Professional Documents
Culture Documents
to kill a
mockingbird
Members:
1. Cindy Cherya
2. Larasati Namira Dastra
3. Soraya Dewi Kartikasari
4. Tiara Angelina Wijaya
5. Aurelia Stefany
6. Sarah Dameria Sembiring
A BRIEF OVERVIEW AND
SUMMARY
To Kill a Mockingbird takes place in the fictional town of
Maycomb, Alabama, South America in the 1930s during the Great
Depression. It is one of the most racist states at that time, White
people in the region have made their own assumption that black
people are poor, uneducated and a source of crime. That year,
despite the many threats and criticism he received from the public,
Atticus, a white lawyer defended a black man named Tom
Robinson who was accused of raping a white girl, named Mayella
Ewell.. The racial prejudice against black people has blinded most
white people to justice and truth, which later led them to find Tom
Robinson guilty even though the evidences and facts found in the
court said otherwise (absence of presumption of innocence during
the trial process).
How could the jury in
To Kill A Mockingbird
find
RatherTom
and
than beingRobinson
ethnicity,
diverse in gender, race,
the jury was
guilty?
monochromatic, populated by 12 white
men. We believe it was this lack of
diversity that prevented the Mockingbird
jury from providing Tom Robinson with
his guaranteed right to a fair trial “by
an impartial jury of the State.”
(no women, no minorities. all white, all men)
01
U.S JURY SYSTEM
Article III, Section II of the U.S Constitution,
the Sixth Amendment (criminal cases) & the
Seventh Amendment to the U.S Constitution
(civil case)
the significance and
importance of jury trial
Duncan v. Louisiana (1968):
Those who wrote our constitutions knew from history and experience that it was
necessary to protect against unfounded criminal charges brought to eliminate
enemies and against judges too responsive to the voice of higher authority. The
framers of the constitutions strove to create an independent judiciary but insisted
upon further protection against arbitrary action. Providing an accused with the
right to be tried by a jury of his peers gave him an inestimable safeguard against
the corrupt or overzealous prosecutor and against the compliant, biased, or
eccentric judge.
the common problems
associated with
jury trials
1. The jury tempted to convict based on personal
feelings rather than on conviction beyond
reasonable doubt.
2. The jury exhibits discrimination by racial “A court is only as sound as its jury,
/ ethnicity / sexual prejudices in their mind. and a jury is only as sound as the
men who make it up.” – Atticus’s
=> The jury’s lacks impartiality. closing argument in
To Kill A Mockingbird
U.S JURY
ELECTION PROCESS
TWO-STAGE
PROCESS
01. 02.
STAGE
1. Taking and passing judge education
2. Acceptance of candidate judge proposals
3. Administrative selection
4. Due diligence selection
5. Determination of graduation ( based on ranking)
6. Submission of proposals to the House of
Representative for approval.
U.S INDONESIA
Common law – inherited from U.K Civil Law – inherited from Dutch
Judge and jury play very different roles in the Judges receive, examine, judge and settle all
trial. The jury listen to the evidence, decide what legal disputes presented to him. In civil cases,
the facts of the case are, and decide whether the judges must assist justice seekers and strive to
overcome obstacles in order to create a simple,
accused is guilty or not guilty, while
fast and low cost trial.
the judge presides over a courtroom, hearing
evidence, making decisions on motions, A person who wishes to become a judge must
instructing juries, and making rulings or pass a judge education held by the Supreme
sentencing. Court and go through several stages. Judges are
appointed by the President of the Republic of
When selecting the jury, the court creates a pool of Indonesia from the names of candidates
qualified people (venire) from the community, submitted by the House of Representatives on
continued by jury challenge (for cause and the recommendation of the Judicial Commission.
peremptory challenge) to select people from the
venire to be the jury.
CONCLUSION
In regards to our analysis to the To Kill A Mocking Bird Film,
we found out that the lack of diversity diminishes the quality of
decisions made by juries that lack different perspectives and
life experiences.
+ +