Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neutron Activation
Analysis (NAA)
Conclusions
C.G. Shull
source
B.N. Brokhouse
Neutrons’ development
A neutron source
Expanding horizons
allows to probe the
structure and the
dynamics of materials
in a wide range of
lenghts and time
scales
Physics
1960 Physics
Neutrons’ development
Expanding horizons
Chemistry
1970
1960 Physics
Neutrons’ development
Expanding horizons
Geology
Biology
Engineering
1980
Chemistry
1970
1960 Physics
Neutrons’ development
Expanding horizons
Soft multidisciplinary
condensed matter science
1990
1980
1970
1960 Hard
Neutrons’ development
expanding horizons
2000
1990
1980
1970
1960
Available Experimental Techniques:
spectroscopic techniques (structure and dynamics) and purely structural methods
Neutron properties
energy-moment plan
corresponding to Interatomic
spatial-temporal grains spacing
Intermolec
ular
energies
Comparison of neutron
scattering and the most Semplificati
current spectroscopic on neutron-
technique core
interaction
Highly
penetrating
(neutral
particle)
Disadvantages
• the need of a neutron source (costs, risk, .....)
• no possibility of chemical discrimination (valence, bonds, ...)
• it is not applicable for the analysis of pure beta emitters: 3H, 14C, 32P, 10Be
Research activity @ neutron facilities
Reactor technology, developed in 1940s reached a plateau in performance in 1970s with the construction of ILL (F) and HFIR (USA).
The spallation process, developed in the 1970s, opened the opportunity to produce brighter beams.
Some important nuclear reactors and the relative
construction dates, starting from 1930…
Currently operating
high-flux spallation
sources include ISIS
The long pulse and low (UK), SNS (USA) and
repetition rate time structure of the MLF at J-PARC
the proton pulses will make ESS
the ideal source for long-
(J).
wavelength neutrons, with
energies in the range of about The European
0.1 meV to 50 meV
Spallation Source
(ESS) will surpass
current neutron
sources
Portable neutron generators
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
Maximum
Typical Tube Operating
Model Applications Neutron Yield
Lifetime Mode
[n/s]
Explosive detection, Buried land mines,
1,200 hours @
API 120 NG Chemical weapons, UXO analysis, Drugs 2.00E+07
107 n/s
Continuous only
detenction, In-Vivo body composition
Large object imaging in cargo, Radiation effects
1,000 hours @
D 711 NG research, Fast neutron radiography, Neutron 2.00E+10
1010 n/s
Continuous only
activation analysis
Explosive detection, Buried land mines,
Chemical weapons, UXO analysis, Drug
1,200 hours @ Continuous and
MP 320 NG detection, In-Vivo body composition, Minerals 1.00E+08
108 n/s pulsed
mining and exploration, Bulk materials (coal,
cement)
Up to 500 hours Continuous and
P 211 NG Transuranic waste assay, Fissionable Materials 1.00E+08
or greater pulsed
Explosives detection, Bulk materials analysis,
4,500 hours @ Continuous and
P 385 NG WMD detection, UXO analysis, Contraband 5.00E+08
108 n/s pulsed
detection, Vehicle inspection
Nowadays a valid alternative to existing large-scale neutron scattering facilities, is offered by the new generation of portable neutron devices
Portable neutron generators
applications
Security detection of explosive material, illegal drugs, chemical and nuclear weapons, luggage or cargo inspections
Arts and
art objects and archaeological artefacts typically not permitted to investigate with destructive techniques
Archaeology
on-line analysers of raw materials transported on conveyor belts, especially in cement factories; analysis of minerals or materials with
Industries similar compositions
(glass, cement, coal)
Research reaction cross-sections and interfering reactions
training of young scientists in various aspects of neutron generation and diagnostics and a wide spectrum of modern technologies,
Educational such as those related to ion sources, particle acceleration techniques, beam handling and diagnostics, magnet technology, vacuum
techniques, detector technology, nuclear electronics, data acquisition as well as processing techniques
environmental studies focused on elements of interest such as Hg, Cd, As, Cu; recycled material (metals, plastics or mixtures
Environmental and Geological thereof), waste rock piles, mine tailings, etc…; in agriculture it is useful for detecting pesticide residues on crops
Electronics measure of impurities in silicon semiconductors and neutrons testing on electronic devices
living material is composed mainly of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, the presence or absence of other elements can have a
Biology and Medicine profound effect on the well being of an organism. Thus, it is being used in several laboratories to measure the concentrations of
magnesium, copper, zinc and other metals in human blood
How function a portable neutron generator
These accelerators generate neutrons of ~2.5 and ~14.1 MeV, respectively. They consist of a source
able to generate positively charged ions; one or more devices to accelerate the ions; a metal hydride
target loaded with either deuterium, tritium, or a mixture of the two and a gas-control reservoir, also made
of a metal hydride material. The most common ion source used in neutron generators is a cold-cathode,
or Penning ion source, which is a derivative of the Penning trap used in Penning ion gauges. As far as
the elemental analysis is concerned, a low neutron flux of 107 ÷ 108 n/s is required, that furnishes the
advantage to measure easily prompt gamma from (n,γ) and (n,n’,γ) reaction and allows to work safer,
both in steady and in pulse mode, compared to radioactive neutron sources. In order to produce this
neutron flux an ion source is used, such as Deuterium ions, of a few tens of microamperes and more
than 80 KeV energy, which produce neutrons of 106 ÷ 108 n/s from D-D or D-T reactions
Experimental set-up for NAA
N. Marchese, A. Cannuli, M.T. Caccamo, C. Pace 2016 New generation non-stationary portable neutron generators for biophysical applications of neutron activation analysis Biochimica et
1
In order to perform a preliminarily evaluation of the shielding thicknesses was used the method of Removal Cross section. In a
second moment, data preliminarily obtained were verified with simulations with MCNP Monte Carlo code.
