Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group L
Section 2
PGP 14
AGENDA
Case Background
Issue in case
Case Analysis
Solutions
Company
Personality Associates offered family counselling with a well-qualified professional staff in a modern relaxed setting
Tree-lined, pleasant street assisted in services offered
Word-of mouth endorsement by faculty and other members of the University were he initially taught
Revenue for 2005 was $1.6 million
Staff: 8 full-time and part-time licensed psychologist and counsellors
Business was incorporated in 1995 by Myers and two other partners with a total capitalization of $200,000
Original contribution to the partnership was maintained until the date of incorporation
The building that housed Personality Associates was owned by the corporation, free and clear
The substantial profit after-tax (retained earnings) earned since the company’s inception had been used to completely amortize the
mortgage
The company essentially debt free and solely owned by Myers and two of his associates – the original investors
Public was willing to accept the “for-profit” medical care facility
Personality Associates was poised to expand
Revenue for the company was expected to increase by a compound annual rate of 15 percent over the next five years or so
Income statement and Balance sheet
Revenue $1,600,000
Total Expenses (1,120,000)
Profit before tax 480,000
Taxes (35%) (168,000)
Profit after tax $312,000
Revenue was expected to grow at the rate of 15% per year and myer was thinking of opening another facility
with out diluting the service offered at his center
They were going for the renovation of existing facility and were thinking How should the projected need for
approximately $150,000 be acquired?
Another was how they should plan for the funds for the new facility they are trying to acquire at the cost of
$850000 ?
They wanted to expand the company and was ready for further borrowings but didn’t want to dilute their
holding on the company
Conflict between “for profit” vs Control over the company
Case Analysis
EFN 168876.8
Yes, the projected financing allows us to retain majority control in the business as profit after tax and the
available surplus is more than enough to finance the future investment. External fund requirement (EFN) is
also coming negative which supports our calculations.
Is expansion feasible for the company? Are there likely any ethical
issues related to operating a chain of therapy centers?
Yes the expansion is feasible as the company is financially strong enough to meet the future investment and
requirement.
Yes there are ethical issues related to operating a chain of therapy centres. The dilemma which Myers had
might be true i.e. the quality will not be maintained in the chain. Myers wanted to make sure that the internal
mechanisms traditionally used in the business to assure quality would be maintained. In addition to certain
state licensing requirements, many such operations used peer monitoring and evaluation to ensure
conformity to accepted rules of conduct and the providing of high-quality service.
How should the owner/managers deal with the question of growth
versus maintaining control of the business?
The question of growth is solved by the internal growth and profit after tax. Only the question of maintaining
control of business should be considered deeply. This could be achieved by recruiting knowledgeable and
skilful persons.
What managerial/financial problems will likely occur with
expansion?
Financially the percentage PAT will also increase and the management issues will increase. Hence proper
managerial actions to be taken.
Generally, what are some reasonable sources of expansion funds for
the type of expansion planned by Personality Associates?
Reasonable sources of expansion funds for the type of expansion planned are as follows :-
Fund it internal revenue i.e. surplus and profit after tax.
Take loan from the bank or creditors
Issue IPO. But this will reduce the control over the company.