Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Control Chart For Attributes
Control Chart For Attributes
Improvement
Chapter 9- Control
Charts for Attributes
2
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives
When you have completed this chapter you should:
Know limitations of variable control charts and the different
types of attibute charts.
Know the objectives of the p chart group and the applicable
distribution.
Be able to construct a:
Fraction defective chart- fixed subgroup size
Fraction defective chart-variable subgroup size
Percent defective chart
Number defective chart
3
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives cont’d.
4
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Attribute
The term Attribute refers to those quality
characteristics that conform to specifications
or do not conform to specifications.
Attribute are used:
5
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Attribute
A nonconformity is a departure of a quality
characteristic from its intended level or state
that occurs with a severity sufficient to cause
an associated product or service not to meet
a specification requirement.
Defect is concerned with satisfying intended
normal, or reasonably foreseeable, usage
requirement.
6
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Attribute
Defect is appropriate for use when evaluation
is in terms of usage.
Nonconformity is appropriate for conformance
to specifications.
The term Nonconforming Unit is used to
describe a unit of product or service
containing at least one nonconformity.
7
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Attribute
Defective is analogous to defect and is
appropriate for use when unit of product
or service is evaluated in terms of usage
rather than conformance to specifications.
Limitations of variable control charts:
These charts cannot be used for quality
characteristics which are attributes.
8
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Attribute
Types of Attribute Charts:
1. Nonconforming Units (based on the
Binomial distribution): p chart, np chart.
2. Nonconformities (based on the Poisson
distribution): c chart, u chart.
9
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
The P Chart is used for data that consist of the
proportion of the number of occurrences of an
event to the total number of occurrences.
It is used in quality to report the fraction or
percent nonconforming in a product, quality
characteristic, or group of quality characteristics.
10
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
Formula:
np
p
n
The fraction nonconforming, p, is usually small,
say, 0.10 or less.
Because the fraction nonconforming is very
small, the subgroup sizes must be quite large
to produce a meaningful chart.
11
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
It can be used to control one quality
characteristic, as is done with X bar and R chart,
Or to control a group of quality characteristics of
the same type or of the same part,
Or to control the entire product.
It can be established to measure the quality
produced by a work center, by a department, by a
shift, or by an entire plant.
12
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
It is frequently used to report the
performance of an operator, group of
operators, or management as a means of
evaluating their quality performance.
The subgroup size of the P chart can be
either variable or constant.
13
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
Objectives of the P Chart:
1. Determine the average quality level: This
information provides the process
capability in terms of attributes.
2. Bring to the attention of management
any changes in the average.
3. Improve the product quality: Ideas for
quality improvement.
14
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
Objectives of the P Chart cont’d:
4. Evaluate the quality performance of
operating and management personnel.
5. Suggest places to use Xbar and R chart:
They are more sensitive to variation.
6. Determine acceptance criteria of a
product before shipment to the customer.
15
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P-Chart Construction for Constant
Subgroup Size
1. Select the quality characteristic(s):
a) Single quality characteristic.
b) Group of quality characteristics.
c) A part.
d) An entire product.
e) A number of products.
f) It can be established for performance control of an
operator, work center, department, shift, plant, or
corporation
16
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Constant Subgroup Size
cont’d.
2. Determine the subgroup size and method:
The size of the subgroup is a function of the
proportion nonconforming.
A minimum size of 50 is suggested as a
starting point.
17
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Constant Subgroup Size
cont’d.
3. Collect the data:
At least 25 subgroups.
Different sources (Check sheet).
For each subgroup the proportion
nonconforming is calculated by the formula
P = np/n
18
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Constant Subgroup Size
4. Calculate the trial central line and the control
limits:
p np
n
p (1 p )
UCL p 3
n
p (1 p )
LCL p 3
n
19
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-2 A p Chart to Illustrate the Trial Central Line and
Control Limits Using the Data from Table 9-1
20
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Constant Subgroup Size
cont’d.
5. Establish the revised central line and control limits.
pnew p0
np np d
n n d
p0 (1 p0
UCL p0 3
n
p0 (1 p0 )
LCL p0 3
n
21
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-3 Continuing Use of the p Chart for Representative
Values of the Proportion Nonconforming, p
22
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
The P Chart is most effective if it is posted
where operating and quality personnel can
view it.
The control limits are usually three standard
deviations from the central value. Therefore,
approximately 99% of the plotted points, P,
will fall between the upper and lower control
limits.
23
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
A P Chart will also indicate long-range
trends in quality, which will help to evaluate
changes in personnel, methods, equipment,
tooling, materials, and inspection
techniques.
P-chart is based on the binomial
distribution.
24
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-4 Various Techniques for Presenting p -Chart Information
25
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Variable Subgroup Size
1. Collect the data.
2. Determine the trial central line and control
limits: Since the subgroup size changes each
day, limits must be calculated for each day.
26
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-5 Preliminary Data, Central
Line, and Trial Control Limits
FIGURE 9-5 Preliminary Data, Central Line, and Trial Control Limits
27
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Variable Subgroup Size
cont’d.
2. As the subgroup size gets larger, the control
limits are closer together.
3. Establish revised central line and control limits:
28
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Variable Subgroup Size
cont’d.
