Final Traffic

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS
UNIVERSITY
Department: B.Tech planning 5th semester
Traffic and Transportation planning
Old Malakpet(Hyderabad)
Submitted to:-
Mr. Tausif
Mr. Sai seshidhar
Contents:-
1. Introduction - demography and history of malakpet

2. Exisitng landuse
3. Road inventory
4. House hold survey
5. Traffic Volume count
6. Speed & delay
7. Spot speed
8. origin destination
9. employment and establishment
10. Parking survey
11. pedestrian survey
12. pedestrian volume count
13. Public transport survey
14. Boarding & alighting
15. IPT
16. non motorized
17. hawkers and vendors
AIM :
To study the existing situation of the Old Malakpet, analysing the data and addressing the issues by providing necessary
recommendations related to traffic and transportation.
OBJECTIVES :
• To observe and notify the traffic flow patterns , traffic management techniques and other parameters that can help enhance the
existing situation
• Conduct traffic surveys related to transportation study such has , TRAFFIC VOLUME , PEDESTRIAN SUREVY , PARKING SURVEY , ORIGIN
DESTINATION , etc .
SCOPE OF THE STUDY : EXPECTED OUTCOMES :
In line with the specific objectives of the study described above, the scope of work is
divided roughly into the following areas of activities as follows : 1. EFFICIENY – to achieve efficient
• Collecting household, land use, and travel demand data management of existing resources
• Development and operation of an urban transport model 2. QUALITY - to reduce the negative
• Formulation of transport strategy and institutional mechanism impact of transportation
• Identification of a phased program of transport investments and management proposal 3. EQUITY – to make commutation
accessible by all the communities
STUDIES CARRIED OUT :
1. OD survey 6. Hawkers & Vendors survey 11. House-hold survey
2. Volume count 7. Pedestrian volume count 12. Spot speed survey
3. Pedestrian study 8. Non motorised vehicle survey 13. Employment establishment survey
4. Parking studies 9. IPT survey 14. Boarding & alighting
5. Road Inventory 10. Public Transport survey
THE STUDY METHODOLOGY ADOPTED CAN BE BROADLY DIVIDED IN TO
FIVE STAGES.
Stage 2: Collection of Stage 4: ideate

Stage 1: Stage 3: Analysis the Stage 5: estimating
information, and solutions considering
Finalization of exiting situation the performance of
review of existing present situation and
study methods drawing the issues proposed solutions
transport scenario. future demand
and problems
SHEET NO.
INTRODUCTION- – AIM , OBJECTIVES , TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
BASIC SURVEYS STUDIES CARRIED OUT
PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 1
(2019-2023)
SCHEDULE OF SURVEYS DONE
SURVEY TIME INTERVAL:
• MORING HOURS: 7:00am to 10:00pm
• AFTERNOOON HOURS: 12:00pm to 2:00pm
• EVENING HOURS: 4:00pm to 7:00pm
Date of survey Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
• PVC( Malakpet junction, Market

Origin
junction, yashoda hospital
destination, spot Speed and delay Road inventory, land
junction,nalogonda x road junction,
11/11/2021 speed, household (Nalgonda X Roads to use, on- street and
old Malakpet junction)
(Nalgonda x Dilshuknagar) off- street parking.
• Hawkers & vendors (locations - from
roads)
start to end of Malakpet)
Traffic volume count,
speed and delay Boarding & alighting- Bus, MMTS (for
Road inventory, land
(Nalgonda X road, bus Nalgonda bus stop & yashoda
12/11/2021 Household survey use , on- street and
Moosarambagh, hospital bus stop; for MMTS Malakpet
off- street parking.
Nalgonda X Roads to railway station)
Dilshuknagar)
Traffic volume count,
Origin PVC (yashoda hospital
speed and delay
destination, spot Road inventory, on- junction,nalogonda x road junction);
(Nalgonda X road,
13/11/2021 speed, street and off- street nmv, public transport survey
Moosarambagh,
employment and parking. pedestrian survey, intermediate public
Nalgonda X Roads to
establishment transport survey
Dilshuknagar)
SHEET NO.
INTRODUCTION- – AIM , OBJECTIVES , TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
BASIC SURVEYS STUDIES CARRIED OUT
(2019-2023)
OLD MALAKPET PROFILE
PROFILE
Traffic and transportation
Co-ordinates: 17.3780° N, 78.5053° E
District: Hyderabad
• It is connected to all the major cities across the country through various State: Telangana Government Body: Greater
major and local highways. Hyderabad municipal corporation
• There IS ONE MAJOR ROAD Hyderabad-vijayawada highway. DEMOGRAPHICS:

Population: 46256
Literacy:69.9%
• OLd MALAKPET is accessible by Local bus , metro , local train( MMTS ) . Sex ratio:940
Nearby localities are malakpet , koti , Nalgonda x road.
Area: 3.02 km²
• Iconic/Important structures in old -Malakpet 1) Masjid-e-Idara Millia.
2)Panchasheel Community centre 3)Anjaneyaswamy temple,water tank TOPOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE
junction 4)Hyderabad Race course.
Old Malakpet
Average
Annual Maximum
Average Soil : Annual
elevation : 498m Red sandy with Temperature: 330 C
Rainfall : 115
above sea level areas of black mm
cotton soil. Annual Minimum
Temperature: 23.50 C
SHEET NO.
INTRODUCTION- OLD TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
PROFILE OF OLD MALAKPET
BASIC SURVEYS MALAKPET PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 3
(2019-2023)
OLD MALAKPET PROFILE
Population projection
years population population

200000
1981 15250.4688
180000
1991 21392.8
160000
2001 26042.3204
140000
2011 46256 120000
population
2021 74009.6 100000
80000
2026 93615.56189
60000
2031 118415.36
40000
2036 149784.899 20000
2041 189464.576 0
1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041
SHEET NO.
PROFILE OF OLDPROJECTION
MALAKPET TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
BASIC SURVEYS POPULATION
(2019-2023)
Key map:
Study area : old malakpet
Legend
Water Body
local streets
arterial road
boundary
collector roads
sub-arterial
recreational
mixed residential
5%
publlic and semi public
9%
commercial
Buildings N
11% residential
Scale:
7%
68%
Intsructed by :
Residential Mixed residential Mr. Tausif Iqbal
Recreational commercial Mr. Seshidhar
Public and semi public
SHEET NO.
MAPS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

LANDUSE USE MAP
(2019-2023)
Key map:
Study area : old malakpet
Legend
local streets
boundary
collector roads
sub-arterial
arterial road
Scale:
Navigation
Intsructed by :
Mr. Tausif Iqbal
Mr. Seshidhar
SHEET NO.
BASIC SURVEYS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

ROAD HIERACHY MAP
(2019-2023)
Road Inventory : It defines the process of listing down Objectives : Methodology for carrying out the survey :
or recording the contents of the transport infrastructure • To appreciate the physical characteristics of the identified road • Data is collected manually by measuring the length of
in a detailed manner. network in terms of right-of-way, carriage way, abutting landuse, the cross sectional elements, and also by visual
It provides compiled information of the status and the etc. inspection.
existing condition of a road. • To identify physical constraints and bottleneck points along the • Samples are collected where ever the road cross-
identified road network. section has variation.
Right of Way (RoW) • To assess the capacity potential of the identified road network.
Output :
The area of land, acquired publicly, for encompassing all • To identify the existing road hierarchy.
the various cross-sectional elements of the road. • To understand the existing transport situation in order to • The aspects of the physical parametersof a
develop a rational land use and transport plan and mobility road network infrastructure and the limitations
The cross-sectional elements associated
improvement measures.
include :
to it. (Source : URDPFI Guidelines,
• Carriageway 2015)
• Median
• Shoulder
• Kerb
• Footpath
• Refuge space
• Service road
• Street Median
furniture Service Carriageway Right of
Footpath Shoulder Carriageway Shoulder Footpath Service
• Layby (Pipelines for road way road
• Utilitie water sewerage,
Shoulder
storm
s water drainage,
electricity,
• Surfaced clear portion along the carriageway edge that
etc.)
supply,
Carriageway Median serves as an emergency lane for vehicles.
• Part of the road intended for vehicles moving on it, rather than for • Also acts as refuge space for vehicles, for overtaking
• Portion in-between the carriage way
pedestrians. operations, for future widening of road and for providing
which temporary diversion of traffic during road repair, etc.
• It’s width is influenced by number of lanes, design speed, design separates the traffic flow in opposite direction.
volume and road classification. • Prevents conflicts, provides space for
Kerb pedestrians to pass the road, for installing signs Footpath
• Boundaries between carriageway and shoulders or footpath. and lights • Portion of right of way of road, used for the
and also prevents glare of lights from
• Assists drainage, improves channelization and delineation of movement of pedestrian traffic only.
the
opposite
traffic flows, protects pedestrians and contributes to the safety
traffic
of the road. Layby
Service road Street furniture • Paved area at the side of the highway, designated for
• Local road that runs parallel to an expressway or highway that • Commodities added to roads, footpaths and drivers to stop in, for emergency parking, or where
provides access to the commercial development and property verges to help influence road user behavior and vehicles can wait.
bordering it, with little disruption to other traffic. assist pedestrians. • Differs from shoulder as it is only for a small part of
the road.
SHEET NO.
BASIC SURVEYS
BASIC SURVEYS INTRODUCTION TO ROAD
INVENTORY
TRAFFIC STUDIES( WORKSHOP)
7
Arterial road
(4-lane Type of Cross-section of Urban roads as
divided) per IRC standards and existing
measurements of the site.
Measurements are in metres
Arterial road
(4-lane
divided) Collector road
(2-lane)
Sub-Arterial road
(4-lane divided) Collector road
(2-lane)
Sub-Arterial road
(4-lane divided) Arterial road :
• Road primarily for through traffic, usually on a continuous route.
• Connects intra-urban places, such as CBD and outlaying residential areas or
major suburban centers.
Sub-Arterial road :
• Similar to Arterial road but offering somewhat lower level of traffic mobility.
• Provides similar functions as that of Arterial road at a lower scale.
SHEET NO.
INTRODUCTION TO ROAD
BASIC SURVEYS
INVENTORY
TRAFFIC STUDIES( WORKSHOP)
8
Local road
(with Collector road :
sidewalk) • Road for collecting and distributing traffic from and to local roads and also for providing
access to Arterial and Sub-Arterial roads.
• Acts as feeder for the Arterial and Sub-Arterial roads from local streets and vice-
versa.
Local Street :
• Street primarily for access to the residence, business or other abutting property.
• These do not carry large volumes of traffic but are the focal points of origination and
Local road termination of majority of trips in urban areas.
(Source : IRC 86, 1983)
(with
sidewalk) OBSERVATIONS:
 The existing measurements are not satisfying the standards of the cross
sections.
 Road surface was good on arterial and sub arterial roads, but condition of local
roads was not poor.
 The major land use was covered with commercial.
Motorised Vehicles Inventory

Node carriage way ( kerb to kerb) Street
no. of Shoul lighting Right of way
Road name from to Length lanes divided/undivided shoulder LHS Median RHS der (Y/N) width (m)
Nalgonda X roads Dilsuknagar Malakpet metro 16.51m 2 divided 0.4m 7.06m 2.19m 7.26m Y 16.91
Nalgonda X
Malakpet metro MGBS roads 15.4m 1 divided 0.4m 6.6m 2.7m 6.1m 0.4m Y 16.2
New market
NH 65 (A1457) metro dilsuknagar 30.81m 4 Divided 16.36m 2.53m 11.92m Y 37.01
Yashoda
Race course road hospital race club 5.7m 1 undivided 1.2m 2.8m 2.9m 0.6m Y 7.5
Hyderbad -
vijayawada Nalgonda X 1.72
highway roads new market 15.86m 3 Divided 0.9m 6.24m 2.42m 7.2m m Y 18.48
Yashoda
NH65 (A1443) hospital new market 18.98m 3 divided 8.4m 2.48m 8.1m Y 22.28
SHEET NO.
ROAD INVENTORY
BASIC SURVEYS TRAFFIC STUDIES( WORKSHOP)
9
Map showing where the measurements have be taken on Hyderabad-Vijayawada road. Bus stops on Hyderabad – Vijayawada road
Bus stops
Node ( Bus stop) Width of bus lane Lane Bus Location Types of Bus
Name of the road From to L R w.r.t. road infrastructure Bus lane Segrgation Types of Bus stop
Street lights
Shelter fences
Nalgonda X road Malakpet metro Dilsuknagar 5.06m - LHS of the road Pedestrian Crossing Kerbs Pullout bustop
Nalgonda X road Yashoda Hospital Malakpet metro - 3.38m LHS of the road Street Lights Inlane bus stop
Street lights
NH65 Nalgonda X road dilsuknagar 3.3m - LHS of the road Shelter. Kerbs Inlane bus stop
Shelter
Street lights
kerbs kerbs
NH65 dilsuknagar nalgonda X roads - 3.6m LHS of the road Fences fences Pullout bustop
Old Malakpet road Malakpet Chaderghat road 3.3m - LHS of the road Street lights Inlane bus stop
Nagarjuna sagar road Malakpet metro Nalgonda X roads 2.4m - LHS of the road street lights Inlane bus stop
SHEET NO.
BASIC SURVEYS ROAD INVENTORY TRAFFIC STUDIES( WORKSHOP)

10
Foot path inventory
LHS RHS
lightin Barrier
g free Enchroach lighting Barrier
Type (P/UP) length (m) Width (m) Encroachment (Y/N) design Type (P/UP) length (m) Width (m) ment (Y/N) free design
P 29.49 3.12 low Y N P 20.8 2.79 low Y N
P 55.31 3.72 medium Y N P 35.3 3.27 medium Y Y
P 51.24 2.85 medium Y N P 18.57 3.64 medium Y N
Encroachment
Barrier free design: 00– 25% Low
Barrier-free is a way of thinking about design to remove or replace the
things that keep a person from accessing or using their home the 25 – 50% Medium
way they need to. Barrier-free design dictates how easily you get into 50 – 75% High
and move around in your home, as well as how you approach the things 75 – 100% Very High
in your home (such as a bathroom counter).
Kerb Height – 0.3m

Observations: Median height – 0.8 m
 Footpaths near the arterial road were all paved
 All the footpaths have street lighting
 Only near new market metro barrier, free design has been observed.
 Encroachments were drastically varying between low and medium. SWOT Analysis – Road Inventory
Strength -
Issues:
Weakness Width of the cross sections were not
Footpath near Nalgonda X roads, which is of length 55m has no
satisfying the standards, which may
encroachment or any pedestrian walk.
Pictures showing the footpaths lead to traffic congestion.
Due to open defaecation and land filling, footpath is not used by any
on the Hyderabad – pedestrian. Opportunity -
Vijayawada road.
Threats Due to open defaecation near

Nalgonda X road footpath, leads to
spread of diseases
SHEET NO.

