Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment
Classroom Practice
AUTUMN 2017
AGENDA
10:00 Summary of principal examiners reports – general comments and specific units
10:30 Refreshments
15:30 Finish
GCE DATA
A2
910 80 49.7
Unit 3
A2
907 80 41.5
Unit 4
GRADE BOUNDARIES 2017
A* 65 57
A 46 (42) 46 (53) 58 51
B 39 (35) 40 (46) 51 45
C 32 (29) 34 (39) 44 39
D 26 (23) 28 (33) 38 33
E 20 (17) 22 (27) 32 28
CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGES 2017
A* A B C D E
AS 2016 7.9 25.8 49 70.1 84.2
Unit grade
Unit Weightings Maximum unit uniform mark A B C D E
Unit 1 (15%) 75 60 53 45 38 30
Unit 2 (25%) 125 100 88 75 63 50
Unit 3 (30%) 150 120 105 90 75 60
Unit 4 (30%) 150 120 105 90 75 60
Qualification grade
Maximum uniform marks A B C D E
GCE AS 200 160 140 120 100 80
GCE A level 500 400 350 300 250 200
Uniform marks correspond to unit grades as follows:
The uniform marks obtained for each unit are added up and the subject grade is based on this total.
At A level, Grade A* will be awarded to candidates who have achieved a Grade A (400 uniform marks) in
the overall A level qualification and at least 90% of the total uniform marks for the A2 units (270 uniform
marks).
EXAMINATION DATES FOR 2018
2017 papers and mark schemes available on the secure website only –
moved to the open website 6 months after results day.
REFLECTION ON SUMMER 2017 EXAMS:
Principal Examiner’s Report Summary (AS)
UNIT 1:
• There were some very impressive scripts which met all the assessment
objectives – all questions were accessible. The vast majority completed the
paper.
• There are a significant number of candidates unable to deal with tasks
involving straightforward quantitative skills. Poor presentation and
reluctance to write out formulae characterised far too many scripts.
• The need to fully understand the framework in which organisations operate is
an essential element in this paper. It was surprising that a considerable
number of candidates could not appreciate the differences between the
public and private sectors. (Q3b).
• The specific problems facing new start-up businesses must be appreciated in
order to address many of the tasks set in this paper. In Q2b far too many
candidates made no reference whatsoever to the financial issues that
hamper new businesses when trying to achieve their goals.
REFLECTION ON SUMMER 2017 EXAMS:
Principal Examiner’s Report Summary (AS)
UNIT 2:
• There were some very impressive scripts which met all the assessment
objectives – all questions were accessible. The vast majority completed the
paper.
• Knowledge of two areas of the specification was somewhat disappointing – the
limitations of the Boston Matrix and Budgeting.
• Marks were lost by many candidates because they failed to apply their
responses to the specific scenario in which the tasks were set. This was
particularly the case in relation to the distribution channels used by Heinz (Q1:4)
and the business environment at Carlton plc’s new distribution operation (Q3:4).
• The inability of candidates to reach the top bands in relation to evaluation was
significant. Conclusions offered were often mere repetition of points
already made and not an overall statement that made a judgement or said
something of significance.
• The ability to plan longer responses and communicate them effectively was
lacking in many scripts. As an idea sprung to mind, so it would be included,
leading to disjointed and poorly presented responses.
REFLECTION ON SUMMER 2017 EXAMS:
Principal Examiner’s Report Summary (A2)
UNIT 3:
• Good knowledge on section (a) type questions. Candidates were able to
demonstrate technical ability during calculation work leading to many
scoring full marks.
AS A
Boston Matrix Mission Statements
Lean Production Outsourcing
Total Quality Management Change
Marketing technology Capital Employed
Workforce planning Interpreting Balance Sheets
Budgets PED/YED
ISSUES ARISING FROM SUMMER 2017:
Total Quality Management (TQM)
Candidates’ Performance:
The Facility Factor (FF) for an item expresses the Mean Mark as a percentage of
the Maximum Mark. It indicates the accessibility of the question to the candidates.
The FF for this question was the lowest of all the questions in Unit 2, indicating that
candidates found this area of the specification particularly challenging. Whilst some
candidates were able to offer suggestions as to how TQM might be achieved within
an organisation, the overall appreciation of the concept was weak.
ISSUES ARISING FROM SUMMER 2017:
Total Quality Management (TQM) (cont.)
Greater
empowerment
Customer
Communication
orientation
TQM
A Philosophy
Continual Monitoring
Improvement Performance
Strategic
Planning
ISSUES ARISING FROM SUMMER 2017:
Budgets
Candidates’ Performance:
The Facility Factor for an item expresses the Mean Mark as a percentage of the
Maximum Mark. It indicates the accessibility of the question to the candidates. The
FF for this question was low, indicating that candidates found this area of the
specification particularly challenging. Whilst some candidates were able to analyse
and evaluate the impact of setting budgets in relation to the success of an
organisation, generally responses were brief and failed to address the task in
hand.
ISSUES ARISING FROM SUMMER 2017:
Budgets (cont.)
