Culture is more often a source of conflict than synergy according to Professor Geert Hofstede. He identifies 6 dimensions along which cultures can be analyzed: masculinity vs femininity, long term orientation vs short term normative orientation, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism vs collectivism, and indulgence vs restraint. Each dimension represents opposite preferences or emphases that distinguish cultures.
Culture is more often a source of conflict than synergy according to Professor Geert Hofstede. He identifies 6 dimensions along which cultures can be analyzed: masculinity vs femininity, long term orientation vs short term normative orientation, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism vs collectivism, and indulgence vs restraint. Each dimension represents opposite preferences or emphases that distinguish cultures.
Culture is more often a source of conflict than synergy according to Professor Geert Hofstede. He identifies 6 dimensions along which cultures can be analyzed: masculinity vs femininity, long term orientation vs short term normative orientation, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism vs collectivism, and indulgence vs restraint. Each dimension represents opposite preferences or emphases that distinguish cultures.
• Gender is very important in this dimension and the roles of men and women are clearly defined in countries with high scores. There are specific values which are considered to be feminine such as reaching agreements, being kind to others and building relationships. The values Masculinity considered to be masculine include being assertive, strong and competitive. There is often a clear difference between work that women do and work that men do. For those with lower scores, the roles can be exchanged and they can take on each others’ characteristics. • This dimension deals with traditional values. In cultures who score highly in this dimension, it is important to be loyal and Long-term committed to a job or to people. There is a orientation high value placed on education and training. The cultures with low scores value spontaneity and creativity as well as new ideas. • This dimension looks at the structure of power in a culture or society. Cultures with high scores have clear leaders and the space Power between leaders and those below them is distance large. Decisions are made at the top. Cultures with lower scores tend to have flatter organisations and people are considered to be more equal. Decision- making can be made at different levels. • This dimension deals with how nervous people become when they do not know what to expect. Cultures with high scores are uncomfortable when they do not know what Uncertainty to expect. They like to follow guidelines Avoidance which have been set out. Those with lower scores do not like to follow rules and accept both change and risk more easily. They often look at the long-term goals rather than what is happening at the moment. • This dimension deals with the relationships people have with each other. In cultures with Individualis high scores people have fewer interpersonal relationships. They depend more on m themselves. Those with a low score are very loyal to the group they belong to. Harmony is essential in groups.
Juan Ignacio Oliva-Cruz, Antonia Navarro-Tejero and Jorge Diego Sánchez. Revolving Around India(s) : Alternative Images, 313. 64.99. ISBN: 9781527545243