Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anwaruddin, S. M. (2016). Why critical literacy should turn to ‘the affective turn’: Making a case
for critical affective literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 381-
396.
Ahmed, A., Morgan, B., & Maciel, R. F. (2021). Feeling our Way: A Trioethnography on Critical
Affective Literacy for Applied Linguistics. Calidoscópio, 19 (4), 538-552.
Ahmed, A., & Morgan, B. (2021). Postmemory and multilingual identities in English Language
Teaching: A duoethnography. Language Learning Journal, 49 (4), 483-498.
Morgan, B., Rocha, C., & Maciel, R. F. (2021). Literacies in Times of Crisis:
A Trioethnography on Affective and Transgressive Practices. Brazilian Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 21 (2), 333-369.
Multidisciplinary Influences in/for CAL
● Duoethnography is helpful to
promote an affective approach
to knowledge production.
● It challenges the neoliberal
notion of an autonomous
subject, capable of
managing/regulating emotions.
● Duoethnography promotes a
dialogical and distributive
notion of emotions.
Affect/Emotion: Final Thoughts & Cautions
Discussion points
• Too many “turns”? (i.e. insights and blind spots of an
affective/emotion turn)
• Not just positive emotions
• A confessional obligation, neoliberal subjectification, cruel
optimism (Berlant), normalizing emotion rules/emotion
labour in ELT/LTE
Terima kasih!
Anwar & Brian