11
PROPOSALS:
• Public Toilet on Footpath
• Road Assets Management Tool
Public Toilet on Footpath: Road Assets Management Tool:

 Awareness towards sanitation and proper usage of  The projects include different tasks within the road asset management
roads and footpaths. field, related to: condition survey data collection using high
 In accordance to the Swatch Abhiyan, this public
performance equipment, pavement condition analysis, maintenance
facility on foot path can be taken place which plan analysis, road asset management system (RAMS) implementation
improves hygiene, eradicates practices of open and customization, bridges and slopes inventory, app development for
defecation and commitment to citizens and proper routine works control, analysis of new maintenance solutions.
utilization of footpath.  The RAMS is a planning tool that has a database, which stores and
presents road data information, planning short and long-term road
maintenance. The system is also used to create budgets and maximizes
economic returns of the investments made for the road network.
 This RAM system will help to improve the road network and standards
of the road cross sections so as to make the high degree of
commitment to citizens, ensuring that investments will serve to
achieve the best maintenance
http://164.100.228.143:8080/sbm/content/writereaddata/ https://www.asphaltindiana.org/docs/2-
Advisoryon20PublicandCommunuityToilet.pdf LTAP_Asset_Management_Guide.pdf
SHEET NO.

12
Household Survey
Introduction:
In order to capture the movement of persons, We visited different homes and made interview about the movements (trips) of
persons of a certain day. The survey was a sample survey and targeted persons were selected randomly from the population of
the Study area.
Purpose:
To capture people’s movement such as origin, destination, trip purpose, travel time etc.
Objectives:
• To elicit socio‐economic characteristics of the household
• To elicit travel characteristics of the household (total trips, purpose of trips, mode used, trip length,
trip origin and destination etc.)
• To appreciate desired pattern of traffic.
• To elicit opinion (of the residents of the study area) regarding general transport problems of
the city and the probable areas of improvement.
Number of surveyed houses: 113
Expected outcome:
Socio‐economic profile of the study area, number of trips, purpose of trips, mode used, trip length, trip origin and
destination, vehicle ownership.
Methodology:
Simple random sampling
Decide on the sample

Define the population
size (381- 95% Collection of data Analysis
(46256)
confidence level)
SHEET NO.
INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

HOUSEHOLD SURVEY B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 13
Methodology: Simple random sampling
Confidence interval:
The confidence interval (also called margin of error) is the plus-or-minus. There are different equations that can be used to calculate
confidence intervals depending on factors such as whether the standard deviation is known or smaller samples (n<30) are involved,
among others.
Confidence level:
The confidence level is a measure of certainty regarding how accurately a sample reflects the population being studied within a
chosen confidence interval.
Sample size:
The larger your sample size, the more sure you can be that their answers truly reflect the population. This indicates that for a given
confidence level, the larger your sample size, the smaller your confidence interval. However, the relationship is not linear (i.e.,
doubling the sample size does not halve the confidence interval).
Percentage:
When determining the sample size needed for a given level of accuracy you must use the worst case percentage (50%). You should
also use this percentage if you want to determine a general level of accuracy for a sample you already have. To determine the
confidence interval for a specific answer your sample has given, you can use the percentage picking that answer and get a smaller
interval.
Sample size calculation:
Sample size = (z2)* (p̂ (1+p̂ )) /c2
Where:
Z = Z value (e.g. 1.96 for 95% confidence level)
p̂ = percentage picking a choice, expressed as decimal (0.5 used for sample size needed)
c = confidence interval or margin of error
For Finite Population
sample size
New sample size =
sample size -1
1+
population
Calculated Sample size = 381
Source:
Sample Size Calculator - Confidence Level, Confidence Interval, Sample Size, Population Size, Relevant P
opulation - Creative Research Systems (surveysystem.com)
SHEET NO.

Survey Questionnaire
Department of Urban and Regional Planning School of Planning and Architecture
Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture and fine arts University
Mahaveer Marg, MasabTank, Hyderabad
Household Survey
Survey Date : __/__/2021 Ward No: Zone : Locality : Distance from PT / IPT : a) within 0.5km b)0.5 to 1km c)above 1km
Responder Details
Respondent Name: Location: House No: Household size:

Houshold Details
Educatio Distance from Mode of travel

Name Age Sex Marital Status nal StatusEmployment Status work place ( Prefered )
No. and type of owned Vehicle : a) c) NMT (Cycle,

Bicycle b) Tricycle c) any other a) Two Wheeler b) Four Wheeler Any Other) d) Electric Vehicle
Time taken to Average

Mode Nearest stop (Distance) reach waiting time Cost of travel (Fare)
City Bus
Metro
Railway
Trip Purpose:
Where does this trip begin?: Where does this trip end?:
Origin Destination Via Route Time Taken Mode of travel - PT, 2W ,3W ,4W , Cycle
SHEET NO.

Household Data Analysis Number of trips
Male Female Children(<15)
Gender 160
57%
Inference: Inference: 140
Among 471 sample size No. of trips 120
population 52% (i.e 239) generated by male
are male and 47% (i.e 100
working population
47%
52% 216)are female is great when 80
compared to female 23%
60
19%
40
20
male female
0
Vehicle Ownership
Preferred mode of transport
3% Inference: Inference:
14% Public Private Walk
Vehicle ownership is The larger portion
120
dominated by 2 of people prefer
Wheeler's, around 83% of 38%
travel on private 100
the respondents own 2 vehicles or by walk
80 31%
wheelers. While, 4 (38% and 30%
30%
wheeler ownership respectively) 60
83% percentage stood at 14% rather than public
and cycle at 3 % 40
transport.
2W 4W Cycle 20
SHEET NO.
ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

PCTR (Per Capita Trip Rate)
Per Capita Trip Rate (PCTR): How many trips are generated by an individual is calculated.
PCTR (Per Capita Trip Rate) = Total trips

Total population
Total population (according to survey)=471

Mode of travel No of trips
PCTR including walk
bus 154
Total trips including walk= 486
2W 154
PCTR = total trips including walk/total population
4W 8
=486/471
PCTR (including walk)= 1.03 Walk 146
PCTR excluding walk Cycle 8
Total trips excluding walk= total trips – walk trips Office vehicle 6
=486-146 =340 School bus 10
Total trips excluding walk =340 Total trips 486
PCTR = Total trips excluding walk/ total population
=340/471
PCTR (excluding walk)= 0.72
SHEET NO.

TLFD (Trip Length Frequency Distribution)
Trip length Frequency Mid values Fi*xi Trip Length

(Km) (fi) (xi) 100
0-2 60 1 60 90 86
3-5 86 4 344 80
6-8 46 7 322
70
9-11 14 10 140
60
No. of persons travel

60
12-14 7 13 91
15-17 5 16 80 50 46
18-20 19 19 361 40
21-23 0 22 0 30
24-26 3 25 75 19
20
27-29 1 28 28 14
10 7
30-32 2 31 62 5
3 2
0 1
0
Average trip length (km)= 6.4 0--2 3--5 6--8 9--11 12--14 15--17 18--20 21--23 24--26 27--29 30--32
Trip length (km)
Inference:
• This graph shows number of trips for trip length intervals. Most of the trips are in the distance of 3-5
km.
• Highest distance traveled is 30-32 and number of trips in that interval is 2.
• Total trips are 243.
• Most of the trips generated are work based trips.
SHEET NO.

Trip Length by Travel Mode
Trip Bus 2w 4w Walk Cycle Office School Trip length by mode

length vehicle bus
Bus 2W Car Walk
(Km) Cycle Office vehicle School bus
0-2 0 4 0 50 3 0 3 60
3-5 18 41 1 23 1 0 2
6-8 29 15 2 0 0 0 0 50
9-11 8 5 1 0 0 0 0
12-14 5 2 0 0 0 0 0
40
15-17 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
No. of persons travel

18-20 11 5 0 0 0 3 0
30
21-23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24-26 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
27-29 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20
30-32 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
10
Mode Bus 2W Car walk Cycle Office School
vehicle bus
0
Average 9.92 7.19 7 1.94 1.75 19 2.2 0--2 3--5 6--8 9--11 12--14 15--17 18--20 21--23 24--26 27--29 30--32
Trip Length
Trip length
(km)
Inference:
• In this graph, trip length and mode share have been described.
• Large number of people prefer private transport rather than public transport for travel. More number of trips are by
walk and two wheeler as more number of peoples work place is near to their home.
• Average trip length of walk is 1.94 km i.e most of the trips are by walk at this length.
SHEET NO.

DEFINITIONS:
 TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT:
 traffic volume is defined as the number of vehicles crossing a section of a road per unit time at any selected period.
Traffic volume studies are conducted to collect data on the number of vehicles and/or pedestrians that pass a point on a highway
facility during a specified time period. This time period varies from as little as 15min to as much as a year, depending on the
anticipated use of the data.
 VOLUME
volume on a road is the number of vehicles passing the measurement point during a specified time interval.
 DEMAND
Demand is a measure of the number of vehicles ( or passengers, or persons) waiting for service in the given time period.
 CAPACITY
Capacity is the maximum number that can reasonable be expected to be served in the given time period.
 PCU
PASSENGER CAR UNIT it is a vehicle unit used for expressing highway capacity unit
 PHV
peak hour volume_ the maximum number of vehicles that pas a point on a highway during a period of 60 consecutive inutes.
 VC
vehicle classification with respect to the type of vehicles for cars, two-axle trucks, or three-axle trucks.
 FLOW RATE
vehicles/15min expanded to 1 hour
 (PHF)
Peak Hour Factor is used to convert the hourly volume into the volume rate representing the busiest 15 minutes of the hour.
SHEET NO.
INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

BASIC SURVEYS PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 20
(2019-2023)
INTRODUCTION:
Traffic Data Collection is basic requirements for transport planning. Traffic Data forms an integral part of national economics and
such knowledge is essential in drawing up a rational transport policy for movement of passengers and goods by both government
and the private sectors.
Traffic Volume Count is counting of number of vehicles passing through a road over a period of time. It is usually expressed in
terms of Passenger Car Unit (PCU) and measured to calculate Level of Service of the road and related attributes like congestion,
carrying capacity, V/C Ratio, identification of peak hour or extended peak hour etc.
Traffic volume count or TVC is usually done as a part of transportation surveys, TVC can be classified or unclassified.
The study of Classified Traffic Volume Count is to understand factors that form the basis of:
a) Checking the efficiency/saturation of the road network by comparing current traffic volume with the calculated capacity or by
identifying level of service
b) Establishing the use of the road network by vehicles of different categories, traffic distribution, PCU/vehicle value
c) Need of median shifting or road widening
Duration and Interval of Traffic Counts

In order to predict traffic flow volumes that can be expected on the road network during specific periods, knowledge of the fact is
required that traffic volumes changes considerably at each point in time. There are three important cyclical variations:
•Hourly pattern: the way traffic flow characteristic varies throughout the day and night;
•Daily Pattern: The day-to-day variation throughout the week
•Monthly and yearly Pattern: The season-to-season variation throughout the year.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES.
Aim :
To carry out a traffic studies and analyze the traffic characteristics.
Objectives :
1. To study relevant literature in order to understand the concepts of traffic studies .
2. To appreciate existing transport network in the city In order to assess growth of transport sector by collecting the required data.
3. To determine the service flow rate in PCU/PCE unit.
4. To determine of vehicle composition in traffic stream.
5. To find the PHV,PCU,V/C RATIO, etc.
Methodology :
Methods for volume survey:
There are two major methods of counting vehicle for volume survey. They are-i)Manual Counting Methodii) Automatic counting
method
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Location This road connects to the
dilshuknagar junction and
LB Nagar from nalgonda X
road with stretch 5.2 km.
and LB Nagar with stretch
11 km. moosarambagh to
dilshuknagar is 2.1 km,
and to LB Nagar is 8.1km .
This road connect to

chaderghat circle with
stretch 2.6km along
with u turn and
moosarambagh to
chaderghat is 3.0km
NALGONDA X ROAD
MOOSARAMBAGH JUCTION
THIS ROAD
THIS ROADCONNECTS
CONNECTS TO TO AMBERET
CHANCHELGUDA
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC – NALGONDA X ROAD
ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT
ROOT : NALGONDA ROAD [ From: Chadarghat To : Chanchalguda
S.N TWO AUTO TEMPO/
LOCATION 1 O. Timing
09.00 to
CAR WHEELER RICKSHAW BUS JEEP TRUCK LORRY OTHERS TOTAL
MALAKPET TO NEW MARKET 1 09.15
TREND CHART FOR 15 MINUTES INTERVAL (MORNING AND EVENING) The above graph shows
that there is a peak
hour (9.00-10.00) having PHV
PCU
the highest traffic 4000
1200 3569.553578.95
volume of 3578.95. 3437.1 3388.2 3339.4
985.7 3500
1000 921.3 3132.6
847.2 872.5 2997.65
815.35 824.75 826.65
794.95 814.7 2811.95 2735.8
768.7 3000
total number of vehicles

800714.75 722.55
679.75 692.55 2644.1
640.85 630.85 This graph shows that PCU of
No. Of Vehicles
600 2500
vehicles is high(985.7) at
400 morning interval 9.00-9.15 & 2000
low(630.85) at evening interval
200 1500
5.45-6.00.
0 1000
5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0
.45 .00 .15 .30 9:4 .00 0.1 0:3 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4 6:0
-8 5-9 0-9 5-9 0- -10 -1 -1 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5- 500
3 0 4 0 1 9:3 45 .00 .15 4:0 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4
8. 8. 9. 9. . 0 10
09 1 0
8.30 - 8.45 - 9.00 - 9.15 - 9.30 - 4.00 - 4.15- 4.30- 4.45- 5.00-
morning and evening timings 9.30 9.45 10.00 10.15 10.30 5.00 5.15 5.30\ 5.45 6.00
Peak stream line flow morning and evening hours
Others 02
1
Lorry 0 PIE GRAPH FOR TOTAL VEHICULAR COMPOSITION
-19 1
Tempo/Truck
Vehicle type
Bus 24
Total vehicle composiiton
-25
Jeep 13
-26 3% 3% 1%0% 0%
-261 Car 121
168 25%
-154Auto rickshaw
391 From the above graph, we
-386 Two-wheeler 49%
can say that the
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
composition of two wheeler
4:45-5:00 9:45-10:00 vehicle is high(5420) and
traffic count other vehicles is low(22).
19%
On comparison, the composition of two wheeler, auto rickshaw is higher in evening peak
period & car is higher in morning peak period. Two-wheeler Auto rickshaw Car Jeep Bus
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC – NALGONDA X ROAD
ANALYSIS
TREND CHART FOR 15 MINUTES INTERVAL (MORNING AND LOCATION 2
EVENING) NEW MARKET TO MALAKPET
PCU
2500
2275
This graph shows that PCU PHV
7643.65
of vehicles is high(2275) at 8000
2000 7125.85
1757178317731813 evening interval 5.45-6.00 6407.55
7000
No. Of Vehicles
& low(538) at morning 5858.45

1500 6000 5156.75
1224 interval 8.30-8.45.

