Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Family Culture
Organizational culture is not fixed or static, and can evolve over time as the
organization grows and adapts to changing circumstances. By being aware of
the values and behaviors that shape their organizational culture, leaders can
work to strengthen and improve the culture, align it with the organization's
goals and values, and create a positive and supportive work environment.
Cultural Blur in Family Firms
Cultural blur in a family business refers to the situation where there is
a mismatch or conflict between the cultural values and practices of
different family members involved in the business. This can happen
when family members come from different cultural backgrounds, or
when there are generational or gender differences in the family.
Generational Conflict:
Famous example being Henry Ford and his dictatorial control of the Ford Motor
Company. In the first 30 years of the 20th century he built the company into the
most successful industrial enterprise the world had ever seen, but then, during 15 years
of paranoia and obsessive behaviour, he reduced it to virtual bankruptcy. Edsel, his only
son, became president, but throughout his tenure Henry Ford remained alive and
wielded the real power in the company. Edsel was admired for his creativity, his
consensus approach to management and his good judgement, but his presidency was
purely nominal. All his important ideas were blocked by his father, who belittled him
in public, portraying him as incompetent, weak, and
‘too fond of cocktails and decadent East Side living’. Edsel became a pawn in a huge
and destructive power struggle, eventually emerging from the process an ill and broken
man.2
Conductor:
Like proprietors, conductors are also firmly in control, but they are much
more willing to build up a good staff, delegate responsibility, and foster
efficiency and harmony in the organisation. Conductors like the idea of a
family business, and they like the idea of their children joining the company
and working with them. Thus they invite and orchestrate the involvement of
the children and, to preserve harmony, often encourage them to take over
different areas of the operation – so one may assume responsibility for
marketing, another production and a third financial administration.
Technicians:
Third category of family business founders build companies based
on their creative or technical skills and are often obsessive types,
most at home in drawing offices working on designs and products
that only they fully understand
Technicians generally dislike administration and the day-to-day details of
management. Thus, unlike conductors, they are not orchestrating and
usually will have brought in non-family managers to whom they delegate
the organisational role in the business.
While technicians are relaxed about giving up control over adminis-
trative details, they are usually less willing to pass on their special
knowledge to their children, who may lack the same technical skills. . In
the end, what usually forces them round is the realisation that unless their
technical skills, which are at the core of the business, are passed on, the
company will not survive.
Women In Family Business
Women have come a long way in family business, in step with
increases in the scope of women’s independent activity and
personal ambition over the past 40 years. At the same time,
however, we still see the wives of family company owners playing
traditional, behind-the-scenes roles as confidante and business
adviser, acting as a sounding board for their husbands, often on
issues of character and human perception, and, more prominently, as
family leader and a symbol of unity, fostering teamwork and
communication. As wives and mothers, their first priority is
generally the preservation of the family, and often, when there is
conflict in the business between the father and the children, the
owner’s wife (sometimes known as CEO
– for ‘chief emotional officer’!) is the mediator who works at
calming the situation and keeping the peace.
On passing down the business to the next generation, gender differ- ences
seem to remain more ingrained, with the common assumption being that the
boys will have the business and the girls will get the cash, and that they are
not likely to be interested in working for the family company. Keeping
shares with the male blood line is still of course a pronounced
preoccupation in some parts of the world. In the Indian culture, for example
(although things are rapidly changing there too), it was not so long ago that
children were moved around respected families to make sure there was a
male in each of the branches. It has also been known for an elder brother,
unable to have children of his own, to adopt his younger brother’s male child.
But as the scenarios are changing women have been increasingly taking on
more prominent roles in family businesses in recent years. Studies have
shown that family businesses with women in leadership positions tend to
perform better in terms of profitability and growth. This may be due in part to
the fact that women often bring unique perspectives and skills to the table,
such as strong communication skills, a focus on collaboration, and a keen eye
for detail.
Examples of Women in Family Business Leadership roles are:
Roshni Nadar Malhotra, Chairperson of HCL Technologies, a global
IT services company founded by her father
Vinita Gupta, CEO of Lupin Limited, a pharmaceutical company
founded by her father
Radha Kapoor Khanna, Founder and Executive Director of the
Indian School of Design and Innovation, and daughter of Rana
Kapoor, founder of Yes Bank
Kavitha Chugani, CEO of Zandu Realty Limited, a real estate
development company founded by her father
Husband & Wife Teams
As with so many other aspects of family businesses, there are few hard-and-fast
rules. For some couples, being together all the time can be a recipe for disaster
and divorce; for others, shared business experiences, like shared personal
experiences, can strengthen and enrich their marriage while complementary
temperaments and talents are particularly important, the couple must also be able
to work together as a team. This means that they have to decide how they are to
share the workload, allocate power and divide up the rewards of their
efforts.
