You are on page 1of 18

Evaluation of the Findings

by PPPK regarding the Audit


Opinion of KAP ABC
towards PT JKL
Proposed by: Nisita Sarinarulita (1806174130)

Supervisor: Kurnia Irwansyah Rais S.E., M.Ak.


Table of
Contents

01
Chapter 1:
02
Chapter 2: Company Profile &
03
Chapter 3:
Introduction Internship Activities Evaluation

04 05
Chapter 4: Conclusion Chapter 5: Self
& Recommendation Reflection
Chapter 1: Introduction

The reasons in choosing to write an The reasons in choosing to intern at Internship Activities:
Internship Report: PPPK: 1. Analysing the financial
statement, specifically the Fixed
1. Gain new insights and 1. Broaden connection with Assets of PT JKL
experience in the working experienced financial
2. Understanding several PSAK and
industry professionals
SA to evaluate the compliance
2. Implement the theory that have 2. To learn the work of financial of both KAP and PPPK
been learned into real-life cases professionals from different 3. Evaluating the Findings by PPPK
perspectives towards KAP ABC

The reasons in choosing the topic:


The Purpose of the Internship Report:
1. The internship activities focuses on the
evaluation of the Findings by PPPK 1. Evaluation of the PPPK findings regarding the
audit opinion of KAP ABC towards PT JKL
2. The discussion of the case revolves around
the audit opinion and the measurement done 2. Evaluation on self-reflection and self-
by KAP ABC awareness towards the internship experience
that have been done
Chapter 2: Company Profile & Internship
Activity Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan - PPPK
● Focuses on regulating, inspecting, and the
growth of financial professionals.
● Bidang Pelaporan, Bidang Pengembangan,
Bidang Pemeriksaan → Where the internship
activities were conducted
Chapter 2: Company Profile &
Internship Activity
PT JKL

● An enterprise that operates in the mining of


KAP ABC iron ore, coal, and mining minerals.
● Public Accounting Firm that has been operating ● The industry ranges from producing and
since 1971. A part of the ABC Global. distributing steel sponges, steel slabs, hot sheet
● Their goal is to deliver their services to help steel, etc.
clients in improving transparency, governance
accountability, and financial performance and ● The business process consists of producing half-
return. finished goods into finished goods (ironmaking
production facilities).
KAP ABC’s Work Line
1. Audit and Assurance
2. Advisory Deals
3. Actuarial Services
4. Consulting
5. Tax
Chapter 2: Company Profile &
Internship Activity

PT JKL’ s case
● Fixed Assets in the form of a plantation

2011 2013 2015 2016 2017 2019


Planning the Construction Technology Feasibility Impairment Change of
Plantation. of the issues. study. calculation by auditor to KAP
plantation. KAP XYZ. ABC.
Plantation caught
fire.
Calculation of Fixed Assets by KAP ABC
Chapter 2: Company Profile &
Internship Activity
Calculation of Fixed Assets by KAP ABC - Restatement of Impairment Assets

Internship Activities:
● Understanding PSAK 16 : Fixed Assets
● Understanding PSAK 48 : Impairment of Assets → Focusing on the recoverable
amount concept.
● Understanding PSAK 68 : Fair Value Measurement → Focusing on the principle
of highest and best use, as well as market participants.
● Evaluating the inspector teams findings
● Finalize the evaluation of findings by PPPK
Chapter 3: Evaluation

PMKRI No.186/PMK.01/2021 - Inspection Process by PPPK

Article 48 regarding PPPK’s field inspection. The procedures ● Yearly inspection done by PPPK
are; ● KMKRI No.46/KM.01/2020 as the basis of inspection
1. Submit requests for documents and/or working papers for year 2021
2. Reviewing documents and/or working papers
3. Make requests for information related to tracing
documents and working papers if necessary, either
through interviews, clarifications and/or confirmations
to the Public Accountant, KAP leader, KAP branch
leader being examined, Associated Parties, and/or the
Asosiasi Profesi Akuntan Publik
4. Submit the provisional conclusion of the audit results in
writing to the Public Accountant, KAP leader, and/or
KAP branch head being examined before discussing ● The inspection is done to assess the compliance level
the provisional conclusion of the audit results, and towards the regulations and standards that have been
set
5. Discussing the provisional conclusions of the audit
results with the Public Accountant, KAP leader, and/or
branch head of the audited KAP, as well as holding a
closing meeting
Chapter 3: Evaluation
The Findings by PPPK are to justify why the impairment and the final value of assets should not be recognized
as zero by KAP ABC and PT JKL.

