002 834,402 934,530 1,046,674 845,157
Salary to Compensation Cost 0.8
61.7% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 77.4% 69.8%
Ratio 0.7
Benefits to Compensation Cost
Ratio 38.3% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 22.6% 30.2% 0.6
HR to Organization Employees Salary to Compensation Cost
0.5

Axis Title
Ratio 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2.8% 2.5% 2.6% Ratio
HR Cost to Revenue Ratio (HR 0.4 Benefits to Compensation Cost
Total Cost) 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% Ratio
0.3
HR Cost to Operating Cost Ratio 0.5% 1.0% 1.3% 2.0% 1.8% 1.3%
(HR Total Cost) 0.2

HR Cost per Employee (HR Total 0.1

Cost) 20,000 23,000 26,450 30,418 34,980 26,970 0
HR Budget Variance (HR Total 1.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 5.0% 2.7% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
Cost)
Years
Human Capital ROI (Shows the
ratio of income to employment 9.00 10.00 10.61 11.16 12.87 10.73
costs)
It can be derived that salary to compensation cost ratio
Revenue per FTE 1,986,196 2,252,298 2,500,859 2,546,129 2,479,505 2,352,997 have had an upward trend. Benefits to compensation
HR Expense to Operating
Expense Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 cost ratio have had a downward trend.
 Human Capital Spending & ROI
Cost
Metrics - Permanent
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Human Capital Spending
Average
0.04
HR to Organization Employees 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 2.8% 2.5% 2.6%
Ratio
0.03
HR Cost to Revenue Ratio (HR
Total Cost) 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2%
0.03 HR to Organization Employees
Ratio
HR Cost to Revenue Ratio (HR
HR Cost to Operating Cost Ratio 0.02 Total Cost)
0.5% 1.0% 1.3% 2.0% 1.8% 1.3%
(HR Total Cost) HR Cost to Operating Cost Ratio
0.02 (HR Total Cost)
HR Cost per Employee (HR Total
Cost) 20,000 23,000 26,450 30,418 34,980 26,970 0.01

HR Budget Variance (HR Total 0.01

1.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 5.0% 2.7%
Cost)
0
Human Capital ROI (Shows the 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
ratio of income to employment 9.00 10.00 10.61 11.16 12.87 10.73
costs)
It can be observed that the HR to organization ratio had a stable
Revenue per FTE
1,986,196 2,252,298 2,500,859 2,546,129 2,479,505 2,352,997
trend. HR cost to operating cost ratio had also with stable trend.
HR Expense to Operating But HR cost to Revenue ratio had an increasing trend.
Expense Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02
Thank You