Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Longitudinal studies
We start knowing the effect (the disease) and we look for the risk
factor/factors, in general, in a retrospective manner
exposed
Sample
with disease
unexposed
Target population
exposed
Sample
without disease
unexposed
Time
Study direction
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Systematic sample
Stratified sample
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Exposed to the
risk factor a b a+b
Unexposed to
the risk factor c d c+d
TOTAL
a+c b+d a+b+c+d
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
DATA ANALYSIS
a
- exposure odds for cases =
c
b
- exposure odds for control group =
d
a
c ad
ODDS RATIO (OR) =
b bc
d
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
INTERPRETATION
OR = 1
there is NO association between exposure and
disease
OR < 1
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
If OR>1 and CI limits are close to OR, but without including the
value 1, then we can state that there is a positive association
between the risk factor and the disease
ADVANTAGES:
Fast
Cheap
Easy to perform
It looks into more than one risk factor (more than one exposure)
They can determine causality, they are usefull for only one disease
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
DISADVANTAGES:
Memory errors, selection errors
EXAMPLE:
In an obstetrics clinic there was performed a study on the
newborns between 1960 and 2000, in order to establish a
possible connection between drinking alcohol during pregnancy
and the apparition of the lip and maxillary cleft. During this
study there were devised two groups, one of 43 newborns with
lip clefs or labio-maxillo-palatine clefs and a control group with
newborns without the malformation. There are no differences
between the two groups (except the presence of the
malformation in the cases group). There were excluded from the
sample lot the patients with other malformations besides lip
clefs or labio-maxillo-palatine clefs.