Communicating about

Risks

[Phillip G. Clampitt, Ph.D.]

12/09/21

1
1. What is risk communication?
 Communicating about relative
benefits and hazards
– benefits
– hazards
– relative “weighing alternatives”
 Examples
– Smoking
– Alcohol
– Drugs
12/09/21 2
2. Analyzing risks
 Well developed science
 Based on fault trees
 Major dimensions
– Exposure
– Effect (“who” impacted, children)
 “ … the risk may be well understood
in a statistical sense but still be
uncertain at the level of individual
events” (Morgan, Scientific American)
12/09/21 3
3. Perceptions of Risk
 Not linear or straightforward
 Two dimensions
– Ability to observe
– Ability to control
 So what?
– Perceptions change
– Reactions change
– Communications should change

12/09/21 4
12/09/21 5
4. Principles of perception
 What is a tolerable risk for some is
intolerable for others
 Trust is a critical factor
– Experts
– Science (problem of uncertainty)
 Rules of thumb vary for different
audiences
 Understanding is not the same as
agreement & participation
12/09/21 6
5. Ways of communicating
 Ancient way
– Myths, legends, rituals, metaphors
 Old way
– Expert Sender
– Concerned Receiver
 Another way
– Dialogue allowing perception of control

12/09/21 7
6. The premise of effective risk
communication
 “The essence of good risk
communication is very simple: learn what
people already believe, tailor the
communication to the knowledge and to
the decisions people face and then
subject the resulting message to careful
empirical evaluation” - Morgan
 Example: EPA’s 1st Radon brochure
never address a key myth
– Radon contamination is permanent)

12/09/21 8
7. What is your objective?
 Minimize concerns
 Inform publics of expert opinion
 Educate publics
 Persuade publics
 “provide people with a basis for
making an informed decision”
 “successful risk comm. need not
result in consensus or in uniform
personal behavior” (National Research Council)
12/09/21 9
8. Developing the strategy
 AA
– “Risk communication will suffer to the
extent that the audience(s) is
mischaracterized” National Research Council
– “People tolerate risk for reasons that
may have little to do with factual
details, formal risk estimates, or details
of risk abatement proposals” - Heath
– Perceptions in the risk grid

12/09/21 10
Strategy cont.
 Creating the right mindset
– Accept the desire for non-expert
audiences to exert control
– Recognize the value-laden nature of
risk assessment (“non-rationale”)
– Realize that you better harvest the
dissent or someone else will
– Trust the power of dialogue over
monologue

12/09/21 11
Strategy cont.
 Develop the right processes
– Collaborate with audiences in info.
Gathering, risk assessment and control
– Allow audiences to have a role in the
risk control process
– Build trust over time through
community outreach
– Allow the public to develop & practice
emergency response measures

12/09/21 12
Strategy cont.
 Facilitate the dialogue
– Acknowledge the uncertainties
– Do not trivialize concerns
– Accept criticism of data and decision
processes
– Participate in dialogue underscoring
both legitimate benefits & potential
harms
– Frame questions/concerns in terms of
experiences & values of audiences
12/09/21 13
Strategy cont.
 Assess the impact
– Focus groups
– Participation rates
– Question analysis
– Surveys

12/09/21 14
9. Implement strategy
 Not a one-time event
 Publish policy statements
 Keep in contact with key audiences
 Monitor issues
– locally
– nationally
– internationally
 Revise strategy

12/09/21 15