Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYSIS
Presented by
Sreekuttty Radhakrishnan
FEN-2020-09-008
OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
Cressman Analysis
Barnes Analysis
Optimum interpolation
SURFACE FITTING METHOD
Panofsky in 1949 .
The surfaces were defined by means of 2D polynomials . One for each sub-region .
Panofsky made the first attempt to fit mathematical functions to two dimensional
meteorological data.
He arbitrarily divided his map of report into sub-region
Each containing 10-20 observations .
In each sub-region , Panofsky fitted the observations with a 3rd degree polynomial
He sought a good fit between the analysis height and the observed height fields .
He sought to minimize the angle between observed wind and analyzed height gradient .
Coefficient to vary smoothly from one region to another sub-region ,they where expressed in
polynomials in X and Y .
In this way discontinuities were avoided at boundaries between regions
Methods Of Surface Fitting
Ordinary least square fitting .
Weighted least square fitting .
Splines .
Advantages
Attractive method for small number of observations .
No background field is required
Account for observational error
Disadvantages
Computationally expensive when large number of observations are considered
One must be wary of under fitting , over fitting , or using the wrong set of
functions
EMPIRICAL LINEAR INTERPOLATION
The empirical linear interpolation was popular from the late 1950 to about
1980.
In this method , model grid point values are derived using the values of
variable from near by location .
Bergthorsson and Doos (1955)were first to introduce the method .
They obtained a gridded analysis of the height field
Which relied upon many different sources of information such as..
i. The background height field from model forecast
ii. Climatology
iii. Height and wind observation
CRESSMAN METHOD
This radius of influence decreases with each successive scan . After a large
number of a scan the grid value converges to the observation.
I.e. ,
Three kinds of observations handled by the cressman
successive correction scheme :
Height only
Wind only
Height and wind together
R is the scan radius and d is the distance from the grid
point at the center of the circle to the observation .
Height(I index)
Wind(j index)
Height and wind (k index )
The radius of influence is R ; its value decreases on
successive scans .
Advantages
This method is simple and computationally fast
Can be multivariable
Procedure is tunable
The result are generally pleasing
Disadvantages
This scheme is not well suited for divers observations because
observational error is not accounted for .
Does not account for uneven distribution of data
Scale of result varies with observational density
Optimum values of R , v ,etc. are determined by trial and errors
BARNES SCHEME
1. On first scan , estimate the value of variable at each grid point using
equation
2. Estimate the variable value for each observation located by averaging the
four closest grid values
3. Calculate the difference between estimated and observed value at each
observation location .
4. Distribute the differences on to the grid points using linear interpolation
scheme described above with the Barnes weighting function
5. Repeat the last 3 steps (2-4) until the observation value is less than pre-
defined value
Advantages
there is no need to set an influence radius .
Only two passes are necessary
No background field is required
Steps
• Values of the model fields are derived at each of the observation location
using an objective analysis .
• Difference between the model based values and the actual observation
values , which are called observation increment , that are obtained at each
observation location .
• Find out the weights that are assigned to each of the observation
location in order to estimate the observation increment value at the
each of the mode grid point .
• Then , the analysis increment are added to background values at each
model grid point to generate a new .
Advantages
Estimate of analysis error produced as a function of the distribution and
accuracy of the data
Disadvantages
Computationally more expensive than other commonly used methods
Not designed for best performance during extreme event
THANK YOU ……….