Professional Documents
Culture Documents
November 2022
1
CRISIL Ratings ViewCube on InvITs and REITs
ViewCube is a compilation of sector views expressed during CRISIL Ratings’ webinars. These include CRISIL
Ratings’ own views, those of stakeholders, and those emanating from a poll conducted during the webinar.
2
Contents
3
Our view
Section 1
4
‒ Posted a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~90% over fiscals 2019-2022
Evolving regulations along with favourable tax structure aiding wider acceptance
InvITs-REITs have witnessed addition of asset classes beyond roads and transmission over the last four years
‒ Roads still account for 50% of the outstanding InvITs-REITs by volume; telecom infrastructure contributes to more than 50% of the total
AUM
‒ Moving from passive to active infrastructure asset classes, which are higher in the risk spectrum
‒ Data centres, hospitals, railways/metros, airports can be potential asset classes for future monetisation
‒ Only 2 of the outstanding 11 InvITs have leverage (debt to AUM) more than 50%
‒ Regulatory requirement of maintaining ‘AAA’ rating may leave limited headroom to increase leverage
*InvITs: Infrastructure investment trusts; REITs: Real estate investment trusts
5
© 2022 CRISIL Ltd. All rights reserved.
Global presence and evolution in India
6
InvITs and REITs, a win-win for all stakeholders and the macro-economy
Developers Facilitation of easy entry and exit Macro economy
for investors
Access to low-cost and Pooling of assets leading to risk Development of primary and secondary
long-term capital diversification capital markets
7
Globally accepted investment vehicle with a long track record
InvIT/ REIT structure varies across countries because of differences in governance, legislation and demographics
United
US Singapore Japan Hong Kong India
Kingdom
Market capitalisation
1293 72 112 21 56 17
($ billion)
Market cap/GDP (%) 5.6% 18.1% 2.3% 5.7% 1.8% 0.5%
Source: S&P CapIQ as of October 2022
*only publicly traded REITs
8
Evolution of InvITs and REITs in India
AUM has seen a CAGR of 90% over fiscals 2019-2022
AUMs (Rs ‘000 crore) InvITs REITs 92
81
10
New asset classes have joined the InvIT-REIT bandwagon
Renewables, telecom infrastructure are new asset classes
Inner circle represents number of trusts
Outer circle represents share of AUM
• Initially, more passive asset classes with stable cash flows such as power transmission and toll roads were deemed amenable to the InvIT platform
• Gradually, more classes such as pipelines, telecom infrastructure and renewables have come into the fray
• Roads have emerged as the most popular asset class driven by:
‒ Long operational track record of assets
‒ Ready availability of assets with healthy pace of infrastructure creation
‒ Predictability of cash flows with costs linked to inflation
‒ Strong counterparty for HAM projects– National Highways Authority of India
11
© 2022 CRISIL Ltd. All rights reserved.
