Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The consumer redressal process is becoming cumberstone expensive and time consuming. Many time consumers
are required to engage lawyers in these cases required time for filling and attending the court proceedings in
most purchases cash memos are not issued and evidence is not easy to gather moreover most purchases in the
market are small retail sales. The existing laws also are not clear on the issue of compensation to consumers of
defective products besides this the enforcement of laws that protect workers especially in the unorganised sector
is weak. Similarly rules and regulations for working of markets are often not followed
Consumer Movements
● Case Studies
● Reji’s Sufferings - reji Mathew a boy studying in class ninth admitted in a private clinic in Kerala
for operation of tonsils
● An ENT surgeon operated under general anaesthesia as a result of improper anaesthesia reji
showed symptoms of brain abnormalities and was crippled for life
● Father filed a complaint in state consumer dispute redressal commission claiming compensation for
rupees 5 lakh for medical negligence and deficiency
● The state commission dismissed saying that evidence was not sufficient regis father appeal against
national consumer dispute redressal commission located in New Delhi
● They look after the complete and held the hospital responsible for medical negligence and directed
to pay the compensation
● In my opinion it is the negligence of doctor and staff which resulted in this condition of the boy
producers and provider should strictly follow required safety rules and regulations to perform safe
operations.
● While using many goods and services we as consumers have the right to be protected against the
marketing of goods and delivery of services that are hazardous to life and property
Questions of Case Study
1. LPG cylinder should be safely delivered and handled in the medicine the MRP
should not be exceeded and expiration date should be checked same with
edible oil and lastly in a high rise building proper safety measures for the
workers and the surrounding should be taken
2. Once I was near a construction area where the workers were not wearing
safety equipments as a result one worker fell and got himself hurt which was
the responsibility of the producer or the owner.
● Waiting- Ankita and engineering graduate after
submitting all certificates and attending interview for a
government job did not receive any news of the result.
● The officials also refused to comply therefore filed an
application using the RTI act saying that it was her right to
move the result in a reasonable time so that she could plan
her future
● He was not only informed about the reasons for the delay
in the end result but also got her call letter for appointment
as she performed well in the interview
● In my view it is completely correct I have the right to view
her result under consumer right of ‘right to be informed’.
Questions of Case Study
1. To increase profit margins some retailers for shopkeeper sell products above MRP which is wrong it happens
many a time when you go to a hill station for a water place when the charge us extra for service at special place
2. The ingredients help us to know what's inside so that we can buy it with accordance to our energies and nutrition
requirements it also has MRP and various marks such as ISI and agmark. But they should also have proper
warning if any so that the user is alerted
3. Yes I agree RTI act insurance its citizens all the information about the function of government departments if the
work is not being done which is important for living gandi gandi question the authorities for this
● A Refund-
● Abhirami student join the two year course at a local coaching institute and gave lump sum
amount of 61020 rupees
● However she decided to opt out at the end of one year as she found that quality of teaching
was not upto the mark when she asked for a refund she was denied
● She filed the case in district consumer court and they directed the institute to refund 28000
saying that she had the right to choose
● The institute again appealed in in state consumer commission the state commission upheld
the district court direction and further find the institute fees 25000 for a frivolous appeal it
also directed the institute to pay rupees 7000 as compensation and litigation cost
● And also restrained all education and professional institutions from charging fees for the
entire duration of the course in advanced any violation of this order mein invite penalties
and imprisonment commission said
● In my opinion the decision was fair this activity of taking the money in advance was the
violation for right to choose for the student if he wanted to discontinue the service
Questions of Case Study