GSM Network Audit Report

121272.BSC_02.HW.TELE.Endaselasie.NR
New Era, New GSM

Copyright©2017 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Huawei Confidential Page 1

 BSC Version ： V100R017ENGC10SPC575
Network Basic Info
Equipment Type

BTS EGBTS DBS3900 Others

316 1 1

316 Sites 1270 Cells 6981 TRX

Interface Mode Type of Traffic Terminal Capability

121272.BSC_02.HW.TEL Support UMTS Support U900 Support VAMOS
A:IP Abis:IP 13.23%
Support LTE TDD Support LTE FDD
E.Endaselasie.NR

86.77%

Voice Traffic Data Traffic

121272.BSC_02.HW.TELE.Endaselasie.NR

Huawei Confidential Page 2

 Network Audit
CS KPI Benchmarking PS KPI Benchmarking Network Quality
Voice Access Downlink HQI Downlink interference Downlink weak coverage
Data Access

Voice Experience Voice Call Drop 121272.BSC_02.HW.TELE.En

daselasie.NR 92.44% 3.26%4.30%

Data Speed Data Call Drop

Voice Handover
85.00% 90.00% 95.00% 100.00% 105.00%

RF Resource Usage( Cell Level)  Interference and weak coverage are the
250.00%
main cause of low HQI.
200.00% Average 71.93%
150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%

Huawei Confidential Page 3

 DL RX_LEV

Huawei Confidential Page 4

 DL HQI

Huawei Confidential Page 5

 Network KPI

121272.BSC_02.HW.T
Item Baseline
ELE.Endaselasie.NR
Immediate Assignment Success Rate 97% 93.60%

Accessibility TCH Assignment Success Rate 97% 99.32%

CS KPI Call Drop Rate on SDCCH 1% 0.03%

Mobility Success Rate of Intra-BSC HO 94% 93.79%

Retainability TCH Call Drop Rate(Including HO) 1% 0.32%

Accessibility Downlink EGPRS TBF Establishment Success Rate 95% 93.32%

PS KPI Retain ability DL EGPRS TBF drop rate (%) 5% 5.93%

User experience Throughput of Downlink EGPRS Users LLC PDU(Kbps) —— 73.68

60%
CPU Occupation Rate of Interface Board 6.80%

Board Board Usage 60%

CPU Occupation Rate (CP System) 23.21%

CPU Occupation Rate (UP System) 60% 23.58%

Huawei Confidential Page 6

 Key Findings

1. BSC version is V100R017ENGC10SPC575.

2. The main BTS type is EGBTS.
3. PS traffic occupy 13.23% traffic, terminal of Supporting UMTS is
37.35%.
4. Interference and coverage are the main cause of low quality.
5. Average RF resource usage of all cells is 71.93%.

Huawei Confidential Page 7

 Contents
·Experience & Performance
Coverage & Interference

Capacity & Load

Huawei Confidential Page 8

 Current Network KPI & Experience

Item Baseline Current GAP

Immediate Assignment Success Rate 97% 93.60% 3.40%

Accessibility TCH Assignment Success Rate 97% 99.32% -

CS KPI Call Drop Rate on SDCCH 1% 0.03% -

Mobility Success Rate of Intra-BSC HO 94% 93.79% 0.21%

Retainability TCH Call Drop Rate(Including HO) 1% 0.32% -

Accessibility Downlink EGPRS TBF Establishment Success Rate 95% 93.32% 1.68%

Retain ability DL EGPRS TBF drop rate (%) 5% 5.93% 0.93%

PS KPI

User experience Throughput of Downlink EGPRS Users LLC PDU(Kbps) —— 73.676863 　

Huawei Confidential Page 9

 KPI Analysis : Immediate Assignment Success Rate
Immediate Assignment SDCCH Call Drop TCH Assignment
CSSR: 92.89%
93.60% -6.40 0.03% -0.03 99.32% -0.68

Trend: Immediate Assignment Success Rate Total Failure Times Fail Reason Analysis
Worst 5% Cells Other Cells
96.00%

94.00% Busy SDCCH

30.48%
92.00% Channel Activation
46.41% Failure
53.59%
90.00% 69.50%
0.03% Setup Indications
88.00% Timed Out
2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1-
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

 Immediate Assignment Success is

Fail Times by Different Reason in TOP Cells
(93.6%) which is lower than the
Busy SDCCH Channel Activation Failure Setup Indications Timed Out
baseline (97%).
 Top cells occupy 53.59% of
12000
failure times.
8000  The main reason of failure reason
is Setup Indications Timed Out
4000 and for TOP cells the main failure
0
reason is Busy SDCCH
Huawei Confidential Page 10
 KI Analysis
KPI Analysis :: TCH
Voice Access KPI-
Assignment BSC1
Success Rate
Trend: TCH Assignment Success Rate Total Failure Times Fail Reason Analysis
99.45% Worst 5% Cells Other Cells
99.40% TCH Congestion
99.35%
99.30% 26.80% Abnormal state
99.25% 38.96%
99.20% Um interface and
61.04%
99.15% transmission
99.10% 73.20%
99.05% other
2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1-
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

 TCH Assignment success rate

Fail Times by Different Reason in TOP Cells
is (99.32%) which is higher the
TCH Congestion Abnormal state
baseline (97%).
Um interface and transmission other  Top cells occupy 73.20% of
1500
failure times.
 The main reason of failure
1000 reason is Um interface and
500 transmission and for TOP
0
cells the main failure reason
is Um interface and
transmission.