Growth potential over the medium term
12
InvITs and REITs can be partners in India’s infrastructure growth
Expected infrastructure funding requirement Attractive routes for infrastructure financing
Energy
Toll/ annuity roads HAM* roads
13
Strong monetisable base available across infrastructure asset classes
Analysis of current asset valuations Opportunities present across asset classes
Optic fiber
8% Renewable
Discounted cash flow (DCF) method and current market multiple
used to arrive at the potential of each asset class Pipeline
14
InvITs and REITs, partners in the National Monetisation Plan
Sector-wise monetisation plan Phasing of the planned monetisation
1.8
1.7
Roads 1.6 1.6
Railways 1.52
0.88
0.2
Ports 0.13 15
Stadiums
0.11
0.15
Others 0.26
But pace of adoption by developers depends on multiple factors
Why developers may choose this route Why developers may not choose this route
• Will lead to a more efficient tax structure • Regulatory restrictions on leverage/rating and
high surveillance
• Helps accelerate growth and allows focus on
infrastructure creation rather than • Risk profile of underlying asset classes may
maintenance be
high
16
Strong pipeline of assets moving into InvITs/REITs
Healthy growth expected to continue
111
62
0 13
FY15 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 Est
• ~Rs 40,000 crore of InvITs have already been announced and expected to operationalise over the coming months
• Growth momentum is expected to continue over the medium term, supported by monetisation of existing asset classes and new
asset classes moving into InvIT-REITs
17
Credit profile of InvITs and REITs
18
19
Long tenure of debt with increasing bank loans in the debt
mix
While the average maturity has been constant at ~9 years… …The share of bank loans has increased
FY20 FY22
Trust A 5
7
10 49% NCDs
Trust B 58%
10
10 51%
Trust D
10 42%
Trust E 6
6
FY20 FY22
• An analysis of the debt profile of the five largest InvITs/REITs shows that the proportion of bank loans in the debt mix has increased with the Reserve
Bank of India allowing commercial banks to lend to these trusts
• Still, the average debt maturity is long at ~9 years
• While the trusts face refinancing and interest rate risks, these are mitigated by:
‒ Long remaining life of the assets leading to healthy project life cycle ratio (PLCR) and ample refinancing opportunities
‒ Healthy cushion in the DSCR
20
Low leverage and diversified asset portfolio improve credit profile
100% Fiscal 2020/21 100% Fiscal 2022
90% 90%
Typical debt/AUM of a
80% standalone infrastructure asset 80%
70% 70%
60% 60%
Debt/AUM
Debt/AUM
Adequate cushion
40% 40%
30% 30%
in DSCR
in DSCR
available
available
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
0.5 1 1.5 2 3 0.5 1 1.5 2 3
2.5 Note: Size of bubble indicates number of assets held 2.5
DSCR (Times) DSCR (Times)
• Though InvITs have been allowed to increase net debt to 70% of their asset value, most are still well below the threshold
• These five trusts have completed six distributions and are eligible to raise the leverage
• The mandatory ‘AAA’ credit rating stipulated for a 70:30 debt-to-equity ratio provides an automatic cap to the leverage
• As the InvIT spectrum widens, the risk profile of the underlying asset classes has increased, necessitating lower leverage
21
Credit profiles of InvITs-REITs vary across the risk spectrum
Varied degree of Earnings Counterparty Operating Regulatory Interest rate
risks → risk risk risk risk risk
Power
transmission*
HAM roads^
Toll roads
Renewable energy
Telecom Infra
Commercial real
estate
The above table represents the risk of these asset classes relative to each other. More ‘active’ asset classes such
as education centres, hospitals, hotels would have higher relative risks
^NHAI assets
*Interstate transmission system assets High risk Low risk
Moderate risk
22
Key takeaways
With evolving regulations, the CAGR was over 90% during fiscals 2019-22; growth momentum expected
to continue with AUM reaching Rs 5 lakh crore by the end of the current fiscal
So far, the credit risk profile remains healthy on account of low leverage resulting in healthy DSCR across
asset classes. Leverage has remained low despite regulatory relaxation, probably due to the mandate of
a ‘AAA’ rating
Beside traditional infrastructure classes, newer assets such as data centres, hospitals, airports,
railways could also provide growth opportunities. As the assets classes move from passive to active,
the underlying risk spectrum would widen.