1081 1095 5000
1000 868 842 827
757 4000 3294.1
3152.45
591 613 685 The above graph shows 2923.35
2646.4
538
that there is a peak hour 30002427.75
500
(5.00-6.00) having the 2000
0
highest traffic volume of 1000
45
45 .00 .15 .30 9:
5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5
00 0.1 0:3 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4 6:0
0 7643.65.
. . 0
0 -8 5-9 0-9 5-9 0- -10 -1 -1 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5-
3 4 0 1 9:3 45 .00 .15 4:0 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4 30 4 5 00 15 30 00 15 0\ 45 00
8. 8. 9. 9. . 9 . 9. . . . . . . 3 . .
09 1
0 10 - - - 10 - 10 - 10 0 -5 5 -5 -5 5-5 0 -6
.1 0 .4 .0
30 45 0 5 0 .0 4 .3 4 5
Morning and evening hours 8. 8. 9.
0
9.
1
9.
3 4 4
morning and evening timings
PIE GRAPH FOR TOTAL VEHICULAR COMPOSITION

Peak stream line flow

-1 3
Others
407 178 36 25
-1 2
Lorry
844
-10 7
Tempo/Truck
Vehicle type
Bus
-28 41 5:45-6:00
4828 7827
Jeep
-47 136 10.00 to 10.15
-314 Car 576
Auto rickshaw
-45 358
-401 Two-wheeler 969 From the above graph, we

can say that the composition 2742
-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
of two wheeler vehicle is
traffic count
high(7827) and other vehicles
is low(25). Two-wheeler Auto rickshaw Car Jeep
In both intervals, the two wheeler vehicle composition is high where as the
Bus Tempo/Truck Lorry Others
composition of auto rickshaw & car is high in morning peak period than in evening
peak period.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC –
ANALYSIS
TREND CHART FOR 15 MINUTES INTERVAL LOCATION 3
(MORNING AND EVENING)
SAIDABAD TO MALAKPET
PCU
1800 1672 PHV
1605
1572 1521
1560
1600
1400 1289 The above graph shows that
1233 1183 7000 6325.056369.6
1144 1145 5987.75
1200 1105 there is a peak hour (5.00- 5604.9
9269671021
1013
6.00) having the highest
6000 5265.9

1000
No. Of Vehicles
800 traffic volume of 6369.6. 5000 4283.14407.2

800 4145.45
3715 3927.75
600 4000
400 3000
This graph shows that PCU of vehicles is
200 2000
high(1672) at evening interval 5.15-5.30 &
0 low(800) at morning interval 8.30-8.45. 1000
5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0
.45 .00 .15 .30 9:4 .00 0.1 0:3 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4 6:0
8 9 9 9 - 0 - - - - - - - -
3 0- 45- 00- 15- :30 5-1 0-1 5-1 :00 :15 :30 :45 :00 :15 :30 :45 0
8.30 - 8.45 - 9.00 - 9.15 - 9.30 - 4.00 - 4.15- 4.30- 4.45- 5.00-
8. 8. 9. 9. 9 9.4 0.0 0.1 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 9.30 9.45 10.00 10.15 10.30 5.00 5.15 5.30\ 5.45 6.00
0 1 1
morning and evening timings morning and evening timings

2
Others 0
-7 1
Lorry Total vehicle composiiton
-6 4
Tempo/Truck
206 309 52 158 10
Vehicle type
Bus 19
-15 3750
-10 15
Jeep
-210 Car 272
Auto rickshaw 389 From the above graph, we can 8274

-247
731
say that the composition of
-476 Two-wheeler
two wheeler(8274), auto
-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800
rickshaw(4074) and car(3750)
traffic count is high and other vehicles is
4074
low.
5:15-5:30 10.15-10:30
On comparison, the composition of two wheeler, auto rickshaw & car is higher in evening peak Two-wheeler Auto rickshaw Car Jeep
period than in morning peak period. Bus Tempo/Truck Lorry Others
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC –
ANALYSIS
(MORNING AND EVENING) MALAKPET TO SAIDABAD
PCU
900
781 803
800 771 PHV
718 708 696 2926.12978.6
645 655 668 3000 2822.92876.62904.5
700 This graph shows that PCU of vehicles is
582 563 559 537 high(781) at evening interval 4.30-4.45 &
600 545
519
No. of Vehicles
low(482) at morning interval 9.30-9.45. 2500 2208.9 2223

482 2108.85
2104.65
500 2096.4

400 2000
The above graph shows that
300
there is a peak hour (5.00- 1500
200 6.00) having the highest
100 traffic volume of 2978.6. 1000
0
500
4 5 00 15 30 :45 00 .15 :30 :15 :30 :45 :00 :15 :30 :45 :00
. . . . .
0 -8 5-9 0-9 5-9 0-9 -10 -10 -10 0-4 5-4 0-4 5-5 0-5 5-5 0-5 5-6
3 4 0 1 :3 5 0 5 : 0 :1 :3 : 4 :0 : 1 : 3 :4
8. 8. 9. 9. 9 9.4 0.0 0.1 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 0
8.30 - 8.45 - 9.00 - 9.15 - 9.30 - 4.00 - 4.15- 4.30- 4.45- 5.00-
0 1 1
9.30 9.45 10.00 10.15 10.30 5.00 5.15 5.30\ 5.45 6.00
Peak stream line flow PIE GRAPH FOR TOTAL VEHICULAR COMPOSITION
0
Others
0
-273
Lorry
202 15
0-6
Tempo/Truck 206 276 52
Vehicle type
Bus-9 25
1905
17
Jeep-10
200 4125
Car 98
165 From the above graph, we
-98Auto rickshaw
can say that the
-267 Two-wheeler 252
composition of two
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 wheeler vehicle is 1733
traffic count high(4125) and car’s is
higher than that of auto
5:15-5:30 10.15-10:30 rickshaw’s.
Two-wheeler Auto rickshaw Car
On comparison, the composition of two wheeler is higher in morning peak period where as the Jeep Bus Tempo/Truck
auto rickshaw & car is higher in evening peak period than in morning peak period. Lorry Others
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC – MOOSARAMBAAGH JUNCTION
ANALYSIS LOCATION 1
TREND CHART FOR 15 MINUTES INTERVAL
(MORNING AND EVENING) AMBERPET TO MOOSARAMBAAGH
PCU
1200
1037 PHV
1000 928
894 903
836 845 825 high(1037) at morning interval 9.15-9.30 &
806
800 759 764 787 743 low(660) at evening interval 5.45-6.00. 4000 3693.5
3668.65
3619.65
3608.75
722
667 660 3330.65
632 3500 3099.6
The above graph shows that
No. Of Vehicles
2960.65
600 2829.35
2764.55
there is a peak hour (8.30-9.30) 3000 2681.85

having the highest traffic 2500
400
volume of 3693.5.
2000
200
1500
0 1000
5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0
. 45 .00 .15 .30 9:4 .00 0.1 0:3 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4 6:0 500
8 9 9 9 - 0 - - - - - - - -
3 0- 45- 00- 15- :30 5-1 0-1 5-1 :00 :15 :30 :45 :00 :15 :30 :45
8. 8. 9. 9. 9 9.4 0.0 0.1 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 0
0 1 1 8.30 - 8.45 - 9.00 - 9.15 - 9.30 - 4.00 - 4.15- 4.30- 4.45- 5.00-
9.30 9.45 10.00 10.15 10.30 5.00 5.15 5.30\ 5.45 6.00
Morning and evening peak hours

-4 1
Others PIE GRAPH FOR TOTAL VEHICULAR COMPOSITION
-3 2
Lorry
-19 4
Tempo/Truck
Vehicle type
Bus 25
-11 3% 3% 2% 0% 1%
Jeep
-38 15
-251 Car 124 25%

47%
-158Auto rickshaw 154
-460 Two-wheeler 380 From the above graph,

-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 we can say that the
composition of two 19%
traffic count
wheeler is high(47%).
4:45-5:00 9:45-10:00

On comparison, the composition of two wheeler, auto rickshaw & car is higher in morning peak
Jeep Bus Tempo/Truck
period than in evening peak period. Lorry Others
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC – MOOSARAMBAAGH JUNCTION
ANALYSIS
(MORNING AND EVENING) MOOSARAMBAAGH TO
AMBERPET
1200 PCU
986 965
high(986) at morning interval 9.15-9.30 PHV
1000 935
869 875
916 904
865
& low(696) at evening interval 5.45-6.00. 4000 3648.65
839 3592.6
3518.7 3573.25
3509.7
795 820 3473.7 3461.4
759 778 761 3500 3306
800 746 3148
696 2978.9
3000
No. Of Vehicles
600

The above graph shows 2500
400 that there is a peak hour 2000
(4.00-5.00) having the
200 highest traffic volume of 1500
3648.65.
1000
0
5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0
. 45 .00 .15 .30 9:4 .00 0.1 0:3 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4 6:0 500
0-8 5-9 0-9 5-9 0- -10 -1 -1 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5-
3 4 0 1 9:3 45 .00 .15 4:0 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4
8. 8. 9. 9. . 0
09 10 10 0\
3 0 45 15
.0
0 30 00 15 45 00
Morning and evening peak hours 9. 9 . . .
10 - 10 0 -5
10
.
-5
. .3
-5
.
-6
.
- - - - 5 0 -5 5 0
. 30 . 45 00 5 0 .0 4.1 .3 4.4 5 .0
8 8 . 1 3 4 4
9. 9morning 9. and evening timings
-4 1
Others
-3 2
Lorry Total vehicle composiiton
-19 4
Tempo/Truck
Vehicle type
Bus
-11 25 3% 3% 1% 0% 0%
Jeep
-38 15
-251 Car 124 29% 44%

-154 Auto rickshaw 150 From the above graph, we can
-378 Two-wheeler 380 say that the composition of
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 two wheeler vehicle is
high(44%) whereas the car’s is
traffic count
29% & auto rickshaw’s is 20%. 20%
4:45-5:00 9:45-10:00
In both intervals, the two wheeler & auto rickshaw’s composition is high where as the Two-wheeler Auto rickshaw Car
Jeep Bus Tempo/Truck
composition of car is higher in morning peak period than in evening peak period.
Lorry Others
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC –
MOOSARAMBAAGH JUNCTION
ANALYSIS LOCATION 3
TREND CHART FOR 15 MINUTES INTERVAL
(MORNING AND EVENING) DILSUKHNAGAR TO NEW MARKET
PCU
1600
PHV
1400 13241369 This graph shows that PCU of vehicles
1252 5000 4677.45
4641.8
1168 1125 is high(1369) at evening interval 5.30- 4350.75
1200 1077 1077 4500 4154.25 4268.75
992 961 1041 5.45 & low(782) at morning interval 4062.45 4055.95
964 3890.6 3936.7
1000 912 937 854
907
10.15-10.30. 4000
3832.05
782
No. of vehicles

800 3500
600 The above graph shows that
3000
there is a peak hour (4.45-
400 2500
5.45) having the highest
200 traffic volume of 4677.45. 2000
0 1500
5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0
.45 .00 .15 .30 9:4 .00 0.1 0:3 4:1 4:3 4:4 5:0 5:1 5:3 5:4 6:0
-8 5-9 0-9 5-9 0- -10 -1 -1 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5- 0- 5- 1000
0
3 4 0 1 :3 5 0 5 :0 :1 :3 :4 :0 :1 :3 :4
8. 8. 9. 9. 9 9.4 0.0 0.1 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 500
0 1 1
0
Morning and evening peak hours 8.30 - 8.45 - 9.00 - 9.15 - 9.30 - 4.00 - 4.15- 4.30- 4.45- 5.00-
9.30 9.45 10.00 10.15 10.30 5.00 5.15 5.30\ 5.45 6.00
Peak stream line flow morning and evening timings
Others 0
0
-2 0
Lorry PIE GRAPH FOR TOTAL VEHICULAR COMPOSITION
-15 18
Tempo/Truck
Vehicle type
Bus 28
-22
2% 3% 2% 0% 0%
-19 12
Jeep
-272 Car 371 25%
Auto rickshaw
-202 213
-624 Two-wheeler 612

51%
-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800
traffic count From the above graph, we can
say that the composition of
5:30 PM-5:45 PM 10.00 AM to 10.15AM two wheeler is high(51%). 18%
In both intervals, the composition of two wheeler, auto rickshaw is high whereas the car’s is Two-wheeler Auto rickshaw Car
higher in evening peak period than in morning peak period. Jeep Bus Tempo/Truck
Lorry Others
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TVC –
MOOSARAMBAAGH JUNCTION
ANALYSIS LOCATION 4
TREND CHART FOR 15 MINUTES INTERVAL (MORNING NEW MARKET TO DILSUKHNAGAR
AND EVENING)
PCU
3500 31863171
3000 2889 PHV
2661 2698 11943.55
2542 11715.6
2500 12000
2086 10418.2
2000 1891 18711951 This graph shows that PCU of vehicles is
1720
1617 15701679 10000 9198.15
No. of vehicles
1411 1400
high(3186) at evening interval 5.00-5.15 &
1500 8135.9 7882.5
low(1400) at evening interval 4.30-4.45. 7769.55

8000 6860.55
6798.35
1000 6381.05
500 6000
The above graph shows that there is
0 a peak hour (5.00-6.00) having the
4000
4 5 00 15 30 :45 00 .15 :30 :15 :30 :45 :00 :15 :30 :45 :00 highest traffic volume of 11943.55.
. . . . .
0 -8 5-9 0-9 5-9 0-9 -10 -10 -10 0-4 5-4 0-4 5-5 0-5 5-5 0-5 5-6
3 4 0 1 :3 5 0 5 : 0 :1 : 3 :4 : 0 :1 : 3 :4
8. 8. 9. 9. 9 9.4 0.0 0.1 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 2000
0 1 1
Morning and evening hours
0
3 0 45 00 . 15 30 00 15 0\ .4
5
.0
0
9. 9. 0. 0 0 .
- 5 . 5. . 3 5 6
- - -1 -1 - 1 00 5- 0 -5 5- 0-
0 5 1 4 0
8.
3
8.
4
. 00 . 15 . 30 4. 4. 4.
3 4. 5.
9 9morning 9 and evening timings
-4 2
Others
-1 0
Lorry
-22 14
Tempo/Truck 3% 1% 1% 0% 0%
Vehicle type
Bus 39
-34 39%
Jeep
-38 94
-963 Car 1127

