Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development
• While there are a lot of controversies surrounding human development, you may
agree with several issues since you use as bases your own personal experiences or
the observations you make about your peers, friends, family members, etc.
• You may also quench your thirst for knowledge based on certain theories of
human development which had long been on certain theories of human
development which had long been developed and which are continuously being
develop.
• Although no single theoretical viewpoint would offer a rather satisfying
explanation of human development, each of the theories, however, may
contribute significant insights to your understanding of yourself and of others in
situations at home, in school or any place you go to.
Controversies about Human Development
1. Inherently Bad versus Inherently Good.
• Social philosophers of the 17th and 18th centuries have
portrayed children as inherently bad (doctrine of original sin),
as inherently good (doctrine of innate good), or as neither bad
nor good (doctrine of tabula rasa).
• As it turns out, each of these ideas has remained with us today
in one or more contemporary theories of human development.
• Although one may search for a theory in vain for explicit
statements about human nature, the theorist will typically
emphasize either the positive or negative aspects of children’s
character or perhaps will note that positiveness or negatives of
character depends on the child’s experiences.
• 2. Nature Versus Nurture.
• This is one of the oldest controversies.
• Are human beings a product of their heredity and other biological predispositions, or
are they shaped by the environment in which they are raised?
• Arthur Jensen (1969) has argued that heredity accounts for some of the variability in
human intelligence; most developmental researchers, however, consider this an
overestimation.
• On the other hand, B.F. Skinner (1971) believes that many human attributes are
determined largely by environment biology playing only a minor role.
• The majority of our human developmentalist now believe that the relative contributions
of nature and nurture depend on the aspect of development in question.
• However, they stress that complex human attributes such as temperament,
intelligence, and personality are the end product of a long and involved interplay
between biological predispositions and environmental forces.
• Thus, it is advisable to think less about nature versus nurture and more about how these
two sets of influences combine or interact to produce developmental change.
3. Activity Versus Passivity.
• Another theoretical controversy is the activity/passivity
issue.
• Some children are curious, activity/passivity issues.
• Some children are curious, active creatures who largely
contribute to the agents of society that treat them.
• Some are passive souls on whom society fixes its stamp.
4. Continuity Versus Discontinuity.
• Continuitytheorists view human development as an
additive process that occurs in small steps, without
sudden changes.
• In contrast, “discontinuity” or “stage” theorists believe
that the developing skill proceeds through a series of
abrupt changes, each of which elevates the child to a
new and presumably more advanced stage.
Developmental Stage
• During this stage, the repertoire of motor and mental abilities that are
open to children greatly expands.
• Parents who give their children freedom in running sliding, bike riding,
skating, and roughhousing are allowing them to develop initiative.
• Parentswho curtail this freedom are giving children a sense of
themselves as nuisances and inept intruders in an adult world.
• Rather than actively and confidently shaping their own behaviors, such
children become passive recipients of whatever the environment brings.
4. Industry Versus Inferiority (6 to 11 years).
• During the elementary school years, a child becomes concerned with
how things work and how they are made.
• As children move into the world of school, they gain a sense of
industry by winning recognition for their achievements.
• But they may instead acquire a sense of inadequacy and inferiority.
• Parents and teachers who support, reward, and praise children are
encouraging industry.
• Those who rebuff, deride, or ignore children are encouraging industry.
• Those who rebuff, deride, or ignore children’s efforts are
strengthening feelings of inferiority.
5. Identity Versus Role Confusion (12 to 18 years).
• As Erikson views intimacy, it is the capacity to reach out and make contact
with other people – to fuse one’s own identity with that of others.
• Intimacy finds expression in deep friendships.
• Central to intimacy is the ability to share with and care about another
person without fear of losing oneself in the process.
• Close involvement, however, may also result in rejection.
• Consequently, some individual pot for relationships of shallow sort.
• Their lives are characterized by withdrawal and isolation.
7. Generativity Versus Stagnation – (Middle
Adulthood)
• Bandura believes that children can learn novel responses by merely observing the
behavior of a model, making mental representations to reproduce the model’s
behavior at some future time.
• This, therefore, is a form cognitive learning, wherein children need not be reinforced
or even respond in order to learn by observing others.
• All that is required for observational learning is for the observer to pay close
attention to the model’s behavior and then store this information in memory so that
it can be retrieved for use at a later data.
• In sum, cognitive theorist like Bandura believes that human development is best
describes as a continuous human development is best described as a continuous
reciprocal interaction between children and their environments the environment
clearly affects the environment as well.
