WQ2 Current status and Water

Production Overview
Q
2
|
Well Stock as of 1st December 2021
As of 1st December 2021, 231 wells at the oilfield:
• 162 production wells (Mishrif)
• 3 production wells (Yamama)
• 29 injection wells (Mishrif)
• 26 water supply wells (Dammam)
• 11 suspended historical wells (Mishrif + Yamama)

162 production wells at Mishrif formation, including:

• 98 active production well stock;
• 17 wells are long term shut-in (due to the limit of
water production);
• 47 new wells are under well commissioning at new
clusters 4 and 9, wellpads and pipelines construction
is ongoing;
• 29 injection well stock.

Yamama Pilot production started from 1st well (WQ2-

Mishrif well stock distribution 831) on July 9, 2021. 2nd well WQ2-787 started from 1
Nov 2021.

77% of producers (75 wells) are equipped with ESP. 23

wells have natural flow completion (23 Mishrif wells and
2 Yamama wells).

2
Actual Mishrif production vs FDP-2018 forecast

Mishrif Actual Performance vs. FDP 2018

3
Current status of idle well stock
As of 1st December 23 production wells are stopped, including
17 production wells are stopped in long term due to following
reasons:

Long term wells shutdown

Number of stopped
№ Reason of wells shutdown
wells
Shutdown due to limited CPF
1 water production 13
2 ESP fail (R=0) 3
3 Conversion to ESP 1
Total 17

Stopped producers due to limited CPF water production

Others ESP fail Cyclic mode

4
Water source in Production Wells
Water cut map for Mishrif formation

Number of wells
Injection water 25

Mishrif formation water

Undefined 20

15

18
10
12 15
3
9 5
3
6 5
2 2 3 2 1
1 1 1 1 1 0
0.3-1 1.1-5 5.1-10 10.1-20 20.1-30 30.1-40 40.1-50 50.1-60 60.1-70 70.1-80 80.1≤
Water cut, %

 The current average water cut is 20.3% vol.

 Associated water observed in production of 86 wells or 87.7%
of production wells. The main water source is:
• Injected water – 68 wells.
• Mishrif formation water - 10 wells.
• Water source is not idefined because of low water cut – 8 wells.

5
Overview of intervals water breakthrough
3 main Production/Injection types of water breakthrough are being identified for Mishrif:

4,5 '' tbg

ESP
4,5 '' tbg
4,5 '' tbg

Perf. Joint

Prod. Pkr
Prod. Packer Prod. Packer
4,5'' Tbg
FIV 4,5'' Tbg

9 5/8'' csg. Shoe

9 5/8'' csg. Shoe 9 5/8'' csg. Shoe
SSD

Perf Interval

7'' Packer

SSD

Nipple Profile

7'' liner shoe 7'' liner shoe

7'' liner shoe

Middle water breakthrough – selective zonal

Lower water breakthrough -
Bridge plug
• Water break through at the bottom of
perf. Interval, water conning effect
• Mostly in the edge wells
• Water source – Mishrif formation
water from aquifer
• Should be mitigated by running bridge
plugs. 3 jobs done to date.
• Associated risks:
 Blockage oil reserves below
bridge plug
 cement bond integrity /
openhole packer integrity in
the edge wells
 7’’ liner conditions
Upper waterbreakthrough -
Straddle packers
• Water break through at the top of perf.
Intervals or Upper Mishrif
• Linked to the presence of PT1 /
secondary porosity
• Water source – injected water from
water injection wells
• Should be mitigated by running
straddle packers. 2 jobs were
unsuccessful, its planned to repeat in
2022
• Associated risks:
 cement bond integrity /
openhole packer integrity in the
edge wells
 7’’ liner conditions
isolation
(Technology Being Evaluated)
• Water break through in the middle
zone of the perf. interval
• Linked to the presence of PT1 /
secondary porosity zones
• Water source – injection water
from water injection wells
• Planned to mitigate by zonal
isolation or smart completion
• Associated risks:
 cement bond integrity /
openhole packer integrity
in the edge wells
 7’’ liner conditions
6
Bridge Plug, Well x Case Study
Petro types Relative permeability
by water
4,5 '' tbg

ESP x

Perf. Joint

Prod. Packer

FIV
OWC

9 5/8'' csg. Shoe

• Water production confirmed from Mishrif aquifer at

the bottom of the perforation intervals.
• A bridge plug ran in the interval above the lower
7'' liner shoe
perforation to isolate formation water inflow

7
Bottom zone WSO Summary
x
WC-50%

WC-11%

x2
WC-55%

• 2 WSO jobs performed in 2019 in wells x and x2

WC-27.5% • Both wells were put back into operation with reduced water
cut.
x3 • x3 WSO job done in Sep 2021
WC-70% • Well is currently being produced and monitored after a long
SI period. WC is gradually decreasing. Latest WC 47% (-13%)
• As of 01.10.2021 cumulative oil gain is ~214 KBbl

WC-62%
8
x4 Water Shut-Off
• According to simulation model it is expected rapid water break through
trough the upper production interval (PT1) if the well converted to
4,5 '' tbg
injector
• In order to mitigate fast water breakthrough the upper perforated
interval was isolated by straddle packer system (zonal isolation) during
Workover job in Nov 2021
• Injection start is planned for Jan 2022.