If Po is known, the process of data collection
and trial control limits is not necessary.
P is the proportion (fraction) nonconforming
in a single subgroup.
Pbar is the average proportion (fraction)
nonconforming of many subgroups.
29
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
P Chart Construction for Variable Subgroup Size
cont’d.
Po is the standard or reference value of the
proportion (fraction) nonconforming based
on the best estimate of PBar.
Φ is the population proportion (fraction)
nonconforming.
30
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
Minimizing the Effect of Variable Subgroup Size
1. Control limits for an average subgroup size: By using an average
subgroup size, one limit can be calculated and placed on the
control chart.
nav
n
g
p0 (1 p0
UCL p0 3
nav
p0 (1 p0 )
LCL p0 3
nav 31
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-7 Chart for May Data Illustrating Use of an
Average Subgroup Size
32
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
Minimizing the Effect of Variable Subgroup Size cont’d.
Case I: This case occurs when a point (subgroup
fraction nonconforming) falls inside the limits and
its subgroup size is smaller than the average
subgroup size.
Case II: This case occurs when a point (subgroup
fraction nonconforming) falls inside the average
limits and its subgroup size is larger than the
average subgroup size.
33
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The P Chart
Minimizing the Effect of Variable Subgroup Size cont’d.
Case III: This case occurs when a point (subgroup
fraction nonconforming) falls outside the limits and
its subgroup size is larger than the average
subgroup size.
Case IV: This case occurs when a point (subgroup
fraction nonconforming) falls outside limits and its
subgroup size is less than the average subgroup
size.
34
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-8 p Chart Illustrating Central Line and Control
Limits for Different Subgroup Sizes
35
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The np Chart
Number Nonconforming Chart (np):
The np chart is easier for operating personnel
to understand than the p chart.
The limitation that this chart has is that the
subgroup size needs to be constant.
36
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The np Chart
37
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
The np Chart
Number Nonconforming Chart (np):
If the fraction nonconforming po is unknown,
then it must be determined by collecting
data, calculating trial control limits, and
obtaining the best estimate of po.
38
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-9 Number Nonconforming Chart ( np Chart)
39
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Process Capability
For an attribute this process is much simpler.
The process capability is the central line of
the control chart.
Management is responsible for the capability.
When the plotted point is outside the control
limit, operating personnel are usually
responsible.
40
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-10 Process Capability Explanation and Responsibility
41
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
The nonconformities chart controls the count
of nonconformities within the product or
service.
An item is classified as a nonconforming unit
whether it has one or many nonconformities.
Count of nonconformities (c) chart.
Count of nonconformities per unit (u) chart.
42
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
Since these charts are based on the Poisson
distribution, two conditions must be met:
1. The average count of nonconformities
must be much less than the total possible
count of nonconformities.
2. The occurrences are independent.
43
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
Objectives:
1. Determine the average quality level: This
information gives the initial process capability.
2. Bring to the attention of management any
changes in the average.
3. Improve the product quality: Ideas for quality
improvement.
44
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
Objectives cont’d.:
4. Evaluate the quality performance of
operating and management personnel.
5. Suggest places to use Xbar and R chart.
6. Determine acceptance criteria of a
product before shipment to the customer.
45
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
C Chart construction:
1. Select the quality characteristic(s):
a) Single quality characteristic.
b) Group of quality characteristics.
c) A part.
d) An entire product.
e) A number of products.
f) It can be established for performance control of
an: operator, work center, department, shift, plant,
or corporation
46
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
C Chart construction cont’d:
2. Determine the subgroup size and method:
3. Collect the data:
At least 25 subgroups.
Different sources.
47
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
c-Chart Construction cont’d:
48
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-11 Control Chart for Count of Nonconformities ( c Chart), Using
Preliminary Data
49
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
c ne w = c 0 =
c - cd
g - gd
UCL = c 0 + 3 c0
LCL = c 0 - 3 c0
50
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
51
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
C chart construction cont’d:
52
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities/Unit
Chart for Count of Nonconformities/Unit (u Chart)
u
c
u
c
n n
u
UCL u 3
n
u
LCL u 3
n
53
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
FIGURE 9-13 u Chart for Errors on Waybills
54
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Charts for Count of Non-
conformities
Chart for Count of Nonconformities/Unit
(u Chart)
Scale selected is continuous for the u chart. For
the c chart is discrete.
Subgroup size for the u chart can vary. For the c
chart is 1.
The u chart is limited in that we do not know the
location of the nonconformities.
55
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
A Quality Rating System
Nonconformity Classification:
1. Critical nonconformities: Unsafe conditions for
individuals using, maintaining, or depending upon the
product.
2. Major nonconformities: Result in failure or reduce
materially the usability of the product for its intended
purpose.
3. Minor nonconformities: Reduce materially the usability
of the product for its intended purpose.
56
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Control Chart Selection
Quality Characteristic
Variable Attribute
Defective Defect
no
n>1? x and MR
59
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Computer Program
EXCEL/Minitab program files on the
website will solve for:
p chart
np chart
c chart
U chart
60
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved
Homework
5, 7, 16b, 23
61
Quality Improvement, 9e © 2013, 2008 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc
Dale H. Besterfield Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 • All Rights Reserved