You are on page 1of 8

: Around the world

Presentation by
| Group 1 | Section A |

Saranya Maniyan M055-20


Himanshu Mandal M272-20
Kunal M038-20
Kamalla Puneeth M228-20
Aviral Tripati M212-20
Pranathi Dharmapuram M236-20
Aswath Boopathy
Q1 The Global Story

Where did the retailer struggle? Where did it do well?

❖ The retailers could not estimate the demand and ❖ Walmart did well in advertisement campaigns, and the hype
the strategic location in many of the geographies created around the brand drew the crowd towards the store
like Asia. since its opening.

❖ Another central area of struggle for the retailers ❖ It did pretty well to maintain a tough competition to other
was local laws that were cumbersome in giant retailers as if and when required by announcing to
managing and bringing the stocks to the store. invest a massive amount of money.

❖ It faced enough competition from early-mover ❖ They were demonstrating aggressive pricing techniques to
foreign retailers such as Carrefour, K-Mart, Metro, take over the competition.
Tesco.
❖ It is placing more advertisements in local newspapers to
❖ Lastly, the competition was able to adapt to maintain its brand presence.
Walmart, and the existing superstores were able
to offer a wide variety of products initially. ❖ It did very well in countering the competition by offering
niche products and necessities at a very competitive price.
What were the major reasons for success or failure in Can location characteristics explain the difference in
each country? performance?

❖ Walmart had to face its share of success as well as ❖ Yes, the location will decide the kind of public that
failure in different countries. comes in, its purchasing power & its economic
necessities.
❖ The new stores achieved success in some countries
including Canada, Mexico & UK but the company had to ❖ The above factors will decide the sales and the
exit Germany & South Korea. product that the store has to sell, ultimately
determining the margins and revenues.
❖ In Australia, the store was successful because
technology and store structure made it easy for the ❖ Hence we see that location plays a very critical role
customer to pick and choose things easily. in the performance of the store.

❖ Due to price differentiation strategies, it did suffer some


failures there.

❖ Similarly, in China, the main reason for success was the


compilation of products and retailer margins.

❖ The initial problems were there because of local product


sourcing issues.
Q2. Best entry mode greenfield investments or acquisitions?

Acquisition is the best entry mode for Walmart

● Walmart gained success mostly ● Acquisition is lot more


throught the acquisitions. easier than greenfield
investments.
● Ex: JV with Cifra(WALMEX),
● Research cost reduced and
Woolco stores in Canada and
less cultural restraints.
Asda in England ● Same management team
● Failed to capture asian markets (Executive level)
● Greenfield investment failed in ● Time saved through
Brazil lead to slower growth rate. acquisitions.
Q2. Did local characteristics drive mode of entry? Why?

➢ Yes because different countries have


different cultures and tastes.
➢ Failed to understand Japanese
consumers.
➢ EDLP model failed in China
➢ Previous mishaps: Large parking lot in
Mexico.
➢ Lot of R&D is required.
➢ Time constraint is also deciding factor
Q3 Was Walmart’s FDI in India a good idea?

O Ownership
L Location

India’s growing retail sector


I Internalisation

Walmart had a lack of


Low-cost labour Expertise in national &
understanding of customer needs/
international retail management,
cultural differences The Indian laws allow FDI in retail J-I-T Inventory management,
industry only in cities with a retail information &
Walmart had a strong brand name
population of a million or more, it is transportation management
and reputation
not easy to find suitable real estate
in these large urban areas
High cost of rent in Indian metro
cities
Most source 30% of their products
from Indian MSMEs

Was JV with Bharti enterprises the right form of entry?


Q4 Finding the best strategy to expand:

Cultural C A Administrative
Cultural Differences: Indian laws are considered
Indian consumers assumed unclear and uncertain - It allows
low price = low quality FDI in retail industry only in cities
with 1M+ population
Geographical Economic

High rent in metro cities, Huge G E Low income group - purchases


area for car parking - Indian usually from kirana stores
customers came by bus.

Firm can gauge the degree of difference in these parameters and choose among
● Greenfield : when the degree is minimal and have similar parameters
● Joint Venture: when the combined degree of difference is moderate
● Acquisition: when the combined degree of difference is high

You might also like