Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Created by:
G.Dinesh Reddy - 74052100346
The bargaining power of buyers, refer to the pressure that buyers can put on
businesses to get them to provide higher quality products, better
customer service and lower prices. It is important to keep in mind that the
bargaining power of buyer analysis is conducted from the perspective of the
seller.
❖ Bargaining power of buyers
Difference between competitors
By Damini Nandi
The low price of streaming services and abundance of content , which
are on- demand, creates competitive advantage over traditional media
services.
Bargaining power of buyers
By Damini Nandi
❖ Switching cost.
There are minimal switching cost in streaming services. Viewers are not
tied to any contracts so many viewers are paying on a monthly basis
with the option to cancel subscriptions at any time which increases the
bargaining power of buyers.
Bargaining power of buyers
By Damini Nandi
❖ Price sensitivity
❖ Switching costs
Switching costs for the products that Netflix offers is relatively low which increases the
threat of substitutes, since consumers don’t incur any detrimental costs from switching
between the sources of product. The subscription prices between Netflix and their
competitors don’t drastically differ making it easy to switch from one subscription to
another. The most significant substitute for online streaming media is the physical form
of DVD’s. Some people prefer to own a physical copy of a movie or television series
rather than rent it in digital form. The movie theatres is another form of substitute as
you can access the movies as soon as they are released rather than waiting for them to
be uploaded on Netflix.
Bargaining power of suppliers
By Harshit Mahajan
Bargaining power of suppliers
By Harshit Mahajan
The supplier to streaming services are production houses who produce a show/movie/series,
However, if we look how the production houses worked on releasing in the past, we see that, They used to produce, for a example a movie and
it used to stream in theatres and used to last 90 days maximum on average and for a show it had fix timing to air on televisions, this gave rise
to streaming services which provided customers with attractive options to consumers.
But with the introduction of streaming services with major companies like Netflix , Amazon prime , etc. Now a customer can watch any
movie/show/series anytime anywhere. This was a gave the production House another reason to make a contract with streaming service
providers.
However everything comes with a threat and counterattack
Bargaining power of suppliers
By Harshit Mahajan
The suppliers currently has also started their own streaming platforms which provides their content to be
used by the customers. This gets production houses 100% of the stream income, however this is a threat to
other streaming services as they lose customers on that content. There are many examples to this like
Discovery channel starting their own streaming services Discovery+, Zee tv starting their own Zee 5,Sony
tv with Sony liv, etc.
Bargaining power of suppliers
By Harshit Mahajan
Streaming service providers in order to counter the supplier threat have started producing their own
show/movie/series this content which is exclusively available only on their platform. The attracts more
Customers as it has no runtime on theatres and television. Currently globally and nationally every
Streaming service provider is producing content, for example Netflix original series like sacred games,
Delhi crime which are exclusively only on Netflix.
Threat of new entrants
By Vipasha Jain
Threat of new entrants
By Vipasha Jain
❖ Barriers to entry
Barriers to entry are high for a new entrant who doesn’t already
produce their own video content due to the extremely high
investment needed in either producing new content or
acquiring content from big players.
For established organisation in the entertainment industry the
barriers to entry are fairly low as they will be also to
immediately launch the service with their own content and can
already have a fan base for the organisation as a whole or for a
specific series.
Threat of new entrants
By Vipasha Jain
❖ Customer loyalty
Ownership has been largely replaced with so-called
subscription commerce in streaming services.
While convenient this approach depends on
consumer loyalty streaming services have to retain
customers who might only subscribe to particular
show when that show ends some might flee or
change services. Netflix customer satisfaction
dropped by 1% from 79% to 78% when Disney new
streaming service to launch. Netflix announced a
drop in US customers
Threat of new entrants
By Vipasha Jain
❖ Capital requirements
Another barriers facing new entrant to the
market is acquiring the network capacity to hold
a significant amount of video content as well as
support substantial website visit without
crashing. This capability is expensive and this
high capital expenditure will prevent loss
established competitions from entering the
business. Streaming services also spend too much
on advertising to attract new subscriber.
Threat of new entrants
By Vipasha Jain
❖ Government policies
In in the streaming service, syndication deals,
licensing agreement and other streaming services
makes it hard for broadcasters to offer exclusive
content. To major impediment to becoming an
online video streaming service is acquiring, creating
and licensing content.
In India over the top (OTT) streaming services like
Prime video , Netflix, Disney+ Hotstar are regulated
by ministry of information and broadcasting.
Threat of new entrants
By Vipasha Jain
❖ Switching costs
Switching cost for the product in streaming service is relatively low
which also increase the threat of substitute. Since consumer doesn’t
Incur any determinant cost from switching between the sources of
product Netflix manage to prevent customers from ditching it service
due to high stitching cost
Threat of new entrants
By Vipasha Jain
❖ Number of competitors
Over the past few years, competition among video streaming services has increased rapidly,
and COVID-19 pandemic has supercharged this competition. There are many competitors in
this industry, all providing different types of content. One of the major one being Google’s
YouTube, which has around 2 billion users out of which 30 million are paid ones.
High number of competitors is a boon for the end consumer and a curse for someone who
wants to enter this industry without having an existing traditional broadcasting service.
Rivalry among existing competitors
By G.Dinesh Reddy
❖ Diversity of competitors
Competitors are very diverse, some of them are traditional broadcasters, like HBO, NBC peacock,
BBC, Disney+, etc. Some of them produce their own content, like Amazon and Netflix. And finally
there are those who merely buy streaming rights.
For example, Amazon not only allows its users to watch movies and TV shows, they also provide
additional services like music streaming, fast deliveries and commercial offers for their “prime
members”.
One of the major reason behind this diversity is the quality difference among the competitors
Rivalry among existing competitors
By G.Dinesh Reddy
❖ Switching costs
Switching cost is relatively low because, the servers on which the
content is stored are often times leased form another company. For
example Netflix uses Amazon web services for providing their own
service.
Hence in the event of closure, servers can be repurposed and streaming
rights can be sold to some other vendor.
Rivalry among existing competitors
By G.Dinesh Reddy
❖ Industry growth
The global video streaming market size was valued at
$50.11 billion in 2020. It is expected to expand at a
compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.0% from 2021
to 2028. Innovations, such as blockchain technology and
artificial intelligence, to improve video quality are
expected to boost the market growth. AI is playing an
essential role in editing, cinematography, voice-overs,
scriptwriting, and several other aspects of video
production and upload.