Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communication
Darshana Ashoka Kumara
Morality
⚫ Morality is, at very least, the effort to guide one’s
conduct by reason -- that is, to do what there are
the best reasons for doing-- while giving equal
weight to the interests of each individual who will
be affected by what one does -- James Rachels.
⚫ If we can benefit someone, without harming
someone else, we ought to do so.
⚫ If we can prevent harm to someone, without
harming someone else, we ought to do so.
⚫ • Ethics has to do with social standards; morality is
about personal beliefs.
⚫ • Ethics comes from secular institutions, whereas
morality is a religious phenomenon.
⚫ • Ethical judgments are absolute and objective; moral
judgments are relative and subjective.
⚫ Virtue ethics, advocated by Aristotle and Thomas
Aquinas, focuses on the inherent character of a person
rather than on specific actions. There has been a
significant revival of virtue ethics in the past half-
century, through the work of such philosophers as G.
E. M. Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Alasdair Macintyre,
Mortimer J. Adler, Jacques Maritain, Yves Simon, and
Rosalind Hursthouse.
⚫ Deontology argues that decisions should be made
considering the factors of one's duties and others'
rights.
⚫ Immanuel Kant's theory of ethics is considered
deontological for several different reasons.[9][10] First,
Kant argues that to act in the morally right way, people
must act from duty .
⚫ Deontology is defined as an ethical theory that the
morality of an action should be based on whether that
action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules,
rather than based on the consequences of the action.
An example of deontology is the belief that killing
someone is wrong, even if it was in self-defense.
⚫ In deontology, actions and outcomes are measured
separately.
⚫ Consequentialism argues that the morality of an
action is contingent on the action's outcome or result.
⚫ Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about
producing the right kinds of overall consequences.
Ethics in Journalism
⚫ Truth and Accuracy
4. Other considerations
a. Will someone scoop me if I hold on for a full paper?
b. These students and postdocs need publications now
c. My funding agencies want to see publication before they renew
d. I’m giving up on this project, but I’ve got enough to publish
VII. Allocating Credit
A. Citation of other’s work
1. Purposes
a. Acknowledge previous or related work done by others
i. Conflicting data or hypotheses
ii. Supporting data or hypotheses
iii. Additional work in the same area
b. Direct reader to related information
c. Place your paper in context with the current state of the field
2. Failure to cite others (or to cite them correctly)
a. Hard feelings; calls for corrections
b. Hurting others careers: citations = reward for work, grants, promotion
c. May be excluded from interaction with peers—reputation is hurt
B. Authorship and Acknowledgement
1. How may authors?
a. Historically, often just one
b. Current collaborative nature of science means single author rare now
c. Field dependent: Chemistry: 5-10 is common
d. High Energy Physics or Genome Sequencing: hundreds
2. Who’s the most important author?
a. In some fields, the order listed is the order of contribution
b. Some journals only list authors alphabetically
4. Responsibility of authors
c. Each author is accountable for the results
d. Each author should sign off on the results and agree with conclusions
VIII. Error and Negligence
B. Types of errors
3. Random errors can’t be accounted for or corrected
4. Systematic errors can be discovered and accounted for
a. Instrumental, environmental errors
b. Human errors—honest mistakes
c. If discovered after publication, publish a correction—won’t be
condemned
5. Negligence = haste, carelessness, inattention
a. Doesn’t meet the standards of professional scientists
b. Reputation will suffer; public confidence is lowered
IX. Scientific Misconduct
A. Deception
1. Making up data or results
2. Changing or falsifying data or results
3. Using someone else’s ideas as yours = plagiarism
B. Consequences
1. Minor ethical lapses
a. Handled within the scientific community
b. Peer review, administrative action, tenure review
2. Scientific misconduct
c. Can harm other people (medical research)
d. Wastes tax dollars
e. Damages the reputation and values of science to society; funding
f. Destroys personal reputation, livelihood, research career
g. Can be punished by the legal system (in rare cases)
C. Procedure
2. Preliminary Investigation, usually be responsible institution
3. Adjudication: Due Process to accused
A. Responsibilities to:
1. The Public—serve the public interest
2. The Science of Chemistry—thorough, accurate, advancement
3. The Profession—ethical considerations
4. The Employer—honest effort for employer’s interests
5. Employees—fairness, respect, safety, credit
6. Students—obligation to society, treat with respect
7. Associates—credit, respect, encouragement
8. Clients—faithful, confidentially, honestly, charge fairly
9. The Environment—understand consequences, protect