The document discusses the Basic Resource Gap (BRG) of state governments in India in the context of fiscal federalism. It defines three variants of BRG (BRG1, BRG2, BRG3) that decompose the resource gap based on different categories of resources available to states. BRG recognizes constraints faced by states in terms of constitutional allocations from the central government as well as limitations on market borrowings. The document analyzes fiscal dependency and stress ratios to understand states' reliance on central transfers and stressed sources of funding like market loans. BRG provides an analytical framework to comprehensively assess states' resource positions and fiscal management.
The document discusses the Basic Resource Gap (BRG) of state governments in India in the context of fiscal federalism. It defines three variants of BRG (BRG1, BRG2, BRG3) that decompose the resource gap based on different categories of resources available to states. BRG recognizes constraints faced by states in terms of constitutional allocations from the central government as well as limitations on market borrowings. The document analyzes fiscal dependency and stress ratios to understand states' reliance on central transfers and stressed sources of funding like market loans. BRG provides an analytical framework to comprehensively assess states' resource positions and fiscal management.
The document discusses the Basic Resource Gap (BRG) of state governments in India in the context of fiscal federalism. It defines three variants of BRG (BRG1, BRG2, BRG3) that decompose the resource gap based on different categories of resources available to states. BRG recognizes constraints faced by states in terms of constitutional allocations from the central government as well as limitations on market borrowings. The document analyzes fiscal dependency and stress ratios to understand states' reliance on central transfers and stressed sources of funding like market loans. BRG provides an analytical framework to comprehensively assess states' resource positions and fiscal management.
Professor Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune Introduction • In recent years the mismatch between government expenditure and receipt has resulted in a persistent and seemingly unsustainable gap in resources. • The FRBM Act 2018 has targeted fiscal deficit to GDP ratio at 3 % for the consolidated position of the state government and debt to GDP ratio at 20 per cent. the • It may be noted that in the context of fiscal federalism the state governments have constitutional constraints (Resource inflow to state government from central government in terms of taxation grants) as per the finance commission recommendations. • There are institutional constraints in terms of non-constitutional ( non- statutory grants ) grants from central government to state government. Continued…… • Third constraint originate from the financial market in terms of market borrowings. According to Article 293 of the constitution the state government cannot borrow from the external market. In addition the domestic source of borrowing are limited and subject to approval of central government. • Fourth constraint is the Ways and Means Advances ( WMA) from the RBI to state government even though WMA is not a resource large recourse to WMA and overdraft in the end is a resource. Limitations of fiscal deficit • As explained above the fiscal deficit as defined in the Indian context Total Expenditure –( Revenue receipts + Non-debt capital receipts+ Disinvestment receipts ) • Fiscal deficit defined in this way doesn’t explicitly present the constitutional and institutional constraint above and there it needs to be supplemented with a resource gap concept which recognises and focuses on more granular aspects of the resource gap of the state governments. Concept of BRG • The BRG is presented as a concept anchored in the idea of understanding the resource gap concept. • BRG recognises the total resource requirement ( TRR ) which is equal to total expenditure. • BRG decomposes the resource gap position in three variants namely BRG1 , BRG2, BRG3. • BRG1 = TRR – Resources of BRG1( BRGR1 ) • BRG2 = TRR – Resources of BRG2 ( BRGR2) • BRG3 = TRR-BRG2 Resources of three variants of BRG • BRGR1 = Own tax revenue ( OTR) + Own non-tax revenue ( ONTR) + ( Internal debt (ID) – Market borrowing(MB) – WMA) + Recovery of loans (RoL) + Public Account Receipts ( PAR). • BRGR2 = BRGR1 + Share in central taxes as per the recommendations of finance commission ( SCT) + Statutory grants ( SG) as per the recommendations of finance commission + Grants under provision to article 275 (1) of the constitution. • BRGR3 = Non-statutory grants from the centre(NSGFC) + Market borrowing(MB) + Loans and Advances from centre(LAC) + WMA Fiscal dependency and fiscal stress • The three variants of BRG has an analytical advantage of explicitly recognising the fiscal dependency of the states and the centre and fiscal stress of the state government arising out of resources received from the centre and borrowings raised from the financial market. • There are two concepts of Fiscal dependency known as a) Fiscal dependency ratio 1(FDR1) b) Fiscal dependency ratio 2(FDR2) • FDR1 = BRG1 / TRR • FDR2 = BRG2/TRR Continued…… • Fiscal stress ratio (FSR) = FDR1 – FDR2 • The FDR1 recognises the extent to which there is an requirement for resource inflow from Finance Commission( FC) recommendations in terms of tax and grants plus the requirement from non-statutory grants, MB and LAC. Thus FDR1 presents the total dependency of the resource position of the state government. • The FDR2 recognises the extent to which there is a requirement for fiscal transfer from the centre in terms of FC recommendations. • It also recognises the inadequacy of the FC recommendations and need for Non-statutory Grants , MB and LAC. Continued………. • This is a stress factor as there is volatility in the financial market to raise market borrowing and less scope for non-statutory grants and LAC which are discretionary in the nature and subject to lower magnitude because hard budget constraint. Analytical advantage of BRG a. provides a golden rule for fiscal management where total receipts = total expenditure. b. compiles various resource gap on the basis of resources mobilized by the government in the framework of fiscal federalism and marketization of borrowings by the subnational government c. recognizes the constitutionally earmarked accounting arrangements in terms of consolidated fund and public accounts Continued……… d. market borrowings and internal debt are taken in gross terms by including repayments because expenditure on repayments needs to be met from the resources. e. unfolds the resource generation through stressed sources which include market loans, non-statutory grants from federal government and WMA and Overdraft from RBI for temporary cash shortfalls. f. helps the subnational governments the resource management in a more efficient manner by integrating own resources, resources from federal tax devolution and grants-in aid and fiscal stress of uncertainty associated with discretionary grants and market borrowings. g. sensitizes the subnational governments the limitations and moral hazard associated with WMA and overdrafts