You are on page 1of 47

Chapter 5

Cost allocation

1
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Meaning of cost allocation
Cost Allocation: the process of assigning or applying col-

lected indirect costs to cost objects using an allocation


base is known as cost allocation.
The following terms are to be known and they have

strong tie with the allocation of costs to products or ser-


vices. These are:
Cost object

Cost pool and

2 Cost driver © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Cont…
Cost object: - is anything for which a measurement of costs is

desired.
Cost pool: is a collection of overhead costs related to a cost ob-

ject.
Cost driver: is an activity that causes the cost pool to increase

in amount as the cost driver increases in volume.


 Cost allocation requires:

 the pooling of manufacturing overhead costs that are affected by

a common activity and


 the selection of a cost driver whose activity level causes a
3 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Purposes of cost allocation
To provide information for economic deci-

sions
To motivate managers and other employees

To justify costs or compute reimbursement

To measure income and assets for reporting

to external parties
4 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Allocating Costs of a Supporting Depart-
ment to Operating Departments

Supporting (service) department—provides the ser-

vices that assist other internal departments in the


company. Examples of support departments are in-
formation systems and plant maintenance.
Operating (production) department—directly adds

value to a product or service.

5 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Methods to Allocate
Support Department Costs
Single-rate method—allocates costs in each cost pool

(service department) to cost objects (production depart-


ments) using the same rate per unit of a single allocation
base
 No distinction is made between fixed and variable costs in this

method.

Dual-rate method—segregates costs within each cost pool

into two segments: a variable-cost pool and a fixed-cost


© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 6
Allocation Method Trade-Offs

Single-rate method is simple to implement, but

treats fixed costs in a manner similar to variable

costs.

Dual-rate method treats fixed and variable costs

7
more realistically, but is more complex to imple-
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Allocation Bases
When using either the single-rate method or the dual-rate

method, managers can allocate support-department costs


to operating divisions based on either a budgeted rate or
the eventual actual cost rate.
The latter approach is neither conceptually preferred nor

widely used in practice.


Accordingly, we illustrate the single rate and dual-rate

methods next based on the use of budgeted rates.


8 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Example
Consider the central computer department of SHC. This sup-

port department has two users, both operating divisions: the


microcomputer division and the peripheral equipment division.
The following data relate to the 2012 budget:

9 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Allocation Based on the Usage of Computer Services
Single-Rate Method
In this method, a combined budgeted rate is used for fixed and
variable costs. The rate is calculated as follows:

Under the single-rate method, divisions are charged the bud-


geted rate for each hour of actual use of the central facility. The
support costs allocated to the two divisions under this method
are as follows:

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 10


Dual-Rate Method
As in the single-rate method, variable costs are assigned
based on the budgeted variable cost per hour of $200 for
actual hours used by each division.
However, fixed costs are assigned based on budgeted fixed
costs per hour and the budgeted number of hours for
each division.
Given the budgeted usage of 8,000 hours for the microcom-

puter division and 4,000 hours for the peripheral equipment


division, the budgeted fixed-cost rate is $250 per hour
11 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
The costs allocated to the microcomputer division in 2012 un-

der the dual-rate method would be as follows:

The costs allocated to the peripheral equipment division in

2012 would be as follows:

12 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Methods of Allocating Costs of Multiple
Support Departments

1. Direct

2. Step-down

3. Reciprocal

13 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Direct Method

Allocates support costs only to operating depart-

ments.

Direct method does not allocate support-depart-

ment costs to other support departments.

14 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Direct Method
Support Departments Production Departments

Information Systems

Manufacturing

Packaging

15 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Accounting
Data Used in Cost Allocation Illustrations

16 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Cont…
The base used to allocate plant maintenance costs

to the operating departments is the budgeted total


maintenance labour-hours worked in the operating
departments: 6,000 + 10,000 = 16,000 hours.
Similarly, the base used for allocation of informa-

tion systems costs to the operating departments is


4,000 + 500 = 4,500 budgeted hours of computer
time.
17 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Direct Allocation Method Illustrated

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


18
Direct Allocation Method Illustrated

19 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Step-Down Method
Also called the sequential allocation method

Allocates support-department costs to other support de-

partments and to operating departments in a sequential


manner
Partially recognizes the mutual services provided among all

support departments
The latter slides shows the step-down method. Assume

that the plant maintenance


20 costs of $6,300,000 are allo-
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Step-Down Method
Support Departments Production Departments

Information Systems

Manufacturing

Packaging

Accounting
21 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Step-Down Allocation Method Illus-
trated

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 22


Step-Down Allocation Method Illus-
trated

23 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Reciprocal Method
Allocates support-department costs to operating

departments by fully recognizing the mutual ser-


vices provided among all support departments.
Reciprocal method fully incorporates interdepart-

mental relationships into the support-department


cost allocation.

