Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-Dr. Asif
Wani
PG scholar
(Second year)
02/04/2023 1
CONTENTS:
• Introduction
• Surgical anatomy
02/04/2023 2
DEFINITION
American society of oral surgeons 1971-impacted tooth is defined as the tooth which has
already passed chronological age of eruption and failed to come to oral cavity inspite of normal
02/04/2023 3
• According to WHO – An impacted tooth is any tooth that is prevented from reaching its normal
position in the mouth by tissue, bone or another tooth.
• According to ARCHER – A tooth which is completely or partially unerupted and is positioned against
another tooth, bone or soft tissue so that its further eruption is unlikely, described according to its
anatomic position.
02/04/2023 4
CAUSES
• Lack of space- length of mandible, condylar growth, resorption of ant. ramus, A-P length of
alveolar process
• Tooth angulation
• Ectopic eruption
• Obstruction
• Late mineralization
02/04/2023 7
By NORTJE et al.,1977
Type I: Bilaterally single high mandibular canals-single high
canals either touching or within 2 mm of the apices of 1 st and
2nd permanent molars.
02/04/2023 8
Relation of lingual nerve to medial aspect of mandible
02/04/2023 10
GEORGE WINTER’S
• Based on the relationship of the long axis of the impacted tooth in relation to the long axis of the 2nd molar
Buccal version
Lingual version
Torsoversion
02/04/2023 11
02/04/2023 12
PELL & GREGORY’S CLASSIFICATION
02/04/2023 13
COMBINED ADA & AAOMS CLASSIFICATION OF
PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY
02/04/2023 14
ACCORDING TO SUPERIO-INFERIOR POSITION OF 3RD MOLAR
Crown to crown
Crown to cervix
Crown to root
02/04/2023 15
G.R.OGDEN METHOD
02/04/2023 16
KILLEY & KAY’S CLASSIFICATION
02/04/2023 17
• This study demonstrated that males (60.8%) were more likely to present with impacted mandibular third
• The prevalence of third molar impactions was almost the same on both the left and right sides.
• This study also noted that mesioangular impactions were the most common type of impaction.
• The least common form of impactions was the transverse types (2%).
• The prevalence of impacted mandibular third molars for this study was high
02/04/2023 19
RADIOGRAPHS FOR ASSESSMENT
• Angulation
• The crown
• The roots
• Relationship of apices with inf alveolar canal
• Depth of tooth in alveolar bone
• Buccal / lingual obliquity
02/04/2023 21
FACTORS FOR INTERPRETATION
1. Type of impaction
2. External oblique ridge
oblique & post . to third molars – good access
vertical & ant. to third molar – poor access
3. Position & depth (WAR lines)
4. Any pathology
-Dental caries in II and III molars
-Periodontal problems
-Fused roots of II and III molars
-Cysts, odontomes
02/04/2023 22
5. Assessing the buccal / lingual
obliquity
Lingual obliquity -difficult
7. Root pattern
8. Path of withdrawl
9. Texture of bone
02/04/2023 23
PROXIMITY WITH INFERIOR CANAL
02/04/2023 24
HOWE AND POYTON’S
02/04/2023 26
WINTER’S WAR LINES
02/04/2023 27
02/04/2023 28
RED LINE
PEDERSON’S
02/04/2023 30
WHARFE BY McGREGOR
Horizontal 2
1.WINTERS CLASSIFICTION
Distoangular 3
Mesioangular 1
Vertical 0
Normal 0
5.FOLLICLE Possibly enlarged 1
Enlarged 2
Space available 0
6.PATH OF EXIT
Distal cusp covered 1
Mesial cusp covered 2
02/04/2023 Both cusp covered 3 31
RISK ASSESSMENT
02/04/2023 32
THANK-YOU