You are on page 1of 58

Chapter 5

Cost allocation

1
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Meaning of cost allocation
Cost Allocation: the process of assigning or applying

collected indirect costs to cost objects using an allocation


base is known as cost allocation.
The following terms are to be known and they have strong

tie with the allocation of costs to products or services.


These are:
 Cost object

 Cost pool and

2
 Cost driver
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
Cost object: - is anything for which a measurement of costs is

desired.
Cost pool: is a collection of overhead costs related to a cost

object.
Cost driver: is an activity that causes the cost pool to increase

in amount as the cost driver increases in volume.


 Cost allocation requires:

 the pooling of manufacturing overhead costs that are affected by

a common activity and


 the selection of a cost driver whose activity level causes a change
3 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Purposes of cost allocation
To provide information for economic
decisions
To motivate managers and other employees

To justify costs or compute reimbursement

To measure income and assets for reporting

to external parties
4 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Steps in Manufacturing overhead
allocation process
Planning step

Application step

Recording step and

Reconciling step

5 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Planning step
In planning step, a predetermined overhead rate is

calculated in traditional settings and activity pool


rate is calculated in activity based costing settings.
No journal entry is required during this stage.

Predetermined overhead rate = Budgeted MOH


costs__________________
Budgeted MOH cost allocation
bases (cost drivers)
6 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Application step
In the application step, the estimated manufacturing

overhead costs are assigned to the products costs as units


are manufactured.
Applied MOH Cost
= Predetermined MOH rate*Actual MOH cost allocation bases (cost
drivers)

The following entry is required in this step.


Work in process inventory Debit
Manufacturing overhead allocated Credit
7 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Recording step
In the recording step, the actual manufacturing overhead

costs incurred during the accounting period are


recorded.
These costs will be part of the actual product cost and

include the costs of indirect materials, indirect labor,


depreciation, property taxes and other production cost.
Journal entry:
Manufacturing overhead control Debit
Various Accounts Credit

8 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Reconciliation step
The difference between the applied manufacturing overhead costs

and the actual overhead costs is calculated at the end of


accounting period under reconciliation step.
If applied manufacturing overhead is more than the actual

manufacturing overhead it is known as over- applied overhead.


On the other hand, if applied overhead is less than the actual

manufacturing overhead, it is known as under-applied overhead.


 This difference will be eliminated in the end-of-period adjusting entry

process, using one of three possible methods (See chapter 2).

 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 9


Allocating Costs of a Supporting
Department to Operating Departments

Supporting (service) department—provides the


services that assist other internal departments in the
company. Examples of support departments are
information systems and plant maintenance.
Operating (production) department—directly adds

value to a product or service.

10 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Methods to Allocate
Support Department Costs
Single-rate method—allocates costs in each cost pool (service

department) to cost objects (production departments) using the


same rate per unit of a single allocation base
 No distinction is made between fixed and variable costs in this

method.

Dual-rate method—segregates costs within each cost pool into

two segments: a variable-cost pool and a fixed-cost pool.


 Each pool uses a different cost-allocation base.

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 11


Allocation Method Trade-Offs

Single-rate method is simple to implement, but treats fixed

costs in a manner similar to variable costs.

Dual-rate method treats fixed and variable costs more

realistically, but is more complex to implement.

12 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Allocation Bases
When using either the single-rate method or the dual-rate

method, managers can allocate support-department costs to


operating divisions based on either a budgeted rate or the
eventual actual cost rate.
The latter approach is neither conceptually preferred nor

widely used in practice.


Accordingly, we illustrate the single rate and dual-rate

methods next based on the use of budgeted rates.


