GENDER ISSUES IN COMPARATIVE LEGAL HISTORY Lecture No 3 Contradictions of Gender Relations in Modernity
Assoc. Prof. Dr Vojislav Stanimirović
Assist. Prof. Dr Nina Kršljanin Gender and civil law
• The great bourgeois revolutions failed to
bring changes within the families and improve the position of women; however, they created the idea of “universal equality” which women recognised as the basis for their fight for emancipation • French Code Civil of 1804 • Civil Code of Austria of 1811 (ABGB) • Legal transplantation: Serbian Civil Code of 1844; Turkish Civil Code of 1926 • England: Married Women’s Property Act of 1882 Gender in front of the courts: may a woman step forth? • Wherever a married woman’s legal capacity was reduced, so was her procedural capacity; male representative was often required • Women as witnesses – less credible than men • Women as jurors – reluctantly admitted at the beginning of the 20th century, but in practice often avoided • Legal education and practice of law – mid 19 th century, but with lots of obstacles(limited access to universities, legal professions, the bar) • Women as judges – entry to these functions was even slower, and the percentage of women judges stayed disproportionately low; some Islamic countries appointed their first female judges Lawyer Jeanne Chauvin swearing her oath in only in the 21st century the courthouse, Paris, France, 1900 • Gender profiling of crimes and criminals: “male” and “female” crimes • “Male” crimes: violent crimes, duelling, private vendetta, crimes against military, civil and clerical service, rape, homosexuality Gender and • Rape: gender-neutral definition only in the
criminal law: late 20th century and is still absent from
many legislations sex crimes • Homosexuality: lesbianism was mostly overlooked by legislators and more • “Female” crimes: adultery, witchcraft, abortion, infanticide, prostitution, also – using poison as a medium to kill • Gender and punishment: different treatment of men and women Gender, public and democracy: fight for suffrage • Public functions still dominantly belonged to men; women could not vote, be elected, or hold high public offices • 19th and early 20th century – rise of strong feminist and suffragist movements in many countries, many linked to anti-slavery and temperance movements; connections between feminism and socialism intensified • New Zealand 1893 – first to enfranchise women; the second wave of enfranchisement happened after the WWII and decolonisation Religion, law and gender in a secularizing world Catholic Church • 1917 – first code of canon law deemed women inferior in many ways; limited capacity, various religious bans, restricted access to theological studies; husband’s superiority was reaffirmed, as well as many other directives about women’s inferiority contained in the Corpus Iuris Canonici • second half of the 20th century – the Catholic Church changes its attitude towards women • 1983 – the new code of canon law banned sex discrimination and recognised equality of every kind among people • absolute gender equality: the teaching function (munus docendi), the sanctifying function (munus sanctificandi) and the power of governance (munus regendi) • women can hold every ecclesiastical office which does not require the sacred order Protestant denominations developed their own legal systems • since the beginning, three kinds of calling have been accessible to women: deacon, pastor and bishop • sometimes the function of a parish priest or of a bishop are jointly assigned to a married couple Orthodox Churches • nowadays, Orthodox Churches have left the idea of women’s inferiority, but only partially; only men are considered to be the true members of the clergy Gender, race and colonialism: all women are unequal, but some are more unequal than others • Slavery and colonialism; the myth of “lower” races • Native patriarchal laws • patriarchal, but often different from the western patriarchal model • colonialists enforced them when they were suitable • when reforms were attempted, either there was local resistance, or the reforms were seen as “white people saving the backward natives”, which enforced harmful stereotypes • reforms often worsened the position of native women, as they ignored local traditions and social structure • Stereotypes: white men = civilised masculinity, native men – either effeminate, or savage and bestial; white women = delicately feminine, dark-skinned women = sly and promiscuous • USA and racism: segregation, black feminism