● Based on the calculation of Fixed Assets done by the audit team of KAP ABC, they decided to recognize the
final value of assets using the value in use measurement
● There are several reasonings why KAP ABC decided to use Value in Use measurement as their measurement
method
● KJPP Calculation by the management team of PT JKL
○ The KJPP Calculation cannot find the market value nor the comparable value for the fixed assets of PT
JKL
○ The cost approach cannot be used as a measurement method because the fixed assets were currently
not operating
Chapter 3: Evaluation
Reasonings by KAP ABC why they chose to use Value in Use measurement

PSAK 68 principle Depreciated


No Market Management
of “Highest and Replacement Cost
Participants Intentions
Best Use” Usage of IAS 36

Paragraph 28 stated that ● PT JKL had offered the Basis of Conclusion IAS 36 ● The management
the highest and best value assets to third-party “IASC believed that were initiating a
of an assets must fulfilled: entities as a form of replacement cost transformation plan.
1. Physically possible partnership, but there techniques are not
● PT JKL is planning to
were no interests. appropriate to measure the
2. Legally permissible do a collaborative
recoverable amount of an
3. Financially feasible ● Partnership with third- operation with third-
asset.”
parties will not parties to rebuild the
The management team of generate adequate plantation and utilize
returns. ● The market value them by the year of
PT JKL also stated that the
● PT JKL were not could not be 2022.
assets were only
willing to sell the generated.
momentarily ceased. And
with the specified assets as scrap. ● Income approach
technology that the assets cannot be use.
have, it can only be utilized ● Cost approach
by PT JKL. cannot be use.
Chapter 3: Evaluation
PPPK’s Findings

Finding 1 : PPPK’s Philosophy regarding PSAK Finding 2 : The concept of Highest and Best Use of an Asset
● PSAK 48 Paragraph 18 in which the recognition of ● PSAK 68 Paragraph 27 stated that the highest and
recoverable amount should be determined by best value of the assets must be recognized
comparing the highest value of value in use and ● In Paragraph 28 —> The assets must be physically,
fair value less cost of disposal. legally, and financially feasible to be recognized
● PSAK 48 stated that the entity should assess and ● The asset is legally permissible, where the
recognize the best possible benefit from the calculation of fair value (scrap value) can be done.
assets. The calculation using Sales Value should And calculating the fair value does not mean that
also be considered other than Value in Use. the asset must be sold.
● PSAK 68 regulates the Fair Value measurement. ● The asset is financially feasible, where it can be
Calculating the fair value of the assets does not calculated using the in-situ approach and the scrap
mean that the assets must be sold. In this case, it value will be the ultimate way out to sell the
will generate a higher amount of scrap value that assets.
is higher than zero.
Chapter 3: Evaluation
PPPK’s Findings

Finding 3 : DRC and Basis of Conclusion IAS 36 Finding 4 : Management Intentions


● The usage of Basis of Conclusion IAS 36 by KAP ● The management team of PT JKL still strongly
ABC should not be done. believed that the asset will be use again in the
● In PSAK 25 Paragraph 7 until 12 it is regulated that future. They are planning a transformation plan in
there are hierarchies that the audit teams must year 2022 thus the management team did not
follow regarding the usage of the regulations and want to recognize the asset as scrap value.
standards. If there is a PSAK and SA that regulates ● This furthermore confirmed the findings of the
the related problems, then the audit team must inspector team where the assets should be valued
prioritize using PSAK. higher than zero.
● In PSAK 48 there was a statement that if the
calculation of fair value is hard to be obtained,
then value in use can be used as a recoverable
amount
● In PSAK 68 it is stated that the fair value can also
be measured using sales value or income
approach.
Chapter 3: Evaluation
PPPK’s Findings

