• Address- concepts good & bad action. • System of rules- allow people to coexist peacefully in organizations. • Refers- to what civilization & groups see as “right & acceptable”. • Geographical locations/religion/family/ life experiences- all have an impact on morals. Public Morality • Refers- values that person- uphold in his public life. • Each profession- own set- guidelines/ standards/ values. • Laws- created- regulate/preserve public values. • Social norms- helps individuals in performing their professions successfully. • In this- people see- members- large political community as citizens of a State. • Demands- we put aside on loyalty to blood relatives, look beyond our own interest & commit to utilize power based on common values. • Citizens in democratic society- tied together by commitment to common values established through public reason such as political freedom, shared traditions & cultural heritage rather than by sentiments or self-interest. Constitutional Morality • New concept-written in const.- FR (A. 12-35), DPSP (A.36- 51), Preamble & FDs. • Not limited only to follow Const. provisions literally but based on values like individual autonomy/liberty/ equality without discrimination/ recognition of identity with dignity & right to Privacy. • Adherence- to core principles of Const. democracy. • Ensures est.- ROL in land while integrating changing aspirations & ideals of the society. • It is sentiment to be cultivated in minds of a responsible citizen. • Upholding C.M- not just duty of judiciary or State but also of individuals. S.C. Judgements Sabarimala Verdict- in this religious freedom/ gender equality/ right of women to worship guaranteed U/A. 14,21,25- reinstated which stuck down practice of banning entry of women of a certain age to temple in Kerala as unconstitutional. Kesavananda Bharati case- S.C. restricted power of Parliament to violate basic structure of Const. • Central Elements of C.M- freedom & self-restraint. • self-restraint- precondition for maintaining freedom under a proper Constitutional Govt. Conclusion • Place of morals- law- main concern- legal/political philosophers. • It upheld right over wrong but because of lack of correct interpretation – differs from person to person. • Conflict b/w C.M. & S.M as because S.M upheld/ validate things which are valid from very long time & oppose other things like same sex marriage/ adultery etc. but as a wise judge thinks that society grows with time & law- changed/ adaptable acc. To modern needs of people. • Necessary to differentiate b/w C.M & S.M.