This document defines multimodal discourse as communication that uses multiple semiotic modes, including verbal and visual interactions. It applies theories of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) that view communication as more than just language. Multimodal discourse analyzes how modes like images, gestures, sounds are combined and relate to each other. It may involve reinforcing messages, playing complementary roles, or having a hierarchical relationship. The document establishes three types of modality in multimodal communication: naturalistic modality using sounds/images; abstract modality regarding images; and sensory modality based on sensory pleasure from audiovisual texts.
This document defines multimodal discourse as communication that uses multiple semiotic modes, including verbal and visual interactions. It applies theories of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) that view communication as more than just language. Multimodal discourse analyzes how modes like images, gestures, sounds are combined and relate to each other. It may involve reinforcing messages, playing complementary roles, or having a hierarchical relationship. The document establishes three types of modality in multimodal communication: naturalistic modality using sounds/images; abstract modality regarding images; and sensory modality based on sensory pleasure from audiovisual texts.
This document defines multimodal discourse as communication that uses multiple semiotic modes, including verbal and visual interactions. It applies theories of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) that view communication as more than just language. Multimodal discourse analyzes how modes like images, gestures, sounds are combined and relate to each other. It may involve reinforcing messages, playing complementary roles, or having a hierarchical relationship. The document establishes three types of modality in multimodal communication: naturalistic modality using sounds/images; abstract modality regarding images; and sensory modality based on sensory pleasure from audiovisual texts.
Definition of Multimodal Discourse • Discourse Discourses are socially constructed knowledges of (some aspect of) reality. By 'socially constructed, we mean that they have been developed in specific social contexts, and in ways which are appropriate to the interests of social actors in these contexts, whether these are very broad contexts or not (a particular family), explicitly institutionalized contexts (newspapers) or not (dinner- table conversations), and so on. Discourses are socially situated forms of knowledge about (aspects of) reality. This includes knowledge of the events constituting that reality (who is involved, what takes place, where and when it takes place, and so on) as well as a set of related evaluations, purposes, interpretations and legitimations. • Multimodal Multimodal is one branch of the study of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) developed by Kress and Van Leeuwen in Reading Images (2006). This multimodal study applies all interactions, both verbal and visual interactions. The term multimodality views communication and representation as more than language. It places more attention on other communication modes, such as the visual mode of images, gesture, gaze, posture, color, typography, or composition (Kress & Leeuwen, 2006). Kress and Leeuwen certainly offer grammar, which is a structure for the study of visual modes. The three Meta-functions of visual grammar are called as symbolic, interactive, and compositional. The social semiotic approach to image analysis is based on Halliday’s approach to language as a social semiotic. Language is not seen in this approach from the ideational meaning: the definition of the circumstance, operation, or state of affairs, but it is seen as one of the semiotic structures representing a culture. These Meta-functions are the ideational ,interpersonal, and textual function (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004). • Multimodal discourse is defined as the use of several semiotic modes in the design of a semiotic product or event, together with the particular way in which these modes are combined they may for instance reinforce each other (say the same thing in different ways), fulfil complementary roles, or be hierarchically ordered, as in action films, where action is dominant, with music adding a touch of emotive colour and sync sound a touch of realistic presence (Kress G. Van Leeuwen, T, 1996, 2001 Batesman et al., 2002) • It is clear that a mode (gesture, colour, taste) may be quite fully articulated and yet not have a correspondingly articulated set of labels in language, spoken or written Establishing the right modality • Naturalistic modality, Naturalistic modality produced with sound, images, audio-visual texts or the combination of all these. • Abstract modality Abstract modality with regard to images • Sensory modality Sensory modality based on the sensory pleasure or displeasure represented by an audio-visual text