• The implication is that children are actively involved in creating the very
environments that will influence their growth and development.
THE COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY
• According to Jean Piaget, children are neither driven by undesirable instincts nor
molded by environmental influences.
• Instead, he and his followers view children as constructivists – that is, as curious,
active explorers who respond to the environment according to their understanding of
its essential features.
• Piaget’s cognitive development is an age-related change that occurs in mental
activities such as attending, perceiving, learning, thinking, and remembering.
• Piaget’s viewed intelligence as a basic life function that helps the organism adapt to
its environment.
• He added that intelligence is a form of equilibrium toward which all cognitive
structures or schema tend.
• Intellectual activity is undertaken with one goal in mind: to produce a balanced or
harmonious relationship between one’s thought processes and the environment.
Stages of Cognitive Development
1.Sensorimotor Stage (Birth to 2 years).
• During this period infants are busy discovering the relationships between sensations and motor
behavior.
• They learn, for instance, that their hands are part of themselves, whereas a ball is not. They learn
how far they need to reach in order to grasp a ball.
• Perhaps the main feature of this stage is the child’s mastery of the principle of object
permanence.
• Piaget observed that when a baby of 4 0r 5 months is playing with a ball and the ball rolls out of
sight behind another toy, the child does not look for it even thought it remains within reach.
• Piaget contended that infants do not realize that objects have an independent existence.
• This proposition explains a baby’s delight in playing peek-a-boo.
• Around the age of 8 months the child graphs the fact of object constancy and will search for toys
that disappear from view.
• Hence, during the sensorimotor stage infants become able to distinguish between various objects
and experiences and to generalize about them.
• This ability lays the groundwork for later intellectual and emotional development
2. Preoperational Stage (2 to 7 years).
• A key part of the preoperational stage is the child’s developing capacity to employ
symbols, particularly language.
• Symbols enable people to deal with things in another time and place.
• Because of symbols, children are no longer limited to the stimuli that are immediately
present.
• Children use symbols to portray the external world internally – for instance, to talk
about a ball and form a mental image of it.
• They do not have this capacity earlier. In the sensorimotor stage children “know”
about a ball in that they can roll it, throw it, or grasp it, but they cannot conceive of a
ball as an entity apart from these activities.
• Now they learn the word “ball” and use it more or less appropriately to refer to round
objects.
• Egocentrism is another characteristic of the preoperational stage.
• By this term Piaget does not mean that the child is self-serving or
selfish. Rather, children 4 and 5 years of age consider their own point
of view to be the only possible one.
• They are not yet capable of putting themselves in another’s place.
• They are unaware that the other person has point of view. A 5-year-
old who is asked why it snows will answer by saying “So children can
play in it”.
3. Stage of Concrete Operations (7 to 11 years).
• This stage is the beginning of rational activity in children.
• They come to master various logical operations, including arithmetic, class and set relationships,
measurement, and conceptions of hierarchical structures.
• Probably the aspect of this stage that has been most thoroughly investigated is the child’s growing
ability to “conserve” mass, weight, number, length, area, and volume.
• Before this stage, for instance, children do not appreciate that a ball of clay can change to a
sausage shape and still be the same amount of clay.
• Furthermore, before the stage of concrete operations, children cannot understand that when
water is poured out of a fall glass into a wider glass that the water fills only halfway, the amount of
water remains unchanged.
• Instead, children “concentrate” on only one aspect of reality at a time.
• They see that the second glass is half-empty and conclude that there is less water in it. In the stage
of concrete operations children come to understand that the quality of water remains the same.
• Piaget refers to this ability as the conservation of quality.
• This ability is usually achieved between 6 and 8 years of age.
4. Stage of Formal Operations (11 years and older).
• In this stage the child’s thought remains fixed upon the visible evidence and concrete
properties of objects and events.
• Now children acquire a greater ability to deal with abstractions.
• The adolescent can engage in hypothetical reasoning based on logic.
• Adolescents, however, respond that snow is black.
• In other words, the adolescent acquires the capacity for adult thinking.
• In the stage of formal operations, young people become capable of abstract thought
with respect to a ball.
• In addition to anticipating what will happen to a ball under various conditions, they
now can discuss it in scientific terms and test hypotheses concerning it.
• They can explain why it is that a billiard ball shot against a surface at one angle will
rebound at a particular complementary angle.
• And they can discuss Newtonian principles about the behavior of spherical objects.
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG’S THEORY OF
MORAL DEVELOPMENT