Pros Cons
Prioritises and controls spending Everyone must be involved or lack of
commitment and demotivation may
Monitoring - changes must be result.
explained and reactions made
Poor quality information must be
Allocates responsibilities and improves avoided - managers must not
accountability overstate their needs.
Efficient use of resources in relation Inflexible budgets do not allow for
to achieving objectives change in the marketplace -
competitors activities need to be
Motivates staff by setting targets that countered.
need to be met
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
Question: Explain the ways in which Officequip plc could have benefitted
from internal economies of scale as a result of increasing its output. [6]
(Summer 2017 Eduqas AS Component 2)
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
Question: Explain the ways in which Officequip plc could have benefitted
from internal economies of scale as a result of increasing its output. [6]
(Summer 2017 Eduqas AS Component 2)
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
Evaluative questions will
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
AO1: Knowledge
“Such as” does not
indicate you have to use
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
WHICH AO’S ARE BEING ASSESSED?
AO1: Knowledge
AO2: Application
AO3: Analysis
AO4: Evaluation
UNDERSTANDING SKILLS REQUIREMENT:
AO3/AO4
Discussion:
• How confident are you at sharing what skills are
needed with your students in exam questions?
• How would you help students decide on the
skills to demonstrate in answers?
UNDERSTANDING SKILLS REQUIREMENT:
AO3/AO4
• Explain the importance of entrepreneurs and SMEs to the primary, secondary and tertiary
sectors of the UK economy
• Evaluate the impact of entrepreneurs and SMEs on businesses and the economy
Evaluate the importance of SMEs such as Ranjit’s business to the UK economy. [6]
Over lunch:
• Have you got any resource ideas to share that could cut
down delivery time in the content-heavy AS
specification?
TEACHING AS CONTENT IN TIME TO EACH OF
THE ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES
A level weightings:
Example of how to teach AO’s across one topic and to save time
when delivering the large AS specification:
1. INTRODUCTION
2. ARGUMENT – managing change is important
Point Evidence Explain
Overcome employee resistance
Improve financial performance
Gain market share
4. CONCLUSION
COMPARATIVE JUDGEMENTS
Task
Delegates to refer to Specimen Answers booklet in CPD pack.
• Why have you ranked them in that order? Why were marks
awarded for each AO. Discuss.
QUANTITATIVE SKILLS:
Specification Expectations
These resources:
• Explain what students might be expected to calculate (and what they don’t need
to calculate e.g. index numbers)
• Explains in detail the method for each calculation along with a worked example
• Provides practice questions
• Provides the answers to questions
QUANTITATIVE SKILLS:
Common pitfalls and mistakes
1. Stating a final incorrect answer without any workings and thus gaining 0
marks
Advice: show workings for calculations – method marks could be gained even if
final answer is incorrect
2. Not labelling or incorrect labelling of results e.g. not including ‘£’, not
providing correct ‘units’ (e.g. using £ sign for breakeven quantity), not realising
elasticity is a unit free measure (e.g. including a £ or % sign)
Advice: label fully and be aware of different labels for different measures
3. Not realising amount of monetary units in data (e.g. £000’s, £m, £bn) and
interpreting figures incorrectly e.g. JD sports net profit being £92 and
interpreting this as being very low, without realising that in the table all figures
were in £m).
Advice: Advice: ensure all data is read fully, accurately and in context.
QUANTITATIVE SKILLS:
Common pitfalls and mistakes (cont.)
• Not being able to read index numbers from a graph or table and being able to
interpret it correctly (practice using the quantitative skills resources on WJEC)
• Not being able to label a critical path correctly – ensure students label CP correctly
with //
– Better for student to be able to construct instead of just completing so they have
the depth of knowledge (same for other topics e.g. cash flow)
• Not using the data rather than overlooking it (being confident in what it shows). Using
numbers from text (reading data carefully to extract information)
• Being clear on how to calculate formulas e.g. capital employed being shareholders’
funds + long term liabilities
Common errors
• Incorrect formulas
• Incorrect calculations
• Incorrect/no labelling (e.g. no £ sign)
For each unit a candidate has sat, the mark achieved on each item is given.
ITEM LEVEL DATA:
1. Item Level Summary (Candidates)
Click the candidate’s name to compare his/her performance with other candidates in the centre and overall as a
report.
ITEM LEVEL DATA:
1. Item Level Summary (Candidates)
Click the ‘DOWNLOAD DATA’ icon for a complete set of candidate data that
can be viewed and manipulated as a spread sheet.
ITEM LEVEL DATA:
2. Centre Performance in Context
This is used to see how your centre performed, relative to other centres with
WJEC and is accessed via the Results tab.
This gives (for each item) the mean, facility factor and attempt %, for all candidates
as well as males and females separately.
ITEM LEVEL DATA:
Using the Item Level Data
Free subject specific resources available for all to download from our website:
http://www.wjec.co.uk/qualifications/business-studies/r-business-gce-as-a/
Our free Online Exam Review allows teachers to analyse item level data,
critically assess sample question papers and receive examiner feedback:
http://oer.wjec.co.uk/