Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction to Managerial
Economics
Content
• Introduction
• Meaning and Definitions of Managerial Economics
• Characteristics of Managerial Economics
• Nature of Managerial Economics
• Types of Managerial Economics
• Principles of Managerial Economics
Introduction of Managerial Economics
• Managerial economics is a stream of management studies which
emphasises solving business problems and decision-making by
applying the theories and principles of microeconomics and
macroeconomics. It is a specialised stream dealing with the
organisation’s internal issues by using various economic theories.
• Managerial economics, used synonymously with business
economics. It is a branch of economics that deals with the
application of microeconomic analysis to decision-making
techniques of businesses and management units. It acts as the via
media between economic theory and pragmatic economics.
Managerial economics bridges the gap between "theory and
practice". businesses and management units
Definitions of Managerial Economics
According to Spencer and Siegelman,“The integration of economic
theory with business practice for the purpose of facilitating decision-
making and forward planning by management”.
According to McGutgan and Moyer, “Managerial economics is the
application of economic theory and methodology to decision-making
problems faced by both public and private institutions”.
• Managerial economics studies the application of the principles,
techniques and concepts of economics to managerial problems of
business and industrial enterprises. The term is used interchangeably
with micro economics, macro economics, monetary economics.
Characteristics of Managerial Economics
(i) It studies the problems and principles of an individual business firm or
an individual industry. It aids the management in forecasting and evaluating
the trends of the market.
(ii) It is concerned with varied corrective measures that a management
undertakes under various circumstances. It deals with goal determination,
goal development and achievement of these goals. Future planning, policy
making, decision making and optimal utilization of available resources, come
under the banner of managerial economics.
(iii) Managerial economics is pragmatic. In pure microeconomic theory,
analysis is performed, based on certain exceptions, which are far from
reality. However, in managerial economics, managerial issues are resolved
daily and difficult issues of economic theory are kept at bay.
(iv) Managerial economics employs economic concepts and principles,
which are known as the theory of Firm or 'Economics of the Firm'. Thus,
its scope is narrower than that of pure economic theory.
(v) Managerial economics incorporates certain aspects of
macroeconomic theory. These are essential to comprehending the
circumstances and environments that envelop the working conditions
of an individual firm or an industry. Knowledge of macroeconomic
issues such as business cycles, taxation policies, industrial policy of the
government, price and distribution policies, wage policies and
antimonopoly policies and so on, is integral to the successful functioning
of a business enterprise.
(vi) Managerial economics aims at supporting the management in taking
corrective decisions and charting plans and policies for future.
(vii) Science is a system of rules and principles engendered for attaining
given ends. Scientific methods have been credited as the optimal path
to achieving one's goals. Managerial economics has been is also called a
scientific art because it helps the management in the best and efficient
utilization of scarce economic resources. It considers production costs,
demand, price, profit, risk etc. It assists the management in singling out
the most feasible alternative. Managerial economics facilitates good
and result oriented decisions under conditions of uncertainty.
(viii) Managerial economics is a normative and applied discipline. It
suggests the application of economic principles with regard to policy
formulation, decision-making and future planning. It not only describes
the goals of an organization but also prescribes the means of achieving
these goals.
Nature of Managerial Economics
• To know more about managerial economics, we must know about its various
characteristics. Let us read about the nature of this concept in the following
points:
• Art and Science: Managerial economics requires a lot of logical
thinking and creative skills for decision making or problem-solving. It is
also considered to be a stream of science by some economist claiming
that it involves the application of different economic principles,
techniques and methods, to solve business problems.
• Micro Economics: In managerial economics, managers generally deal
with the problems related to a particular organisation instead of the
whole economy. Therefore it is considered to be a part of
microeconomics.
• Uses Macro Economics: A business functions in an external
environment, i.e. it serves the market, which is a part of the economy
as a whole.
