Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Decision
Making for
Marketing and
Events
1. Title
2. Executive summary (c.100 words) – see final business tutorial for how to write this
3. Contents
4. Figures List
5. Introduction (c.200 words) – the purpose of the report/ background information
6. Methods (c.200 words) – the analysis methods you used on the data
7. Results (c.200 words) – key findings from your analysis
8. Ethical issues (c.100 words) – any ethical issues in how the data was collected
9. Discussion (c.200 words) – your conclusions from your analysis
10. Recommendations for the next conference and future research (c.200 words) –
including any recommendations for the format and content of the next conference,
critical path analysis for organising the next conference (diagram), and
recommendations for how to collect data about the conference in future
11. References
12. Appendix (only expected to include any additional data you feel necessary to
support your argument elsewhere)
Marking criteria: in full in assessment brief
% Descriptor Criteria
Assessment Choice of data used, Critical approach to Quality of discussion Quality of Standards of literacy,
criteria/ and analysis of the the data, including recommendations for future structure and
weighting data ethical issues events, data collection, and presentation, including
Grading (25%) (20%) planning ( 25%) referencing (10%)
level (20%)
90- PASS Outstandingly Outstanding Discussion provides Clear and appropriate Highest standards of
100 Outstanding thorough and rigorous evaluation of the an outstandingly recommendations given for literacy and professional
analysis of the data strengths and robust and concise both the next conference presentation, following
provided. Outstanding weaknesses of the synthesis and and future data collection. the structure specified in
choices in which data data and data interpretation of Outstanding originality of the brief. Outstanding use
to use and how. gathering methods, your data analysis, thought, using a critical of external sources,
Outstanding insight including ethical supported by approach and external referencing that conforms
and understanding of issues. evidence from your sources to develop precisely to UWE Harvard
relevant statistical analysis. recommendations. requirements.
tools. 23-25 marks 18-20 marks 18-20 marks 23-25 marks 9-10 marks
80-89 PASS Exceptionally thorough Exceptional Discussion provides Clear and appropriate Highest standards of
Exceptional and rigorous analysis evaluation of the an exceptionally recommendations given for literacy and professional
of the data provided. strengths and robust and concise both the next conference presentation, following
Exceptional choices in weaknesses of the synthesis and and future data collection. the structure specified in
which data to use and data and data interpretation of Exceptional originality of the brief. Exceptional use
how. Exceptional gathering methods, your data analysis, thought, using a critical of external sources,
insight and including ethical supported by approach and external referencing that conforms
understanding of issues. evidence from your sources to develop precisely to UWE Harvard
relevant statistical analysis. recommendations. requirements.
tools. 20-22 marks 16-17 marks 16-17 marks 20-22 marks 8 marks
70-79 PASS Excellent and rigorous Excellent evaluation Discussion provides Clear and appropriate Excellent standards of
Role of tutorials – and your role
• Every tutorial builds towards your assessment
o Understand the key tools, techniques, theories
o Practice applying to real world scenarios
o Use feedback from tutor in sessions to improve your work on
your business report
• Your role
o Prepare: allows us to focus on practical application and answer
your questions in class, instead of reading the materials in class
or missing the preparatory video