24 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Reciprocal Method
Support Departments Production Departments

Information Systems

Manufacturing

Packaging

Accounting
25 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Reciprocal Allocation Method Illustrated

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 26


Choosing Between Methods

Reciprocal is the most precise.

Direct and step-down are simple to compute and understand.

Direct method is widely used.

27 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Cost Allocation:
Joint Products and Byproducts

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 28


Joint Cost Terminology
Joint costs—costs of a single production process that yields

multiple products simultaneously.


Splitoff point—the place in a joint production process where

two or more products become separately identifiable.


Separable costs—all costs incurred beyond the splitoff point

that are assignable to each of the now-identifiable specific


products.

29
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Cost Terminology
Joint products—outputs of a joint production process that

yields two or more products with a high sales value com-


pared to the sales values of any other outputs.
Byproducts—outputs of a joint production process that

have low sales values compare to the sales values of the


other outputs.

30
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Process Overview
Steam:
An Output with Zero Sales Value

Joint Product #1

Single Production
Process

Joint Product #2

Byproduct

31
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Cost Allocation Methods
 Market-based—allocate using market-derived data (dol-

lars):
1. Sales value at splitoff
2. Net realizable value (NRV)
3. Constant gross-margin percentage NRV

 Physical measures—allocate using tangible attributes of

the products, such as pounds, gallons, barrels, and so on

32
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Sales Value at Splitoff Method
Uses the sales value of the entire production of the

accounting period to calculate allocation percent-


age
Ignores inventories

33
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Cost Illustration Overview

34
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
The selling price per gallon

For cream is $8

For liquid skim is $4

35
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Sales Value at Splitoff Illustration
Allocation of Joint Costs Using Liquid
Sales Value at Splitoff Method Cream Skim Total
Sales value of total production at splitoff
point: (25,000*$8; 75,000*$4) $200,000 $300,000 $500,000
Weighting ($200,000/$500,000;
$300,000/$500,000) 0.40 0.60
Joint costs allocated:
(0.40*$400,000; 0.60*$400,000) $160,000 $240,000 $400,000

36
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Net Realizable Value Method

Allocates joint costs to joint products on the basis

of relative NRV of total production of the joint


products.
NRV = Final Sales Value – Separable Costs

37
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Net Realizable Value Method Over-
view

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


39
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
Solution:

40
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Constant Gross Margin NRV Method

Allocates joint costs to joint products in a way that

the overall gross-margin percentage is identical for

the individual products.

Joint costs are calculated as a residual amount.

41
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
 Step 1: Compute overall gross margin percentage

This is based on the final sales value of total production during the

accounting period.
 Step 2: Compute total production costs for each product.

The difference between the final sales value of total production and the

gross margin then yields the total production costs that the product must
bear.
 Step 3: Compute allocated joint costs.

As the final step, the separable costs for each product are deducted from

the total production costs that the product must bear to obtain the joint-
cost allocation for that product.
42
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
Solution:

43
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Physical-Measure Method
Allocates joint costs to joint products on the basis of

the relative weight, volume, or other physical measure


at the splitoff point of total production of the products.

44
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Physical Measures Illustration
Allocation of Joint Costs Using Liquid
Physical Measure Method Cream Skim Total
Physical Measure of total production
(gallons) 25,000 75,000 100,0000
Weighting (25,000/100,000;
75,000/100,000) 0.25 0.75
Joint costs allocated (0.25*$400,000;
0.75*$400,000) $100,000 $300,000 $400,000

45
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Byproducts
Two methods for accounting for byproducts

Production method—recognizes byproduct inventory as it is

created, and sales and costs at the time of sale.


Sales method—recognizes no byproduct inventory, and rec-

ognizes only sales at the time of sales: byproduct costs are


not tracked separately.

46
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
The End!

47 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

You might also like