Huawei Confidential Page 11

 KPI Analysis : SDCCH Call Drop

Trend: Call Drop Rate on SDCCH Fail Reason Analysis

Stable State(Connection Failure)
0.04% 0.56% 0.79%
Stable State (Error Indication)
0.03%
Stable State (Release Indication)
29.11%
0.02%
HO Failure

0.01% Forced Handover

69.55%
Equipment Failure(Abis+Equipment)
0.00%
2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1-
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 No MRs

 SDCCH call drop is (0.03%) which is lower than the baseline (1%).
 The main reason of failure reason is Stable State (Error Indication) and Stable
State (Connection Failures).

Huawei Confidential Page 12

 KPI Analysis : TCH Call Drop
Trend: TCH Call Drop Rate(Including HO) Fail Reason Analysis
0.40%
0.03% 5.51% Stable State (Connection Failure)
0.35%
10.40%
0.30% Stable State (Error Indication)
0.71%
0.25%
Stable State(Release Indication)
0.20%
Handover State
0.15% 56.36%
26.99%
0.10% No MRs

0.05%
Equipment Failure
0.00%
2020-1-13 2020-1-14 2020-1-15 2020-1-16 2020-1-17 2020-1-18 2020-1-19 2020-1-20 Force HO

 TCH call drop is (0.32%) which is lower than the baseline (1%).
 The main reason of failure reason is Stable State (Connection Failure) and Stable
State (Error Indication).

Huawei Confidential Page 13

 KPI Analysis : Intra-BSC HO Success Rate
Trend: Intra-BSC Radio HO Success Rate Fail Reason Analysis
97.00%
Channel Unavailable
96.00%
Request Speech Version Unavailable
95.00%
Abis Resource Unavailable
94.00%
35.40%
Terrestrial Resource Request Failure
93.00%
Channel Active Failure
92.00% 63.09%
0.01%
A Interface Fault
91.00%
0.08%
Timer Timeout
90.00% 0.00%
2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1-
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1.42% New Channel Access Failure

 Intra-BSC HO success rate is (93.79%) which is Lower than the baseline (94%).
 The main reason of failure reason is (Channel Unavailable) and (New Channel
Access Failure Rate).

Huawei Confidential Page 14

 KPI Analysis : Data Access KPI

Trend: BSC Downlink EGPRS TBF Establishment Success Total Failure Times Fail Reason Analysis
Rate
98.00% Worst 5% Cells Other Cells
96.00% 0.03% No Channel
94.00% 27.81%
92.00% MS No Re-
90.00% 50.19% 49.81% sponse
88.00%
86.00% 72.16% Others
2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1-
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

 DL EGPRS TBF Establishment

Fail Times by Different Reason in TOP Cells
success rate is (93.32%) which is
No Channel MS No Response Others
lower the baseline (95%).
 Top cells occupy 49.81% of
failure times.
 The main reason of failure
15000
reason is MS No Response and
10000
5000 for TOP cells the main failure
0 reason is MS No Response.

Huawei Confidential Page 15

 KPI Analysis : Data Call Drop KPI
Trend: Downlink EGPRS TBF Call Drop Rate Total Failure Times Fail Reason Anal-
8.00%
7.00% Worst 5% Cells Other Cells ysis
5.86%
6.00% No Channel
14.03%
5.00%
4.00% 27.48%
Suspend
3.00% 42.27%
2.00%
Flush
1.00% 37.84%
0.00% 72.52%
2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1- 2020-1-
MS No Response
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

 DL EGPRS TBF call drop is

Fail Times by Different Reason in TOP Cells
(5.93%) which is above the
No Channel Resource Suspend Flush MS No Response
baseline (5%).
 Top cells occupy 27.48% of
failure times.
 The main reason of failure
3000
reason is MS No Response
2000
1000 and for TOP cells the main
0 failure reason is MS NO
Response.

