Professional Documents
Culture Documents
corporate brands
MODULE 3.3 AND 3.3
Syllabus:
• In building global brand equity, we often must create different marketing programs
to satisfy different market segments. Therefore, we must:
• 1. Identify differences in consumer behavior—how consumers purchase and use
products and what they know and feel about brands—in each market.
• 2. Adjust the branding program accordingly through the choice of brand elements,
the nature of the actual marketing program and activities, and the leveraging of
secondary associations.
• The third way to build global brand equity, leveraging secondary brand associations
(co-branding, character, events, country) , is probably the most likely to require
change across countries because the entities linked to a brand may take on very
different meanings in different countries.
• For example, U.S. companies such as Coca-Cola, Levi Strauss, and Nike
traditionally gained an important source of equity in going overseas by
virtue of their U.S. heritage, which is not as much of an issue or asset in
their domestic market. Harley-Davidson has aggressively marketed its
classic U.S. image, customized for different cultures, to generate about 30
percent of its sales from abroad.
• Understanding how consumers form their impressions of country of origin
and update their brand knowledge can be challenging. The design,
manufacture, assembly, distribution, and marketing of products often
involve several countries. Apple’s iPhone is designed and owned by a
U.S. company and assembled and shipped from China from parts
produced largely in several Asian and European countries.
Understand local behavior before going global
• One reason many companies ran into trouble initially going overseas is that they unknowingly—
or perhaps even deliberately—overlooked differences in consumer behavior. E.g., Starbucks,
Dunkin's. Because of the relative expense and sometimes unsophisticated nature of the
marketing research industry in smaller markets, many companies chose to forgo basic consumer
research and put products on the shelf to see what would happen. As a result, they sometimes
became aware of consumer differences only after they fail. To avoid these types of mistakes,
marketers may need to conduct research into local markets.
• In many cases, however, marketing research reveals that product differences are not justified for
certain countries. At one time, Palmolive soap was sold globally with 22 different fragrances,
packages, nine shapes, and numerous positionings. After conducting marketing analyses to reap
the benefits of global marketing, the company chose to employ just seven fragrances, one core
packaging design, and three main shapes, all executed around two related positionings (one for
developing markets and one for developed markets).
Advantages and disadvantages
• ADVANTAGES OF GLOBAL MARKETING PROGRAM:
• 1. Economies of Scale in Production and Distribution: From a supply-side or cost
perspective, the primary advantages of a global marketing program are the
manufacturing efficiencies and lower costs that derive from higher volumes in
production and distribution. The more economies of scale in production and distribution
from a standardized global marketing program will prevail by increase in production.
• Lower Marketing Costs: Another set of cost advantages arises from uniformity in
packaging, advertising, promotion, and other marketing communication activities. The
more uniform, the greater the potential savings. A global corporate branding strategy
such as Sony’s is perhaps the most efficient means of spreading marketing costs across
both products and countries. Branding experts maintain that using one name can save a
business tens of millions of dollars a year in marketing costs.
Example
• E.g., Pepsodent toothpaste was a failure in South-East Asia because the company promised that
persons who used it would have whiter teeth, which caused the communications campaign to
fail, since persons from this part of the world saw black or yellow teeth as symbols of prestige.
• https://thunderbird.asu.edu/thought-leadership/insights/its-peach-not-stork-how-pg-recovered-p
ampers-fail-japan
Leadership brand
• Leadership brand is a reputation for developing exceptional managers with a
distinct set of talents that are uniquely geared to fulfill customers' and
investors' expectations. A company with a leadership brand inspires faith that
employees and managers will consistently make good on the firm's promises.
E.g., Parents who take their kids to a Disney theme park assume that ride
operators and restaurant personnel will be upbeat, friendly, and gracious.
• A leadership brand conveys your identity and distinctiveness as a leader. It
communicates the value you offer. ... A strong personal leadership brand
allows all that's powerful and effective about your leadership to become
known to your colleagues, enabling you to generate maximum value.
• Brand leadership refers to the techniques and strategies that
organizations use to market a product or service. Usually, the brand
leader is a best-selling product or service and one that is recognized in
a certain market segment. Leading brands are identified as such when
they are relevant, unique, and exciting.
• A leadership brand is also embedded in the organization’s culture,
through its policies and its requirements for employees.
• For example, the tagline of Lexus is “the pursuit of perfection.”
Internally, the Lexus division translates that promise into the
expectation that managers will excel at managing quality processes.
Five principles of brand leadership
• A corporate image will depend on a number of factors, such as the products a company
makes, the actions it takes, and the way it communicates to consumers.
• A corporate brand is distinct from a product brand in that it can encompass a much wider
range of associations. As, a corporate brand name may be more likely to evoke
associations of common products and their shared attributes or benefits, people and
relationships, programs and values, and corporate credibility.
• These associations can have an important effect on the brand equity and market
performance of individual products. For example, one research study revealed that
consumers with a more favorable corporate image of HUL were more likely to respond
favorably to the claims made in an ad for Surf Excel and therefore actually buy the
product.
• Building and managing a strong corporate brand image, however, can
necessitate that the firm keep a high public profile, especially to influence
and shape some of the more abstract types of associations. The CEO or
managing director, if associated with a corporate brand, must also be
willing to maintain a more public profile to help communicate news and
information, as well as perhaps provide a symbol of current marketing
activities. E.g., Steve Jobs, Ratan Tata have maintained public image and
communicate specially in the launch of the product.
• At the same time, a firm must also be willing to subject itself to more
scrutiny and be extremely transparent in its values, activities, and
programs. That helps them to maintain corporate image in public.
Corporate brands thus have to be comfortable with a high level of
openness.
• Corporate brand equity is the differential response by consumers, customers,
employees, other firms, or any relevant community to the words, actions,
communications, products, or services provided by an identified corporate brand
entity.
• In other words, positive corporate brand image occurs when a relevant community
responds more favorably to a corporate ad campaign, a corporate-branded product
or service, a corporate-issued PR release, and so on than if the same offering were
attributed to an unknown or fictitious company.
• Corporate image dimensions:
• Common Product Attributes, Benefits, or Attitudes: Like individual brands, a
corporate or company brand may evoke in consumers a strong association to a
product attribute (Hershey with “chocolate”), type of user (BMW with
“youngsters”), usage situation (McDonalds’ with “fun times”), or overall
judgment (Sony with “quality”).
Two specific product-related corporate image associations—high quality
and innovation deserve special attention.