Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01
Chapter 1:
02
Chapter 2: Company Profile &
03
Chapter 3:
Introduction Internship Activities Evaluation
04 05
Chapter 4: Conclusion Chapter 5: Self
& Recommendation Reflection
Chapter 1: Introduction
The reasons in choosing to write an The reasons in choosing to intern at Internship Activities:
Internship Report: PPPK: 1. Analysing the financial
statement, specifically the Fixed
1. Gain new insights and 1. Broaden connection with Assets of PT JKL
experience in the working experienced financial
2. Understanding several PSAK and
industry professionals
SA to evaluate the compliance
2. Implement the theory that have 2. To learn the work of financial of both KAP and PPPK
been learned into real-life cases professionals from different 3. Evaluating the Findings by PPPK
perspectives towards KAP ABC
PT JKL’ s case
● Fixed Assets in the form of a plantation
Internship Activities:
● Understanding PSAK 16 : Fixed Assets
● Understanding PSAK 48 : Impairment of Assets → Focusing on the recoverable
amount concept.
● Understanding PSAK 68 : Fair Value Measurement → Focusing on the principle
of highest and best use, as well as market participants.
● Evaluating the inspector teams findings
● Finalize the evaluation of findings by PPPK
Chapter 3: Evaluation
Article 48 regarding PPPK’s field inspection. The procedures ● Yearly inspection done by PPPK
are; ● KMKRI No.46/KM.01/2020 as the basis of inspection
1. Submit requests for documents and/or working papers for year 2021
2. Reviewing documents and/or working papers
3. Make requests for information related to tracing
documents and working papers if necessary, either
through interviews, clarifications and/or confirmations
to the Public Accountant, KAP leader, KAP branch
leader being examined, Associated Parties, and/or the
Asosiasi Profesi Akuntan Publik
4. Submit the provisional conclusion of the audit results in
writing to the Public Accountant, KAP leader, and/or
KAP branch head being examined before discussing ● The inspection is done to assess the compliance level
the provisional conclusion of the audit results, and towards the regulations and standards that have been
set
5. Discussing the provisional conclusions of the audit
results with the Public Accountant, KAP leader, and/or
branch head of the audited KAP, as well as holding a
closing meeting
Chapter 3: Evaluation
The Findings by PPPK are to justify why the impairment and the final value of assets should not be recognized
as zero by KAP ABC and PT JKL.
● Based on the calculation of Fixed Assets done by the audit team of KAP ABC, they decided to recognize the
final value of assets using the value in use measurement
● There are several reasonings why KAP ABC decided to use Value in Use measurement as their measurement
method
● KJPP Calculation by the management team of PT JKL
○ The KJPP Calculation cannot find the market value nor the comparable value for the fixed assets of PT
JKL
○ The cost approach cannot be used as a measurement method because the fixed assets were currently
not operating
Chapter 3: Evaluation
Reasonings by KAP ABC why they chose to use Value in Use measurement
Paragraph 28 stated that ● PT JKL had offered the Basis of Conclusion IAS 36 ● The management
the highest and best value assets to third-party “IASC believed that were initiating a
of an assets must fulfilled: entities as a form of replacement cost transformation plan.
1. Physically possible partnership, but there techniques are not
● PT JKL is planning to
were no interests. appropriate to measure the
2. Legally permissible do a collaborative
recoverable amount of an
3. Financially feasible ● Partnership with third- operation with third-
asset.”
parties will not parties to rebuild the
The management team of generate adequate plantation and utilize
returns. ● The market value them by the year of
PT JKL also stated that the
● PT JKL were not could not be 2022.
assets were only
willing to sell the generated.
momentarily ceased. And
with the specified assets as scrap. ● Income approach
technology that the assets cannot be use.
have, it can only be utilized ● Cost approach
by PT JKL. cannot be use.
Chapter 3: Evaluation
PPPK’s Findings
Finding 1 : PPPK’s Philosophy regarding PSAK Finding 2 : The concept of Highest and Best Use of an Asset
● PSAK 48 Paragraph 18 in which the recognition of ● PSAK 68 Paragraph 27 stated that the highest and
recoverable amount should be determined by best value of the assets must be recognized
comparing the highest value of value in use and ● In Paragraph 28 —> The assets must be physically,
fair value less cost of disposal. legally, and financially feasible to be recognized
● PSAK 48 stated that the entity should assess and ● The asset is legally permissible, where the
recognize the best possible benefit from the calculation of fair value (scrap value) can be done.
assets. The calculation using Sales Value should And calculating the fair value does not mean that
also be considered other than Value in Use. the asset must be sold.
● PSAK 68 regulates the Fair Value measurement. ● The asset is financially feasible, where it can be
Calculating the fair value of the assets does not calculated using the in-situ approach and the scrap
mean that the assets must be sold. In this case, it value will be the ultimate way out to sell the
will generate a higher amount of scrap value that assets.
is higher than zero.
Chapter 3: Evaluation
PPPK’s Findings
There was an inconsistency between the PSAK and the ● KAP ABC should understand and implement the
audit process as well as measurement done by KAP ABC PSAK correctly
which then led to the findings by PPPK. ● KAP ABC should have considered all the available
● KAP ABC measurement in recognizing the final value measurement such as sales value to get a higher
of assets as zero is not in accordance with PSAK 48 result of fixed assets
Paragraph 18 where the measurement of assets ● The inspection team of PPPK should be more
should be calculated by its best value. transparent in disclosing whether each KAP have
been in accordance to the regulations or not.
● KAP ABC can still calculate the scrap value of the
fixed assets using Fair Value Measurement as
regulated in PSAK 68.
● PPPK had done the inspection in accordance to
PMKRI 186/PMK.01/2021.
● The findings by PPPK are in accordance to the
available PSAK.
Chapter 5: Feelings and Thoughts