PTDHG

9 5/8'' prod packer

SSD
9 5/8'' csg. Shoe

7'' prod packer

Mishrif Perf

7'' liner shoe

Proposed Completion

9
Titanium coagulants technology (TK-10, SOVNEFTEPROM)

FEATURES
Series of lab tests shown two base mechanics of technology:
inorganic gel thermotropic at surface temperature solution has viscosity of
water , in reservoir conditions the entire volume of solution forms stable viscous gel;
volumetric suspended particles block large flooded pores.

Applicability and properties of the composition of the chemical TK-10 as follows:

-wide temperature limits 25 ->150С
-formation water salinity 0 - 360 g/L
-high structural and mechanical gel properties mechanical strength, viscosity
low initial viscosity (1,2- 1,7 cP)
-the total volume of the solution is converted to a gel
-controlled gelation period
-adjustable penetration depth.

10
Option review - Titanium coagulants technology (TK-10, SOVNEFTEPROM)
x5 x6
Oil, m3/d Oil, m3/d
PLT 2018 PLT 2015 Inj
m3/d
Liq, m3/d Liq, m3/d PLT
PLT 2018 PLT 2015 2018

Estimated volumes of Reagent TK 10
Complex approach to increasing the efficiency of well development using
Reagent TK 10 product
• 75% of liquid rate and 90% of water rate of
x5 from two upper high permeability intervals
• Source of water breakthrough is x6
• SOVNEFTEPROM’s proposal includes
x5 - isolation of the interval @2686-2710 MD
x6 - Isolation of the interval @2532-2975 MD
Results of efficiency evaluation will be sent to BOC for negotiation
11
Results of Evaluation for xi Injection Pattern
Results of PLT by years
Injectivity index, m3/d/bar Zonal intake, %
Interval PLT -2016 PLT-2018 PLT-2020 Interval PLT -2016 PLT-2018 PLT-2020
2700-2734 99.7 244.7 196.1 2700-2734 82% 93% 90%
2746-2813 4.5 3.2 2.3 2746-2813 2% 0.5% 1%
2824-2842 34.2 35.2 2824-2842 13% 6%
34.2 9%
2856-2911 4.3 2.6 2856-2911 3% 0.5%

Results of interference test for WQ2-163

12
 Example of analyze
Results of xi cyclic injection

Cumulative oil production vs

Ln of cumulative liquid production
17001 700
8000
x7

Cumulative oil production, kt

WC, %
1 600

Накопленная добыча нефти, тыс. т

1 500

1 400

1 300
1300
6000 75 1 200

1 100 Constant inj

Production/injection, cmpd

1 000 Trend of constant inj

900 Cyclic inj
900 6,000 6,050 6,100 6,150 6,200 6,250
Десятичный логарифм накопленнрй добычи жидкости
6,300 6,350

Cyclic inj 6000 6350

Ln of cumulative liquid production
4000 50
19001 900

x8

Cumulative oil production, kt

1 800

Накопленная добыча нефти, тыс. т

1 700

Constant inj 1 600

WC trend
2000 25 15001 500
WC trend
1 400

rend
1 300

WC t 1 200
Constant inj
Failed ESP of WSW
1 100
Trend of constant inj
1 000 Cyclic inj
10.17 01.18 04.18 07.18 10.18 01.19 04.19 07.19 10.19 01.20 04.20 07.20 10.20 01.21 04.21 07.21 10.21 1000 6,050 6,100 6,150 6,200 6,250 6,300
Десятичный логарифм накопленной добычи жидкости
6,350 6,400

6050 6400
Ln of cumulative liquid production

• The water production ( water cut) of nearby producers stabilized

• 5 out of 7 productive wells with positive effect, WC of 2 wells not decreased
• Cumulative oil gain of cyclic injection by xi is 1188.2 Kbbl

13
 Oil gain due to cyclic injection

Water cut, %

14
 Well & Reservoir Surveillance @ WQ2

Key WRM Control Parameters

Energy State Vertical sweep Aerial Sweep:

1. Production/Injection 1. Production/Injection 1. Injection pattern
Volumes Control Conformance monitoring performance monitoring
2. Reservoir Pressure
3. VRR monitoring

WRS Surveillance Activities

1. Production/Injection rates 1. Sampling 1. Production Logging
measurement 2. Production Logging 2. Interwell Tracer Injection
2. BHP/WHP pressure 3. Sequential zonal testing 3. 4D Seismic
monitoring 4. Intrawell Tracers 4. Sampling
3. Pressure transient analysis 5. Smart Completion 5. Reservoir performance
4. Sequential zonal testing 6. Saturation logging modelling
7. Well Performance Modelling 6. Pressure Transient
Analysis (Interference
Tests)

15
 Reservoir surveillance plan for Mishrif formation
Current production & injection distribution by Mishrif units

As of 01.12.2021, PLT tests were performed in 98

wells or 77% of active well stock of Mishrif
formation.
Every day all production and injection wells
measured by flowmeters. Every active well tested
by PLT, Slickline or PDHG
Simulation model updated quarterly based on
last testing and PLT data
As per PLT results, production & injection
distribution between Mishrif units of 98 wells as
follows:
production
Net Oil Thickness, m
mA mB1 mB2 up mB2 low mC

40.3% 46.9% 10.1% 2.6% 0.01%

injection
mA mB1 mB2 up mB2 low mC

39.0% 47.6% 10.3% 3.6% 0.1%