All Organic

Group Leader : Dela Cruz Von Charles

Members
Blanco Enrique
Dela Victoria Jairus
Erece Edrian
Guerrero Jason Lance
 Article A

https://news.mongabay.com/2022/05/devastated-by-a-typho
on-community-foresters-in-the-philippines-find-little-support/
 1. Identify
the Problem
 Article A problems

Problem 1 : Can community

foresters restore the destroyed
forest?

Problem 2 : A bacterial species

closely related to deadly citrus
greening disease is rapidly
evolving its ability to infect insect
hosts, and possibly plants as well.
2. How did they research for the problem?
What methods were used?

A. The researchers determine the

problem through the process of
how the authority helps the
community on rehabilitating their
location.

B. The researchers determine the

problem through a wide
variety of human activities, on
both land and ocean. The
methods used by the
researchers are
Mesoamerican Reef case
study, Quantifying N Pollution
from multiple sources,
Estimating N discharge, and
Assessing habit overlap.
 
 3. What Are the hypotheses?

a. let the b. Stop cutting trees c. Rehabilitate the

communities and start planting destroyed forest
strengthen and new ones
fortify their
environment 
 
 
There is no quantify relative
contribution between;

A.leaching crop production,

B. runoff from livestock

production

C.sewage wastewater
generated by permanent
residents and tourists to N
loading in each
watershed basin of the MAR
region

D. the extent to which these

excess nutrients overlap with
coastal ecosystems.
4. What are the experiments made?

What Are the

experiments
made
A. The researchers started an
experiment that allows the
people in that community to
rehabilitate a lot faster than
usual and also with the help of
the authorities and other
natural personnel.
 
B. The Research was
implemented to track the
source of nitrogen pollution
that are affecting the barrier
reef. When the research was
first conducted, in tropical
system such as coral reefs in
which it has much poor
nutrient waters and therefore
they adapted to their
conditions. 
5. Did the experiment prove or disprove the
hypothesis/es?
A. The experiment was approve for it is
supported by the hypothesis because
the rehabilitation of their community
was a lot easier if there are the only
the one doing it so by allowing more
authorities and personnel to help the
is much efficient.
 
B. As they are continuing their research,
they rejected their hypothesis in
which case that leaching crop
production, leaching crop
production, runoff from livestock
production,sewage wastewater
generated by permanent residents
and tourists to N loading in each
watershed basin of the MAR
region, the extent to which these
excess nutrients overlap with
coastal ecosystems. Truly affects
the barrier reefs.
 
 
What is/are the
conclusion/s?
 Conclusions
A. After the researchers
observed and finished their
experiment, they can conclude
that the experiment about
rehabilitation as their priority
solution to fix their destroyed
community was a great
response to the calamity. In
addition, they also said that if
another big one hit them and
60% of their area is still
destroyed then no further
improvement happened to
their community.
B. The results are indicative of the
complexity of the pollution issue -
even land use changes and
agricultural expansion very far
inland can have impacts to
marine ecosystems Additionally,
the researchers found that high
biodiversity habitats were more
exposed to plumes originating
from smaller, coastal watersheds.
And while tourism represented a
very small proportion of the
overall pollution, the watersheds
that contributed the most
pollution tended to also have high
number of tourists or be near
those that did.