The Naresh Chandra Committee was appointed in 2002 to examine corporate governance issues in India. It recommended that auditors should be independent and prohibited from providing non-audit services. It suggested auditor rotation every 5 years, audit partner rotation, and limiting fees from a single client to 25% of revenue. The committee also recommended strengthening disclosures, qualifications in audit reports, replacing auditors only via special resolution, and establishing boards to monitor audit quality. It suggested penalties for auditors involved in unethical practices.
Original Description:
Original Title
Naresh Chandra Committee Report on Corporate Audit And
The Naresh Chandra Committee was appointed in 2002 to examine corporate governance issues in India. It recommended that auditors should be independent and prohibited from providing non-audit services. It suggested auditor rotation every 5 years, audit partner rotation, and limiting fees from a single client to 25% of revenue. The committee also recommended strengthening disclosures, qualifications in audit reports, replacing auditors only via special resolution, and establishing boards to monitor audit quality. It suggested penalties for auditors involved in unethical practices.
The Naresh Chandra Committee was appointed in 2002 to examine corporate governance issues in India. It recommended that auditors should be independent and prohibited from providing non-audit services. It suggested auditor rotation every 5 years, audit partner rotation, and limiting fees from a single client to 25% of revenue. The committee also recommended strengthening disclosures, qualifications in audit reports, replacing auditors only via special resolution, and establishing boards to monitor audit quality. It suggested penalties for auditors involved in unethical practices.
Governance Contents Introduction Prohibition of non-audit services Independence of auditors Disclosures Qualification in Audit Report Replacing auditors Formation of board for monitoring audit process Penalties Corporate Governance is the system of rules, practices and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. Introduction While SEBI was making efforts to introduce corporate governance standards among Indian corporates, the Department of Company Affairs (now MCA) took another initiative in this direction. The Naresh Chandra Committee was apppointed as a high level committee to examine various corporate governance issues by the department of company affairs on August 21, 2002. It has taken forward the recommendations of Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee on Corporate Governance which was setup by the SEBI. Recommendations Set-up against the background of massive accounting frauds in companies abroad, the Committee on corporate audit and governance headed by the former Cabinet Secretary, Naresh Chandra, has recommended the CEOs and CFOs of listed companies and public limited companies with paid-up capital and free reserves exceeding Rs.10cr. or turnover exceeding Rs.50cr. should certify the correctness of the annual audited accounts of such companies should be rotated every 5 years. Other recommendations compulsory audit partner rotation partners and atleast 50 percent of the engagement team (excluding article clerks and trainees) are responsible for the audit If required, such rotated personnel could be allowed to return after a break of 3 years. a special resolution, disclosing the reasons, be required whenever an auditor, who is otherwise eligible for re-appointment, is proposed for that client. Prohibition of Non-audit Services It is recommended that auditors should be prohibited from providing non-audit services concurrently with audit review services. Non-audit services include book keeping, internal audit, investment advice, legal advice and financial and information system design. Independence of Auditors All the committees insisted upon independence of auditors, but this committee insisted much on auditor’s independence in the following lines: Prohibition of direct financial interest in the audit client by the audit firms receiving any loan and/or guarantees from or on behalf of the audit client by the audit firm audit partners and other associated persons from joining an audit client or key personnel of the audit client wanting to join the audit firm, for a period of 2 years from the time they were involved in the preparation of accounts and audits of the client.
undue dependence on audit client by ensuring that
fees received by a firm from any client and its subsidiaries should not exceed 25% of the total revenue of the audit firm, providing certain exceptions in case of small audit firms. business relationship with the audit client by the audit firms, its partners or any member of the engagement team and their direct relatives. audit firms from performing certain non-audit services. Disclosures Full disclosures of accounts and decisions of management involving the funds of the company to all its stakeholders is a need of good corporate culture. The auditors should disclose implications of contingent liabilities so that investors and shareholders have a clear picture of contingent liabilities. Qualification in Audit Report In addition to the existing provisions in the Companies Act regarding qualifications in audit reports, the committee has made further recommendations that the auditor should read out the qualifications with explanations to shareholders at the company’s AGM and audit firm is mandated to send separately a copy of the qualified report to the ROC, SEBI and Principal Stock Exchange with a copy of the letter of the management of the company. Replacing Auditors In the event of an auditor being appointed in the place of a retiring auditor, the committee has recommended that Section 225 of the Companies Act be amended to require a special resolution for the purpose and that an explanatory statement giving reasons for such replacement be provided. The outgoing auditor will have the right to comment on the statement. Formation of Board for Monitoring Audit Process The committee has suggested setting up of the Corporate Serious Fraud Office with specialists inducted into a multi-disciplinary team that not only uncovers the fraud but is able to direct and supervise prosecutions under various economic legislations through appropriate agencies. Three independent quality review boards be constituted, one each for the ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI to periodically examine and review the quality of audit and cost accounting firms and pass judgment and comments on the quality and sufficiency of systems and practices. Penalties According section 539 of the Companies Act, 1956, if an auditor is found to be involved in unethical practices he will be punishable with imprisonment , which may extend to 7 years also be liable to a fine.
u/s 21 of Chartered Accountants Act, such an
auditor will be prevented from exercising his duty and his License will be cancelled by the ICAI. End Note It was suggested that corporate governance practices should be followed by companies should be rated using rating models. Companies should be rated, based on the parameters of wealth generation, maintenance as well as on corporate governance. There are several corporate structures available in the developed world, but there is no one structure, which can be singled out as being better than the others. The committee’s recommendations are not, therefore, based on any one model, but, are designed for the Indian environment. Its fundamental objective is not mere fulfillment of the requirements of law, but, in ensuring commitment of the Board in managing the company in a transparent manner for maximizing long-term shareholder value. Abbreviations used- i. CEO - Chief Executive Officer ii. CFO - Chief Financial Officer iii. AGM - Annual General Meeting iv. ROC - Registrar of Companies v. SEBI - Securities and Exchange Board of India vi. ICAI - Institute of Chartered Accountants of India vii. ICSI - Institute of Company Secretaries viii. ICWAI - Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India