41%
Auto rickshaw
-427 402
Two-wheeler 1387
-734 From the above graph, we
-1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 can say that the composition 16%
traffic count of car is high(40%) where as
the two wheeler’s is 39% &
4:45-5:00 9:45-10:00 the auto rickshaw’s is 16%.
On comparison of both intervals, the two wheeler & car composition is higher in evening peak Jeep Bus Tempo/Truck
period where as the composition of auto rickshaw is higher in morning peak period. Lorry Others
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT – ANALYSIS
NALGONDA X ROAD JUNCTION MOOSARAMBAGH JUCTION

V/C RATIO AM PM V/C RATIO
1.6 1.47 1.5
2.5 2.32
2.25
1.4 1.26
1.2 2
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LEVEL OF SERVICE
0.98
1 0.89
0.8 1.5
0.8 0.69 1.18
1.11
0.63 1.05 1.04
1
0.6 1 0.88
0.4
0.5
0.2
0 0
ROUTE 1 ROUTE 2 ROUTE 3 ROUTE 4 ROUTE 1 ROUTE 2 ROUTE 3 ROUTE 4
ROUTES ROUTES
From the above graph, we can say that there is low LOS in morning peak hours in all From the above graph, we can say that there is low LOS in route1 in evening peak hour
routes. and almost equal LOS in morning and evening peak hours of route 2,3 & 4.
JUNCTION ROAD PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR VOLUME PASSENGER CAR UNIT PEAK HOUR FLOW ACTUAL DESIGN FLOW V/C LOS
RATE RATIO
(pcu/hr)
Nalgonda X Road Malakpet-new market 09-00 to 10.00 3578.95 985.7 881,942.75375 0.0040580298265 0.98 F
Nalgonda X Road New market-Malakpet 05.00 to 06.00 7643.65 2274.95 4,347,230.391875 0.0017582804017 0.89 F
Nalgonda X Road Saidabad-chadarghat 05.00 to 06.00 6369.6 1672.25 2,662,890.9 0.0023919868440 0.69 F
Nalgonda X Road Malakpet-Saidabad 05.00 to 06.00 2978.6 803 597,953.95 0.0513959790488 1.47 F
Moosarambagh Amberpet-moosarambagh 08.30 to 09.30 3693.5 1036.8 957,355.2 0.0038580246913 1.26 F
Moosarambagh Dilsukhnagar-new market 04.00 to 05.00 3648.65 964.6 879,884.005 0.0041467397739 1.50 F
Moosarambagh Moosarambagh- 04.45 to 05.45 4677.45 1369.2 1,601,108.25 0.0029213827359 0.63 F

dilsukhnagar
Moosarambagh Moosarambagh-amberpet 05.00 to 06.00 11943 3186.3 9,514,291.8 0.0012552694673 0.80 F
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
ISSUES:-
• There is more traffic in Moosarambagh Junction when compared to Nalgonda Junction.

• The major disadvantage is unproductive time. People don’t reach offices at the right time and so their important
work or meetings get delayed. This may also lead to setbacks in their profession.
• So many vehicles more than the road capacity lead to the emission of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere causing
pollution.
• Daily traffic jams or congestion increases the stress levels of the commuters. Frustration and irritation build up.
• To avoid the jam, sometimes people drive very unsafely and that leads to accidents or injuries.
• High chance of collision due to tight spacing between the vehicles.
• Emergency vehicles like ambulance and fire brigade get delayed due to traffic jams and they are unable to reach
the destination on time. This may lead to major mishaps.
• Increase in use of narrow lanes to avoid congestion on the main roads.
RECOMMENDATIONS:-
 Only 3% of total vehicles were buses. Public transport should be increased and improved.
 5% of total vehicles were non-motorized vehicles. A dedicated lane should be provide to facilitate non-
motorized vehicle.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
SPEED AND DELAY Objective : Various methods for
conducting a speed and delay
SURVEY survey
➢ To study relevant literature in
• The speed and delay studies give the order to understand the concept 1.Floating car Method
running, overall speeds, fluctuations in of speed and delay.
➢ To analyze the data collected. 2.License Plate or vehicle number
speed and delay between two stations.
• The results of the speed and delay studies Method
Application
are useful in detecting the spot of 3.Photographic Method
congestion, the causes delay and in arriving ⮚Evaluating congestion, capacity, level of service and the 4.Elevated Observer method
at a suitable remedial measure. need for improvements.
• In general, the efficiency of the roadway is ⮚To assess the need for installation of an appropriate traffic 5. Interview method
judged from the travel time. control device.
Aim of the survey: ⮚Travel time and delays are some of the factors that affect
the modal choice. Method used during survey
To evaluate the quality of the traffic ⮚Before and after speed and delay surveys are useful for
movement along a route and identify assessing the effectiveness of improvement measures.
the location, cause and extent of the ⮚To determine cost benefit analysis, the cost of a journey Floating car method:
delays in the route. depends upon the speed at which it is made. The speed and flow can be obtained
by travelling in a car against and with
Selection criteria:
the flow, and noting down the
Terminology following data:
• The selected stretch should showcase all the
1.Journey time: Total time taken by the vehicle to • The journey time
characteristics of the area in which you are
complete the journey including all delays supposed to survey. • Duration and cause of delays
incurred enroute. • The observer should be able to calculate the
2.Journey speed: Also known as overall travel • The number of vehicles met with from
traffic volume coming in opposite direction.
speed, is the effective speed of a vehicle between the opposite direction
two points.
3.Delay: The elapsed time (in seconds) spent • The number of vehicles overtaking the
Surveyformat :
driving at a speed less than 5 mph. test vehicle
4.Fixed delay: the delay to which a vehicle is
Date:
subjected regardless of the amount of traffic Name of the stretch/road: Road from Road to
volume and interference is present. Direction of trip Journey time Delay(sec)
No. of
5.Operational delay: the delay caused by Journey No. of vehicles
interference from other component of traffic No. of vehicles Reaso
From node To node time (min- Distance vehicles from Time (sec)
overtaking n
stream. Examples include time lost due to sec) overtaken opposite
direction
congestion, parking maneuvers, etc.
SHEET NO.

Speed and Delay PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 34
(2019-2023)
Average
No. of vehicles
No. of vehicles
Direction JOURNEY TIME (min) STOPPED DELAY No. of vehicles overtaken from opposite
overtaking
direction
(Dilsukhnagar--
Nalgonda X road)(E-
W) 14.27 2.30 31.00 20.00 213.00
(Nalgonda X road-
Dilsukhnagar)(W-E) 15.53 3.10 31.33 19.33 186.67
E-W W-E
ny 11.00 ny 12.00
na 186.67 na 213.00
tw 14.27 tw 15.53
ta 15.53 ta 14.27
q 6.63 q 7.55 A stretch of 3.8KM of the road
t 12.62 0.21 t 13.96 0.23 towards Nalgonda X Road
speed 18.06 speed 16.33
Running time 11.97 0.19 Running time 12.43 0.20
running speed 19.04 running speed 18.34
Summary STRETCH DISTANCE =3.8KM

E-W W-E
average volume (q) 6.63 veh/min average volume (q) 7.55 veh/min
average journey time (t) 12.62 min (or) 0.21 hr average journey time (t) 13.96 min (or) 0.23 hr
average journey speed 18.06 kmph average journey speed 16.33 kmph
average running time 11.97 min (or) 0.19 average running time 12.43 min (or) 0.20
Running Speed 19.04 kmph Running Speed 18.34 kmph
average speed 15.9 kmph average speed 14.68 kmph
A stretch of 3.8KM of the road

na=avera ge no.of vechiles opposite direction towards Dilsukhnagar
ny=no of vechiles overtaking-- no of vechiles overtaken
Inference : • Existing System We considered a stretch of 3.8 KM that is from
It is observed that there is mostly fixed delay which is due to signal avg volume for E-W direction (q)= na + ny/ta + tw Dilsukhnagar to Nalgonda X road
stops. • The features of this road are 2 line road.
q=flow of vechiles in one direction of stream
• Tar bitumen road.
t=average journey time in minute
• All kinds of vehicles like Buses, Cars, Bikes, and Autos use the
avg journey time (t) = tw - ny/q road.
avg journey speed = distance of stretch/average journey time • Peak hours – 08:30 AM to 10:30 AM & 04:00 PM to 06:00 PM.
• Due to traffic , a part of the stretch Dilsukhnagar to Nalgonda X
Running time= Journey time +delay
road & Nalgonda X road to dilsukhnagar faces severe traffic jam
during peak hours and passengers faces long stop time
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Jourvey and running time
Journey and running speed
average running time
Running Speed
average journey time (t)

average journey speed
11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5

15 15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5 19
W-E(Nalgonda X road-Dilsukhnagar) E-W(Dilsukhnagar-Nalgonda X road)

W-E(Nalgonda X road-Dilsukhnagar) E-W(Dilsukhnagar-Nalgonda X road)
Average of speeds
20
18
16
14
12
10
0
average journey speed Running Speed average speed
E-W(Dilsukhnagar-Nalgonda X road) W-E(Nalgonda X road-Dilsukhnagar)
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
(W-E) Minutes of travel:
• It takes nearly 13 minutes to travel from dilsukhnagar-

Nalgonda x road(E-W) & Nalgonda X road-Dilsukhnagar (W-
E)i.e the distance of3.8 km
Towards
Chadarghat
Towards L
B Nagar
(E-W)
Towards
Chadarghat
Towards L
B Nagar
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Journey Time:
• Between new market to nalgond x road it took 4-5 min

time due to congestion of road and signal
• Between moosarambagh metro to dilsukhnagar it took 3-4
Towards min due to signal
Chadargha
t
Towards
LB Nagar
Legend
1-2 min
3-4 min
2-3 min
4-5 min
Towards
Chadargha
t
Towards LB Nagar
Legend
1-2 min
3-4 min
2-3 min
4-5 min
38
Speed and Delay PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V
(2019-2023)
PROPOSALS:-
We consider a stretch of 3.7 kilometer that is from Nalgonda x Road to Dilsuknagar
Features of this road are :
• 3 line road on both the sides.

• Tar bitumen road.
• As it is a National Highway (NH 65) passing through one of the major business centers of the city .
• All kinds of vehicles like Buses, Cars , Bikes, Lorries and Autos use the road.
• 1 traffic signal and 2 U turns should be crossed to reached the destination .
• After conducting speed and delay survey we have identify some issues for that we are giving some proposals .
• There is a lot of traffic jam due to the onside parking on roads between the Nalgonda x Road and Mosarambagh
for that we are proposing a parking space for vehicles beside the Malakpet Market that will reduce the congestion
of traffic .
• Recently ,GHMC proposal for parking facilities in Hyderabad in which one of the place is Nalgonda x Road.
• Other issues are , traffic jam near Malakpet Market through which the lorries and autos in and out from the
market that is causing traffic jam and delay for that we are proposing that the Heavy vehicles should be travel
through back side gate that is not in use with that traffic jam will be less .
RECOMMENDATIONS:-
We have to increase the width of the road towards New Market to Nalgonda X Road to reduce traffic congestion.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
SWOT:-
STRENGTH:
It is a commercial area
NH 65 passing through these junctions
WEAKNESSES
There is a lot of traffic jam during peak hours due to the road width
OPPORTUNITIES:
For parking we can give space beside new market which will reduce the traffic congestion
THREATS:
From Nalgonda X Road towards new market high load vehicles travel in and out thus results in
accidents due to the heavy traffic over the junction.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Spot Speed Survey
Introduction • Accidental analysis,

Spot speed is the instantaneous speed of a vehicle at a specified • Geometric design,
location. Spot speed can be used to design the geometry of road
• Research studies.
like horizontal and vertical curves, super elevation etc. Location
and size of signs, design of signals, safe speed, and speed zone
determination, require the spot speed data. Various methods for conducting a spot speed survey
Aim
1. Stopwatch method/ Direct timing procedure
To determine the speed distribution of a traffic stream at a
specific location 2. Enoscope technique
Objective
Spot speed studies are conducted to estimate the distribution of 3. Pressure contact tubes
speeds of vehicle in the traffic stream at a particular position on
4. Radar speedometer
highway.
5. Photographic method
Application
Spot speed studies are used to determine the speed distribution Method used during survey:
of a traffic stream at a specific location. The data gathered in Stopwatch method/ Direct timing procedure:
spot speed studies are used to determine vehicle speed • Two reference points are marked on the pavement at a
percentiles, which are useful in making many speed-related suitable distance apart.
decisions. Spot speed data have a number of safety applications,
including the following: • An observer starts and stops an accurate stopwatch as a
vehicle crosses these two marks.
• Speed trends,
• From the known distance and the measured time intervals,
• Traffic control planning, speeds are calculated.
SHEET NO.