13 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Example
Consider the central computer department of SHC. This support

department has two users, both operating divisions: the


microcomputer division and the peripheral equipment division.
The following data relate to the 2012 budget:

14 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Allocation Based on the Usage of Computer Services
Single-Rate Method
In this method, a combined budgeted rate is used for fixed and
variable costs. The rate is calculated as follows:

Under the single-rate method, divisions are charged the


budgeted rate for each hour of actual use of the central
facility. The support costs allocated to the two divisions under
this method are as follows:

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 15


Dual-Rate Method
As in the single-rate method, variable costs are assigned
based on the budgeted variable cost per hour of $200 for
actual hours used by each division.
However, fixed costs are assigned based on budgeted fixed
costs per hour and the budgeted number of hours for
each division.
Given the budgeted usage of 8,000 hours for the microcomputer

division and 4,000 hours for the peripheral equipment division,


the budgeted fixed-cost rate is $250 per hour ($3,000,000 ÷
16 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
The costs allocated to the microcomputer division in 2012

under the dual-rate method would be as follows:

The costs allocated to the peripheral equipment division in 2012

would be as follows:

17 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Methods of Allocating Costs of Multiple
Support Departments

1. Direct

2. Step-down

3. Reciprocal

18 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Direct Method

Allocates support costs only to operating

departments.

Direct method does not allocate support-

department costs to other support departments.

19 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Direct Method
Support Departments Production Departments

Information Systems

Manufacturing

Packaging

20 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Accounting
Data Used in Cost Allocation Illustrations

21 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Cont…
The base used to allocate plant maintenance costs

to the operating departments is the budgeted total


maintenance labour-hours worked in the operating
departments: 6,000 + 10,000 = 16,000 hours.
Similarly, the base used for allocation of
information systems costs to the operating
departments is 4,000 + 500 = 4,500 budgeted
hours of computer time.
22 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Direct Allocation Method Illustrated

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


23
Direct Allocation Method Illustrated

24 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Step-Down Method
Also called the sequential allocation method

Allocates support-department costs to other support


departments and to operating departments in a sequential
manner
Partially recognizes the mutual services provided among all

support departments
The latter slides shows the step-down method. Assume that

the plant maintenance costs of $6,300,000 are allocated


25 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Step-Down Method
Support Departments Production Departments

Information Systems

Manufacturing

Packaging

Accounting
26 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Step-Down Allocation Method
Illustrated

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 27


Step-Down Allocation Method
Illustrated

28 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Reciprocal Method
Allocates support-department costs to operating

departments by fully recognizing the mutual


services provided among all support
departments.
Reciprocal method fully incorporates
interdepartmental relationships into the support-
department cost allocation.
29 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Reciprocal Method
Support Departments Production Departments

Information Systems

Manufacturing

Packaging

Accounting
30 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Reciprocal Allocation Method Illustrated

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 31


Choosing Between Methods

Reciprocal is the most precise.

Direct and step-down are simple to compute and understand.

Direct method is widely used.

32 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Allocating Common Costs

Common cost—the cost of operating a facility,

activity, or like cost object that is shared by two or

more users at a lower cost than the individual cost

of the activity to each user.

33 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Methods of Allocating
Common Costs
Stand-alone cost-allocation method—uses
information pertaining to each user of a cost object
as a separate entity to determine the cost-allocation
weights.
Individual costs are added together and allocation

percentages are calculated from the whole, and


applied to the common cost.
34 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Methods of Allocating Common Costs
Incremental cost-allocation method ranks the individual users

of a cost object in the order of users most responsible for a


common cost and then uses this ranking to allocate the cost
among the users.
The first ranked user is the primary user and is allocated costs up

the cost as a stand-alone user (typically gets the highest allocation


of the common costs).
The second ranked user is the first incremental user and is allocated

the additional cost that arises from two users rather than one.

35
Subsequent users are handled in the same manner as the second
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Example
Consider Ayele, a senior student in Addis Ababa University

who has been invited to an interview with an employer in


Mekele. The round trip Addis-Mekele airfare costs Br.1,200. A
week prior to leaving Ayele is also invited to an interview with
an employer in Dessie. The Addis-Dessie round trip airfare
costs Br. 800. Ayele decided to combine the two recurring trips
into an Addis-Mekele-Dessie trip that will cost Br. 1,500 in
airfare. The Br. 1, 500 is a common cost that benefits both
prospective employers.
36 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Stand-alone cost-allocation method
Mekele employer: Br1,200 * 1,500 = 0.60*1,500= Br 900
Br1,200 + Br 800

