Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M2 IGCC HRSG Enhanced Modeling and Simulation in Power Plant DR R R Joshi
M2 IGCC HRSG Enhanced Modeling and Simulation in Power Plant DR R R Joshi
3
Origin of the Research Problem
4
Origin of the Research Problem Contd.
5
Enhanced Modeling and Integrated
Simulation of Gasification in Power Plant for
Capacity Enhancement and Clean Power
Production
6
Overview of a gasifier for power production with relevant processes 7
Process Flow Diagram for simulation of the power plant
8
Overview of HE skid for power production developed using HYSYS 9
Stages In Process Simulation
Apart from design considerations, IGCC performance depends on
numerous integration options and can be improved by process
optimization. These considerations include
10
Model of Power Plant
Gas stream
•As gas turbines were modeled, gas streams had to be
considered. These contain:
•Air (as N2, O2 mixture).
•Gas fuel (containing CH4, C2H6, C3H8,
•n-C4H10, n-C5H12)
•Gas turbines
•This is a complex model consisting of three sections:
• a compressor;
•a combustion chamber with a pre-mixer for air and fuel;
and
• an expansion section
11
Model of Power Plant
•Heat exchangers
•The exhaust gas of a gas turbine is hot enough to
generate steam at different pressure levels, for use as
process steam, in de-aeration or in steam turbines for
additional power generation. A fundamental model was
developed for the waste heat recovery section, consisting
of a series of heat exchanger models.
12
Model of Power Plant
•Combustion reactions
•This model assumes the use of natural gas with the first 5
alkanes (methane, ethane, propane, n-butane and n-
pentane), identified as Cl,…,C5, respectively. The
combustion in air of each of these 5 hydrocarbons, is
described by an extent of reaction εi, i=1,…,5.
3i
O2 iCO2 (i 1)H 2
i 2i 2 12
C H
O
13
Methodology
designed to burn both Natural Gas and Diesel Oil with automatic
control. Fuel changeover shall be initiated manually through the
fuel selector switch or automatically by the fuel gas pressure
switch which is operated when the fuel gas pressure drops below a
preset value. Fuel Gas (Natural Gas) is presently the primary
source of Fuel for the power plant. This comes from offshore and
onshore Fuel Gas production facilities.
14
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
15
Analysis on the basis of
process simulation study and calculations
16
Analysis on the basis of process simulation
study and calculations
3.The maximum available fuel gas quantity is 55630 Nm3 / hr The full
amount of fuel gas available can not be utilised with the existing
gas conditioning skid in circuit.
4.Diesel Oil System :As per pressure drop calculation with a
recycle flow of 50m3/hr from tank back to pump ,the pressure
drop across the orifice under conditions of 1GTG to 4GTG’s
operating is from 48.432 m to 51.122 m i.e. within narrow range.
Therefore this scheme is practical to operate.
5.Gas hydrate formation is shown as possible scenario by the
simulation. Same is the case for FSNL condition at GTG4 inlet.
17
Effect of humidity on power generation-
winter conditions
18
19
Complete Optimized PFD of Four Gas Turbines 20
21
Existing design capacities and design modifications in the system
23
Simulation of heat conditioning skid
24
Simulation of gas turbine section with PRVs for
capacity augmentation
25
Comparison of Flow sheets with
3 GTGs and 4 GTGs
•Objective: 100 MW Power Generation:
•FDP-1 Fuel, 17% WC conditions:
26
1. Analysis - With 3 GTGs:
•Maximum power that can be generated: 105 MW (35MW each)
•Required fuel supply: 35,630 Nm3/hr (31,000 kg/hr)
•Bottlenecks:
•1. The present High Pressure Knockout Vessel, Gas Conditioning
Skid, Filters are able to process a maximum of 27,400 Nm3/hr.
•2. Fuel Gas Super Heaters with 2 heaters are not sufficient. Third
Heater should be brought in operation. Three will operate partially
and this will hamper the efficiency by around 12%. In this case
there is no stand bye heater in the system, and 4th heater may
have to be provided as a stand bye
27
2. Analysis - With 4 GTGs
• Maximum power that can be generated: 112 MW (28MW each) or
• 113 MW (31X3=93 + 20= 113 MW)
•Full Load and partial one
•Available fuel supply: 35,630 Nm3/hr (31,000 kg/hr)
•Bottlenecks:
•1. The present High Pressure Knockout Vessel, Gas Conditioning
Skid, Filters are able to process a maximum of 27,400 Nm3/hr.
