Professional Documents
Culture Documents
38
DG1: Pelvic tilt
• Reduces the vertical movements of
the upper body, and thereby
increases energy efficiency.
• The pelvis slopes downwards
laterally towards the leg which is in
swing phase. i.e. rotation about an
anterior-posterior axis
• Only anatomically possible if the
swing leg can be shortened
sufficiently (principally by knee
flexion) to clear the ground.
• Where this is not possible (e.g.
through injury), the absence of
pelvic tilt and pronounced
movements of the upper body are
obvious.
39
DG2: Pelvic rotation
40
DG3: Knee flexion in stance
phase
• As the hip joint passes
over the foot during the
support phase, there is
some flexion of the
knee.
• This reduces vertical
movements at the hip,
and therefore of the
trunk and head.
41
DG4: Ankle mechanism
• At footstrike, the
effective length of the
leg is increased by the
projection of the
calcaneus behind the
ankle.
42
DG5: Forefoot mechanism
43
DG6: Reduced lateral pelvic
displacement
• Is minimised by having a
narrow walking base i.e.
feet closer together than
are hips.
• Therefore less energy is
used moving hip from
side to side (less lateral
movement needed to
balance body over stance
foot.
• Enabled by valgus
angulation at the knee
44
Running
45
The above two differences lead to the following consequences:
• When running, the body’s momentum alone has to carry it
over the support foot, as the other foot is not in contact with
the ground.
• The position of heelstrike, relative to the CoM, helps with this
(see previous slide), because it means that the CoM is not
lowered as much at footstrike.
• The position of heelstrike relative to the CoM also reduces the
‘braking effect’ of the GRF during the first part of the stance
phase
46
During transition from
walking to running,
•the period of double
support disappears
•a greater proportion of the
pace time is spent in the
swing phase:
Activity Approx %time on:
stance swing
Slow walk 60 40
Race walk 50 50
Run 30 70
Sprint 20 80
47
Stride rate and length
48
GRF during running
Compared with walking:
49
Energy considerations during
running
• Energy usage differs fundamentally between running and
walking
• In running, both kinetic and potential energy are high
during the flight phase.
• Energy storage in elastic tissues at the start of the support
phase has a more prominent role in running.
• By contrast, elastic energy storage during walking is
smaller – in fact we ignored it altogether when
considering this topic earlier.
50