Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMPENSATION
z
DEFINED
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
1. There must be two parties, who, in their own right, are principal creditors and
principal debtors of each other
2. Both debts must consist in money, or if the things due are fungibles
(consumables), they must be of the same kind and quality
3. Both debts must be due. (Unless agreed by the parties – Art. 1282)
There must be two parties, who, in their own right, are principal
creditors and principal debtors of each other.
z
General Rule
In case of a guarantor.
Example
FACTS:
QUESTION
Answer
There is no legal compensation. Under the code, it is essential that there must
be two parties, who in their own right, are principal creditors and principal
debtors of each other.
Question
Suppose X actually used the money for school tuition, would the answer be
different?
z
Answer
2nd requisite
Both debts must consist in money, or if the things due are fungibles
(consumables), they must be of the same kind and quality
z
Facts
A borrowed from X 10,000 payable on demand. Later on, X obtained a loan from
A in the form of fertilizers amounting to 10,000.
When X demands for the payment of 10,000 cash, A refuses to pay and claims
for legal compensation.
z
Question
Legally, there is no valid legal compensation as the code provides, both debts
must consists in money or if things due are fungibles, it must be of the same
kind and quality.
z
4th Requisite
In this case, both contracts are voidable since one of the parties
has no legal capacity, therefore the same is not demandable.
Later on, parents of the siblings died and left and estate.
Before partition, A wanted to waive his share to the estate in favor of X and to
set-off his debt to the latter.
z
Question
No. the code provides that the debt must be liquidated. In the case give, the
share of A in the estate is yet to be liquidated, therefore, legal compensation is
not tenable.
z
5th Requisite
X demanded for the payment of 500K. A offered the car to X to set-off the loan
the former obtained to the latter.
z
Question
No. LBP has an interest over the subject car and in fact the same was
encumbered unto it. The code provides that for compensation to take in effect,
there must be no controversy or retention commenced by third person over the
object.
In the case given, the car has controversy as it was encumbered to LBP and the
latter has retention rights over the subject car.
When compensation has taken place without any intervention on the part of the
interested parties, obligation is extinguished.
The debtor cannot set up The debtor may set up The debtor may set up
against the assignee the compensation for debts PRIOR defense of compensation
compensation against the to the assignment, but not of all credits until he is
assignee. However, if the subsequent ones. notified of such
debtor notified the assignor of assignment
his reservation of his right to
the compensation, the debtor
can still set up compensation
z
Debts which cannot be subject to
compensation
5. Certain obligations in favor of the government, such as taxes, fees, duties and
others of a similar nature.
z
When Compensation takes effect
It will take effect from the moment all of the essential requisites
prescribed by law are present.
NOVATION
z
What is Novation?
Classification of Novation
z EXTINCTIVE
When the OLD obligation subsists to the extent it remains compatible with the
amendatory agreement.
z
KINDS of NOVATION
z
As to its essence
2. IMPLIED/TACIT - when the old and the new obligations are incompatible
with each other on every point, the novation is tacit or implied.
z
As to Extent/Effect
Let us say that under the judgment obligation, the liability of the
judgment debtor is for the amount of P6,000, but both judgment
debtor and judgment creditor subsequently entered into a contract
reducing the liability of the former to only P4,000.
z
Is there NOVATION?
z
Answer
In the case given, there is no new or modified obligation arose out of the payment of
the reduced amount, as the two obligations are not in unequivocal terms with each
other neither was there complete and substantial incompatibility between the two
obligations.
(Sandico vs Piguing)
z
Facts
Is there Novation?
z
DELEGACION – Insolvency of the NEW debtor shall not revive the action of
the Creditor against the OLD Debtor. Except when such insolvency was already
existing and of public knowledge or known to the debtor when he delegated his
debt.
(Art. 1296)
z
Therefore, there is nothing to novate, the new obligation cannot produce any
effect.
z
There is no new obligation. In novation the NEW obligation must also be valid.
z
General Rule:
Exception:
General Rule:
Exception:
If stipulated otherwise.
z
Novation By Subrogation
When a creditor pays another creditor who is preferred, even without the
debtor’s knowledge;
When a third person, not interested in the obligation, pays with the express
or tacit approval of the debtor;
When, even without the knowledge of the debtor, a person interested in the
fulfillment of the obligation pays, without prejudice to the effects of confusion
as to the latter’s share.
z
Example