Professional Documents
Culture Documents
B P Ravi
Adviser [Mineral Processing], Bangalore.
Ex Professor and Head, Mineral Processing Dept., VSK University, Nandihalli
Ex Head and ODO, RMPL, IBM, Ajmer
Ex Metallurgical Officer, BGML, KGF,
Ex Asst. Metallurgist, HGML [CU], Kalyadi.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Experimental
3. Results and Discussion
4. Bulk flotation of sulphides and arsenide
4.1 Characteristics of the sample
4.2 Effect of activator Copper sulphate dosage on bulk flotation of sulphides and arsenide
4.3 Effect of collector dosage on bulk flotation of sulphides and arsenide
4.4 Effect of % solids on bulk flotation of sulphides and arsenide
4.5 Final bulk flotation of sulphides and arsenide for bulk production
5 Micro pelletization / granulation studies on desulphurized tails
5.1 Characteristics of the desulphurized tails
5.2 Effect of pelletizer rpm
5.3 Effect of angle of inclination of pelletizer
5.4 Effect of binder OPC concentration
5.5 Effect of combination of binder concentration
6 Final test and Conclusions
Acknowledgements
100 100
80 85
C wt% for U/s
80
60
46
40
40
33.3
20 25
0
10 100
Size in Micron Size vs C Wt% for
U/s
07/23/2022 6
XIV NSMTA-2018 MCP HCL 2122018
4.3 Effect of activator copper sulphate dosage;
The activator copper sulphate dosage was varied from 0, 1 and 2 kg/t at MOG D80
0.06mm, %S, 0.1 kg/t KAX collector and 20 % Solids. The results are shown in Fig 2. The
results indicate that optimum results with selectivity and 85% S recovery was obtained at
1 Kg/t CuSO4 similar to findings of Ravi et.al. (2003 and 2013).
Fig.2; Effect of CuSO4dosage
86
84
82
80
%S Distn.
78
76
74
72
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
CuSO4Kg/t
80
70
60
50
%S Distn.
40
30
20
10
0
0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26
KAX kg/t
85.4
85.2
85
84.8
84.6
%S Distn
84.4
84.2
84
83.8
83.6
83.4
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38
% Solids by wt.
50
Fig5 Effect Of Rpm 4
45 45 3.4
3.5
40 37.5
C -STRENGTH
3 3
35
30 2.7 2.5
25 33 2
% SAND
20 21 1.5
15
1
10 0.5
5 0.5
0 0
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 RPM
50VS %SAND
RPM RPM VS C-STRENGTH"
07/23/2022 XIV NSMTA-2018 MCP HCL 2122018 12
5.2 Effect of binder OPC concentration
Review of literature indicated that OPC consumption for mine back fill varied from 4 to8% in CPB.
Hence, OPC binder dose was varied from 5 to 10% with 2.5% step. The results are shown in Table 4 &
Fig 6 The results indicate that the crushing strength and drop number increased with binder dosage.
Hence, the binder dosage was kept at maximum of 10%.
Table 4 ; Effect of Binder OPC concentration
Yield %-6m Wt% Drop CS
Particulars %OPC
+0.2mm of yield Sand No Kg/Cm2
Variable OPC% 5.0 % 90 50 45.0 17 3.0
45 degrees, 7.5% 98 50 49.0 17 3.0
moisture 11%, rpm 25 10.0% 99 45 44.6 25 3.5
C -STRENGTH
47 3.3
% SAND
3.2
46
45 3.1
45 3 3
44.6
44 3
2.9
43 2.8
42 2.7
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
%OPC %OPC VS %SAND
%OPC VS C-STRENGTH
07/23/2022 XIV NSMTA-2018 MCP HCL 2122018 13
5.3 Effect of angle of inclination
The angle of inclination of the disc pelletizer was varied from 30 to 60 degrees keeping rpm, moisture, OPC
% constant. The results are given in Table 5 & Fig 7. Balling mainly depends on inclination of disc which
primarily affects the angle of repose. The extent to which charge is lifted along the kidney shaped trajectory
and size of the zone occupied by charge are functions of the angle of repose of the material being pelletized
which itself is dependent on angle of inclination of disc. At lower inclination the angle of repose will be small.
This yields coarser pellets. At too steep an angle, not all the charge would no longer be lifted by friction
leading formation of small pellets which is needed. The tilt angle for high production rates with a minimum
diameter of 6 mm varies between 45-60 o depending on the frictional coefficient of ore and the lifting
coefficient. The rim height is also determined by the tilt angle. Filling volume is dependent on both factors.
With increasing in inclination the % desired size increased. Increase in angle of inclination and rpm favors
formation of micro pellets.
Table 5 ; Effect of angle of inclination
Fig 7 Effect of Angle
Wt 100 89.1 3.6
% % CS 90 3.5 3.5
Ang % Dr 80 3.5
Particulars +0.2 -6 Kg/ 3.4
le Sa No 70 3.3
mm mm Cm2
C -STRENGTH
60
nd 3.2
% SAND
50
35 44.6 3.1
40
3 3
Variable angle 30o 97 34 33.0 17 3.0 30
20 2.9
moisture 45o 99 45 44.6 25 3.5 10 2.8
11%,rpm 25 0 2.7
C -STRENGTH
88 3 3
No Cm2 2.5
mm yield 87
% SAND
85.5 2
Variable binder % 100:0 99 90 89.1 25 3.5 86
1.5 1.5
85
OPC : CaSO4 50:50 90 95 85.5 17 3.0 1
84 0.5
Angle 60o, moisture 11%, 20:80 94 95 89.3 7 1.5 83 0
rpm 25, Binder 10% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Particulars of bulk flotation for Product Wt% %S % Ppm %Distn %Distn % Distn
desulpharization As Au S As Au
pH 8 natural, D8060 microns, 28%S, Bulk float for reuse 16.0 6.68 4.08 1.40 80.4 83.8 64.0
0.25kg/t Ammonium hydroxide and1kg/t Pellet feed 84.0 0.25 0.15 0.15 19.6 16.2 36.0
CuSO4 with conditioning time of1’ and Head Cal 100 1.07 0.79 0.35 100.0 100.0 100.0
15’ each, 0.18kg/t KAX in 2 stages with The size analysis indicated that D100 ; 0.106 mm, D80; 0.060mm, D50; 0.050mm and
conditioning time of 1’,0.16 kg/t Pine oil D25;0.025mm. The sample contains mainly quartz (50 – 55%) occurs as aggregates with
in 2 stages with conditioning time of 1’ minor to subordinate amounts of arsenopyrite, pyrite, iron oxides-carbonates
each. The bulk flotation time was 2’ and
4’ respectively for 1 and 2 stage
Particulars of final micro pelletization test on Yield %-6mm Wt% Drop C Strength
deslulpharized dried flotation product +0.2mm of yield Sand No Kg/Cm2
1;1 binder OPC : CaSO4,Angle 60o,
90 95 89.1 25 3.5
moisture 11%, rpm 30, Binder 10%
6B Conclusions