You are on page 1of 25

TRUTH AND OPINION

OPINION

STATE OF JUDGEMENT OF
A PERSON ABOUT
SOMETHING IN THE
WORLD.
OPINION

SOME OPINIONS ARE SO


WEAKLY MADE
OPINION

THEY HARDLEY SEE THE


LIGHT OF THE DAY IN
THE WORLD OF PRINT
AND DIGITAL MEDIA
OPINION

SOME OPINIONS ARE VERY


STRONGLY PUT THAT
PEOPLE UNQUESTIONINGLY
TAKE THEM AS TRUE.
OPINION….

STATEMENTS OF
JUDGEMENT THAT ARE IN
NEED OF FURTHER
JUSTIFICATION
OPINION

IF THEY DO NOT PASS THE TESTS OF


JUSTIFICATION AS WE HAVE SHOWN
ABOVE, OPINIONS WILL HAVE TO BE
DEFENDED WITH BETTER REASON
TO STRENGTHEN THEM.
HOW TO CRITICALLY
EXAMINE OPINIONS
WHOEVER MAKES THE
OPINION MUST BE ABLE
TO ARGUE FOR IT IN THE
MOST REASONABLE WAYS
WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?

AN ARGUMENT IS A
GROUP OF STATEMENT
THAT SERVE TO SUPPORT
A CONCLUSION
EXAMPLE

“THERE IS NO HOPE IN
THE PHILIPPINES”
ARGUMENTS

THIS IS NOT YET AN


ARGUMENT. IT IS AN
EXPRESSION OF
OPINION
ARGUMENTS

IF THE PERSON WANTS TO


CONVINCE ANOTHER PERSON
THAT HIS/HER OPINION IS TRUE
HE MUST PROVIDE REASONS
TO SUPPORT HIS/HER CLAIM
EXAMPLE OF AN ARGUMENT

“THERE IS NO HOPE IN THE


PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT
BECAUSE MANY OFFICIALS ARE
CORRUPT, AND FILIPINO VOTERS
CONTINUE TO ELECT THEM”.
ARGUMENT/CLAIM
“THERE IS NO HOPE IN THE PHILIPPINE
GOVERNMENT

REASON A REASON B

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FILIPINO VOTERS


ARE CORRUPT CONTINUE TO ELECT THEM

THIS WHAT AN ARGUMENT LOOKS LIKE


CLAIM PREMISES
(THE REASONS USED
(THE CONCLUSION OF
TO SUPPORT THE
AN ARGUMENT)
CONCLUSION)
ARGUMENT

CLEARLY, NOT ALL


ARGUMENTS ARE GOOD
ARGUMENTS
LOGIC

BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY
THAT STUDIES AND
ELABORATES ON GOOD
ARGUMENTS
FALLACIES
FALLACIES

GROUP OF STATEMENTS
THAT APPEARS TO BE
ARGUMENTS, BUT FAIL TO
SUPPORT THE CONCLUSION.
EXAMPLE

CLAIM PREMISE
THERE IS NO HOPE BECAUE THE
IN THE PHILIPPINES IS A
PHILIPPINES TROPICAL COUNTRY
FALLACIES

HOWEVER, FALLACY CAN


BE TRICKIER THAN THE
EXAMPLE
FALLACIES

THEY USUALLY COME IN


THE GUISE OF WELL
ARTICULATED
ARGUMENTS
IN SUMMARY

• OPINIONS ARE STATEMENTS OF JUDGEMENT OF A


PERSON ABOUT SOMETHING IN THE WORLD. WE
SHOULD NOT TAKE THEM AS IMMEDIATELY TRUE.
• WE SHOULD ALWAYS CRITICALLY EXAMINE THE
OPINION AND ITS SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS.
• WE SHOULD ALSO BE WARY OF STRONGLY PUT
ARGUMENTS BUT ON DEEP INTROSPECTION ARE
ACTUALLY FALLACIOUS.
IN SUMMARY

• TO BE ABLE TO HOLD

CREDENCE OPINIONS SHOULD PASS


FURTHER JUSTIFICATION.

You might also like