Spot Speed PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 41
(2019-2023)
Procedure:
Factors effecting spot speed:
Select study
Spot speeds measured at a location depend on a methodology
number of factors:
1. Geometric layout of the road.
Identification of
2. Volume of traffic. parameters
3. Composition of traffic
4. Condition of road
Selection of Study Area
5. Environmental influences
Survey Questionnaire:
Data collection
Analysis
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Spot Speed Survey Location
Road 1: LB Nagar to Malkapet

Stretch length: 80m
Road 2: Nalgonda to Malkapet

Stretch length: 70m
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Spot Speed Analysis
Frequency %
Location: Nalgonda X Road(LB Nagar to Malakpet Road)
50
• Stretch Length – 80 m.
45
• Sub-Arterial road 43.62
40
• It is surrounded by commercial complexes.
35
Survey details:
Frequency%
30
• Method used- Stopwatch method
25
• Survey time – 7:00 am – 9am, 12:00 pm to 2:00 pm, 4:00 pm 22.34
to 6:00 pm. 20
18.44
15
Data collected: 10 10.64
5
Class Mid 0.53
2.48 1.95
0 0
Intervals Value Frequency Frequency% CF CF% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0-10 5 3 0.53 3 0.53 Mid Value(KMPH)

11-20 15.5 104 18.44 107 18.97
21-30 25.5 246 43.62 353 62.59
31-40 35.5 126 22.34 479 84.93 43.62% of vehicles travel in between the speeds of
21kmph and 30kmph. Which is also close to the mean
41-50 45.5 60 10.64 539 95.57 speed limit 29.63 kmph
51-60 55.5 14 2.48 553 98.05
61-70 65.5 0 0 553 98.05
71-80 75.5 11 1.95 564 100
SHEET NO.
ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

(2019-2023)
Cummulative Frequency% (km/hr)
120
Average speed 29.63
98 Percentile
98.05 98.05 100
100 95.57
85 Percentile 84.93
15th percentile 13
Cummulative Frequency%
80 85th percentile 35.5

62.59
60 98th percentile 55
Maximum speed 72
40
Minimum speed 8
18.97
20 15 Percentile
0.53
0 Geometric Design Speed = 98th Percentile
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Safe Speed limit = 85th Percentile
Mid Value(KMPH) Minimum Speed limit = 15th Percentile
Inferences:
• The maximum speed attained by the vehicles is 72km/hr., it is greater than the speed limits mentioned by the IRC
Standards, i.e., 60 km/hr.
• Considering that the 85th percentile speed is the best value for determining the speed limits for traffic regulations,
the spot speed calculated from our gathered data is less than 35.5 km/hr.
• The 15th percentile speed is 13 km/hr. The vehicles travelling below this speed cause an interference with the traffic
stream and may cause hazards.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Spot Speed Analysis
Location: Nalgonda X Road(Nalgonda to Malakpet Road) Frequency%
• Stretch Length – 70 m. 35
• Sub-Arterial road 29.82
30
• It is surrounded by commercial complexes.
Survey details: 25 22.89
Frequency%
• Method used- Stopwatch method 20 18.07
• Survey time – 7:00 am – 9am, 12:00 pm to 2:00 pm, 4:00 pm 15.36
to 6:00 pm. 15
10
Data collected:
4.52
5 3.31 4.22
Class Mid 0.6 0
1.2
Interval Value Frequency CF Frequency% CF% 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
5-10 7.5 2 2 0.60 0.60
Mid Value(KMPH)
11-15 13 51 53 15.36 15.96
16-20 18 99 152 29.82 45.78
21-25 23 76 228 22.89 68.67 29.82% of vehicles travel in between the speeds
26-30 28 60 288 18.07 86.75 of 16kmph and 20kmph. Which is also close to
31-35 33 15 303 4.52 91.27 the mean speed limit 22.94 kmph
36-40 38 11 314 3.31 94.58
41-45 43 14 328 4.22 98.80
46-50 48 0 328 0 98.80
51-55 53 4 332 1.20 100
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Cummulative Frequency %
120
(km/hr)
98 Percentile
98.8 98.8 100
100 85 Percentile 91.2794.58 Average speed 22.94
Cummulative Frequency%
86.75
68.67
45.78
98th percentile 43
40
Maximum speed 50.4
20 15.96
15 Percentile
0.6
Minimum speed 9
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Mid Value(KMPH)
Inferences:
• The maximum speed attained by the vehicles is 50.4km/hr., it is less than the speed limits mentioned by
the IRC Standards, i.e., 60 km/hr.
• Considering that the 85th percentile speed is the best value for determining the speed limits for traffic
regulations, the spot speed calculated from our gathered data is less than 27 km/hr.
• The 15th percentile speed is 12 km/hr. The vehicles travelling below this speed cause an interference with
the traffic stream and may cause hazards.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Employment and Establishment
Employment and establishment surveys is the total number of persons who work for the establishment including working
proprietors, active business partners and unpaid family workers, as well as persons working outside the establishment when paid
by and under the control of the establishment, for example, sales representatives, outside service engineers and repair and
maintenance personnel.
The enumeration may refer to a specified day, pay period or calendar week in the inquiry period
Aim : To find the employment status and the structure of the establishments within the area.
Objective : To collect the employment data from all the establishments . It would provide estimates for the demand side
conditions of the labor market.
Survey Methodology :
The survey is done on 2 stages . They are:
The first stage of sample selection is a probability sample of establishments within the area, and
The second stage of sample selection is a probability sample of jobs within areas and sampled establishments.
Survey Date :
S.NO :
__/__/2021 Ward No: Zone : Locality :
Establishment Details
Establishment Name: Location: Parking: a) Yes b) No a) On-Street b) vOff-Street
Distance from PT / IPT : a) within 0.5km
Land Use: Site Area: Built-Up Area: b)0.5 to 1km c)above 1km
Employees Mode Of
1 No . Of Employees: Transport : 2W 4W P.T IPT
Visitors Mode Of
No. Of Daily Visitors: Transport : 2W 4W P.T IPT
Distance To Reach
The Establishment: <1 >1 >3 >5 >10 >15
SHEET NO.
Employment and INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
Establishment PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 48
(2019-2023)
Key map:
GHMC Ward No': 26
Study area : Old Malakpet
Scale: 1:6,000
Intsructed by :
Mr. Tausif Iqbal
Mr. Sai Seshidhar
SHEET NO.
Employment and LOCATION OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
Establishment
ESTABLISHMENTS PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 49
(2019-2023)
Type of Parking Facility Distance to Reach Estab-
Inference : lishment
17%
By the observation most of >15 3 to 5 1 to 2 <1
Inference : It tells about
the establishments doesn’t
the employees distance to
have the parking facilities.
reach the establishment
The type of parking near the
83% 4 from their house. Based
establishments is on street
on the observation most
parking. 3
1 of the people live within
2 1km of distance from the
21 establishments
On street Parking Off street Parking
0 5 10 15 20 25
No. of daily visitors
Inference : Number of Employees

Based on the observation Inference : It tells about
16% Number of Employees
there is more percentage the Number of workers
4%
of 10-20 visitors are are working in no. of
36%
44% visited to the 10 to 20 2 establishments. By the
establishments on daily observation, in most of
basis. the establishments have
5 to 10 4 limited workers.
10 to 20 20 to 40 40 to 60 >100
0 to 5 22
0 5 10 15 20 25
SHEET NO.
Employment and ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
(2019-2023)
Trip Attraction Rate
Visitors mode of transport
• Trip Attraction identifies the number of trips attracted by
2W 4W PT/IPT Others the various activity centers in the Traffic analysis zone (TAZ)
30 and trip production identifies the number of trips produced
27
Inference : Most of the by the households in the TAZ.
25
visitors prefer 2W because
Trip rate of Visitors
20 of the availability of
Total number of Visitors =1.064
parking facilities near the
15 Total area of establishments
establishments.
10 Trip rate of Employers
5 4 Total number of employers =0.056
1 1 Total area of establishments
0
• Trip rate of visitors is 1.064. Trip rate of employers
is 0.056
• Here Total number of visitors are 1740 and total
Employees mode of transport area of establishments is 1634.51sqm
• Total number of employers are 92
2w 4w PT Walk Inference :
30 Most of the employees Trip attraction Rate:
25 working in establishments
25 prefer 2W for their Trip attraction rate of visitors = Total number of visitors x Trip rate
travel and based on the = 1740 x 1.064
20
availability of parking = 1,851.36
15 facility near the
establishment. Trip attraction rate of employers
10
= Total number of employers x Trip rate
5 3 = 92 x 0.056
1 1 = 5.152
0
SHEET NO.
Employment and ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
(2019-2023)
Origin Destination Survey
Introduction
In a transportation study, it is often necessary to know the exact origin and destination of the trips. It is not only necessary to know
how many trips are made, but also group these trips with reference of the zones of their origin and destination. Other information
yielded by O-D survey includes land-use of the zones of origin and destination, household characteristics of the trip making family,
time of the day when journeys are made, trip purpose and mode of travel. Origin is defined as the place where the trip begins and
destination is defined as the place where the trip ends
Scope
To conduct O_D studies and collect data regarding to number of trips generated, attracted and distributed.
Objective
• To judge the adequacy of existing routes and to use in planning new network of roads.
• To plan transport system and mass transit facilities in cities including routes and schedules of operation.
• To locate terminals and to plan terminal facilities.
• To locate intermediate stops of public transport.
• To locate new bridges as per traffic demands.
Methodology
Road Side Interview Method:
The vehicles are stopped at previously decided interview stations by a group of persons and the answers to prescribed questionnaire
are collected on the spot. The information collected include the place and time of origin and destination, route, locations of
stoppages, the purpose of the trip, type of vehicle and number of passengers in each vehicle.
SHEET NO.

O-D SURVEY PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 52
(2019-2023)
School of Planning and Architecture, Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture and Fine arts University
ORIGIN DESTINATION SURVEY
Location Of Survey: Direction From: To: Date

S.NO' Vehicle Type Occupancy Origin Destination Trip Purpose S.NO' Vehicle Type Occupancy Origin Destination Trip Purpose
(including (including
Driver) Driver)
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Vehicle 1. Two (2) (3) Taxi/Cab (4) (5) LCV ( Light Commercial (6) Axie (7) Multi-Axie
Type Wheelers Car/Jeep/Van Autoricksha Vehicle ) Truck Truck
w
Trip Purpose [ Applicable (1) Work (2) Shopping (3) (4) Personal (5) Social (6) (7) Other
only for Modes ( 1,2,3 ) ] Education Business Recreational Purpose
SHEET NO.

O-D SURVEY PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 53
(2019-2023)
Trip length Frequency Distribution (“LB nagar- Malakpet”)
Working day Weekend

Morning Afternoon Evening Morning Afternoon Evening
30 30
25 25
20 20
no. Of trips
No. of trips
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0--2 3--5 6--8 9-- 12-- 15-- 18-- 21-- 24-- 27-- 30-- 33-- 36-- 39-- 42-- 45-- >48 0--2 3--5 6--8 9--11 12-- 15-- 18-- 21-- 24-- 27-- 30-- 33-- 36-- 39-- 42-- 45-- >48
11 14 17 20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 14 17 20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47
Trip length Trip length
Inference:
• The graph explains number of trips for trip length intervals. At different time intervals in a
day.
• In Working days, Most of the trips are in 9-11 interval.
• In Working days, Highest distance of travel is >48 i.e 2 trips are generated in the evening.
• In Weekend, Most of the trips are in 6-11 interval.

• In Weekend, Highest distance of travel is >48 i.e 1 trip is generated in the evening.
SHEET NO.

O-D SURVEY B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 54
Trip length Frequency Distribution (“Nalgonda- Malakpet”)
Working day Weekend

Morning Afternoon Evening Morning Afternoon Evening
35 35
30 30
25 25
20 20
No. of trips
No. of trips
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0--2 3--5 6--8 9-- 12-- 15-- 18-- 21-- 24-- 27-- 30-- 33-- 36-- 39-- 42-- 45-- >48 0--2 3--5 6--8 9--11 12-- 15-- 18-- 21-- 24-- 27-- 30-- 33-- 36-- 39-- 42-- 45-- >48
11 14 17 20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 14 17 20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47
Trip length Trip length
Inference:
• The graph explains number of trips for trip length intervals. At different time intervals in a
day.
• In Working days, Most of the trips are in 6-8 interval.
• In Working days, Highest distance of travel is >48 i.e 3 trips are generated in afternoon and
3 trips are generated in the evening.
• In Weekend, Most of the trips are in 6-8 interval.

• In Weekend, Highest distance of travel is >48 i. e 3 trips are generated in afternoon and 3
trips are generated in the evening.
SHEET NO.

Trip purpose (“LB nagar- Malakpet” on working day)
Morning Afternoon Evening
80
70
Inference:
To understand trip purposes at different
60
time intervals on working day.
50 The trip purpose for most of the trips in
No. of trips
40 the morning is work.

30 Large number of trips in the afternoon
are having work.
20
More number of trips in the evening are
10
having work, Home, shopping.
0
Business Education Goods Home Other Recreational Shopping Social Work
purpose
Trip purpose
Trip purpose (“LB nagar- Malakpet” on weekend)

60
Inference:
50 To understand trip purposes at different
time intervals on weekend day.
40
The trip purpose for most of the trips in
the morning is work.
No. of trips
30
Large number of trips in the afternoon
20 are work ,shopping such as personal
works.
10
0 having work, Home, shopping.
purpose
Trip purpose
SHEET NO.

Trip purpose (“Nalgonda- Malakpet” on working day)
60 Inference:
50
time intervals on working day.
40
The trip purpose for most of the trips in the
morning are work and education.
No. of trips
30 Large number of trips in the afternoon are

having work, business, shopping, goods such
20
as personal works as their trip purpose.
10 More number of trips in the evening are
having work, Home.
0
purpose
Trip purpose
Trip purpose (“Nalgonda - Malakpet” on weekend)

60 Inference:
50 time intervals on weekend day.
The trip purpose for most of the trips in the
40
morning is work.
No. of trips
30 Large number of trips in the afternoon are

work, business, shopping, goods such as
20 personal works.
10
having work, Home.
0
purpose
Trip purpose
SHEET NO.

Mode by purpose
Inference:
Two Wheeler The more number of trips generated for work
and education i.e 326 and 138 trips
respectively.
Most preferred modes of travel are two
Taxi/Cab
wheeler and car ie. 620 and 344 trips
respectively.
Multi-Axie
Truck
Average occupancy
Average of Occupancy
LCV
Mode (including Driver)
Auto 2.1
Axie Truck 2.1

Car Car 2.1
LCV 1.8
Multi-Axie Truck 1.7

Axie Truck
Taxi/Cab 2.3
Two Wheeler 1.4
Auto
Inference:
Average occupancy for different modes.
0 50 100 150 200 250
auto, Axie truck, car is 2.1 and taxi/cab is
2.3.
SHEET NO.

