CASE STUDY ON

QUEBEC
REFERENDUM VOTE

TEAM MEMBERS:
PRATYUSH JENA
PRABIN JENA
PRATIK KHANDUAL
PRITICHANDANA NAYAK
 INTRODUCTION
 From1960 , Quebecois have been debating
whether to separate from Canada and form an
independent nation.
 So
voting is done and as the result majority of
people are not in the favor of separation.
 Butwhen the ballots are counted a fraud came
out and it create a disapproval among the people.
 QUEBEC REFERENDUM, 1995
5,000,000

4,500,000

4,000,000

3,500,000

3,000,000

2,500,000

2,000,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

500,000

0
No Yes Valid Vote Invalid Vote Total Vote
Completion Polling organization/client Sample Yes No Undecided
Date size

30 October 1995 Official results 4,757,509 49.42% 50.58%

Oct 27 Léger & Léger 1,003 47% 41% 12%
Oct 25 SOM 1,115 46% 40% 14%
Oct 25 Angus Reid 1,029 48% 44% 8%
Oct 23 CROP 1,072 44% 43% 13%
Oct 20 Léger & Léger 1,005 46% 42% 12%
Oct 18 Angus Reid 1,012 45% 44% 11%
Oct 16 CROP 1,151 42% 44% 14%
Oct 16 SOM 981 43% 43% 14%
Oct 12 Léger & Léger 1,002 45% 42% 13%
Oct 12 Gallup 1,013 39% 43% 18%
Oct 11 Create 470 43% 49% 8%
Oct 9 Lepage 1,285 45% 42% 13%
Oct 4 Léger & Léger 1,015 43% 44% 13%
Sep 29 Lepage 1,369 44% 46% 10%
Sep 28 Léger & Léger 1,006 44% 45% 11%
Sep 27 Angus Reid 1,000 41% 45% 14%
Sep 25 SOM/Environics 1,820 39% 48% 13%
Sep 25 CROP 2,020 39% 47% 14%
Sep 25 Decima 750 40% 42% 18%
Sep 19 Create 1,004 39% 46% 15%
Sep 14 COMPAS 500 36% 40% 24%
Sep 12 SOM 1,003 37% 45% 18%
Sep 9 Léger & Léger
MEAN959 42.34
44%
45.52
43%
13.6013%
MEDIAN 43.5 44 13
MODE 44 44 13
ST DEV 3.25 2.34 3.27
 MEAN MEDIAN

13.60 13

43
42.34

44

45.52

1 2 3
1 2 3
 MODE ST.DEV

13 3.473 3.26,

44

44 2.35,

1 2 3

1 2 3
 CONCLUSION

 The majority people are not in the favor of the

separation.
 Dispute is created due to there are large number
of spoiled ballots.
 As there are a large number of “No” votes and
rejected ballots which indicates the fraud in
voting.