Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2106663723)
MANAJEMEN OPERASI
SALEMBA 2021
1) Sharing information
2) Allocating Supply
3) Managing Production
4) Empowering Actions
Carlos Goshn.
Sharing information:
Their information sharing had the amazing depth to constantly update their regional production forecast
but it would be a distraction. So they brought send two staff members to Japan to gather their own
information and to solve problems holistically.
Allocating supply:
Their operational network, allocation was on the sales, marketing, and the regional Supply chain
management. They identified which car models required integrated GPS To meet customer demands, and
allocated resources accordingly, low end models Did not receive the allocation. Customers were willing to
purchase those models Without an integrated GPS. This method was completed within two weeks of the
earthquake and continually updated as the supply situation became clearer.
Managing
Production :
Nissan slowed their
production lines in a targeted
way. Management also pulled
vacation time into April and
May in order to free up
capacity later in the summer
when upstream bottlenecks
were projected to have
cleared. They used this
vacation as bought by having
in-transit inventory to identify
and implement supply
alternatives. They secure air
freight out of Japan so they
could get critical parts out of
the Country faster and
Empowering Action :
Their rapid and flexible action of empowered decision making without lengthy analysis helped them to recover
the critical situation. Actually they were successfully enabled themselves to take prompt actions when the time
came. Their speedy decisions at the situation by employee safety & damage caused and to take appropriate
actions based on this. They were able to gathered team immediately for damage restoration just after 15 minutes
of earthquake.
02 What else could Nissan has
alone to prepare for and
respond to the disaster?
Nissan thought little of the harms caused by the
tsunami, which was a result of the earthquake. Now
considering that tsunamis are results of submerged
earthquake, for what reason didn't Nissan ascertain
tsunami harms to a degree level with those of quakes?
Nissan could have made new tsunami clearing courses
and focuses that considered tsunami dangers. Likewise,
Nissan could have enormously expanded its
nourishment storage to be adequately sufficient for its
workers, their families and nearby inhabitants inside a
basic range.
As indicated by the Exhibit 2
for the situation examine,
fires broke out in the Tochigi
factory. This distinguishes a
weakness for fire
arrangement in the planning
and recognizing phases of
hazard administration. The
costs to keep these fires may
likewise be ostensible since
one could reveal the present
intend to cover the neglected
regions where the fires
occurred.
03 What could Nissan have done to assess the
risk of disruption in their supply chain?
Nissan had an association committed to the risk management beginning in 2008.
The Global Disaster Control could have arranged and distinguished the dangers more
deliberately, particularly when it came to topographical interdependencies and risk
possibilities. Japan is situated in a zone where tremors are visit. Nissan's risk
management centered around distinguishing and dissecting dangers as right on time as
could be expected under the circumstances, and arranging and quickly actualizing
countermeasures.
The organization built up a committed risk management work which was in charge of these exercises.
There was additionally an official level board of trustees that settled on choices on corporate dangers,
assigned "risk proprietors" to deal with the particular dangers. Be that as it may, as per the contextual
investigation, the effect of tsunamis was thought little of and this was a noteworthy defect in the
likelihood/affect network. At that point Nissan would lead a quantitative and subjective examination to
design the sorts of reactions important.
Be that as it may, the belittling in the ID stage kept an appropriate risk
examination to react to the tidal wave dangers. Utilizing specialists acquainted
with Japanese calamity dangers ought to have been a need and put tidal wave
risks in the high risk zone. To evade these bottle necks in the inventory
network, Nissan could have streamlined, to a significantly higher degree, every
single basic part to be tradable with parts in various areas.
This would for all intents and purposes dispose of the requirement for
possibility stores of basic and various coming required from Japan and different
regions.
04 How did Nissan’s product line
strategy help or hurt its ability to
respond to and recover from the
disaster?
Nissan’s took a good product line strategy that help its
ability to respond to and recover from the disaster. Nissan
displayed their production lines in a targeted way. Nissans
management department considered in-stock and in-transit
inventory within their network and slowed their production
line for avoiding bottlenecks. The company successfully ramp
down their production so that they were able to decrease
overtime costs for operations that were expected to be
bottlenecked. The company’s management brought their
vacation time between April and May so that they could free
up their capacity later in the summer when upstream
bottlenecks were projected to have cleared.
The company used the time
bought by having in-transit
inventory to identify and implement
supply alternatives. Their lead time
was 20 days for ocean transport
from Japan to United States. This
meant management have 20 days to
identify how to excess another
suppliers on critical situation. They
also secure air freight out of Japan
to get critical parts faster and quiet
the reduction of in-transit stocks.
05 How will the operational changes announced in 2012
affect Nissan’s exposure to future disruptions? How will it
affect its steady-state operations? What trade-of is
management making and why?