Medchal Key map:
!
SURVEY CONDUCTED ON THURSDAY (11/11/2021)
!
Gandimaisamma
GHMC Ward No': 26
Yamjal
!
Kompally
!
Patancheru
!
Jeedimetla Bolarum
miyapur ! !
!
Ashok Nagar
!
Alwal Study area : Old Malakpet
!
kukatpally
Lingampally ! Balnagar
!
Kondapur
!
Cherlapally Legend
!
Hitex ECIL!
! ! !( Old Malakpet
Madhapur
! Malkajgiri
! ! !
External Trips
Gachibowli
!
NO' OF
TRIPS
Manikonda 0-4
!
Uppal 5 - 10
CBIT, Osman Sagar Ramanthpur!
! !
11 - 16
ChaitanayapuriKothapet
!( ! ! Nagole 17 - 24
Attapur ! !
! Alkapuri
suncity !
! 25 - 38
Sarurnagar
!
! LB Nagar 39 - 73
Karmanghat!
!
Jilalguda ! Bhagyalatha 74 - 153
shivarampally ! ! ! Hayathnagar
! Aramghar Meerpet !Chintalkunta ! Hyderabad Boundary
! !
NGO's colony! B.N Reddy
!
Chandrayan Gutta Badampet! !Balapur ! Hastinapuram
!
DRDO Guramguda
!
Scale: 1:160,000
!
Shamshabad
!
Intsructed by :
Mr. Tausif Iqbal
Thupuguda
! Mr. Sai Seshidhar
Ibrahimpatnam
!
SHEET NO.
TRAFFIC STUDIES (WORK SHOP)
MAPS OD DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM
B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 59
SURVEY CONDUCTED ON THURSDAY (11/11/2021)
By the observation
Internal – External Commuting trips Frequency is Low with only 6% show the
dependency rate is much lower.
PERCENTAGE TRIPS
7% 6% Internal – Internal Commuting trips Frequency is high with 45% means the
requirements of trip makers are available within the city.
I-E
I-I
E-I External – Internal Commuting trips Frequency is also high 42% only 3%
42% 45% E-E
declined compared to Internal – Internal commuting trips, this is due
dependency on city and influence of having good opportunities and
requirements.( High Dependency)
External – External Commuting trips Frequency is only 7%,and these are the
long trips generated.
SHEET NO.
Medchal
!
Key map:
SURVEY CONDUCTED ON SATURDAY (13/11/2021)
Gandimaisamma
!
!
Yamjal GHMC Ward No': 26
Kompally
!
Patancheru
!
Jeedimetla Bolarum
miyapur ! !
!
Ashok Nagar
!
Alwal
kukatpally
!
Study area : Old Malakpet
Lingampally ! Balnagar
! !
Kondapur Cherlapally
!
Hitex !
ECIL! Legend
!
Madhapur
! Malkajgiri !( Old Malakpet
! !
Gachibowli !
External Trips
!
NO' OF
TRIPS
Manikonda
! 0-4
Uppal
CBIT, Osman Sagar Ramanthpur!
! ! 5 - 10
ChaitanayapuriKothapet 11 - 16
!( ! ! Nagole
Attapur ! !
! Alkapuri
suncity ! 17 - 24
!
Sarurnagar
! 25 - 38
! LB Nagar
Karmanghat!
! 39 - 73
Jilalguda ! Bhagyalatha
shivarampally ! ! ! Hayathnagar 74 - 153
! Aramghar Meerpet !Chintalkunta !
! !
NGO's colony
! B.N Reddy Hyderabad Boundary
!
Chandrayan Gutta Badampet! Balapur ! Hastinapuram
! !
DRDO Guramguda
!
! Scale: 1:160,000
Shamshabad
!
Intsructed by :
!
Thupuguda Mr. Tausif Iqbal
Ibrahimpatnam Mr. Sai Seshidhar
!
SHEET NO.
MAPS OD DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM
SURVEY CONDUCTED ON SATURDAY (13/11/2021)
By the observation
PERCENTAGE TRIPS Internal – External Commuting trips Frequency is 4% and declined by 2%
8%4% when compared to working day. (Thursday)
I-E Internal – Internal Commuting trips Frequency is 47% increase by 2%.

I-I
E-I
41% 47% External – Internal Commuting trips Frequency is 41% only 1% declined,
E-E
this is due to partial holidays for some organisations in Hyderabad if it
was a complete holiday (Sunday) the chances of declining is more.
External – External Commuting trips Frequency 8%, increased by 1%.
SHEET NO.
Key map:
RECOMMENDATION
The total stretch length from GHMC Ward No': 26

L.B Nagar – Dilshuknagar – Nalgonda
X Road is 7.24 KM.
Nalgonda X Road
H
! Study area : Old Malakpet
Mushurambagh
From the Origin And Destination
DilshukNagar
G H
!
Kothapet Analysis it is observed that trips Legend
G
generated from Dilshuknagar 7% and H
! Area
L.B Nagar 10% ranked High among G Junction
other areas with total 17% Trips. NH 65
L.B Nagar
Arterial Road
H
!
From the Speed and delay analysis it
is observed that delay is due to
Scale: 1:30,000
signal stops, namely junction points
are Kothapet and Mushurambagh
these two are T- junctions. Intsructed by :
Mr. Tausif Iqbal
Mr. Sai Seshidhar
SHEET NO.
MAPS OD RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION
PRESENT RECOMMENDATION
Signal
The above diagram shows the current design

of Junction. The above diagram shows the Recommended design of Junction.
Due to Signal’s at junctions the travel time and delays Here in this design there is no Signal, And Provision of U-Turn will
helps in continuous flow of vehicles and travel time, delays, traffic
are frequent, and it is observed that due to no
volume and traffic jams will minimized with this approach. .
continuous flow of vehicles it leads to heavy traffic
volume and traffic jams.
SHEET NO.
On street parking
PARKING
• Parking is a major problem as it hinders
TYPE OF PARKING PARKING SURVEYS
road traffic AIM

ON STREET PARKING OFF STREET PARKING
• It is an impact of development A area must have enough parking space
• The unavailability of parking space leads • On street parking means • Exclusively allotted for parking. to provide there residents and their
to
increase in rejection the vehicles are parked on • At some distance away from the
vistiors a place to park their vechiles
• This has on influence on the preferable mode of the sides of the street main stream of traffic
travel
• Provision of parking can be capitalised
itself
• Usually controlled by • They may be operated by OBJECTIVES
Government agencies either public agencies of private • Learn the methodology of parking surveys
EFFECTS • Observing trends in parking occupancy
firms
Congestion and Parallel Surface car • Changes in parking accumulation over time
Accidents Environmental parking parks • Know parking index and turn over
Pollution • Know user satisfaction ratesPLATE
Obstruction to Fire
TERMINOLOGIES
Fighting Operations 30° angle g Roof
parkin parks
The total number of
ParkingAccumulation vehicles parked in an area Mechanical ON STREET
45° angle
at a specified moment car parks PARKING
parking
The number of vehicles Underground car

Parking parked at a given duration 60 ° angle
Volume parking parks
of time
Perpendicular Multi-storey OFF STREET

Parking This is the ratio of number parking parks
Load
Parking of bays occupied in the time PARKING
Index duration to the total spaces
available
GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
RECOMMENDED ECS minutes to 1
PERMISSIBLE SPACE STANDARDS
hour FOR PARKING
vehicles ECS
ECS(per 100 sqm. Of floor area)
Car/taxi 1.00 Type of parking Area in sqm.
Two Wheeler 0.25 land uses ECS Per ECS
Auto Rickshaw 0.50 Residential 2.0 Open 23
Bicycle 0.10 Commercial 3.0 Ground Floor covered 28
Trucks/Buses 2.5 Manufacturing 2.0 Basement 32
Emergency Vehicles 2.5 Government 1.8 Multi‐Level with Ramps 30
Rickshaw 0.8 Public and Semi‐Public Facilities 2.0 Automated Multilevel with lifts 16 (Source: MPD
2021)
SHEET NO.
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
PARKING PARKING SURVEY
INTRODUCTION
B.TECH PLANNING,SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 65
SURVEYS
Nalagonda cross road
Yasodha Hospital Market road
Pai showroom
Malakpet metro station
New Market Metro road

Hundai Showroom
SHEET NO.
TRAFFIC AND
PARKING SURVEY MAP
PARKING SURVEYS TRANSPORTATIONPLANNING 66
B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V (2019-2023)
On street On Street Parking
(11/11/21) Inference :
2 wheelers are being parked more in the afternoon
12-2pm. Because of the on street parking more
2 wheelers are parking more in the morning 7-10am because of
traffic congestion is happening. Autos are parking
the on street parking more traffic congestion is happening
more
Parkingnear
Volumethe metro station. No Parking boards
2wheelers are having more in 12-2pm. Cars are being parked
more in 4-7pm.
Parking Load
Cars are having more in the 4-7pm near Yashoda hospital
2 wheelers are having more in 7-10am and afternoon 12-2pm.
Autos are having more in 12-2pm.
Parking Index
Parking Turn Over
SHEET NO.
ON STREET PARKING TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
PARKING SURVEYS B.TECH PLANNING,SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 67
On street Off Street Parking
2 wheelers are having more in the 7-10am and afternoon
12-2pm and 4-7pm. More Trucks are being parked near (12/11/21) Inference :
Parking Volume
market road at 7-10am. Cars are having more in the 4-7pm near Yashoda hospital
2 wheelers are having more at 12-2pm and 4-7pm
Parking Load
Number of Autos are having more in the 4-7pm
Cars are more at 4-7pm.
2 wheelers are having more at 7-10am and 4-7pm. Number
of cars are more at 12-2pm and 4-7pm.
Parking Index
Parking Turn Over
SHEET NO.
OFF STREET PARKING TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
PARKING SURVEYS PLANNING
B.TECH PLANNING,SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 68
On street
Parking Accumulation
90 Parking Load and Index
35
80
70 30
60 25
50
20
40
15
30
10
20
10 5
0
07:00:00 08:00:00 09:00:00 10:00:00 12:00:00 13:00:00 14:00:00 16:00:00 17:00:00 18:00:00 19:00:00 0
07:00:00 08:00:00 09:00:00 10:00:00 12:00:00 13:00:00 14:00:00 16:00:00 17:00:00 18:00:00 19:00:00
Inference : Inference :
Evening 4pm to 5pm more comparing with other At 4pm to 5pm and 7pm to 8pm is more parking load
hours
Parking Volume:
For the full day on-street parking is 702

For the full day off-street parking is 897
SHEET NO
PARKINGACCUMULATION,
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
PARKING SURVEYS PARKING LOAD AND INDEX AND
PARKING VOLUME B.TECH PLANNING,SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 69
On street
Parking Supply and damand
On Street Off Street
800
1000
700
900
600 800
700
500
600
400
500
300 400
200 300
200
100
100
0
Demand Average Maximum 0
Demand Average Maximum
Demand Demand
Demand Demand
Inference
Parking Volume :
Inference :
On Sunday(non-weekday) the facility is under utilized The
Under utilization is being observed in the facility
facility is efficiently utilized on weekdays
Parking Load
TRANSPORT WHY ?
STUDY
STRENGTHS WEAKNESS OPPURTUNITIES THREAT
PARKING To know the
STUDY availability of
- There are more Provide parking No adequate space
Parking Index parking spaces,
number of vehicles facilities. in the surroundings
extent of usage ,
parking on the to allocate parking
estimate future
roads. facility.
Parking Turn Over parking demand.
SHEET NO
PARKING SUPPLY AND SWOT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

PARKING SURVEYS ANALYSIS B.TECH PLANNING,SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 70
ISSUES
 FACTORS LEADING TO DECREASE IN PARKING SPACE :
• Encroachments
• Electric poles in middle of the parking place
 There’s no parking space being allotted to the Commercial spots , which is a major concern.
 People Visiting the shops park their vehicles on road , which in The peak hour will cause traffic congestion.
 On street parking is being followed in a few areas , which is not the Parking zone , and even under the flyover
which cause problem to people while U-turn.
 Absence of No Parking and Parking Signage
boards.
PROPOSALS
On street parking
1)Nalgonda X Road
For Nalgonda x road near bus stand the off street
parking should provide for vehicles.
2)Pie Showroom
For this Showroom in celler the off street parking
should provide for vehicles.
By providing the off street parking the traffic

can be reduced.
3)Enhancing the parking facilities.

Nalagonda cross road
4)Provide No Parking boards and Parking signage boards.
Pai showroom
SHEET NO.
ISSUES AND PROPOSALS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

PARKING SURVEYS PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 71
(2019-2023)
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Survey Methodology
● Pedestrian Volume Count was conducted to know:
○ Number of Jaywalkers/ Facility Users in respective junctions and directions.
○ To also understand the peak time of usage.
● This Survey was conducted at 5 different locations:
○ Weekdays - Near NLG ‘X’ Road, Near Yashoda Hospital, Near New Market, Near Subbaya Gari Hotel.
○ Weekend - Near NLG ‘X’ Road, Near Yashoda Hospital.
● Reasons for selecting these locations:
○ Major Junctions with Bus stops, hence used by many pedestrians
Survey Method
The survey is done in 3 intervals i.e., Morning (7AM to 10AM), Afternoon (12PM to 2PM), Evening (5PM to
7PM)
In all directions at every junction, Facility Users and Jaywalkers were counted simultaneously, 15 min
interval (15min break & 15min Count), the total count for 1hour would be 30min, which was later doubled
to get hourly data, then used to make analysis.
SHEET NO.

BASIC SURVEYS B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V (2019-2023) 72
PVC SURVEY LOCATIONS
SHEET NO.

Weekday
Facility Users at location 1 i.e, Near Railway station

300
250
200
Pedestrians
150
100
50
0
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
Jaywalkers at location 1 i.e, Near Railway station

350
1.1 – From Malakpet Bus Stop in front of BP Station to Chadarghat

300
1.2 - From From Malakpet Bus Stop in front of BP Station to
250 Moosarambagh, 1.3 – From Malakpet Railway Station to Malakpet
200
Bus Stop in front of BP Station, 1.4 – From Malakpet Railway
Pedestrians
Station to Chadarghat, 1.5 – From Malakpet Railway Station to

Moosarambagh, 1.6 – From Malakpet Bus Stop in front of BP
150
100 Station to Malakpet Railway Station .

50
Inference :
Facility users - high in direction 1.3 in evening and low in
0
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 direction 1.3 in morning
Jaywalkers - high in direction 1.5 in morning and low indirection
1.6 in evening
SHEET NO.

Nalgonda 'X' Road(Facility user)
1000
936
900
800
700
600
500 466
400 376
328
300 262 250 268
178 188
200 162
120 122
80 98
100 70
42 46 42
22 24 22
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Weekday Weekend
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6
Nalgonda 'X' Road(Jaywalker)

1400
1190
1200
1000 2.1 – From Nalgonda Bus Stop to Malakpet, 2.2 - From

800 758
Nalgonda Bus Stop to Moosarambagh, 2.3 – From Bharat
Petroleum to Nalgonda Bus Stop, 2.4 – From Bharat
600
Petroleum to Malakpet, 2.5 – From Bharat Petroleum to
400
280
348370
254
378
302 Moosarambagh, 2.6 – From Nalgonda Bus Stop To Bharat
240
200
186
222
172 Petroleum.
0 0 0 0 0
70
7 14 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 4 0 16 Inference :
0
Weekday Weekend
Facility users - high at direction 2.3 in morning
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5
Jaywalkers - high at direction 2.5 in evening
SHEET NO.

Yashoda Hospital weekday and weekend comparision(Facility user)
600
540
500 488
422
400
300 292 291

280
248
229
218
207
194
200 180
168 168
140 130
96
100 74 64 67
45
14
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Weekday Weekend
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
Yashoda Hospital weekday and weekend comparision(Jaywalker)

1000
900
900
3.1 – From Yashoda Hospital to Nalgonda Bus Stop, 3.2 -
800
From Yashoda Hospital to Moosarambagh, 3.3 – From
700
Furniture World to Yashoda Hospital, 3.4 – From Furniture
600
523
World to Nalgonda ‘X’ Road , 3.5 – From Furniture World to
500 456 Moosarambagh, 3.6 – From Yashoda Hospital to Furniture
412
400
334322 338 321
340342
World.
300
240
276
247
223
248
295
251 Inference :
200 186
160
198
158 Facility users – high on weekends at direction 3.6 in
100
100
70 evening
18
Jaywalkers – high on weekends at direction 3.4 in evening
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
0
Weekday Weekend
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
SHEET NO.