• Therefore, it is essential for managers to analyse the different factors of
macroeconomics such as market conditions, economic reforms,
• Multi-disciplinary: It uses many tools and principles belonging to
various disciplines such as accounting, finance, statistics,
mathematics, production, operation research, human resource,
marketing, etc.
• Prescriptive / Normative Discipline: It aims at goal achievement
and deals with practical situations or problems by implementing
corrective measures.
• Management Oriented: It acts as a tool in the hands of managers
to deal with business-related problems and uncertainties
appropriately. It also provides for goal establishment, policy
formulation and effective decision making.
• Pragmatic: It is a practical and logical approach towards the day to
day business problems.
Types of Managerial Economics
• All managers take the concept of managerial economics
differently. Some may be more focused on customer’s
satisfaction while others may prioritize efficient production.
• The various approach to managerial economics can be seen in
detail below:
Liberal Managerialism: A market is a democratic place where people
are liberal to make their choices and decisions. The organisation
and the managers have to function according to the customer’s
demand and market trend; else it may lead to business failures.
Normative Managerialism: The normative view of managerial
economics states that administrative decisions are based on real-life
experiences and practices. They have a practical approach to
demand analysis, forecasting, cost management, product design and
promotion, recruitment, etc.
Radical Managerialism: Managers must have a revolutionary
attitude towards business problems, i.e. they must make decisions
to change the present situation or condition. They focus more on
the customer’s requirement and satisfaction rather than only profit
maximisation.
Objective of the firm
Profit maximisation
• Usually, in economics, we assume firms are
concerned with maximizing profit. Higher profit
means:
• Higher dividends for shareholders.
• More profit can be used to finance research and
development.
• Higher profit makes the firm less vulnerable to
takeover.
• Higher profit enables higher salaries for workers
Economic objectives of firms
The main objectives of firms are:
1.Profit maximization
2.Sales maximization (Baumol’s)
3.Increased market share/market dominance
4.Social/environmental concerns
5.Profit satisficing
6.Co-operatives
• Sometimes there is an overlap of objectives. For example,
seeking to increase market share, may lead to lower profits in
the short-term, but enable profit maximization in the long run.
Business Objectives
SVC Week - 2
Alternative Objectives of Firms
• Baumol’s Sales or Revenue Maximization
• Williamson’s Managerial Utility Functions
• Cyert-March Satisficing Behaviour
• Rothschild’s model of Long-run Survival and Market
share goals
• Entry prevention and Risk avoidance model
• Maximization of value of the firm
Alternative aims of firms
However, in the real world, firms may pursue other objectives apart from profit
maximization.
1. Satisficing Behaviour (Cyert-March)
• In many firms, there is a separation of ownership and control. Those who own the
company (shareholders) often do not get involved in the day to day running of the
company.
• This is a problem because although the owners may want to maximize profits, the
managers have much less incentive to maximize profits because they do not get
the same rewards, (share dividends)
• Therefore managers may create a minimum level of profit to keep the
shareholders happy, but then maximize other objectives, such as enjoying work,
getting on with other workers. (e.g. not sacking them) This is the problem of
separation between owners and managers.
• This ‘principal-agent‘ problem can be overcome, to some extent, by giving
managers share options and performance related pay although in some industries
it is difficult to measure performance.
2. Sales maximization (Prof. Baumol)
• Firms often seek to increase their market share – even if
it means less profit. This could occur for various reasons:
• Increased market share increases monopoly power and
may enable the firm to put up prices and make more
profit in the long run.
• Managers prefer to work for bigger companies as it leads
to greater prestige and higher salaries.
• Increasing market share may force rivals out of business.
E.g. the growth of supermarkets have lead to the demise
of many local shops. Some firms may actually engage in
predatory pricing which involves making a loss to force a
rival out of business.
3. Growth maximization
• This is similar to sales maximization and may involve
mergers and takeovers. With this objective, the firm may
be willing to make lower levels of profit in order to
increase in size and gain more market share. More
market share increases its monopoly power and ability
to be a price setter.