Finding 5 : Market Participant PPPK’s Further Action towards the findings


● KAP ABC stated that there were no available ● The audit opinion and the measurement of fixed
market participants because until the recording assets by KAP ABC was not in accordance with the
date there were still no interested parties. existing PSAK.
● The fixed assets that were offered by PT JKL ● PPPK will take further action in handling KAP ABC
requires a high technology and it is an expensive in agreement of the available policies within the
assets thus it takes more time in searching for organization.
partnership.
● Knowing the character of the fixed assets, the
inspector teams stated that no buyers does not
mean no market participants.
● The further search for market participants by PT
JKL showed that the fixed assets still have a higher
value than zero.
Chapter 4 : Conclusion and Recommendation
Conclusion Recommendation

There was an inconsistency between the PSAK and the ● KAP ABC should understand and implement the
audit process as well as measurement done by KAP ABC PSAK correctly
which then led to the findings by PPPK. ● KAP ABC should have considered all the available
● KAP ABC measurement in recognizing the final value measurement such as sales value to get a higher
of assets as zero is not in accordance with PSAK 48 result of fixed assets
Paragraph 18 where the measurement of assets ● The inspection team of PPPK should be more
should be calculated by its best value. transparent in disclosing whether each KAP have
been in accordance to the regulations or not.
● KAP ABC can still calculate the scrap value of the
fixed assets using Fair Value Measurement as
regulated in PSAK 68.
● PPPK had done the inspection in accordance to
PMKRI 186/PMK.01/2021.
● The findings by PPPK are in accordance to the
available PSAK.
Chapter 5: Feelings and Thoughts

Experience at Bidang Experience at Bidang


Experience at Bidang Pemeriksaan
Pelaporan Pengembangan

Before Internship: Before Internship: Before Internship:


● Nervous and delighted to ● Excited to meet new ● Curious of the case and
be working as an intern supervisor and new teams discussion that will be
● Enthusiastic for the work ● Challenged with the task conducted throughout the
and experience at Bidang that was given month
Pelaporan
During Internship: During Internship: During Internship:
● Felt at ease in doing the ● Felt under-performanced ● Felt overwhelmed with the
task that was given since when doing in-depth unfamiliar and complex
writer was familiar with it analysis materials
● Felt responsible and driven ● Felt appreciative of all the ● Nerve-wrecking when
in finishing the task constructive feedbacks presenting the task

After Internship: After Internship: After Internship:


● Relieved that the task was ● Happy to gain new ● Thankful towards the
managed to be completed perspective regarding supervisors
which careers to take and ● Content with the tasks that
which skills to grow managed to be finished
Chapter 5: Self Reflection

Analysis Evaluation Conclusion

Accomplishments: Push-factors: ● Managed to work with


1. Being able to communicate and 1. Being a student in the most supportive teams and
connect well with the team reputable university in Indonesia supervisors
2. Gaining new insightful 2. Experienced in studying abroad ● Gained new insights and
knowledge where research were conducted connection
3. Learn to be more responsible 3. Experienced in being a part of ● Gained new perspective
and accountable in fulfilling the the campus committee towards the available
job’s obligations professional jobs
4. Accustomed to being guided by
the lecturers ● Managed to do a self-review to
Limitations: improve better in the future
5. Inexperience in the working
4. Limitations in accessing the environment
informations of the materials
5. Lack of work-experience that led
to difficulties in understanding
comprehensive materials
6. Unable to do in-depth research
for the materials
Chapter 5: Self Reflection
Follow-up Plans

2022 2023 2024 2025


Pursue a career Career promotion Take certification Take certification
as a financial as well as taking of Chartered of Chartered
professional at certificate Financial Analyst Accountant (CA).
the independent lessons. (CFA). Finish master’s
central bank. Look for master’s Take a master’s degree.
degree degree in one of
scholarship. the top
universities listed
in the QS World
Rankings.
Thank You nisitanisa@gmail.com
+62812 8118 3008

You might also like