Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The discipline of
LANGUAGE
USE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=VKbp4hEHV-s
MAN TO NEIGHBOUR: ‘Did you hear me
pounding on the wall last night?’
NEIGHBOUR TO MAN: ‘Don’t worry about
it. We were making a lot noise ourselves!’
****************************
**
CUSTOMER: ‘Walton, there’s a fly in my soup .’
WAITER: ‘Keep it down, sir, or else everyone
will want one.’
Charles Morris (1938):
Semiotics is divided into:
syntax – or the study of the combinatorial properties of words,
or rather the study of the formal relation of signs to one
another; (John is a good guy = NP + V + ART + ADJ + N)
- Deixis
- Presuppostion
- Implied meaning
THEORIES:
- Speech act theory (locution, illocution and perlocution);
- Relevance Theory
Discourse analysis
DISCOURSE: linguistic unit larger than a
sentence (again, L use);
Transactional vs. interactional function of
language;
Sentence vs. Utterance
Cohesion vs. Coherence
- Context and cotext dependency
- Deixis
- Presuppostion
- Implied meaning
Violation of semantic rules:
-The rules of language are not like rules of
physics; unlike the latter, the former are
‘violable’ to a degree, this ‘violability’ being
another one of the ‘rules’ of language. There
are three main kinds of rule violation:
anomaly
metaphor
idiomacity.
The Relevance Theory
Move from the code model (communication is
transmittion of info from sender to reeiver) to the
inferential model of communication (communication
achieved by the message recipient’s recognition of the
sender’s informative (i.e. communicative) intention.
A conceptual i.e. psychological model, in which the
sender of the message takes into account the context of
the communication and the mutual cognitive
environment between the sender and the recipient (e.g
presupposition i.e. background infromation).
E.g. Mary: Would you like to come for a run?
Bill: I'm resting today.
Relevance theory (cont.)
Underlying presumption: communicated information
comes with a guarantee of relevance. Developed by
Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson in 1986.
Core of the theory: ‘Communicative principle of
relevance’ which states that “every act of ostensive
communication communicates the presumption of its
own optimal relevance” (Sperber & Wilson, 1986:
158).
When making an utterance the sender of the message
is conveying that what s/he says is worth listening to,
i.e. that it will provide "cognitive effects" worthy of
the processing effort required to find the meaning.
Pragmatics in action:
Grice’s Conversational principles (maxims):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI9tFOcV
nV4
The relevance theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRv1agt7
76c&t=25s
Text 1