4. Long run profit maximization (Rothschild)
• In some cases, firms may sacrifice profits in the short
term to increase profits in the long run. For example, by
investing heavily in new capacity, firms may make a loss
in the short run but enable higher profits in the future.
5. Social/environmental concerns
• A firm may incur extra expense to choose products which don’t
harm the environment or products not tested on animals.
Alternatively, firms may be concerned about local community /
charitable concerns.
• Some firms may adopt social/environmental concerns as part of
their branding. This can ultimately help profitability as the brand
becomes more attractive to consumers.
• Some firms may adopt social/environmental concerns on principal
alone – even if it does little to improve sales/brand image.
6. Co-operatives
• Co-operatives may have completely different objectives to a
typical PLC. A co-operative is run to maximize the welfare of all
stakeholders – especially workers. Any profit the co-operative
makes will be shared amongst all members.
Decision Making
Meaning and Definitions of Decision Making:
• One of the most important functions of a manager is to take
decisions in the organization. Success or failure of an
organization mainly depends upon the quality of decision that the
managers take at all levels. Each managerial decision, whether it
is concerned with planning, organizing, staffing or directing is
concerned with the process of decision-making.
• A decision is a course of action which is consciously chosen from
among a set of alternatives to achieve a desired result. It means
decision comes in picture when various alternatives are present.
Hence, in organization an execute forms a conclusion by
developing various course of actions in a given situation.
Definition of Decision Making
• According to D. E. McFarland, “A decision is an act of
choice – wherein an executive forms a conclusion about
what must not be done in a given situation. A decision
represents a course of behavior chosen from a number of
possible alternatives”.
• According to Haynes and Massie, “a decision is a course of
action which is consciously chosen for achieving a desired
result”.
• According to R. A. Killian, “A decision in its simplest form
is a selection of alternatives”.
Characteristics of Decision-Making
1. Goal-Oriented:
Decision-making is a goal-oriented process. Decisions are usually made to
achieve some purpose or goal.
2. Alternatives:
A decision should be viewed as ‘a point reached in a stream of action’. It is
characterized by two activities – search and choice. The manager
searches for opportunities, to arrive at decisions and for alternative
solutions, so that action may take place. Choice leads to decision.
3. Analytical-Intellectual:
Decision-making is not a purely intellectual process. It has both the
inductive and deductive logic; it contains conscious and unconscious
aspects. Part of it can be learned, but part of it depends upon the personal
characteristics of the decision maker.
4. Dynamic Process:
Decision-making is characterized as a process, rather than as, one static
entity. It is a process of using inputs effectively in the solution of selected
problems and the creation of outputs that have utility. Moreover, it is a
process concerned with ‘identifying worthwhile things to do’ in a dynamic
setting.
5. Pervasive Function:
Decision-making permeates all management and covers every part of an
enterprise. In fact, whatever a manager does, he does through decision-
making only; the end products of a manager’s work are decisions and
actions.
6. Continuous Activity:
The life of a manager is a perpetual choice making activity. He decides
things on a continual and regular basis. It is not a one shot deal.
7. Commitment of Time, Effort and Money:
Decision-making implies commitment of time, effort and money. The
commitment may be for short term or long-term depending on the type of
decision (e.g., strategic, tactical or operating). Once a decision is made, the
organisation moves in a specific direction, in order to achieve the goals.
8. Human and Social Process:
Decision-making is a human and social process involving intellectual abilities,
intuition and judgment. The human as well as social imparts of a decision are
usually taken into account while making the choice from several alternatives.
9. Integral Part of Planning:
As Koontz indicated, ‘decision making is the core of planning’. Both are
intellectual processes, demanding discretion and judgment. Both aim at
achieving goals. Both are situational in nature. Both involve choice among
alternative courses of action. Both are based on forecasts and assumptions
about future risk and uncertainty.
Types of Decision-Making
The decisions taken by managers at various points
of time may be classified thus:
(1)Marginal Analysis