Preliminary Shielding evaluation
In order to optimize the shielding size, both from the point of view of the “weight” and cost, it is necessary to select a materials that
offer a good shielding power (high ). It is also important to utilize the interactions of neutrons with the different materials in order to
optimize the processes of "slowing down" and "capture". Therefore the shielding is made of successive layers of different materials
(lead, iron, hydrogenated materials). The exponential attenuation law is valid only for collimated neutron beam, while in the case in
which the source can be considered as a "point source", the spatial dependence of the neutron flux has to be considered. Therefore
the attenuation law becomes the following:
where is the initial neutron yield (n s-1), is the distance at which neutron flux is calculated respect to the source position, is the
neutron flux at distance from the source and is the thickness of shielding material
The evaluation of the different materials thickness was made considering their characteristics (, weight) in order to limit the weight of
the whole structure. Therefore the following materials and thickness were chosen. Neutron flux was calculated on the external
surfaces at the end of the shielding. Because the source is not symmetric, respect to the shielding structure, it is necessary to
evaluate the neutron flux on every external surface. The following parameters was taken in consideration: distance between the
source, considered a point source; internal surface of the shielding; entire shielding thickness. The values of neutron flux obtained for
the different surfaces are shown below Neutron flux on external shielding surfaces
Different thicknesses of the shielding: green represents the 30% borated PE; grey the barite concrete. In section view it is possible to identify the
“window” for the samples irradiation, positioned between the floor and the neutron generator. Neutrons irradiate target in correspondence of the window
Shielding
structure
Shielding
Shielding section view
thicknesses
Shielding representation inside
the laboratory
Monte Carlo code simulation
Several simulations were performed with a software based on Monte Carlo method, in order to verify the values obtained with the application of
removal cross section. The code used was MCNP5. The code include information relatively to the geometry, the materials and the source
characteristics.
The cells in which evaluate the neutron flux were also specified. These were placed on the external surfaces of the shielding in correspondence to the
specification addressed in the design phase. For neutron flux evaluation was chosen the Track Length Estimate of Cell Flux (F4), that allow to obtain
the average neutron flux in a volume , as described in following formulation.
Down Lateral
Dose rate evaluation
In order to evaluate the effect of shielding, we have to calculate the neutron dose rate. The following parameters were taken into
account as references for the dose rate limits evaluation
• Project Equivalent Dose [mSv/y] 0.5
• Annual duty hours [h/y]1,200
The project neutron dose rate was chosen as half of the annual limit for the population in order to consider also the photons contribute
to the total dose rate. The annual duty hours were chosen as the typical lifetime of the target. Taking into account of the set
parameters, the reference value for the dose rate is equal to
Considering the neutron spectrum obtained with Monte Carlo simulations and applying the conversion factors, were obtained the
following values of neutron dose rate.
Shielding
Equivalent Dose Rate [mSv/h] 1.51x10-3 2.81 x10-2 4.0E x10-2 1.62 x10-2
TheDetail
values of neutronEquivalent
of spectrum dose rate obtained
Dose Rate @ 0.1 m are over
from the the limit
shielding , however, 1.20
[mSv/h] taking
x10-8 into account
2.23 x10-7 the 3.18
geometric
x10-7 attenuation
1.29 x10-7 is possible to
evaluate thatpoint
evaluation the neutron dose rate goes down rapidly below the limit. Therefore is possible to define a restricted zone outside of
which the neutron dose rate is surely below the considered limit.
In order to complete the shielding, it is necessary to evaluate the contribute of gamma-rays to the dose rate and take this contribute
into account in the design of the gamma shielding
Next employment in Electronics for SEE testing
According with the standard JESD89A, this system could be used for accelerated Single Event Effects (SEE)
testing of electronic devices. SEE consists of a failure into electronic devices, caused by the ionizing radiation
coming from the atmosphere. Without the shield and with the future development of the mini-bunker, the facility
allows the SEE cross section estimation at 14 MeV (with the T target) and 2.45 MeV (with the D target). This allows
the estimation of the threshold energy at which the SEE cross section rapidly rises. In fact, for recent technologies,
this energy threshold is in the range of 1÷10 MeV. Moreover thermal neutron test could be also performed, using
the shield described previously , placing the samples not in‑view of the main neutron beam. To this purpose, a
careful simulated and measured characterization of the facility will be required
The Earth’s atmosphere acts as a shield against ionizing radiation coming from the deep space. However, the interaction of
galactic cosmic rays with the terrestrial atmosphere produces a “shower” of secondary particles, mainly neutrons, which come
down to sea level. Thus, all electronic devices are exposed to this “natural” radiation environment. Despite the neutron flux is quite
low (especially at sea level) even a single neutron, under certain conditions, can cause a failure into electronic devices: in this
case, we have a so-called Single Event Effect (SEE). From a physical point of view, SEEs are related to the charge generated in
the semiconductor, through ionization realized by the incident particle. For example, two very common reactions involving the
silicon nucleus are:
n + 28Si → 28Al + p
n + 28Si → 25Mg + α
Conclusions