Weekday
Facility Users at location 4 i.e, Near Market

700
600
500
Pedestrians
400
300
200
100
0
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6
Jaywalkers at location 4 i.e, Near Market

1000
900
800
4.1 – From Market Entrance to Yashoda Hospital , 4.2 - From

700
600
Market Entrance to Moosarambagh, 4.3 – From Uni Gas Station
Pedestrians
500
to Market Entrance , 4.4 – From Uni Gas Station to Furniture
400
300
World , 4.5 – From Uni Gas Station to Moosarambagh, 4.6 –
200
From Market Entrance to Uni Gas Station.
100
Inference :
0
Facility users - high in the evening at direction 4.6 and low in
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6
the morning at direction 4.1
Jaywalkers are high in the evening at direction 4.2 and low in
the afternoon at direction 4.4
SHEET NO.

Weekday
Facility Users at location 5 i.e, Near subhayya gari
hotel
300
250
200
Pedestrians
150
100
50
0
5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
Jaywalkers at location 5 i.e, Near subhayya gari hotel

250
200
150
5.1 – From Subbaya Gari Hotel to Market Entrance , 5.2 - From
Pedestrians
100
Subbaya Gari Hotel to Moosarambagh, 5.3 – From Subbaya Gari
Hotel to Dmart, 5.4 – From Dmart to Uni Gas Station, 5.5 – From
50
Dmart to Moosarambagh, 5.6 – From Dmart to Subbaya Gari Hotel.
Inference :
0 Facility users - high in evening at direction 5.2 and low in evening
5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 1.6
at direction 5.6
Jaywalkers - high in evening at direction 5.1 and low in afternoon
at direction 5.6
SHEET NO.

Observations:
• Pedestrian Volume count is done for 5 junctions but for weekends we have done 2 junctions i.e location
weekday Weekend
2(Nalgonda ‘X’ Road) & 3 (Yashoda Hospital)
location 2 location 3 location 2 location 3
• According to survey done
Location 2 – weekday – 6560 27%
weekend – 2373 43%

57%
Location 3 – weekday – 4962 73%
weekend – 6533
As mentioned in the above information the pedestrian count is more on weekday in location 2
And more on weekend in location 3
SHEET NO.

Comparison with standards (Pedestrian Facilities):
S.NO Indicators Computed Values Level of Service Standard Level of Service
Range Los
1 Signalized Intersection Delay 0% <25 1 1 4

25-50 2
50-75 3
>=75 4
2 % of Area Covered with 50.82% >=75 1 2 2
footpath 50-75 2
25-50 3
<25 4
3 Availability of Signalized 100% 75-100 1 1 2
Intersections 50-75 2
25-50 3
<=25 4
SHEET NO.
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

PVC PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 80
(2019-2023)
Recommendations :
• As the footpath is not available along the complete length of major road we need to increase the total
length of footpath so that the entire major road length has footpath along its length.
Proposals :
• Computed percentage of city covered with footpath is 50.82% this corresponds the level of service 2
• To improve the condition and make the level of service 1(>=75%),we need to increase the % of city
covered with footpaths.
• There should be a minimum increase in length of footpath by 2.31km.
V/C ratio of footpaths:
S.No. Name of the road Footpath side V/C ratio

1. Nalgonda X roads Left 0.0108
2. Nalgonda X roads Right 0.0050
• As the capacity of the footpath is greater than the pedestrian volume of the footpath, a greater number of
jaywalkers can use the footpath easily.
SHEET NO.
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
INTRODUCTION
BASIC SURVEYS PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V
(2019-2023) 81
PUBLIC TRANSPORT
Survey Methodology
Boarding and alighting survey was conducted to know:
• the dependency of users on public transport
• choice of mode of transport.
• Accessibility, demand of a particular transport.
• Feasibility of the facility ( in terms of charges, comfort,
safety )
• And also to know the peak hours of public transport usage.
The survey is done in two locations i.e:
• Nalgonda cross road bus stop
• Sono vision bus stop near yashodha hospital
These locations were selected:
• Because the 2 bus-stops are the major bus-stops, and they
are easily accessible to majority of the users, they tend to
use.
SHEET NO.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT (BUS) TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

BOARDING & ALIGHTING PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 82
(2019-2023)
Survey Methodology
BRTS: The survey is done in 3 time intervals ie: morning ( 7am-10am), afternoon ( 12pm-2pm ), evening( 5pm-
7pm )
The method followed is no.of buses arrived and departed, no.of passengers boarded/alighted, average waiting
time of the bus at the bus-stop has been recorded. This method is followed for 3 time intervals and the
necessary data is collected
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Nalgonda `x` Road Stop Highest Boarding & Alighting From
Boarding Alighting
Nalgonda `x Road
540 Boarding Alighting
385 35
24
153 187
134 141 13 25
116 11 17
70 61 58 54 46
72J 72H 299 1V 277D 156/299
Evening Afternoon Morning
1078
1122
345
540
Malakpet Bus Stop

Highest Boarding & Alighting From
Boarding Alighting
Malakpet
502
Boarding Alighting
405
230 215
193 227
117 177 58
66 62 51
56 77
27 17 16 38
Evening Afternoon Morning 72J 72H 277D 72V 1V 156/299
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Major Bus routes from Nalgonda `x` road
72J – Afzalgunj to Jaipuri colony

72H – Afzalgunj to hayathnagar
299 – Afzal gunj to Lecturer`s colony
1V – Rathifile Bus Stop to NGO`s Colony
277D – MGBS to IBP
156/299 – Mehidipatnam to Hayathnagar
Major Bus routes from Malakpet
1V – NGO`s Colony to Rathifile Bus Stop

72J – Jaipuri colony to Afzalgunj
218D – DSNR to Patancheru
156/299 – Hayathnagar to Mehdipatnam
72H – Hayathnagar to Afzalgunj
Open street map (GIS)
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Comparison with Service level benchmark & LOS by MoUD
Indicators Computation Level of service

Range LoS
1
> = 60%
Total number of buses operating on road = 62(a)
40 – 60% 2
Presence of Organized Public Transport total number of buses under the ownership of
1 20 – 40% 3 1
System in Urban Area (%) STU/SPV or under concession agreement = 62 (b)
Presence of Organized Public Transport System in < 20% 4

Urban Area (%) =( b/a)*100 = =(62/62)*100=100%
Range LoS
1
> = 0.6
Buses on road=62 (a)
Extent of Supply Availability of Public Total Population of the study area = 41185 (b) 0.4-0.6 2
2 1
Transport
Availability of Public transport /1000 population =

0.2-0.4 3
(a/b) = (62/41,185)*1000= 1.5
< 0.2 4
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)

Range LoS
Total length in road kms of the corridors on
which public transport systems ply in the 1
>=1
Ward = 1.397 km (a) (Corridors along which
the service frequency is one hour or less are
only considered to compute the length). 0.7-1 2
Service Coverage of Public Transport in
3 3
the study area
Total Study area= 3.02 Sq.Km (b)
0.3-0.7 3
Service coverage = (a/b) = 1.397/3.02 =0.46

< 0.3 4
Indicators Computation
Level of service
Range LoS
Identification of routes wise average 1

headway in peak hours at identified <= 4
bus stop
Average waiting time for public
4 4-6 2 2
transport users
Waiting time = (Headway/2)
6-10 3
Average waiting time = 10
>10 4
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Overall LOS Calculation
LOS With MoUD

S.no Indicators
Indicators
1 Presence of Organized Public Transport System in Urban

1
Area
2 Extent of Supply -Availability of Public Transport /1000
population. 1
3 Service Coverage of Public Transport in the study area 3
4 Average waiting time for Public Transport users 2
Total 7
Overall Calculated
Comments
LoS LoS (MOUD)
1 <4 The Ward has a good public transport system which is wide spread and easily available to the
citizens. The system provided is comfortable.
2 5-8 The Ward has public transport system which may need considerable improvements in terms
of supply of buses/ coaches and coverage as many parts of the Ward are not served by it.
The frequency of the services available may need improvements. The system provided is
comfortable.
3 9-12 The Ward has a public transport system which may need considerable improvements in terms of
supply of buses / coaches and coverage as most parts of the Ward are not served by it. The
frequency of the services available needs improvements. The system provided is not
comfortable as there is considerable over loading.
4 13-16 The Ward has very poor/no organized public transport system
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Observations
• The boarding of the people is more in the morning hours & at Nalgonda `X` Road (Malakpet to moosarambagh), The buses
which were boarded more were 72J, 72H, 299, 1V, 277D, 156/299.
• The alighting of the people is more in the morning hours & at Malakpet bus stop (Moosarambagh to Malakpet), The buses
which were alighted more were 72J, 72H, 277D, 72V, 1V,156/299.
• Old Malakpet has organized public transport. The coverage of overall public transport service is low.
• The average waiting time for public transport is high.
• Malakpet Bus stop doesn`t have basic public transport facilities.
Suggestions
• As per the MoUD’s service level benchmark document, extent of suppy (availability of public transport) should be level 2 or
above. The old malakpet ward has LOS 1 & it should be maintain LOS.
• The Average waiting time for public transport users, should not be more than 12 minutes. The old malakpet ward average
waiting time is 10 minutes & it should be maintained.
• Target for service coverage, in case of Old Malakpet will be service level 2 or above.
• Malakpet bus stop should have basic infrastructure facilities.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Proposals:
• Location – 2(Sonovision Bus Stop)Bus stop doesn`t
have basic public transport facilities.
• Basic infrastructure facilities like
 Seating
 Bus stop Signages.
 Travel information.
 Shelter.
 Kerbs.
 Carriageway bus stop markings.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Area based Characteristi Features
components cs
Solar Bus shelters, Energy

powered, digital Efficiency
Minimal signage/
Designed Bus advertisemen
and IPT t
Shelters board,
information
kiosks,
rooftop solar
panels,, IPT
shelters
Cycle parking Cycle parking Transport

facility upto
20
Item Cost
Bus shelter & Cycle stand 1,232,000
Grid-connected solar PV system 390,000
Vendor kiosk 250,000
Civil works 278,682
miscellaneous 150,000
Total 2,300,682
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Relevance & Feasibility Relevance: Construct of dedicated bus and IPT shelters
with adequate infrastructure.
Strategic positioning of bus and IPT shelters near
schools, and other
educational institutions to encourage children to
utilize public transportation
services
Capacity: At present the malakpet bus stop
infrastructure is not well structured. However, the
proposed in lane bus at the Yashoda hospital will serve
as the base for all mobility proposals.
Sustainability Aspects Solar powered IPT/Bus shelters kiosks will be fitted
with placeholders for
advertisement, to generate revenue for maintenance
and upgradation of the
shelter and kiosk.
The components of public transport and walkability
proposal covers several
features for differently abled, children, women and
elderly. Principles of
universal design will be adopted and implemented in
the project.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
MULTI MODEL TRANSPORT SYSTEM (MMTS)
Survey Methodology
Secondary Data :
• Acquired from Rail Nelayam, Hyderabad
division
Primary Data:
Boarding and alighting survey was conducted
to know:
• The dependency of users on MMTS
• Choice of mode of transport.
• Accessibility, demand of particular transport.
• Feasibility of the facility ( in terms of
MMTS
charges, comfort, safety )
• To know the peak hours of public transport
usage.
The survey is done at:
• Malakpet MMTS railway station
SHEET NO.
MMTS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

(2019-2023)
MMTS TOWARDS LINGAMPALLY TOWARDS FALKNAMA
Secondary data :
TIME OF TIME OF
 Malakpet railway station comes under Hyderabad division, Substation is falaknama TRAIN NO ARRIVAL TRAIN NO ARRIVAL
47153 06:41 47213 07:13
 Trains start at 6:40 (lingampally) ends 10:15 (falaknama) 47154 07:56 47176 09:21
47211 08:41 47178 10:31
 Frequency of trains is from 30 min to 1hr 47165 10:01 47212 11:16
47157 11:11 47189 12:36
 Currently the average number of people travelling is 2000 on an average 47214 11:53 47181 13:51
47216 14:06 47182 14:39
 Most frequently travelled to stations are falaknama and hafizpet 47161 15:11 47186 16:51
47162 16:11 47120 17:51
 Passenger Peak hours are 5pm - 8pm 47164 18:01 47187 18:21
47166 18:46 47188 19:16
 Due to covid only 50 % of trains are traveling 47207 19:41 47190 19:46
47167 20:11 47191 20:44
 Passengers decreased by 70 % IN 2021 47203 20:51 47192 21:31
47220 21:31 47159 22:28
Security: 47170 22:17 47194 22:56
 Only security Gard is present
 Covid measures mask and sanitizers are being suggested but restriction is not being followed
Parking:
Parking fee for 3 hours
Two wheelers Rs. 12
 Parking is available – paid
Three wheelers Rs. 30
 On an average daily 60 vehicles are being parked Four wheelers Rs. 18
cycle Rs. 5
Safety measurements/ accidents –
 accidents do not occur on station. The once occurred on railway tracks will taken care by GRP (Government railway police )
SHEET NO.
(2019-2023)
NUMBER OF PASSENGERS TRAVELLED THROUGH MMTS IN YEARS 2018 -21
SHEET NO.
(2019-2023)
Survey Methodology
MMTS: The survey is done from 8:00am to 7:15 pm

o The survey was done for trains going towards Lingampally & Falaknama
o Location: platform no 1 &2 closer to entry and exit gate
o Method used : tally marks of people boarding and alighting
L in ga m
Fa
pa
l u
lli
kn am a
The data collected regarding
o No.of trains arrived and departed
o No.of passengers boarded/alighted
o Average waiting time for every train
SHEET NO.
(2019-2023)
MMTS Boarding & Alighting towards Lingaampalli
Boarding Alighting
517
241
146
72 65 76
MMTS
L in ga m
Falu
pa lli
kna
m a
MMTS Boarding & Alighting towards Faluknama

Boarding Alighting
496
335
234 207
65 76
SHEET NO.
(2019-2023)
Indicators Level of service