Huawei Confidential Page 16

 Data Experience Analysis
Current Data Speed(kbps) Data Speed Benchmarking
200
180
Average 63.78kbps 200
180
160 160
140 140  Almost 97.03% cells
120 120
100 100 is lower than 120kps.
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0

Downlink TBF multiplex Degree of Ratio of Downlink EGPRS MCS7~MCS9

low speed cells
1.2

24.67% 0.8

0.6
75.33% 0.4

0.2
TBF multiplex degree>2 cell ratio 0
TBF multiplex degree<=2 cell ratio 121027_H3_AC_DG_WL_GDU_BSC02RNC.HW.dekeanstiyo...SWAP_121112_AC_WL_GU_BSC02RNC.HW.IDAGAKDA...
Huawei Confidential Page 17
 Contents
Experience & Performance

·Coverage & Interference

Capacity & Load

Huawei Confidential Page 18

 Network HQI Analysis

HQI definition: the ratio of 0-3 HQI Benchmarking

Receive Quality Level
1.2
Receive Quality Level BER Range
1
0 BER<0.2%
1 0.2<=BER<0.4% 0.8
2 0.4<=BER<0.8%
0.6
3 0.8<=BER<1.6%
4 1.6<=BER<3.2% 0.4
5 3.2<=BER<6.4% 0.2
6 6.4<=BER<12.84%
7 BER>=12.8% 0

Low Quality Analysis Low HQI Reason  The downlink HQI is

Interference HQI Interference
below the baseline.
• DL Interference Definition: DL RX_lev >-90dBm & RQL > 3 Weak Coverage (96%)
4.30%
• UL Interference Definition: UL RX_lev >-95dBm & RQL > 3 5.53%
5.52% 3.26%  The main reason of
bad downlink HQI is
Weak Coverage 88.95% 92.44%
• DL Weak Coverage Definition: DL RX_lev <-90dBm & RQL > 3 Rate of Weak
• UL Weak Coverage Definition: UL RX_lev <-95dBm & RQL > 3
Uplink Downlink
Coverage and Bad
Quality in Downlink.

Huawei Confidential Page 19

 Interference Caused Low Quality
Traffic Volume on TCH(Erl) DL HQI
35000
30000 0.97
25000
0.95
20000  The interference is
15000 0.93
10000 internal as DL HQI
0.91
5000 decreased with the
0 0.89
traffic increase
: 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00
: 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00 : 00  Average cell TRX
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
configuration are 5,
Cell Level Configuration Distribution 48.76% cells TRX
configuration are
700
600
586 above average.
500
400
300
200 162 152
122
100 52 43 41 58
27
2
0
2 TRX 3 TRX 4 TRX 5 TRX 6 TRX 7 TRX 8 TRX 10 TRX 11 TRX 12 TRX
Huawei Confidential Page 20
 Weak Coverage Caused Low Quality
Weak Coverage and Bad Quality Analysis  DL Weak Coverage and
Bad Quality is 4.30%
 UL Weak Coverage and
Rate of Weak Coverage and Bad Quality in DL 4.30%
Bad Quality is 5.53%
 For most cells the DL
Rate of Weak Coverage and Bad Quality in UL 5.53%
Coverage and Bad Quality
is [0,2%].
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00%

UL Weak Coverage and Bad DL Weak Coverage and Bad TA& Cell Weak Coverage
Quality Distribution Quality Distribution Downlink weak coverage proportion Average TA
100.00% 50

[0,2%] [0,2%] 80.00% 40

60.00% 30
[2%,5%] [2%,5%]
21.45% 17.99% 40.00% 20
30.84% 32.69%
[5%,10%] [5%,10%]
20.00% 10

20.40% 23.94% 0.00% 0

121890...

121607...

121561...
122001_...

121479_...
122015_...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_1...
121538_...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...

SWAP_12...

SWAP_12...
SWAP_12...
[10%,100%] [10%,100%]
27.31% 25.38%

Huawei Confidential Page 21

 Contents
Experience & Performance

Coverage & Interference

·Capacity & Load

Huawei Confidential Page 22

 RF Resource Analysis
Resource Usage by Different Service
TCHF Occupation Ratio TCHH Occupation Ratio PDCH Occupation Ratio
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%

RF Resource Usage(Cell level)

250.00%
Average Resource Usage: 0.41
200.00%
Expansion Threshold: 60% 1589

150.00%
RF Recourse Result
For Forecast Summary (

100.00%
365

50.00%
TRX Expansion Need New Site

0.00%

Huawei Confidential Page 23

 Equipment Resource Analysis
CPU Occupation Rate (CP System) CPU Occupation Rate (UP System)
50.00% 40.00%
35.00%
40.00%
30.00%
30.00% 25.00%
20.00%
20.00% 15.00%
10.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00% 0.00%

CPU Occupation Rate of Interface

12.00%
 The average CPU occupation rate of interface
10.00%
8.00%
board is 6.80%.
6.00%  The average usage of cp system is 23.21%
4.00% and up system 23.58%.
2.00%
0.00%

Huawei Confidential Page 24

 Thank you
www.huawei.com

Copyright©2017 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

The information in this document may contain predictive statements including, without limitation, statements regarding the future
financial and operating results, future product portfolio, new technology, etc. There are a number of factors that could cause actual
results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the predictive statements. Therefore, such information
is provided for reference purpose only and constitutes neither an offer nor an acceptance. Huawei may change the information at any
time without notice.

Page 25 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.