You are on page 1of 16

Clinical Reliability of Classification of www.mkfac.

com
Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity in
Indian Population
Dr Pradeep Moonot
FRCS (Orth)(UK), MS (Orth),
DNB (Orth), MD (Res)(Lond)
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Mumbai/Hyderabad/Surat/Pune

Dr Nrutik Patel
MS (Orthopaedic), Fellowship in Foot and Ankle Surgery(Mumbai)
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Ahmedabad

Dr Prashant Pawar
DNB (Orthopaedic), Fellowship in Foot and Ankle Surgery(Mumbai)
Mumbai
INTRODUCTION
www.mkfac.com

• Classification system has been described for Flatfoot deformity.


• Recently, Consensus Group of American Orthopaedic Foot and
Ankle Society has given classification and termed the whole
spectrum of deformity as “Progressive Collapsing Foot
Deformity” (PCFD)
• In this classification Deformity has been classified in 2 Stages
and 5 Classes.
Consensus Group
Classification of PCFD www.mkfac.com

Stage of deformity
Stage 1- Flexible
Stage 2- Rigid
Classes
Class A – Hindfoot valgus deformity
[Clinical/Radiological finding- Hindfoot Valgus Alignment, Increased Hindfoot Moment Arm, Hindfoot
Alignment Angle, Foot and ankle offset]
Class B – Midfoot /Forefoot Abduction
[Decreased Talar head coverage, Increased Talonavicular coverage angle, Presence of Sinus Tarsi
Impingement]
Class C – Forefoot Varus / Medial Column Instability
[Increased Talus-1st MT Angle, Planter Gapping 1st TMT joints/NC joints]
Class D – Peritalar Subluxation/ Dislocation
[Significant subtalar joint subluxation/ subfibular impingement]
Class E – Ankle Instability
[Valgus tilting of ankle joint]
Material & Method
www.mkfac.com

• Single centeric, prospective study conducted from April 2021 to March


2022 at Mumbai Knee Foot Ankle Clinic, Mumbai, India.
• 38 Patients with total 50 feets were included in our study and
evaluated both clinically and Radiologically.
• Frequencies of each stage and class were assessed in accordance of
PCFD classification.
• Exclusion criteria were defined prior to this study.
• Exclusion criteria were underage patients (age < 17 years) , History of
any hindfoot or midfoot surgery, H/O Neuromuscular diseases and
Peripheral Neuropathy.
What we studied? www.mkfac.com

• After evaluating each patient clinically and


radiologically, we classified each patient
according to PCFD classification.
• After that we compared our results to the
original published data by author.
Clinical Images www.mkfac.com
Radiographic Measurement www.mkfac.com

• Saltzmann View
– Hindfoot Alignment Angle (HAA)
– Hindfoot Moment Arm (HMA)
• Foot AP view
– Talonavicular Coverage Angle (TNCA)
– Meary’s Angle ( Talo 1st MT Angle)
• Foot Lateral view
– Meary’s Angle (Talo 1st MT Angle)
– Calcaneal Pitch Angle (CPA)
– 5th MT Height
– Planter Gapping
Radiographic Measurement www.mkfac.com
www.mkfac.com
Results www.mkfac.com

• Out of total Patients, 32% were male and 68% were female.
• 12 Patients had Bilateral deformity.
• Most Common class was A(92%) followed by Class C(80%).
• The most common subclass was 1ABC (46%) [ 1-Flexible, A-
Hindfoot Valgus, B-Midfoot Abduction, C-Forefoot Varus]
followed by 1AC (24%) and 1ABCD (18%).
• Few patients had isolated deformity.
• Average Hindfoot alignment Angle was 20.9 , average Hindfoot
Moment arm was 8.19 , average Calcaneal Pitch angle was
10.2 , average Lateral meary’s angle was 13.86, average AP
Meary’s angle was 20.64 and average TNCA was 31.65 .
Comparison www.mkfac.com

• The most common subclass in our study was


1ABC (46%) [ 1-Flexible, A- Hindfoot Valgus,
B-Midfoot Abduction, C-Forefoot Varus]
followed by 1AC (24%) and 1ABCD (18%).
• In consensus group study , most common
subclass was 1ABC (25%) followed by
1ABCD(7%) and 1AB(3.6%).
Outlier 1 www.mkfac.com

In case of PCFD with Hallux valgus Talo 1 st MT Angle is not


giving accurate measurement.

So in every case , it should be better to measure Talo 2 nd MT


Angle
Outlier 2 www.mkfac.com

• 52 year female with Left sided


Normal to high arch with Hindfoot
valgus and Significant Talonavicular
uncoverage
Outlier 3 www.mkfac.com

62 year female with B/L PCFD with B/L Dorsal


Talonavicular Gapping ( Instead of Planter Gapping)
www.mkfac.com

• So these 3 cases will not fit in this


classification system.
• We will look forward to improve classification
system and its reliability.
www.mkfac.com

Thank You

You might also like