LITERATURE Introduction • Literature as in any form of writing demands the observance of coherence. • The review is usually presented in a traditional narrative way through summary and synthesis becoming a body of literature by itself. • There is a need for the researcher to express the reviewed literature in his/ her own words to avoid presenting the whole material as a quotation or a series of quotations. • A literature review is not an annotated bibliography in which it summarizes briefly each article that have reviewed or researched on. Structure of a Literature Review
Main components are:
• The Introduction to the review of literature is often a single paragraph that introduces the general topic and provides scholarly (e.g. policy, practice)context of the review. It also identifies the overall statement of knowledge about the topic (e.g. methodology, evidence, problem or opportunity). Structure of a Literature Review Main components are: • In the Body of Literature Review, need to address previous research on the topic grouped according to theme, theoretical, perspective, method used or chronological development. This section draws together the significance of previous individual studies by highlighting the main themes, issues and knowledge gaps. You must connect the literature to the proposed research objectives within this parts and describe previous work you have accomplished related to your proposed study. Structure of a Literature Review Main components are: • The Conclusion to the literature review is often a single paragraph that provides a summary statement of the overall state of knowledge about the topic. This section should reconnect the ideas to your introduction. It should establish the potential significance or importance of your proposed study relative to the current state of knowledge. • Remember to use accurate in text citations. A literature review must contain complete and correct citations for every source. Guidelines in Writing a Literature Review Rule 1: Define the topic and the audience. When defining a topic, consider factors such as Interest, Importance and regency. Rule 2:Search and re-search reference lists. Rule 3: Prepare a conceptual diagram of the need for the different types of literature review. Rule 4: Take notes while reading. Rule 5: Choose the type of review you wish to write. Rule 6: Keep the review focused. Rule 7: Be critical and consistent. Rule 8: Find a logical structure. Rule 9: Make use of feedback. For a coherent presentation, it is suggest to use phrases suggesting the tentative character of the research literature such as: 1. There appears to be strong evidence that… 2. The literature has shown... 3. The foregoing literatures have shown… 4. The data supporting the hypothesis are… Index card are among the most handy research tools ever invented. Here’s the how of recording your scores’ bibliographic information: • Make a separate card for each source. • Give each source a racking number. • For a book include the author, title, date and pace of publication and publisher. • For a periodical, also include the page numbers of the article. • For a website, include the title, the sponsors and authors or editors, if known; the site and date when created or update and the date when you accessed the site. Using index cards will help facilitate the writing of and effective review of literature. Important features and contents can be outlined and recorded on these cards. Doing this will make it easy for you, the researcher to organize and put together the needed information for this section of the research paper: 1. Where you found the information 2. Topic 3. Paraphrased information found 4. Page you the fact on 1. Where you found the information
2. Topic
Hughes Poetry Source#3
Hughes’ Poetry is an example of the innovative & influential art of the Harlem Renaissance Page 15 3. Paraphrased information found
4. Page you found the fact on
Literature Review of Relevant Research 1. Establishes research territory. 2. Establishes significance of territory. 3. Establishes research niche. (Briefly reviews what has been found, and then identifies a gap. Discusses what has been found, but points out inconsistency of results.) 4. Motivates next part of literature review. 5. Further justifies the need to investigate the impact of social influences on memory. 6. Reviews the chronological development of research in this area (an approach that is useful at times, but not always the best). Discusses one key paper at a time by describing its methods and key findings, but then identifies weaknesses in the method and/or limitations in the findings. Then discusses how the next researchers tried to address these problems. 7. Repeat 6 for another sub-topic. 8. Overall conclusion/ summary which indicated why she was going to use a particular methodological approach to her research. END