23
Their view
Section 2
24
25
Excerpts from a panel discussion held during the webinar (2/4)
Amenability of various asset classes to InvITs Private versus public listed InvITs
• Any cash flow generating structure with long term predictability can
Private InvITs have more flexibility in taking up under-construction
assets and can be floated with lower number of investors
•
• investors like to
be amenable to build a balanced portfolio of investments – some
this structure • Some businesses may have inherent project risks or plans of building
want to invest in classes such as transmission which have annuity like projects that are amenable to private routes
cash flows while others may wish to invest in roads which give a rv
d
e
• SEBI has enables both kinds of business platforms to allow more e
hedge against inflation and interest rates s
e
r
capital to come in s
t
ig
• While the asset base in renewables is significant and the class is h
r
ll
• Public requires more disclosures – limited business with a longer track
A
.d
amenable to InvITs, there has not been a lot of traction through this t
L
L
IS
record in relatively safer asset classes may opt for this I
route so far. Some reasons may be: R
C2
2
• Eventually as business grow and the markets becomes deeper, we 0
2
‒ Most developers have a sizeable project pipeline – as InvITs have ©
may see private InvITs converting to public
restrictions on allowing under-construction asset, these may not
be amenable • As market evolves, both types of InvITs should flourish well
‒ Ample capital is available for developers should they wish to raise
equity for their under-construction projects
‒ Higher valuation may be available to developers through PE and
other equity raising routes
26
Excerpts from a panel discussion held during the webinar (3/4)
On de-linking of sponsor from InvITs On innovations to propel InvITs and REITs
• In some foreign markets, there is no concept of sponsor. India may • Promote retail investor participation through:
also go down this route a few years down the line
‒ Enablement – Further reduce the lot size to bring it within the
• Already, there are many financial investor owned InvITs now along reach of retail investors
with the traditional developer owned models
• ‒ Education – increase awareness and knowledge base regarding
Next 5-10 years new InvITs would continue to be started with rv
d
e
InvITs and REITs and the businesses of the underlying asset class e
developers as there is a critical mass of assets that developers need s
e
r
to reassure investors s
t
to monetize ig
h
r
ll
• Eventually, the market may migrate into variety of investors and • Deepen the debt market
A
.d
t
L
L
IS
platforms I
‒ Enable long-term capital providers such as offshore bond market, R
C2
• The larger InvITs will continue to growth without having a ROFO on pension funds, and insurance companies to participate
2
0
2
©
developer assets – they will continue to participate in bids whether for
private assets or public ‒ While insurance companies can subscribe to units of InvITs and
REITs, they are not allowed to invest in their debt instruments.
• The InvITs right now are handful but their asset size is large – this
Allowing this would boost participation
trend is expected to continue where smaller number of InvITs
command a large asset size • Promote sponsor/investor confidence through a stable tax regime
• Larger asset size has an advantage in terms of cost, liquidity and
competitiveness
27
Excerpts from a panel discussion held during the webinar (4/4)
On leverage cap for REITs
• While the debt cap is 49%, it is prudent for REITs to stay in the 25-
30% bracket at most times to maintain a good balance
• REITs have to distribute 90% of the net distributable cash flows. This
means they need to raise debt prudently, in addition to equity, when
going for growth. In case the debt cap is increased, it would help rv
d
e
e
lower the cost of debt and ensure greater flexibility s
e
r
s
t
ig
• Banks are still not allowed to lend to REITs – this may be due to real h
r
ll
A
.d
estate as a sector being classified as “unsafe” for bank lending t
L
L
IS
I
R
C2
2
0
2
©
2
8
Poll view
Section 3
29
6%
18% 17%
4%
54% 33%
33%
30
Results of a survey conducted during the webinar* (2/2)
Q4. Which newer asset class can be Q5. Where do you see the AUM (asset Q6. As a lender, what can be the most
best suited for InvITs-REITs in the near under management) of InvITs-REITs prominent risk while investing in
to medium term? over next 12-18 months? InvITs-REITs?
10%
20%
39%
38%
36%
HAM roads Data centers Less than 5 lakh cr Lack of adequate disclosures
31
Thank you
32
About CRISIL Ratings Limited (A subsidiary of CRISIL Limited)
CRISIL Ratings pioneered the concept of credit rating in India in 1987. With a tradition of independence, analytical rigour and innovation, we set the standards in the credit rating business.
We rate the entire range of debt instruments, such as, bank loans, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, non-convertible / convertible / partially convertible bonds and debentures,
perpetual bonds, bank hybrid capital instruments, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, partial guarantees and other structured debt instruments. We have rated over 33,000
large and mid-scale corporates and financial institutions. We have also instituted several innovations in India in the rating business, including rating municipal bonds, partially guaranteed
instruments and infrastructure investment trusts (InvITs).
CRISIL Ratings Limited ("CRISIL Ratings") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CRISIL Limited ("CRISIL"). CRISIL Ratings Limited is registered in India as a credit rating agency with the
Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI").
33