Especially difficult problems arise in relation to decision-making and role
definition. Some husband and wife teams find that making joint business
decisions can be the key to success, while others divide decision- making
responsibilities either according to agreed strengths and weak- nesses or with
reference to previously agreed roles, so that the partner with authority in a
certain area makes all the decisions in that area. Clear role definition is crucial,
as is conscious separation of business and family issues so that criticisms or
conflicts about business decisions do not become personal.
Couples planning to go into business together should realise that they are
entering a potentially disastrous emotional minefield. It has to be a step
they are both determined to take, but even then it may be best to
include an outsider in the company structure from the start – someone who
will be able to offer a balancing viewpoint.
In-Laws
Some families put pressure not only on their children but also on their
children’s spouses to work in the family firm. Their contribution may prove
to be a disaster or a tremendous success. One factor contributing to this
polarisation between very bad or very good is that in-laws working in the
business usually find themselves in a situation in which, almost regardless of
their performance, family members treat them as outsiders, and non-family
employees believe they have got the job solely because they have married into
the family. They thus find that their deficiencies swiftly become the focus of
attention, and if they are to be accepted they must prove themselves to be very
good indeed. To help overcome both types of opposition, new in-laws should
try to acquire outside experience before they join the family firm.
Multi Family Ownership
For example, where the owner bequeaths the business to his or her two
children. If they each have two children who inherit their parents’ shares, the
single owner in the first generation is replaced by two in the second and
four in the third and, while the second generation comprises siblings, the
third consists of both siblings and cousins. If the business is started by
unrelated partners, the problem of proliferating ownership can become more
acute more quickly.
Multifamily ownership requires a unique combination of people, skills and
attitudes, so it is not surprising that few family businesses survive beyond
the third generation. Those that do have usually taken steps to avoid
intra-family conflict by, among other things, enabling family members who
are not interested in the business to sell their shares and making sure that
the family members who remain are competent.
Many times transfer of power is a really difficult phase for Fathers. he may want to
ease his son’s entry into the business, planning gradually to transfer responsibility
to him and, in due course, to pass control of the business on to him. Subconsciously,
however, he needs to be stronger than his son, and that if he lets his son win he
will be removed from his centre of power. These contradictory influences often
lead the father to behave in erratic and inexplicable ways, sometimes appearing as if
his sole motivation is the welfare and development of the business.
Rebellion against parental authority is a natural phase of a child’s
development, and when the parent is also the employer and source of economic
sustenance for an adult child, this phase may be repressed. Also, as he gets older
the son needs and seeks increasing independence, responsibility and executive
power in the organization, but finds that he is denied it by his father, who refuses to
cede authority. Often the son, desperately eager to take on running the business,
is left on the sidelines for years – way beyond the age when others of comparable
ability and experience in non-family businesses would expect to take over.
Sibling Rivalry
Psychologists believe that sibling jealousy is rooted in the deep desire of children
for the exclusive love of their parents. Underlying this is the child’s concern that
if a parent shows love and attention to a sibling, perhaps the sibling is worth
more, and the child is worth less.
On occasions, often without realising they are doing it, owners intensify sibling
rivalry by fostering a competitive spirit among family members in the business,
effectively reinforcing and magnifying the rivalry that already exists.
The legendary feud between the Gucci brothers provides a graphic example of
escalating sibling rivalry in a family business. . Second- generation brothers
Rodolfo and Aldo each ended up holding about 50 per cent of the shares in the
family empire. At first their rivalry, while fierce, was contained; each had
different ideas about how to expand the business and the role to be played by
their own sons. But arguments and resentment about slights, real and imagined,
increased, and by the 1980s they had boiled over into well-publicised boardroom
fist-fights. In the handover to the third generation, Aldo’s 50 per cent
shareholding was divided unevenly among his children, while Rodolfo’s shares
passed as a block to his only son, Maurizio – an imbalance that only served to
fuel dissension and anger. Along with boardroom violence, other highlights of the
feuding included Aldo’s son, Paolo, shopping his father to the tax authorities (and
later suing him) and the murder of Maurizio in 1995
The key to building conflict management mechanisms is to understand the
predictable roots, as well as what exacerbates conflict, and building around
both of these.
Communication - It is important to communicate openly and honestly
while being sensitive to everybody’s needs. Often conflicts arise as a result
of repressed historical issues that have been brought to the surface.
Inclusion – It is critical that all parties are involved in the communication
process. Often however, some family members may not voice an opinion.
But it is essential that we identify such individuals and ensure that the rest
of the family engages them by asking questions and prompting them to
answer
Negotiation – It is necessary to review and rank all the areas of
disagreement. Once issues are ranked, it is possible to reach a middle
ground with the parties involved.
Objectivity – It is important to maintain an objective approach when dealing
with other parties to establish trust, credibility and respect. We understand that
conflicts often can become emotional and that objectivity is difficult to
maintain. In such instances, involving a neutral outsider or mediator can be of
paramount benefit and can help the parties explore settlement options and move
towards a solution upon which all can agree
Timing – When dealing with family business conflicts, timing is of the essence.