Range LoS
1
> = 0.6
1 Extent of Supply Availability of Public Transport 0.4-0.6 2 1
0.2-0.4 3
< 0.2 4
Range LoS
1
>=1
2 Service Coverage of Public Transport in the study area 0.7-1 2 4
0.3-0.7 3
< 0.3 4
Range LoS
1
<= 4
3 Average waiting time for public transport users 4
4-6 2
6-10 3
>10 4
SHEET NO.
(2019-2023)
Overall LOS Calculation
LOS With MoUD
S.no Indicators
Indicators
1 Extent of Supply -Availability of Public Transport /1000 1

population.
2 Service Coverage of Public Transport in the study area 4
3 Average waiting time for Public Transport users 4
4 Percentage fleet size as per urban bus specification 100%
Total 9
Overall Calculated
Comments
LoS LoS (MOUD)
1 <4 The Ward has a good public transport system which is wide spread and easily available to the
citizens. The system provided is comfortable.
2 5-8 The Ward has public transport system which may need considerable improvements in terms
of supply of buses/ coaches and coverage as many parts of the Ward are not served by it.
The frequency of the services available may need improvements. The system provided is
comfortable.
3 9-12 The Ward has a public transport system which may need considerable improvements in terms of
supply of buses / coaches and coverage as most parts of the Ward are not served by it. The
frequency of the services available needs improvements. The system provided is not
comfortable as there is considerable over loading.
4 13-16 The Ward has very poor/no organized public transport system
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Observations
o People alighting at Malkpet station is high in the morning

o People boarding the train at Malkpet station towards Falaknama is high in the afternoon
o Most of the passengers are Students and employees
o The waiting time for each time is more than 30 min but no delay of trains is observed
o The trains halt at station for only 1 min
o No specific restriction is applied as per covid 19 norms
Suggestions
o As per the MoUD’s service level benchmark document, extent of supply (availability of public transport) should be level 2 or
above. The old Malkpet ward has LOS 1 & it should be maintain LOS.
o The Average waiting time for public transport users, should not be more than 12 minutes. The old Malkpet ward average
waiting time is 30 minutes this is majorly due to decrease of no of train travelling due to covid 19 pandemic it should be
regulated according to the situation
o Target for service coverage, in case of Old Malkpet will be service level 2 or above.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
PROPOSAL:
Multi model transit system
 Malkpet MMTS, Malkpet metro station and Bus stop are located within 150
metres radius
 The access to interchange between these transits is difficult due to lack of
connecting walkways/ pathways available
 The route from Malkpet metro station to MMTS is an arterial road with
continuous traffic flow the absence of footpath and direct connection to the Pedestrian volume count
MMTS are increasing the difficulty of interchanging between transits
 There is a existing foot over bridge connecting MMTS and the bus stop which
hold the capacity of passengers using it
Weekday
Facility Users at location 1 i.e, Near Jaywalkers at location 1 i.e, Near
Railway station Railway station
300 350
250 300
200 250
Pedestrians
1.1 – From Malkpet Bus Stop in front of BP Station to

Pedestrians
200 Chadarghat , 1.2 - From From Malakpet Bus Stop in

150
150 front of BP Station to Moosarambagh, 1.3 – From
100 Malakpet Railway Station to Malakpet Bus Stop in
100
front of BP Station, 1.4 – From Malakpet Railway
50 50 Station to Chadarghat, 1.5 – From Malakpet Railway
0 0 Station to Moosarambagh, 1.6 – From Malakpet Bus
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Stop in front of BP Station to Malakpet Railway
Station .
SHEET NO.
PROPOSAL: Multi model transit system TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
(2019-2023)
Recommendation:
A connecting staircase from metro station to exiting foot over bridge to avoid the traffic congestion on road due
to jaywalkers and easy access to train as well as bus stop, staircase of with 1.5 meters connecting directly to
the foot over bridge with capacity of 60 people .Operational integration between MMTS and bus transportation
to make trips more efficient. As observed during survey people using MMTS are utilizing bus transport network.
By integrating these two systems the passengers will experience less inconvenience while switching between
MMTS and buses.
Benefits
o Increase in system efficiency
o Reduction in conjunction
SHEET NO.
PROPOSAL: Multi model transit system TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
BOARDING & ALIGHTING
Intermediate Public Transport Survey
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Intermediate public transport survey was conducted to know:
• The dependency of users on intermediate public transport.
• Choice of mode of transport.
• Accessibility and demand of a particular transport.
• Feasibility and affordability of the facility ( in terms of charges, comfort, safety )
Location of the survey:
• The survey was done along Nalgonda X road, towards Malakpet railway station.
These locations were selected:
• To know the travel through autos/Share autos(IPT).
• Because most of the IPT users were seen arriving/departing here.
SURVEY METHOD
• The following data was collected by surveying the users who were using the IPT(autos) along the Nalgonda X
road, towards Malakpet railway station.
• Auto, Share auto & Taxi modes of IPT (Intermediate Public Transport) that has been found in the location.
SHEET NO.
IPT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

IPT SURVEY PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 103
(2019-2023)
Is IPT available through out the
How close is the nearest IPT? What are the types of IPT used day & night?
by users?
30% Yes No
40%
Auto
15%
35%
Share Auto
35%
Auto/Share
30% Auto
35% 65%
<250m >1km <1km Auto/Share
15% Auto/Taxi 65% of users answered IPT is not
40% users live at a distance less
than 250m from their nearest IPT available throughout the Day/Night
35% of users use both
auto and share auto.
Is IPT Available to every location Did COVID-19 impact the
in the area or are there any choice of IPT?
What is the range of cost for
stops?
Specific IPT?
Location 10-20rs 45%
Every Lo- 20-30rs
35% 25%
47% cation >30rs 55%
53%
40%
More than 50% of the users say 40% of the IPT users cost range 55% of IPT users say COVID-19
IPT is available to every location. between 20-30rs impacted their choice of IPT
SHEET NO.
IPT
(2019-2023)
SERVICE LEVEL BENCHMARKS COMPARISION
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Computed Standard Level of
S.No Indicators
Values Service
Range LOS
>30 1
Average
25-30 2
1 travel 27kmph 2
speed of IPT 15-25 3
<15 4
>=75 1
ITS with GPS 50-75 2
2 70% 2
facility 25-50 3
<25 4
SHEET NO.
IPT SURVEY IPT
(2019-2023)
Recommendations :
• If parking space for share auto/auto rickshaw with regulated prices
can be provided, it would help make serve as first and last mile
connectors to respective bus stands in and around Major Junctions &
encourage the use of public transport for longer distances while IPTs Nalgonda ‘X’
will be mainly used for shorter distances to access the nearest Public Road Bus Stop
transportation, in this case bus stand.
Proposals :
• Parking lot will be feasible at Nalgonda ‘X’ Road; Based on URDPFI
standards(2014) parking lot with 2 ECU per 100sqm of floor area is
recommended at a public space, further area for each 1 ECU can
Legend
vary from 23sqm to 32sqm for a open parking & basement
Buildings
respectively. Recreational
Public Space
• Based on area of Nalgonda ‘X’ Road, which is approx. 500sqm,
Road
 For an Open parking, Parking space for maximum of 21 share Metro Rail tracks
auto/auto rickshaw is suggested.
 For Basement parking, Parking space for maximum of 16 share
auto/auto rickshaw is suggested.
SHEET NO.
IPT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

(2019-2023)
Level of service
Range LoS
1
>=50
Length of major road network = 2.794
km (a)
1 NMT Coverage (% network covered) Length of Cycle network = 0 km (b) 25 – 50 2 4
% network covered = (b/a)*100
=(0/2.794)*100 = 0 %
25 – 15 3
<15 4
Indicators Computation Level

of
servic
Level of service e–
as per
sugge
stion
Range LoS
1
Length of encroachment due to parking on cycle <=10
track = 0 km (a)
Encroachment on NMV roads by Length of Cycle network = 0*2 = 0 km (b) 10 – 20 2
2 1 4*
vehicles parking (% % of on street parking on cycle track = (Length
of encroachment on cycle network (a) / length
of total cycle network (b))*100 = 0 / (0) = 0 % 20 – 30 3
>30 4
SHEET NO.
NMV TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

NMV SURVEYS PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 107
(2019-2023)
Level of service
Range LoS
1
Total no. of interchanges i.e. major bus >75
stops, terminals and railway stations = 3
(a)
NMT parking facilities at Interchanges Total number of interchanges having 50 – 75 2
3 4
(%) NMT parking facilities (within 250 m
radius) =0 (b)
NMT Parking facilities at Interchanges =
(b/a)*100 =(0/3)*100=0% 25 – 50 3
<25 4
Sr.No Indicator LoS (MoUD)
1 NMT Coverage (% network covered) 4
2 Encroachment on NMV roads by vehicles parking (%) 1
3 NMT parking facilities at Interchanges (%) 4
Total 9
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Overall LoS Calculated LoS Comments
(MOUD
1 3-5 The Ward has adequate NMT facilities along overall road network.
2 6-8 The Ward has NMT facilities which may need some improvements in terms of encroachments, parking
facilities at interchanges etc as some parts of the Ward are not served by it. The system provided is
otherwise comfortable and sustainable
3 9-10 The Ward has NMT facilities which may need considerable improvements
as many parts of the Ward are not served by it.
4 11-12
The Ward lacks adequate NMT facilities
Observation:
• The ward lacks infrastructure facilities for Non Motorized Vehicles.
• There are no dedicated cycle lanes in the city.
• The share of bicycle in the ward is very less at less than 10% of the mode share. However even if this
means small, the city should initiate on cycle tracks for the safety of the minimal existing users.
• Bicycle parking facilities are not available in the ward.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Suggestions:
• 25% of a major roads in a ward should be covered
with bicycle lanes.
• All the interchanges present in the ward should
have NMV parking provision.
• We need to promote the use of NMV in ward.
Proposals:
• Bus stop & MMTS should have NMV parking
facilities.
• Cycle lanes should be provided from 2 bus stops &
New market metro station to residential streets.
• 2 Major Junctions of the old malakpet i.e,
Nalgonda `X` roads & Malakpet should provide
NMV cross facilites along with pedestrians.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
HAWKERS AND VENDORS
Aim/objective: To allocate proper resources and spaces for informal sectors and reduce traffic or congestion caused by
hawkers.
Location: From starting to ending points of malakpet ward boundary.
Objectives: Since the study of hawkers and vendors is rational, the methodologies and approaches vary depending
upon the place, type of activity and the number of vendors and hawkers.
Hence, in this study, the methodology is as follows:
a)Understanding the meaning and reasons for setting up such informal sectors.
b)Primary survey and data collection. This primary data collection specifies about the location, resources available and
used, vendor or hawker and problems faced.
c) Analysing the situation with the data collected and representing the statistically.
d)Drawing out alternative solutions for the problems faced.
e)Recommending based on the alternatives taken.
f) Proposals.
SHEET NO.
HAWKERS & VENDORS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

BASIC SURVEY PLANNING B.PLANNING, SEMESTER V 111
(2019-2023)
Footpaths in Old Malakpet
4
1
2 3
1
2
3
4
The survey is done from the starting to the ending
points of study area. Major vendors are located near
gunj market, new market metro station.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
Existing situation/issues: Based upon the primary survey and data collection, it is observed that:
VENDORS
HAWKERS
a)There are more vendors than hawkers. Reason:
a)Before and during the construction of the
since malakpet has become over crowded with
metro rail, the pedestrian path was filled
vehicles leading to traffic, it is causing a
with vendors. But after the completion of
difficulty in wandering from one place to
the project, the authority has made sure
another.
that there are no such vendor’s stalls near
b)The vendors who are settled on pedestrian paths
to the station. Hence, that created
for activities cause on street parking and further
relocating and removal of many such
leading to traffic, congestion and accidents.
stalls.
(reference picture 1)
b)The hawkers face difficulties such as
c) The vendors face difficulties like not have proper
traffic and not finding proper place to put
infrastructure like: water and light facility
up their stall.
causing a problem at nights. They mostly depend
on the street lights.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
ISSUES
HAWKERS VENDORS
• More traffic is observed in malakpet, it is difficult • Due to lack of parking facilities, the roads are
for the vehicles to even move during peak hours. occupied by the customers and that is creating a
Hence, hawkers face more problems in selling their congestion on road, leading to traffic.
goods and wandering from place to place. • The vendors are even occupying the railings and
roads and due to that, the people are facing an
issue like traffic and accidents.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)
According to national policy of vendors, the vendors cannot be relocated or does not have any right to relocate them.
So, to ensure less traffic occurred by the vendors and the stalls, we can recommend parking spaces which will
increase the space for pedestrians on the stretch and also reduces the traffic.
SHEET NO.

(2019-2023)

Final Traffic

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Traffic

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU ARCHITECTURE AND FINE ARTS

1. Introduction - demography and history of malakpet

Stage 2: Collection of Stage 4: ideate

Date of survey Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4

• PVC( Malakpet junction, Market

• There IS ONE MAJOR ROAD Hyderabad-vijayawada highway. DEMOGRAPHICS:

years population population

2011 46256 120000

Study area : old malakpet

MAPS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

Study area : old malakpet

BASIC SURVEYS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

Measurements are in metres

Motorised Vehicles Inventory

BASIC SURVEYS ROAD INVENTORY TRAFFIC STUDIES( WORKSHOP)

Kerb Height – 0.3m

Threats Due to open defaecation near

BASIC SURVEYS ROAD INVENTORY TRAFFIC STUDIES( WORKSHOP)

Public Toilet on Footpath: Road Assets Management Tool:

BASIC SURVEYS ROAD INVENTORY TRAFFIC STUDIES( WORKSHOP)

Decide on the sample

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

Respondent Name: Location: House No: Household size:

Educatio Distance from Mode of travel

No. and type of owned Vehicle : a) c) NMT (Cycle,

Time taken to Average

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

PCTR (Per Capita Trip Rate) = Total trips

Total population (according to survey)=471

PCTR excluding walk Cycle 8

ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

Trip length Frequency Mid values Fi*xi Trip Length

No. of persons travel

Trip length (km)

ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

Trip Bus 2w 4w Walk Cycle Office School Trip length by mode

No. of persons travel

ANALYSIS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

Duration and Interval of Traffic Counts

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

This road connect to

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

MALAKPET TO NEW MARKET 1 09.15

total number of vehicles

Peak stream line flow morning and evening hours

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

& low(538) at morning 5858.45

total number of vehicles

PIE GRAPH FOR TOTAL VEHICULAR COMPOSITION

Total vehicle composiiton

-401 Two-wheeler 969 From the above graph, we

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

total number of vehicles

800 traffic volume of 6369.6. 5000 4283.14407.2

morning and evening timings morning and evening timings

Peak stream line flow

-210 Car 272

Auto rickshaw 389 From the above graph, we can 8274

INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

low(482) at morning interval 9.30-9.45. 2500 2208.9 2223