•2. Fuel Gas Super Heaters with 2 heaters are not sufficient. Third
Heater should be brought in operation. Three will operate partially
and this will hamper the efficiency of each Heater by around 12%.
•3. Direct flow is essential for the required power generation.
•4. With four GTGs, a maximum of 105 MW power can be
generated with present line conditions. PRVs are not able to run
4th GTG at full speed.
29
References
1Papoulias S A and I E Grossmann. A Structural Optimization Approach in Process Synthesis. Part I: Utility Systems.
Computers and Chemical Engineering. 1983; 7: 695-699.
2Falcetta M F and Sciubba E A. Computational, modular approach to the simulation of power plants. Heat Recovery
Systems & CHP. 1995; 15 (2): 131–145.
3Shisen Xu et al. Development of a novel 2-stage entrained flow coal dry powder gasifier. Applied Energy, 2014;
113:318–323.
4Briesch M S, Bannister R L, Diakunchak I S, and Huber D J, A combined cycle designed to achieve greater than 60 percent
efficiency, Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1995; 117:734–741.
5 Jussi Manninen and X.X. Zhu, Thermodynamic Analysis and Mathematical Optimisation of Power Plants,
Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1998; 22:S537–544
6Kotas, T.J., The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, London and Boston: Butterworths; ISBN 0408013508, 1985
7F Emuna, M Gadallaa,, T Majozi , D Boerc. Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process simulation and
optimization. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2010; 34 (1): 331–338.
8C Descamps, et al. Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2
removal. Energy, 2008; 33: 874-881.
9C C Cormos, et al. Use of lower grade coals in IGCC plants with carbon capture for the coproduction of hydrogen
and electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009; 35: 556-567.
10Mohammad Mansouri Majoumerd, Han Raas, Sudipta De, Mohsen Assadi. Estimation of performance variation of
future generation IGCC with coal quality and gasification process – Simulation results of EU H2-
IGCC project. Applied Energy, 2014; 113: 452–462
11J C Meerman, M Knoope, A Ramírez, W C Turkenburg, A P C Faaij. The techno-economic potential of integrated
gasification co-generation facilities with CCS Going from coal to biomass. Energy Procedia, 2013; 37:6053– 6061.
30
References
12H Christopher Frey and Yunhua Zhu. Improved System Integration for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
(IGCC) Systems. Environmental Science & Technology 2006; 40 (5):1693-1699.
13Jae Chul Lee, Hyeon Hui Lee, Yong Jin Joo, Chang Ha Lee, Min Oh, Process simulation and thermodynamic
analysis of an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) plant with an entrained coal gasifier, Energy, 2014; 64:
58–68.
14M A Rodrıguez-Toral, W Morton, D R Mitchell. Using new packages for modelling, equation oriented
simulation and optimization of a cogeneration plant. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2000; 24: 2667–2685.
15Ong’iro A, Ugursal V I, Al Taweel, A M. and Walkers J D. Modeling of heat recovery steam
generator performance. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1997; 17 (5): 427–446.
16Harker J H and Allen D A, The calculation of temperature and composition of flame gases. Journal of the
Institute of Fuel, 1969; 42:183–187.
17Gaydon A G and Wolfhard H G. Flames. Their structure, radiation and temperature, 4th ed., London: Chapman
and Hall, 1979.
18William Z Black and James G Hartley. Thermodynamics: Si Version, Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers,
Incorporated, 1996, ISBN-13 9780673996459
19Elisabetta Veca and Alessandra Adrover. Isothermal kinetics of char-coal gasification with pure CO2. Fuel, 2014;
123: 151–157.
20Najjar Y S H and Akyurt M. Combined cycles with gas turbine engines. Heat Recovery Systems & CHP, 1994;
14 (2): 93–103.
21Vincenzo Spallina, Matteo C Romano, Paolo Chiesa, Giovanni Lozza. Integration of coal gasification and
packed bed CLC process for high efficiency and near-zero emission power generation. Energy Procedia, 2013; 37:
662 – 670.
31
THANK
YOU
32