Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE 5
PREPARED BY:
AKHILESH SHARMA,
GEU
MODULE-5
• Dividend Policy
• Retained Earnings
• Dividend Pay- Out Ratio
• Factors affecting to dividend policy
• Approaches of Dividend Policy
RELEVANCE THEORY
(A)WALTER’S MODEL
Prof. James E Walter argues that the choice of dividend payout
ratio almost always affects the value of the firm.
The significance of the relationship between internal rate of
return (r) and cost of capital (k) has been studied.
Assumptions :
1. The firm finances its entire investments by means of retained
earning only.
2. Internal rate of return (r) and cost of capital (k) of the firm remains
constant
3. The firms’ earning are either distributed as dividend or reinvested
internally.
4. The firm has a very long or infinite life.
P = D + r/k(E – D)
k
P= Market price per share
D = Dividend per share
E= Earning per share
R = Internal rate of return
k= Cost of capital
a) Growth firm (r > k) : Optimum payout ratio for growth firm is
0%.
b) Normal firm (r = k) : There is nothing like optimum payout
ratio for a normal firm.
c) Declining firm (r < k) : Optimum payout ratio for a declining
firms is 100%.
(B) GORDON’S MODEL
Assumptions :
a. The firm is an all equity firm (no debt)
b. There is no outside financing and all investments are financed
exclusively by retained earnings.
c. Internal rate of return (r) of the firm remains constant
d. Cost of capital remains same
e. The retention ratio (b) once decided upon is constant. Thus,
the growth rate (g) is also constant (g = b x r).
P = E (1 – b)
k – br
1 – b = payout ratio
b = retention ratio
E = Earning per share
1. Given the following information about a company, show the
effect of the dividend policy on the market price per share,
using Walter’s model
EPS = Rs. 8
k = 12%
r = a) 15% b) 10% c) 12%
Show the effect of different dividend policies on the market
price of the shares when dividend payout ratio is :
a. 0%
b. 25%
c. 75%
d. 100%
Modigliani-Miller Model
According to MM, the dividend policy of a firm is irrelevant, as it
does not affect the wealth of shareholders. According to this
theory, the value of the firm depends solely on its earnings
power resulting from the investment policy and not
influenced by the manner in which its earnings are split
between dividends and retained earnings.
ASSUMPTIONS :
1. Capital markets are perfect
2. There are no taxes
3. The firm has a fixed investment policy
4. Floatation cost does not exist
ARGUMENT : Whatever increase in the value of the firm results
from the payment of dividend, will be exactly off set by the
decline in the market price of shares because of external
financing and there will be no change in the total wealth of
shareholders.
External financing increase in number of shares/payment of
interest fall in EPS
The market price of a share in the beginning of a period is equal
to the present value of dividends paid at the end of the period
plus the market price of the shares at the end of the period.
Po = D1 + P1
1 + Ke
Po = market price per share at the beginning of the period
D1 = dividend to be received at the end of the period
P1 = market price per share at the end of the period
Ke = cost of equity capital or rate of capitalization
Step 1 : P1 = Po (1 + ke) – D1
m = I – (E – nD1)
P1
Step 3 : the value of the firm can be ascertained with :
nPo = (n + m)P1 – (I – E)
1 + ke
m = number of shares to be issued
I = Investment required
E = total earnings of the firm during the period
n = number of shares outstanding at the beginning of the period
nPo = Value of the firm
CRITICISM TO MM MODEL
1. Tax differentials : MM’s assumption that taxes does
not exist is far from reality.
2. Floatation cost : There is a presence of floatation
cost. So a rupee of dividend cannot be replaced by a
rupee of external fund.
3. Transaction cost : MM states that if the dividends are
not paid, the shareholders desiring current income
can sell a part of their holdings without incurring
transaction cost.
4. Uncertainty : MM argues that the prices of the 2 firms
which are exactly identical in all respect except with
the dividend policy cannot be different. But this is not
true due to ‘bird in hand argument’.