Dessie employer: Br 800 * 1,500 = 0.4 * 1,500 = Br


600
Br 800 + Br 1,200

37 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


Incremental cost-allocation method
Assume in the example the Mekele employer is viewed as the
primary party. Ayele’s rational is that he had already
committed to go to Mekele before accepting the invitations to
interview in Dessie. The cost allocation would be:
Party Cost Allocated Cumulative Costs Allocated
Mekele (primary) Br 1,200 Br 1,200
Dessie (incremental) 300 (1,500 – 1,200) Br 1,500
• Had the Dessie employer been chosen as the primary party, the
cost allocations would have been Dessie $800 and Mekele
$700(1500-800).
• Under the incremental method, the primary party typically receives
the highest allocation of the common costs. Most users in common
cost situations propose themselves as the incremental party.
38 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cost Allocation:
Joint Products and Byproducts

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 39


Joint Cost Terminology
Joint costs—costs of a single production process that yields

multiple products simultaneously.


Splitoff point—the place in a joint production process where

two or more products become separately identifiable.


Separable costs—all costs incurred beyond the splitoff point

that are assignable to each of the now-identifiable specific


products.

40
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Cost Terminology
Joint products—outputs of a joint production process that

yields two or more products with a high sales value


compared to the sales values of any other outputs.
Byproducts—outputs of a joint production process that

have low sales values compare to the sales values of the


other outputs.

41
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Process Overview
Steam:
An Output with Zero Sales Value

Joint Product #1

Single Production
Process

Joint Product #2

Byproduct

42
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Cost Allocation Methods
 Market-based—allocate using market-derived data
(dollars):
1. Sales value at splitoff
2. Net realizable value (NRV)
3. Constant gross-margin percentage NRV

 Physical measures—allocate using tangible attributes of

the products, such as pounds, gallons, barrels, and so on

43
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Sales Value at Splitoff Method
Uses the sales value of the entire production of the

accounting period to calculate allocation


percentage
Ignores inventories

44
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Joint Cost Illustration Overview

45
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
The selling price per gallon

For cream is $8

For liquid skim is $4

46
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Sales Value at Splitoff Illustration
Allocation of Joint Costs Using Liquid
Sales Value at Splitoff Method Cream Skim Total
Sales value of total production at splitoff
point: (25,000*$8; 75,000*$4) $200,000 $300,000 $500,000
Weighting ($200,000/$500,000;
$300,000/$500,000) 0.40 0.60
Joint costs allocated:
(0.40*$400,000; 0.60*$400,000) $160,000 $240,000 $400,000

47
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Net Realizable Value Method

Allocates joint costs to joint products on the basis

of relative NRV of total production of the joint


products.
NRV = Final Sales Value – Separable Costs

48
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Net Realizable Value Method
Overview

© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.


50
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
Solution:

51
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Constant Gross Margin NRV Method

Allocates joint costs to joint products in a way that

the overall gross-margin percentage is identical for

the individual products.

Joint costs are calculated as a residual amount.

52
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
 Step 1: Compute overall gross margin percentage

This is based on the final sales value of total production during the

accounting period.
 Step 2: Compute total production costs for each product.

The difference between the final sales value of total production and the

gross margin then yields the total production costs that the product must
bear.
 Step 3: Compute allocated joint costs.

As the final step, the separable costs for each product are deducted from

the total production costs that the product must bear to obtain the joint-
cost allocation for that product.
53
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Cont…
Solution:

54
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Physical-Measure Method
Allocates joint costs to joint products on the basis of

the relative weight, volume, or other physical measure


at the splitoff point of total production of the products.

55
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Physical Measures Illustration
Allocation of Joint Costs Using Liquid
Physical Measure Method Cream Skim Total
Physical Measure of total production
(gallons) 25,000 75,000 100,0000
Weighting (25,000/100,000;
75,000/100,000) 0.25 0.75
Joint costs allocated (0.25*$400,000;
0.75*$400,000) $100,000 $300,000 $400,000

56
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Byproducts
Two methods for accounting for byproducts

Production method—recognizes byproduct inventory as it is

created, and sales and costs at the time of sale.


Sales method—recognizes no byproduct inventory, and
recognizes only sales at the time of sales: byproduct costs are not
tracked separately.

57
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
The End!
The End!

58 © 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.

You might also like