Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Boston Molasses Disaster: Course: Engineer and Society Course Code: EEE403 Group No.: 04 Semester: Fall2020
Boston Molasses Disaster: Course: Engineer and Society Course Code: EEE403 Group No.: 04 Semester: Fall2020
Group no.: 04
Semester: Fall2020
Group Members:
Md. Nazmul Miah ( 2016-3-80-010 )
Md. Shibly ( 2016-3-80-012 )
02
Table of Content
Contents Slide no.
Case background 03
Ethical Issues 05
Conclusion 10
References 11
03
Case Background
1. The molasses tank was placed on Boston, Massachusetts,
USA. [1] “Investigated by Municipal court of the
city of Boston”
2. Holding 2.3 million gallons of molasses [1]
https://www.historytoday.com/archive/sticky-t
ragedy-boston-molasses-disaster
3. When more molasses were stored for producing more
Boston Molasses Disaster
alcohol. [1]
Ethical Issues
1. United States Industrial Alcohol Co.(USIA), owner of the tank
ignored all the signs of structure instability. [1]
Engineer’s Responsibilities
to Public Safety
Boston Molasses Disaster
1. They should have gained enough training before 4. They should be aware of danger in any
taking a project [1] consequences [3]
2. They should use standard material in 5. Most importantly they should ensure the value of
construction [2] life on that area. [3]
1. 21 dead and 150 injured. [1] 1. Clean up took 87000 man hours. [1]
2. It made the damage of elevated train tracks. [1] 2. The city became sticky and smelled of molasses. [1]
Boston Molasses Disaster
3. It made a knock to the buildings & toppled electrical 3. The air become full of sweet smell in summer [1]
poles. [1]
4. Various kinds of animal were dead and homeless.
4. Tank rivets were popping as a machinegun bullets that [3]
destroyed neighborhood. [1]
5. The ecosystem of the area was changed [5]
5. Boston city authorities started requiring plans for all
construction projects to be signed. [3]
08
1. Not properly supervised. [1] 1. was not observed the work properly to see if they are
doing right things. [2]
Boston Molasses Disaster
1. Ignored to repair and set people life in danger [1] 1. Leakage was known but they did not warn for public
Conclusion
In this Molasses tank incident, many unprofessional works had
been done. It took over three years of hearing in court and was
involved with 921 witnesses.[1] 119 separate lawsuits had been
filed against USIA.[1] In Massachusetts’s history, this case was the
Boston Molasses Disaster
longest and most expensive civil suit. USIA was charged around
$300,000 in damages, $6,000 to victims family, $25,000 to the
City of Boston and $42,000 to the Boston Elevated Railway
Company. [1] This disaster made the important changes in
constructions and inspection of building in American History.
11
References
[1] Chuck Lyons, "A Sticky Tragedy: The Boston Molasses [4] Erin McCann, "Tsunami of Molasses," New York Times, Section
Disaster," History Today, vol. 59, no. 1, 2009. A, Page 11, 28 November 2016.
https://www.historytoday.com/archive/sticky-tragedy-boston-mo https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/science/boston-molasses-flo
lasses-disaster od-science.html
[5] Stephen Puleo, Dark Tide: The Great Boston Molasses Flood of 1919,
Boston: Beacon Press, 2003.
Boston Molasses Disaster
[2] PDH Engineer, Engineering Ethics: The Great Boston Molasses https://rb.gy/ntrryd
Flood accessed March 5, 17350 State Highway 249, Houston,
TX 77064, 2013.
https://ethics.wikia.org/wiki/The_Great_Boston_Molasses_Floo [6] S. Betancourt, "The Great Boston Molasses Flood: why the strange disaster
d matters today," The Guardian, Boston, 2019.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/13/the-great-boston-molasse
s-flood-why-it-matters-modern-regulation