It is imperative that the matter is addressed when the time is right. Problems
can be caused and conflicts exacerbated both by moving too soon or by acting
too late
Family unity is an important aspect of family life that can bring many benefits to
family members. Here are some tips for promoting family unity:
Quality time: Spending quality time together can strengthen family bonds. Plan
regular family activities and make time for one-on-one interactions with each
family member.
Shared values: Sharing common values and beliefs can help promote family
unity. Discuss and establish family values that everyone can agree on, and make a
conscious effort to uphold them.
Respect for diversity: Each family member is unique, with their own
personality, interests, and beliefs. Celebrate diversity and encourage
family members to express their individuality, while still maintaining
respect and support for each other.
4 This sector is within both the family and ownership circles and therefore
comprises family members who own shares in the business but who are not
employees.
5 Owners who work in the business but who are not family members.
6 Family members who work in the business but who do not own shares.
7 Inhabiting all three circles are owners who are also family members and
employees of the business.
This model helps identify and clarify the different perspectives and
motivation of family business people, as well as the potential sources for
interpersonal conflict and role confusion.
Owners-only individuals (that is, investors in sector 2 of the diagram) will
be principally concerned with return on their investment and liquidity.
Owners who are also managers (in sector 5) will have the same concerns
but with an extra layer of self-interest relating to issues such as job
satisfaction and autonomy.
Relatives who own shares in the business but are not employed by it
(sector 4) may want to increase dividends to provide a better return on
their investment.
Other potential sources of tension and conflict are reflected in
questions like who should lead the business, who should work in it, how
they should be remunerated and who should own shares in the family firm.
The Dysfunctional Ways to approach family conflicts are:
Evolution Phases
The family business tends to become more complex with the passing of time,
and especially with the transition from one generation to the next in broad
terms, ownership of family businesses tends to progress through a sequence,
reflecting ageing and expansion of the owning family: owner-managed business;
sibling partnership; cousin consortium
Owner-managed business
This is how most family businesses start life, and they receive a lot
of attention from analysts and commentators. At the owner-managed stage,
where an individual typically has voting control and makes all the key
decisions, governance is not really an issue.
To perpetuate the family firm, the owner-manager may well be
counting on his or her children to come into the business. If this is not what
they want to do, outsiders must be brought in to run the firm.
Sibling partnership
Assuming the transition is negotiated successfully, the evolution in
second-generation family firms is generally therefore from a single, all-
powerful owner to a partnership of brothers and sisters in which power and
authority must now be shared.
There may be additional owners – sometimes from the parent’s
generation, sometimes among the siblings’ children – but ultimate ownership
authority and influence will rest with the siblings. Developing processes for
sharing power and control among siblings and avoiding sibling rivalry are
important challenges for family firms at this stage of development.
Cousin consortium(association)
By the time the third generation is in place, there is a well-
established business and there may be several dozen or more
family members who have some sort of stake in it. Ownership is
generally in the hands of many cousins from different sibling
branches of the family, often with no single branch having a
controlling shareholding.
Some of these owners will work in the business, many will
not. It is easy to imagine the potential for friction and dysfunctional
behavior if the large-scale complexity arising with these family
groups is not controlled and managed, and there are many real-life
cases that prove the point.
Life Cycle Stages
Family businesses go through several distinct stages in their life cycle. These
stages can be broadly classified into the following:
Entrepreneurial stage: This is the first stage of the family business, where the
founder(s) start the business from scratch. They are usually driven by a strong
passion and vision, and take risks to build the business.
Consolidation stage: In this stage, the business has become established and has a
stable base of customers. The focus is on consolidating the gains made in the
entrepreneurial stage, and improving operations and processes.
Professionalization stage: This is the stage where the family business starts to
professionalize its operations, systems and processes. There is a greater focus on
governance, formalizing structures and procedures, and building a professional
management team.
Growth stage: In this stage, the business starts to expand, either organically or
through acquisitions. The focus is on scaling up the business and achieving growth
targets.
Succession stage: This is a critical stage in the life cycle of the family business,
where the founder(s) hand over the reins to the next generation. This can be a
challenging stage, as it involves managing the transition from one generation to
another, and ensuring continuity of the business.
Renewal stage: In this stage, the family business goes through a period of
transformation and renewal, either due to external forces or internal factors. The
focus is on reinventing the business to stay competitive and relevant in a changing
business environment.
Each of these stages has its own challenges and opportunities, and requires
different skills and strategies to navigate successfully. Understanding the life cycle
stages of the family business can help owners and managers plan and execute their
strategies more effectively.
Sibling rivalry is a common phenomenon that occurs in
many families, particularly among siblings who are
close in age. It can be described as a competition or
conflict between siblings for attention, resources, and
parental approval.
Sibling rivalry can take many forms, including jealousy,
aggression, and resentment towards each other. It can
be caused by a range of factors, including differences in
personality, interests, and abilities, as well as parental
favoritism, perceived inequalities in treatment, and
conflicts over resources such as toys or bedrooms.