Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONCRETE PAVEMENTS
Developed by
Ronald M. Guntert, Jr. President & CEO
Guntert & Zimmerman Const. Div., Inc.
Ripon, CA U.S.A.
• The break through came in 1956, when the late Jim Cox, a
lab tech with the California Department of Transportation,
developed the “California Profilograph” which provided a
repeatable means of measuring and rapidly collecting
pavement smoothness data.
Smoothness
Prototype California Profilograph - 1956
Smoothness
AASHTO TP 76
OBSI Noise Catalog Summary - Concrete
0.30 Kansas I-70
Exp. Aggregate Exposed Aggregate Concrete
Diamond Grinding
0.25
Drag
Longitudinal Tining
Probability Density
Porous Concrete
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110
A-weighted Overall OBSI Level, 60 mph, SRTT (dB ref 1 pW/m²)
So What Causes the Noise?
In Layman’s Terms…
• The “peaks” or high amplitude texture impacts the tire which
act like little hammers creating tire vibration which results in
noise.
• Some negative texture is necessary to “drain away” air
trapped between the tire tread and the pavement. This
explains why some smooth drag textures are noisy.
• Avoid repeating a pattern as this can create a “whine” or
“chatter”. Uniform transverse tining can cause this.
So What Causes the Noise?
In Layman’s Terms…
Thou shalt have Texture...
be it small and negative!
1
Good
Bad
So What Causes the Noise?
In Layman’s Terms…
Negative Texture
Plateaus & Valleys
Surface Excavation
GOOD!
Download from
www.TCPSC.com/LittleBookQuieterPavements.pdf
So Knowing What Causes Noise What is
the Best Texture?
• Understanding what caused noise, Transtec studied many
different texture types and from this catalog wrote up
guidelines on best texturing practices.
• The use of Robotex helped us understand at a microscopic
level why some textures are quiet and others are noisy.
Texture Testing: RoboTex 2.0
103 dBA
Longitudinal Tining
106 dBA
100 dBA
Texturing Guidelines – For Further Reading
– A “how to” guide for designing
and constructing quieter
concrete pavements
– Addresses all conventional
concrete pavement textures
– Simple and practical guidance
Diamond Grinding
0.25
Drag
Longitudinal Tining
Probability Density
Porous Concrete
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110
A-weighted Overall OBSI Level, 60 mph, SRTT (dB ref 1 pW/m²)
How Do We Reduce Texture Variability
How Do We Reduce Texture Variability
• Volume of paste (cement + water) to fill voids plus some for workability
• Well graded or Dense graded Aggregates greatly minimizes risk of
concrete segregation
• Minimize voids (combined gradation) to minimize paste and thus
cement content for greater strength and for
– Reduced cost
– Reduced temperature rise
– Reduced shrinkage
– Reduced permeability to avoid sulfide and chloride attack
– Reduced risk of spalled joints
Combined Aggregate Grading - Shilstone
[2.36mm Sieve]
Why is Segregation Bad? – It is a Key Contributor
to Poor Concrete Smoothness and Texture
Variability / Noise
50
IV
45
40
III
II
Workability Factor
35
WF
30
25
V
20
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20
CF
Coarseness Factor
Effects of Varying Coarse Ag Gradations
Aggregate Stockpile Cross Contamination
Aggregate Cross Contamination and
Rock Dust Contaminated Manufactured Sand
Be Careful of Too Much Surface Mortar / Finishing
Devices Can Disturb the Mortar Uniformity
Be Careful of Too Much Surface Mortar / Finishing
Devices Can Disturb the Mortar Uniformity
Resulting Pattern Left In the Hardened
Concrete Surface Adversely Affects Pavement
Smoothness and Texture Quality
Texture Variability Hurts Pavement
Smoothness, Surface Durability & Increases Noise
Texture Variability
Turbulent Mixing
Zone in the Center
High Uniformity Concrete Being Discharged
How To Achieve High Concrete Uniformity