Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ROLE OF MANAGERS
(support by HR)
MANAGING PERFORMANCE
FOR ACHIEVEMENT OF
DESIRED RESULT.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
HAS BEEN A PARTICULARLY
DIFFICULT AND FRUSTRATING
CHALLENGE FOR COMPANIES
ROLE OF MANAGERS
(support by HR)
• HELPING EMPLOYEES UNSDERSTAND WHAT IS EXPECTED OF
THEM TO ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
• HELPING THEM MEET THESE EXPECTATIONS SUCCESFULLY
• EVALUATING PERFORMANCE AND PROVIDING FEEDBACK
• PROVIDING MEANINGFUL
RECOGNITION AND REWARD
Variables which influence
performance are controllable
by management
• Hard-working
individual withaut the
necessary skills,
abilities, or knowledge
are not likely to achive
much on their jobs.
• Effort is a prerequisite
for performace.
EFFORT DEPENDS ON:
1. Introduction
2. Performance Appraisal
3. Designing Effective Performance Appraisal
3. Key Success Factors & Critical Element
Introduction
HR Management, Definition
Organization’s Strategy
Human Resource
Implementation Plan
Strategic HR Deliverables
Ultimate Goal
Maximizing contribution to achieve business objective
Purposes
• Lead to optimum performance and optimize potensial
• Provide ongoing development cycle ( planning, coaching & counseling,
and feedback )
• Develop on going comunication
• Identify potensial, development need, and near future advancement
• Provide input for salary administration
Characteristics
• As a part of Performance Management System
• Future oriented
• Continuing process
• Measurable and observables
• Simple and easy implement
• Open and constructive system
• Empowering
• Motivating
• Development purpose
• For all employee
Objectives
1. Identifying & evaluating performance
• List of accomplishment
• Appraisal system
• Feedback
• Competency measurement
• Observation
The Strategy
• Appraisal Sytem :
Appraisal - PA Interview - PA Form
• Inter Relation with other HRM :
HR Planning - Learning&Development - Compensation&Benefit -
Carier&Planning
• Not Merely for remuneration adjusment
1.
Next Superior • Employee Participates
• Competency based
• Accomplish based
• Next leader involvement
• Developmental
Direct Superior
Appraise
Employee
Performance Appraisal System
2. Direct Superior
Appraise
Advantage Disadvantage
• Reliable • Peers often are insufficient as the only source
• Valid • Not enough staff at the same level to provide
• Highly Credible quality feedback
• Differences in experience, education, and
work responsbility can create concern about
abilities to provide high quality information
Perfomrance Appraisal System
Direct
3. Superior Other
Self
Appraise Superior
Advantage Disadvantage
• Higher Accuracy • F/B providers avoid “saying what need to be
• Provide F/B from heard”
all direction ; internal • Rater may inflate grades
& external customer • System manipulation by user
Design Effective Performance Appraisal
4 element to be appraised
1. Traits approach
Distinguishing Quality ( as inherited characteristic )
Examples :
• inisiative • judgment • enthusiasm
• effort • creativity • versality
• dependability • attitude • self control
• leadership • maturity • accuracy
• analytical • critical thinking
2. Task approach
Job, duty, assigment
Example :
• knowing the job
• handling people
• Meeting deadlines
• Following through
3. Goals approach
The result desire in the job ( KPI )
Examples :
Goal setting
• Define the overall purpose of the job
Agree main tasks • Identify main tasks
• Define what and why it has to be done
• Identify Key Result Areas from the
Set Target list of main tasks
• Quantified & Time base
Define Perfomance • Define in outcomes & quantified terms
Standards
Cultural
Players
Aspects
Key
Success
Factors
System Communication
Problems Identification
Karyawan tidak
tahu kategori PA
•Kekecewaan
karyawan akan
nilai PA
•PA dianggap
kurang objektif
PA tidak menilai
performance kerja
aktual
Karyawan tidak
mengetahui Goal
Performance aktual ≠ Performance &
Kategori PA kategori PA
AS
Grade
% Jumlah
KU 0.0 0
CU 3.0 1
BA 90.9 30
BS 6.1 2
IS 0.0 0
TOTAL 100.0 33
PA Methods
Tools Advantages Disadvantages
Graphic Rating Scale Simple to use Standards maybe unclear
Quantitative rating Halo effect
Central tendency
Leniency
Bias
BARS Behavior Anchor Difficult to develop
BARS is very accurate
1. Setting Goal
Performance or KPI